Airship Explained

An airship is a type of aerostat or lighter-than-air aircraft that can navigate through the air flying under its own power.[1] Aerostats use buoyancy from a lifting gas that is less dense than the surrounding air to achieve the lift needed to stay airborne.

In early dirigibles, the lifting gas used was hydrogen, due to its high lifting capacity and ready availability, but the inherent flammability led to several fatal accidents that rendered hydrogen airships obsolete. The alternative lifting gas, helium gas is not flammable, but is rare and relatively expensive. Significant amounts were first discovered in the United States and for a while helium was only available for airship usage in North America.[2] Most airships built since the 1960s have used helium, though some have used hot air.

The envelope of an airship may form the gasbag, or it may contain a number of gas-filled cells. An airship also has engines, crew, and optionally also payload accommodation, typically housed in one or more gondolas suspended below the envelope.

The main types of airship are non-rigid, semi-rigid and rigid airships. Non-rigid airships, often called "blimps", rely solely on internal gas pressure to maintain the envelope shape. Semi-rigid airships maintain their shape by internal pressure, but have some form of supporting structure, such as a fixed keel, attached to it. Rigid airships have an outer structural framework that maintains the shape and carries all structural loads, while the lifting gas is contained in one or more internal gasbags or cells.[3] Rigid airships were first flown by Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin and the vast majority of rigid airships built were manufactured by the firm he founded, Luftschiffbau Zeppelin. As a result, rigid airships are often called zeppelins.[4]

Airships were the first aircraft capable of controlled powered flight, and were most commonly used before the 1940s; their use decreased as their capabilities were surpassed by those of aeroplanes. Their decline was accelerated by a series of high-profile accidents, including the 1930 crash and burning of the British R101 in France, the 1933 and 1935 storm-related crashes of the twin airborne aircraft carrier U.S. Navy helium-filled rigids, the and USS Macon respectively, and the 1937 burning of the German hydrogen-filled Hindenburg. From the 1960s, helium airships have been used where the ability to hover for a long time outweighs the need for speed and manoeuvrability, such as advertising, tourism, camera platforms, geological surveys and aerial observation.

Terminology

Airship

During the pioneer years of aeronautics, terms such as "airship", "air-ship", "air ship" and "ship of the air" meant any kind of navigable or dirigible flying machine.[5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] In 1919 Frederick Handley Page was reported as referring to "ships of the air", with smaller passenger types as "air yachts".[11] In the 1930s, large intercontinental flying boats were also sometimes referred to as "ships of the air" or "flying-ships".[12] [13] Nowadays the term "airship" is used only for powered, dirigible balloons, with sub-types being classified as rigid, semi-rigid or non-rigid. Semi-rigid architecture is the more recent, following advances in deformable structures and the exigency of reducing weight and volume of the airships. They have a minimal structure that keeps the shape jointly with overpressure of the gas envelope.[14] [15]

Aerostat

An aerostat is an aircraft that remains aloft using buoyancy or static lift, as opposed to the aerodyne, which obtains lift by moving through the air. Airships are a type of aerostat.[16] The term aerostat has also been used to indicate a tethered or moored balloon as opposed to a free-floating balloon.[17] Aerostats today are capable of lifting a payload of to an altitude of more than above sea level.[18] They can also stay in the air for extended periods of time, particularly when powered by an on-board generator or if the tether contains electrical conductors. Due to this capability, aerostats can be used as platforms for telecommunication services. For instance, Platform Wireless International Corporation announced in 2001 that it would use a tethered airborne payload to deliver cellular phone service to a region in Brazil.[19] [20] The European Union's ABSOLUTE project was also reportedly exploring the use of tethered aerostat stations to provide telecommunications during disaster response.[21]

Blimp

See main article: Blimp. A blimp is a non-rigid aerostat.[22] In British usage it refers to any non-rigid aerostat, including barrage balloons and other kite balloons, having a streamlined shape and stabilising tail fins.[23] Some blimps may be powered dirigibles, as in early versions of the Goodyear Blimp. Later Goodyear dirigibles, though technically semi-rigid airships, have still been called "blimps" by the company.[24]

Zeppelin

The term zeppelin originally referred to airships manufactured by the German Zeppelin Company, which built and operated the first rigid airships in the early years of the twentieth century. The initials LZ, for German: Luftschiff Zeppelin (German for "Zeppelin airship"), usually prefixed their craft's serial identifiers.

