Duquesne-class cruiser (1876) should not be confused with Duquesne-class cruiser.
The Duquesne class was a group of two unprotected cruisers built for the French Navy in the 1870s. The class comprised two ships: and . They were ordered in the aftermath of the Franco-Prussian War, and were intended for use against commerce raiders, which necessitated a high top speed, heavy armament, and long cruising radius. Both ships' engines proved to be very unreliable, required significant maintenance to keep in operation, and burned coal voraciously. Their large crews also increased the cost of operating the vessels, and all of these problems led to short service lives. Over the course of the twenty-five years following their launch, Duquesne saw active service for just seven years, while Tourville was in commission for only four. The former made a single deployment overseas in the mid-1880s, when she cruised on the Pacific station for three years, while Tourville spent just a year in the Far East before being recalled. Both ships were struck from the naval register in 1901 and sold for scrap thereafter.
In the late 1860s, the major European navies saw the success that Confederate commerce raiders had had during the American Civil War, and decided to respond with larger, faster cruisers that could catch such raiders. France's construction program was delayed by the Franco-Prussian War of 1870–1871, but the navy quickly began preparations for the 1872 fiscal year. On 16 December 1871, the French: [[Conseil des travaux|Conseil des Travaux]] (Council of Works) issued a set of specifications for a new first-class cruiser design: it must reach a speed of 17kn, be able to cruise for 5000nmi at a speed of, incorporate an iron hull that was sheathed in wood and copper, include a full ship rig for long-distance sailing, on a displacement of around 4800MT. Furthermore, the ship would require a relatively heavy armament to be able to defeat an enemy cruiser, and a large gun must be placed forward so that it could fire warning shots to compel a hostile merchant vessel to stop.
The naval minister, Louis Pothuau, revised the specifications in early 1872, requesting an armament of five guns and sixteen guns, and he increased the displacement limit to . He forwarded these details to the shipyards that would prepare designs on 23 January. The French: Conseil criticized the increase in size, arguing that it would significantly increase the cost of the new vessels and the improvements thereby attained did not warrant the cost. Five shipyards submitted proposals, which the French: Conseil reviewed on 13 August; they selected the design submitted by Alfred Lebelin de Dionne, though they requested he increase the beam to improve the ships' stability. Pothuau approved the plans on 13 February 1873. Changes to the design were made during construction, including increasing the caliber of the main battery to, and the number of guns to seven, at the cost of two of the 138.6 mm guns.
In service, the ships proved to be disappointments, as they were expensive to operate owing to their great size, though they compared well to their foreign contemporaries. They also suffered from significant problems with their propulsion systems that cut their active careers short. Duquesne would only see seven years of active service, while Tourville was in commission for just four years. They were also too expensive in terms of cost of construction, which prevented more than two of the vessels— and —from being built. A third ship, with the contract name "N", appeared on the 1874 program, again in the 1875 budget, but was never built and thereafter did not appear in French naval programs. Duquesne and Tourville are sometimes considered to be different classes, but they were built to the same design and different only in the arrangement of their propulsion system.
The two Duquesne-class cruisers were iron-hulled vessels that were long at the waterline and long between perpendiculars, with a beam of . They had an average draft of on a displacement of as designed. The ships had a ram bow and an overhanging stern. Their hulls were sheathed with wood to protect them from marine biofouling on long voyages overseas, and they were divided into nine watertight compartments, along with a double bottom. Their crew amounted to 540–551 officers and enlisted men.
The ships' propulsion system consisted of a pair of compound steam engines driving a screw propeller. The engines were arranged in tandem, driving the same propeller shaft; the intent was for the forward engine to be used for high-speed steaming and the aft engine would be used for cruising at more economical speeds. Steam was provided by twelve rectangular, coal-burning fire-tube boilers that were ducted into a pair of funnels placed amidships. They had a full ship rig to supplement their steam engine on long voyages overseas, and their funnels could be retracted to allow full use of the sails.
Their machinery was rated to produce 7200ihp for a top speed of . Coal storage amounted to, and at a more economical speed of, the ship could steam for . Both ships' propulsion systems proved to be very troublesome in service, both in terms of reliability and economy. The engines on both vessels broke down frequently and required frequent lubrication to keep running, and the boilers burned coal at a prodigious rate; all of these problems militated against the long overseas voyages for which they had been designed.
The ships were armed with a main battery of seven M1870 19.8-caliber guns; three guns were placed on each broadside in sponsons on the upper deck, and the seventh gun was placed in the forecastle as a chase gun. These were supported by a secondary battery of fourteen M1870 guns, which were placed in a gun battery amidships, seven guns per broadside. Six Hotchkiss revolver cannon provided close-range defense against torpedo boats for Duquesne, while Tourville received only four of these guns. Duquesne also carried four bronze cannon and a single bronze cannon that could be sent ashore with a landing party or used to arm the ship's boats, though Tourville did not carry any of these guns.
| Name | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Shipyard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 June 1873 | 11 March 1876 | 20 January 1878 | French: [[Arsenal de Rochefort]], Rochefort | |
| 23 February 1874 | 24 February 1876 | 17 August 1876 | French: [[Société Nouvelle des Forges et Chantiers de la Méditerranée]], La Seyne | |
| N | — | — | — |
Because of the ships' unreliable engines, they saw little active service. After being completed in the late 1870s, both vessels were briefly used in experimental operations with the main fleet before being laid up into the early 1880s. Tourville was commissioned in 1881 to take part in the French conquest of Tunisia, but was laid up again thereafter. She was recommissioned in 1883 for a short deployment to East Asia, but her deep draft and the cost of operating her there led to her replacement by other cruisers. As a result, she saw no action during the Tonkin campaign, France's effort to seize control of northern Vietnam. Duquesne was commissioned in 1885 for a deployment to the Pacific station. She cruised the Pacific for the next three years, during which time her wood and copper-sheathed hull protected her from significant fouling. Both ships were modernized in the early and mid-1890s, receiving new quick-firing guns, and in 1894 and 1895, Duquesne served in the Atlantic Division. Both ships were struck from the naval register in 1901; Tourville was sold to ship breakers in 1903 and Duquesne was sold for scrap in 1908.
. Theodore Ropp . The Development of a Modern Navy: French Naval Policy, 1871–1904 . Roberts . Stephen S. . 1987 . Annapolis . Naval Institute Press . 978-0-87021-141-6 . .