Distribution function (measure theory) explained
In mathematics, in particular in measure theory, there are different notions of distribution function and it is important to understand the context in which they are used (properties of functions, or properties of measures).
Distribution functions (in the sense of measure theory) are a generalization of distribution functions (in the sense of probability theory).
Definitions
The first definition presented here is typically used in Analysis (harmonic analysis, Fourier Analysis, and integration theory in general) to analysis properties of functions.
The function
provides information about the
size of a measurable function
.
The next definitions of distribution function are straight generalizations of the notion of distribution functions (in the sense of probability theory).
It is well known result in measure theory that if
is a nondecreasing right continuous function, then the function
defined on the collection of finite intervals of the form
by
extends uniquely to a measure
on a
-algebra
that included the Borel sets. Furthermore, if two such functions
and
induce the same measure, i.e.
, then
is constant. Conversely, if
is a measure on Borel subsets of the real line that is finite on compact sets, then the function
defined by
is a nondecreasing right-continuous function with
such that
.
This particular distribution function is well defined whether
is finite or infinite; for this reason, a few authors also refer to
as a distribution function of the measure
. That is:
Example
. Then by Definition of
Therefore, the distribution function of the Lebesgue measure is
for all
.
Comments
- The distribution function
of a real-valued measurable function
on a measure space
is a monotone nonincreasing function, and it is supported on
. If
for some
, then
- When the underlying measure
on
is finite, the distribution function
in Definition 3 differs slightly from the standard definition of the
distribution function
(in the sense of probability theory) as given by Definition 2 in that for the former,
while for the latter,
- When the objects of interest are measures in
, Definition 3 is more useful for infinite measures. This is the case because
for all
, which renders the notion in Definition 2 useless.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
Notes and References
- Book: Kallenberg . Olav . Olav Kallenberg . 2017 . Random Measures, Theory and Applications . Switzerland . Springer . 10.1007/978-3-319-41598-7. 978-3-319-41596-3. 164.
- Book: Rudin . Walter. W. Rudin. 1987 . Real and Complex Analysis. NY. McGraw-Hill. 172.
- Book: Folland . Gerald B. . 1999 . Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications. NY. Wiley Interscience Series, Wiley & Sons. 33-35.