Streamlined rigid (or semi-rigid)[25] airships are often referred to as "Zeppelins", because of the fame that this company acquired due to the number of airships it produced,[26] [27] although its early rival was the Parseval semi-rigid design.

Hybrid airship

See main article: Hybrid airship. Hybrid airships fly with a positive aerostatic contribution, usually equal to the empty weight of the system, and the variable payload is sustained by propulsion or aerodynamic contribution.[28] [29]

Classification

Airships are classified according to their method of construction into rigid, semi-rigid and non-rigid types.

Rigid

See main article: Rigid airship. A rigid airship has a rigid framework covered by an outer skin or envelope. The interior contains one or more gasbags, cells or balloons to provide lift. Rigid airships are typically unpressurised and can be made to virtually any size. Most, but not all, of the German Zeppelin airships have been of this type.

Semi-rigid

See main article: Semi-rigid airship. A semi-rigid airship has some kind of supporting structure but the main envelope is held in shape by the internal pressure of the lifting gas. Typically the airship has an extended, usually articulated keel running along the bottom of the envelope to stop it kinking in the middle by distributing suspension loads into the envelope, while also allowing lower envelope pressures.

Non-rigid

See main article: Blimp. Non-rigid airships are often called "blimps". Most, but not all, of the American Goodyear airships have been blimps.

A non-rigid airship relies entirely on internal gas pressure to retain its shape during flight. Unlike the rigid design, the non-rigid airship's gas envelope has no compartments. However, it still typically has smaller internal bags containing air (ballonets). As altitude is increased, the lifting gas expands and air from the ballonets is expelled through valves to maintain the hull's shape. To return to sea level, the process is reversed: air is forced back into the ballonets by scooping air from the engine exhaust and using auxiliary blowers.

Construction

Envelope

The envelope itself is the structure, including textiles that contain the buoyant gas. Internally two ballonets are generally placed in the front part and in the rear part of the hull and contains air.[30]

The problem of the exact determination of the pressure on an airship envelope is still problematic and has fascinated major scientists such as Theodor Von Karman.[31]

A few airships have been metal-clad, with rigid and nonrigid examples made. Each kind used a thin gastight metal envelope, rather than the usual rubber-coated fabric envelope. Only four metal-clad ships are known to have been built, and only two actually flew: Schwarz's first aluminum rigid airship of 1893 collapsed,[32] while his second flew;[33] the nonrigid ZMC-2 built for the U.S. Navy flew from 1929 to 1941 when it was scrapped as too small for operational use on anti-submarine patrols;[34] while the 1929 nonrigid Slate Aircraft Corporation City of Glendale collapsed on its first flight attempt.[35] [36]

Ballonet

See main article: Ballonet.

A ballonet is an air bag inside the outer envelope of an airship which, when inflated, reduces the volume available for the lifting gas, making it more dense. Because air is also denser than the lifting gas, inflating the ballonet reduces the overall lift, while deflating it increases lift. In this way, the ballonet can be used to adjust the lift as required by controlling the buoyancy. By inflating or deflating ballonets strategically, the pilot can control the airship's altitude and attitude.

Ballonets may typically be used in non-rigid or semi-rigid airships, commonly with multiple ballonets located both fore and aft to maintain balance and to control the pitch of the airship.

Lifting gas

Lifting gas is generally hydrogen, helium or hot air.

Hydrogen gives the highest lift 1.1kg/m3 and is inexpensive and easily obtained, but is highly flammable and can detonate if mixed with air. Helium is completely non flammable, but gives lower performance-1.02kg/m3 and is a rare element and much more expensive.[37]

Thermal airships use a heated lifting gas, usually air, in a fashion similar to hot air balloons. The first to do so was flown in 1973 by the British company Cameron Balloons.[38]

Propulsion and control

Small airships carry their engine(s) in their gondola. Where there were multiple engines on larger airships, these were placed in separate nacelles, termed power cars or engine cars.[39] To allow asymmetric thrust to be applied for maneuvering, these power cars were mounted towards the sides of the envelope, away from the centre line gondola. This also raised them above the ground, reducing the risk of a propeller strike when landing. Widely spaced power cars were also termed wing cars, from the use of "wing" to mean being on the side of something, as in a theater, rather than the aerodynamic device.[39] These engine cars carried a crew during flight who maintained the engines as needed, but who also worked the engine controls, throttle etc., mounted directly on the engine. Instructions were relayed to them from the pilot's station by a telegraph system, as on a ship.[39]

