Drake-class cruiser explained

The Drake class was a four-ship class of armoured cruisers built around 1900 for the Royal Navy.

Design and description

The Drake class were enlarged and improved versions of the designed by Sir William White, Chief Constructor of the Royal Navy, to counter the new French armoured cruiser .[1] The ships had an overall length of 553feet, a beam of 71feet and a deep draught of 26feet. They displaced 14150LT and proved to be good seaboats in service. Their crew consisted of 900 officers and other ranks.

The ships were powered by two 4-cylinder triple-expansion steam engines, each driving one shaft, using steam provided by 43 Belleville boilers. The engines produced a total of 30000ihp and the Drakes easily reached their designed speed of 23kn.[2] They carried a maximum of 2500LT of coal.[3]

The main armament of the Drake-class ships consisted of two breech-loading (BL) 9.2adj=onNaNadj=on Mk X guns in single gun turrets, one each fore and aft of the superstructure.[3] They fired 380lb shells to a range of .[4] The ships' secondary armament of sixteen BL 6-inch Mk VII guns was arranged in casemates amidships. Eight of these were mounted on the main deck and were only usable in calm weather.[5] They had a maximum range of approximately with their 100lb shells.[6] A dozen quick-firing (QF) 12-pounder 12 cwt guns were fitted for defence against torpedo boats. Two additional 12-pounder 8 cwt guns could be dismounted for service ashore.[7] The ships also carried three 3-pounder Hotchkiss guns and two submerged 17.7inches torpedo tubes.[2]

The ship's waterline armour belt had a maximum thickness of 6inches and was closed off by 5inches transverse bulkheads. The armour of the gun turrets and their barbettes was 6 inches thick while the casemate armour was 5 inches thick. The protective deck armour ranged in thickness from 1- and the conning tower was protected by 12inches of armour.[2]

Ships

The following table gives the build details and purchase cost of the members of the Drake class. Standard British practice at that time was for these costs to exclude armament and stores. The compilers of The Naval Annual revised costs quoted for British ships between the 1905 and 1906 editions. The reasons for the differences are unclear.

Ship! scope="col" align = center rowspan=2
BuilderDate ofCost according to
Laid downLaunchCompletion(BNA 1905)[8] (BNA 1906)[9]
align=center HM Dockyard, Pembrokealign=center 24 Apr 1899align=center 5 Mar 190113 Jan 1902£1,050,625£1,002,977

(ex-Africa)
align=center Fairfield Shipping and Engineering, Govan11 Sep 189921 Feb 19018 Nov 1902£1,023,629£990,759
align=center Vickers, Sons & Maxim, Barrow-in-Furness11 Aug 189928 Oct 190122 Dec 1903£1,013,772£978,125
align=center John Brown, Clydebank30 Nov 18993 Jul 190116 Jun 1903£1,043,097£1,012,959

Service history

The ships served in the First World War with only two surviving it. Good Hope was sunk at the Battle of Coronel in 1914 and Drake was torpedoed in 1917. Drake was also used to ferry Russian bullion (gold) in October 1914 from Arkhangelsk. The gold (equivalent of $39 million) was security for western loans. The transfer took place at high seas, 30 miles off the coast in the dead of night.[10]

Bibliography

. Julian Corbett. Naval Operations to the Battle of the Falklands. 2nd, reprint of the 1938. History of the Great War: Based on Official Documents. I. Imperial War Museum and Battery Press. London and Nashville, Tennessee. 0-89839-256-X.

. . Robert K. Massie. Jonathan Cape. 2004. London. 0-224-04092-8.

External links

Notes and References

  1. Friedman 2012, pp. 243–52
  2. Chesneau & Kolesnik, p. 69
  3. Friedman 2012, p. 336
  4. Friedman 2011, pp. 71–72
  5. Friedman 2012, pp. 243, 260–61
  6. Friedman 2011, pp. 80–81
  7. Friedman 2012, pp. 250, 336
  8. Brassey's Naval Annual 1905, pp. 234–243
  9. Brassey's Naval Annual 1906, pp. 208–215
  10. Book: Thon, Eivind . Krig og penger . Aschehoug & Co . Oslo . 1942 .