If fuel is burnt for propulsion, then progressive reduction in the airship's overall weight occurs. In hydrogen airships, this is usually dealt with by simply venting cheap hydrogen lifting gas. In helium airships water is often condensed from the exhaust and stored as ballast.[40]

Fins and rudders

To control the airship's direction and stability, it is equipped with fins and rudders. Fins are typically located on the tail section and provide stability and resistance to rolling. Rudders are movable surfaces on the tail that allow the pilot to steer the airship left or right.

Empennage

The empennage refers to the tail section of the airship, which includes the fins, rudders, and other aerodynamic surfaces. It plays a crucial role in maintaining stability and controlling the airship's attitude.

Fuel and power systems

Airships require a source of power to operate their propulsion systems. This includes engines, generators, or batteries, depending on the type of airship and its design. Fuel tanks or batteries are typically located within the envelope or gondola.

Navigation and communication equipment

To navigate safely and communicate with ground control or other aircraft, airships are equipped with a range of instruments, including GPS systems, radios, radar, and navigation lights.

Landing gear

Some airships have landing gear that allows them to land on runways or other surfaces. This landing gear may include wheels, skids, or landing pads.

Performance

Efficiency

The main advantage of airships with respect to any other vehicle is that they require less energy to remain in flight, compared to other air vehicles.[41] [42] The proposed Varialift airship, powered by a mixture of solar-powered engines and conventional jet engines, would use only an estimated 8 percent of the fuel required by jet aircraft.[43] [44] Furthermore, utilizing the jet stream could allow for a faster and more energy-efficient cargo transport alternative to maritime shipping.[45] This is one of the reasons why China has embraced their use recently.[46]

History

Early pioneers

17th–18th century

In 1670, the Jesuit Father Francesco Lana de Terzi, sometimes referred to as the "Father of Aeronautics",[47] published a description of an "Aerial Ship" supported by four copper spheres from which the air was evacuated. Although the basic principle is sound, such a craft was unrealizable then and remains so to the present day, since external air pressure would cause the spheres to collapse unless their thickness was such as to make them too heavy to be buoyant.[48] A hypothetical craft constructed using this principle is known as a vacuum airship.

In 1709, the Brazilian-Portuguese Jesuit priest Bartolomeu de Gusmão made a hot air balloon, the Passarola, ascend to the skies, before an astonished Portuguese court. It would have been on August 8, 1709, when Father Bartolomeu de Gusmão held, in the courtyard of the Casa da Índia, in the city of Lisbon, the first Passarola demonstration.[49] [50] The balloon caught fire without leaving the ground, but, in a second demonstration, it rose to 95 meters in height. It was a small balloon of thick brown paper, filled with hot air, produced by the "fire of material contained in a clay bowl embedded in the base of a waxed wooden tray". The event was witnessed by King John V of Portugal and the future Pope Innocent XIII.

A more practical dirigible airship was described by Lieutenant Jean Baptiste Marie Meusnier in a paper entitled "French: Mémoire sur l'équilibre des machines aérostatiques" (Memorandum on the equilibrium of aerostatic machines) presented to the French Academy on 3 December 1783. The 16 water-color drawings published the following year depict a 260adj=midNaNadj=mid streamlined envelope with internal ballonets that could be used for regulating lift: this was attached to a long carriage that could be used as a boat if the vehicle was forced to land in water. The airship was designed to be driven by three propellers and steered with a sail-like aft rudder. In 1784, Jean-Pierre Blanchard fitted a hand-powered propeller to a balloon, the first recorded means of propulsion carried aloft. In 1785, he crossed the English Channel in a balloon equipped with flapping wings for propulsion and a birdlike tail for steering.[51]

19th century

The 19th century saw continued attempts to add methods of propulsion to balloons. Rufus Porter built and flew scale models of his "Aerial Locomotive", but never a successful full-size implementation.[52] The Australian William Bland sent designs for his "Atmotic airship" to the Great Exhibition held in London in 1851, where a model was displayed. This was an elongated balloon with a steam engine driving twin propellers suspended underneath. The lift of the balloon was estimated as 5 tons and the car with the fuel as weighing 3.5 tons, giving a payload of 1.5 tons.[53] [54] Bland believed that the machine could be driven at 80km/h and could fly from Sydney to London in less than a week.

In 1852, Henri Giffard became the first person to make an engine-powered flight when he flew 27km (17miles) in a steam-powered airship.[55] Airships would develop considerably over the next two decades. In 1863, Solomon Andrews flew his aereon design, an unpowered, controllable dirigible in Perth Amboy, New Jersey and offered the device to the U.S. Military during the Civil War.[56] He flew a later design in 1866 around New York City and as far as Oyster Bay, New York. This concept used changes in lift to provide propulsive force, and did not need a powerplant. In 1872, the French naval architect Dupuy de Lome launched a large navigable balloon, which was driven by a large propeller turned by eight men.[57] It was developed during the Franco-Prussian war and was intended as an improvement to the balloons used for communications between Paris and the countryside during the siege of Paris, but was completed only after the end of the war.

In 1872, Paul Haenlein flew an airship with an internal combustion engine running on the coal gas used to inflate the envelope, the first use of such an engine to power an aircraft.[58] [59] Charles F. Ritchel made a public demonstration flight in 1878 of his hand-powered one-man rigid airship, and went on to build and sell five of his aircraft.

In 1874, Micajah Clark Dyer filed U.S. Patent 154,654 "Apparatus for Navigating the Air".[60] [61] [62] It is believed successful trial flights were made between 1872 and 1874, but detailed dates are not available.[63] The apparatus used a combination of wings and paddle wheels for navigation and propulsion.

More details can be found in the book about his life.[64]

In 1883, the first electric-powered flight was made by Gaston Tissandier, who fitted a 1.51NaN1 Siemens electric motor to an airship.

The first fully controllable free flight was made in 1884 by Charles Renard and Arthur Constantin Krebs in the French Army airship La France. La France made the first flight of an airship that landed where it took off; the 170feet long, 66000cuft airship covered 8km (05miles) in 23 minutes with the aid of an 8.51NaN1 electric motor,[65] and a 435kg (959lb) battery. It made seven flights in 1884 and 1885.

In 1888, the design of the Campbell Air Ship, designed by Professor Peter C. Campbell, was built by the Novelty Air Ship Company. It was lost at sea in 1889 while being flown by Professor Hogan during an exhibition flight.[66]

From 1888 to 1897, Friedrich Wölfert built three airships powered by Daimler Motoren Gesellschaft-built petrol engines, the last of which, Deutschland, caught fire in flight and killed both occupants in 1897.[67] The 1888 version used a 21NaN1 single cylinder Daimler engine and flew 10km (10miles) from Canstatt to Kornwestheim.[68] [69]

In 1897, an airship with an aluminum envelope was built by the Hungarian-Croatian engineer David Schwarz. It made its first flight at Tempelhof field in Berlin after Schwarz had died. His widow, Melanie Schwarz, was paid 15,000 marks by Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin to release the industrialist Carl Berg from his exclusive contract to supply Schwartz with aluminium.[70]

From 1897 to 1899, Konstantin Danilewsky, medical doctor and inventor from Kharkiv (now Ukraine, then Russian Empire), built four muscle-powered airships, of gas volume 150m2180m2. About 200 ascents were made within a framework of experimental flight program, at two locations, with no significant incidents.[71] [72]

Early 20th century

In July 1900, the Luftschiff Zeppelin LZ1 made its first flight. This led to the most successful airships of all time: the Zeppelins, named after Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin who began working on rigid airship designs in the 1890s, leading to the flawed LZ1 in 1900 and the more successful LZ2 in 1906. The Zeppelin airships had a framework composed of triangular lattice girders covered with fabric that contained separate gas cells. At first multiplane tail surfaces were used for control and stability: later designs had simpler cruciform tail surfaces. The engines and crew were accommodated in "gondolas" hung beneath the hull driving propellers attached to the sides of the frame by means of long drive shafts. Additionally, there was a passenger compartment (later a bomb bay) located halfway between the two engine compartments.

Alberto Santos-Dumont was a wealthy young Brazilian who lived in France and had a passion for flying. He designed 18 balloons and dirigibles before turning his attention to fixed-winged aircraft.[73] On 19 October 1901 he flew his airship Number 6, from the Parc Saint Cloud to and around the Eiffel Tower and back in under thirty minutes.[74] This feat earned him the Deutsch de la Meurthe prize of 100,000 francs. Many inventors were inspired by Santos-Dumont's small airships. Many airship pioneers, such as the American Thomas Scott Baldwin, financed their activities through passenger flights and public demonstration flights. Stanley Spencer built the first British airship with funds from advertising baby food on the sides of the envelope.[75] Others, such as Walter Wellman and Melvin Vaniman, set their sights on loftier goals, attempting two polar flights in 1907 and 1909, and two trans-Atlantic flights in 1910 and 1912.[76]

In 1902 the Spanish engineer Leonardo Torres Quevedo published details of an innovative airship design in Spain and France titled "French: Perfectionnements aux aerostats dirigibles" ("Improvements in dirigible aerostats").[77] [78] With a non-rigid body and internal bracing wires, it overcame the flaws of these types of aircraft as regards both rigid structure (zeppelin type) and flexibility, providing the airships with more stability during flight, and the capability of using heavier engines and a greater passenger load. A system called "auto-rigid". In 1905, helped by Captain A. Kindelán, he built the airship "Torres Quevedo" at the Guadalajara military base.[79] In 1909 he patented an improved design that he offered to the French Astra company, who started mass-producing it in 1911 as the Astra-Torres airship.[80] This type of envelope was employed in the United Kingdom in the Coastal, C Star, and North Sea airships.[81] The distinctive three-lobed design was widely used during the Great War by the Entente powers for diverse tasks, principally convoy protection and anti-submarine warfare. The success during the war even drew the attention of the Imperial Japanese Navy, who acquired a model in 1922.[82] Torres also drew up designs of a 'docking station' and made alterations to airship designs, to find a resolution to the slew of problems faced by airship engineers to dock dirigibles. In 1910, he proposed the idea of attaching an airships nose to a mooring mast and allowing the airship to weathervane with changes of wind direction. The use of a metal column erected on the ground, the top of which the bow or stem would be directly attached to (by a cable) would allow a dirigible to be moored at any time, in the open, regardless of wind speeds. Additionally, Torres' design called for the improvement and accessibility of temporary landing sites, where airships were to be moored for the purpose of disembarkation of passengers. The final patent was presented in February 1911 in Belgium, and later to France and the United Kingdom in 1912, under the title "Improvements in Mooring Arrengements for Airships".[83] [84] [85]

Other airship builders were also active before the war: from 1902 the French company Lebaudy Frères specialized in semirigid airships such as the Patrie and the République, designed by their engineer Henri Julliot, who later worked for the American company Goodrich; the German firm Schütte-Lanz built the wooden-framed SL series from 1911, introducing important technical innovations; another German firm Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft built the Parseval-Luftschiff (PL) series from 1909,[86] and Italian Enrico Forlanini's firm had built and flown the first two Forlanini airships.[87]

On May 12, 1902, the inventor and Brazilian aeronaut Augusto Severo de Albuquerque Maranhao and his French mechanic, Georges Saché, died when they were flying over Paris in the airship called Pax. A marble plaque at number 81 of the Avenue du Maine in Paris, commemorates the location of Augusto Severo accident.[88] [89] The Catastrophe of the Balloon "Le Pax" is a 1902 short silent film recreation of the catastrophe, directed by Georges Méliès.

In Britain, the Army built their first dirigible, the Nulli Secundus, in 1907. The Navy ordered the construction of an experimental rigid in 1908. Officially known as His Majesty's Airship No. 1 and nicknamed the Mayfly, it broke its back in 1911 before making a single flight. Work on a successor did not start until 1913.

German airship passenger service known as DELAG (Deutsche-Luftschiffahrts AG) was established in 1910.

In 1910 Walter Wellman unsuccessfully attempted an aerial crossing of the Atlantic Ocean in the airship America.

World War I

See main article: German strategic bombing during World War I.

The prospect of airships as bombers had been recognized in Europe well before the airships were up to the task. H. G. Wells' The War in the Air (1908) described the obliteration of entire fleets and cities by airship attack. The Italian forces became the first to use dirigibles for a military purpose during the Italo–Turkish War, the first bombing mission being flown on 10 March 1912.[90] World War I marked the airship's real debut as a weapon. The Germans, French, and Italians all used airships for scouting and tactical bombing roles early in the war, and all learned that the airship was too vulnerable for operations over the front. The decision to end operations in direct support of armies was made by all in 1917.[91] [92]

Many in the German military believed they had found the ideal weapon with which to counteract British naval superiority and strike at Britain itself, while more realistic airship advocates believed the zeppelin's value was as a long range scout/attack craft for naval operations. Raids on England began in January 1915 and peaked in 1916: following losses to the British defenses only a few raids were made in 1917–18, the last in August 1918.[93] Zeppelins proved to be terrifying but inaccurate weapons. Navigation, target selection and bomb-aiming proved to be difficult under the best of conditions, and the cloud cover that was frequently encountered by the airships reduced accuracy even further. The physical damage done by airships over the course of the war was insignificant, and the deaths that they caused amounted to a few hundred.[94] Nevertheless, the raid caused a significant diversion of British resources to defense efforts. The airships were initially immune to attack by aircraft and anti-aircraft guns: as the pressure in their envelopes was only just higher than ambient air, holes had little effect. But following the introduction of a combination of incendiary and explosive ammunition in 1916, their flammable hydrogen lifting gas made them vulnerable to the defending aeroplanes. Several were shot down in flames by British defenders, and many others destroyed in accidents. New designs capable of reaching greater altitude were developed, but although this made them immune from attack it made their bombing accuracy even worse.

Countermeasures by the British included sound detection equipment, searchlights and anti-aircraft artillery, followed by night fighters in 1915. One tactic used early in the war, when their limited range meant the airships had to fly from forward bases and the only zeppelin production facilities were in Friedrichshafen, was the bombing of airship sheds by the British Royal Naval Air Service. Later in the war, the development of the aircraft carrier led to the first successful carrier-based air strike in history: on the morning of 19 July 1918, seven Sopwith 2F.1 Camels were launched from and struck the airship base at Tønder, destroying zeppelins L 54 and L 60.[95]

The British Army had abandoned airship development in favour of aeroplanes before the start of the war, but the Royal Navy had recognized the need for small airships to counteract the submarine and mine threat in coastal waters.[96] Beginning in February 1915, they began to develop the SS (Sea Scout) class of blimp. These had a small envelope of 1699- and at first used aircraft fuselages without the wing and tail surfaces as control cars. Later, more advanced blimps with purpose-built gondolas were used. The NS class (North Sea) were the largest and most effective non-rigid airships in British service, with a gas capacity of 10200m2, a crew of 10 and an endurance of 24 hours. Six 230lb bombs were carried, as well as three to five machine guns. British blimps were used for scouting, mine clearance, and convoy patrol duties. During the war, the British operated over 200 non-rigid airships.[97] Several were sold to Russia, France, the United States, and Italy. The large number of trained crews, low attrition rate and constant experimentation in handling techniques meant that at the war's end Britain was the world leader in non-rigid airship technology.

The Royal Navy continued development of rigid airships until the end of the war. Eight rigid airships had been completed by the armistice, (No. 9r, four 23 Class, two R23X Class and one R31 Class), although several more were in an advanced state of completion by the war's end.[98] Both France and Italy continued to use airships throughout the war. France preferred the non-rigid type, whereas Italy flew 49 semi-rigid airships in both the scouting and bombing roles.[99]

Aeroplanes had almost entirely replaced airships as bombers by the end of the war, and Germany's remaining zeppelins were destroyed by their crews, scrapped or handed over to the Allied powers as war reparations. The British rigid airship program, which had mainly been a reaction to the potential threat of the German airships, was wound down.

The interwar period

Britain, the United States and Germany built rigid airships between the two world wars. Italy and France made limited use of Zeppelins handed over as war reparations. Italy, the Soviet Union, the United States and Japan mainly operated semi-rigid airships.

Under the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was not allowed to build airships of greater capacity than a million cubic feet. Two small passenger airships, LZ 120 Bodensee and its sister ship LZ 121 Nordstern, were built immediately after the war but were confiscated following the sabotage of the wartime Zeppelins that were to have been handed over as war reparations: Bodensee was given to Italy and Nordstern to France. On May 12, 1926, the Italian built semi-rigid airship Norge was the first aircraft to fly over the North Pole.

The British R33 and R34 were near-identical copies of the German L 33, which had come down almost intact in Yorkshire on 24 September 1916.[100] Despite being almost three years out of date by the time they were launched in 1919, they became two of the most successful airships in British service. The creation of the Royal Air Force (RAF) in early 1918 created a hybrid British airship program. The RAF was not interested in airships while the Admiralty was, so a deal was made where the Admiralty would design any future military airships and the RAF would handle manpower, facilities and operations.[101] On 2 July 1919, R34 began the first double crossing of the Atlantic by an aircraft. It landed at Mineola, Long Island on 6 July after 108 hours in the air; the return crossing began on 8 July and took 75 hours. This feat failed to generate enthusiasm for continued airship development, and the British airship program was rapidly wound down.

During World War I, the U.S. Navy acquired its first airship, the DH-1,[102] but it was destroyed while being inflated shortly after delivery to the Navy. After the war, the U.S. Navy contracted to buy the R 38, which was being built in Britain, but before it was handed over it was destroyed because of a structural failure during a test flight.[103] America then started constructing the, designed by the Bureau of Aeronautics and based on the Zeppelin L 49.[104] Assembled in Hangar No. 1 and first flown on 4 September 1923[105] at Lakehurst, New Jersey, it was the first airship to be inflated with the noble gas helium, which was then so scarce that the Shenandoah contained most of the world's supply. A second airship,, was built by the Zeppelin company as compensation for the airships that should have been handed over as war reparations according to the terms of the Versailles Treaty but had been sabotaged by their crews. This construction order saved the Zeppelin works from the threat of closure. The success of the Los Angeles, which was flown successfully for eight years, encouraged the U.S. Navy to invest in its own, larger airships. When the Los Angeles was delivered, the two airships had to share the limited supply of helium, and thus alternated operating and overhauls.[106]

In 1922, Sir Dennistoun Burney suggested a plan for a subsidised air service throughout the British Empire using airships (the Burney Scheme). Following the coming to power of Ramsay MacDonald's Labour government in 1924, the scheme was transformed into the Imperial Airship Scheme, under which two airships were built, one by a private company and the other by the Royal Airship Works under Air Ministry control. The two designs were radically different. The "capitalist" ship, the R100, was more conventional, while the "socialist" ship, the R101, had many innovative design features. Construction of both took longer than expected, and the airships did not fly until 1929. Neither airship was capable of the service intended, though the R100 did complete a proving flight to Canada and back in 1930.[107] On 5 October 1930, the R101, which had not been thoroughly tested after major modifications, crashed on its maiden voyage to India at Beauvais in France killing 48 of the 54 people aboard. Among the dead were the craft's chief designer and the Secretary of State for Air. The disaster ended British interest in airships.

The Locarno Treaties of 1925 lifted the restrictions on German airship construction, and the Zeppelin company started construction of the Graf Zeppelin (LZ 127), the largest airship that could be built in the company's existing shed, and intended to stimulate interest in passenger airships. The Graf Zeppelin burned blau gas, similar to propane, stored in large gas bags below the hydrogen cells, as fuel. Since its density was similar to that of air, it avoided the weight change as fuel was used, and thus the need to valve hydrogen. The Graf Zeppelin had an impressive safety record, flying over 1600000km (1,000,000miles) (including the first circumnavigation of the globe by airship) without a single passenger injury.[108] The U.S. Navy experimented with the use of airships as airborne aircraft carriers, developing an idea pioneered by the British. The USS Los Angeles was used for initial experiments, and the and, the world's largest at the time, were used to test the principle in naval operations. Each carried four F9C Sparrowhawk fighters in its hangar, and could carry a fifth on the trapeze. The idea had mixed results. By the time the Navy started to develop a sound doctrine for using the ZRS-type airships, the last of the two built, USS Macon, had been wrecked. Meanwhile, the seaplane had become more capable, and was considered a better investment.[109]

Eventually, the U.S. Navy lost all three U.S.-built rigid airships to accidents. USS Shenandoah flew into a severe thunderstorm over Noble County, Ohio while on a poorly planned publicity flight on 3 September 1925. It broke into pieces, killing 14 of its crew. USS Akron was caught in a severe storm and flown into the surface of the sea off the shore of New Jersey on 3 April 1933. It carried no life boats and few life vests, so 73 of its crew of 76 died from drowning or hypothermia. USS Macon was lost after suffering a structural failure offshore near Point Sur Lighthouse on 12 February 1935. The failure caused a loss of gas, which was made much worse when the aircraft was driven over pressure height causing it to lose too much helium to maintain flight.[110] Only two of its crew of 83 died in the crash thanks to the inclusion of life jackets and inflatable rafts after the Akron disaster.

The Empire State Building was completed in 1931 with a dirigible mast, in anticipation of future passenger airship service, but no airship ever used the mast. Various entrepreneurs experimented with commuting and shipping freight via airship.[111]

In the 1930s, the German Zeppelins successfully competed with other means of transport. They could carry significantly more passengers than other contemporary aircraft while providing amenities similar to those on ocean liners, such as private cabins, observation decks, and dining rooms. Less importantly, the technology was potentially more energy-efficient than heavier-than-air designs. Zeppelins were also faster than ocean liners. On the other hand, operating airships was quite involved. Often the crew would outnumber passengers, and on the ground large teams were necessary to assist mooring and very large hangars were required at airports.

By the mid-1930s, only Germany still pursued airship development. The Zeppelin company continued to operate the Graf Zeppelin on passenger service between Frankfurt and Recife in Brazil, taking 68 hours. Even with the small Graf Zeppelin, the operation was almost profitable.[112] In the mid-1930s, work began on an airship designed specifically to operate a passenger service across the Atlantic.[113] The Hindenburg (LZ 129) completed a successful 1936 season, carrying passengers between Lakehurst, New Jersey and Germany. The year 1937 started with the most spectacular and widely remembered airship accident. Approaching the Lakehurst mooring mast minutes before landing on 6 May 1937, the Hindenburg suddenly burst into flames and crashed to the ground. Of the 97 people aboard, 35 died: 13 passengers, 22 aircrew, along with one American ground-crewman. The disaster happened before a large crowd, was filmed and a radio news reporter was recording the arrival. This was a disaster that theater goers could see and hear in newsreels. The Hindenburg disaster shattered public confidence in airships, and brought a definitive end to their "golden age". The day after the Hindenburg disaster, the Graf Zeppelin landed safely in Germany after its return flight from Brazil. This was the last international passenger airship flight.

Hindenburgs identical sister ship, the Graf Zeppelin II (LZ 130), could not carry commercial passengers without helium, which the United States refused to sell to Germany. The Graf Zeppelin made several test flights and conducted some electronic espionage until 1939 when it was grounded due to the beginning of the war. The two Graf Zeppelins were scrapped in April, 1940.

Development of airships continued only in the United States, and to a lesser extent, the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union had several semi-rigid and non-rigid airships. The semi-rigid dirigible SSSR-V6 OSOAVIAKhIM was among the largest of these craft, and it set the longest endurance flight at the time of over 130 hours. It crashed into a mountain in 1938, killing 13 of the 19 people on board. While this was a severe blow to the Soviet airship program, they continued to operate non-rigid airships until 1950.

World War II

While Germany determined that airships were obsolete for military purposes in the coming war and concentrated on the development of aeroplanes, the United States pursued a program of military airship construction even though it had not developed a clear military doctrine for airship use. When the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941, bringing the United States into World War II, the U.S. Navy had 10 nonrigid airships:

Only K- and TC-class airships were suitable for combat and they were quickly pressed into service against Japanese and German submarines, which were then sinking American shipping within visual range of the American coast. U.S. Navy command, remembering airship's anti-submarine success in World War I, immediately requested new modern antisubmarine airships and on 2 January 1942 formed the ZP-12 patrol unit based in Lakehurst from the four K airships. The ZP-32 patrol unit was formed from two TC and two L airships a month later, based at NAS Moffett Field in Sunnyvale, California. An airship training base was created there as well. The status of submarine-hunting Goodyear airships in the early days of World War II has created significant confusion. Although various accounts refer to airships Resolute and Volunteer as operating as "privateers" under a Letter of Marque, Congress never authorized a commission, nor did the President sign one.[114]

In the years 1942–44, approximately 1,400 airship pilots and 3,000 support crew members were trained in the military airship crew training program and the airship military personnel grew from 430 to 12,400. The U.S. airships were produced by the Goodyear factory in Akron, Ohio. From 1942 till 1945, 154 airships were built for the U.S. Navy (133 K-class, 10 L-class, seven G-class, four M-class) and five L-class for civilian customers (serial numbers L-4 to L-8).

The primary airship tasks were patrol and convoy escort near the American coastline. They also served as an organization centre for the convoys to direct ship movements, and were used in naval search and rescue operations. Rarer duties of the airships included aerophoto reconnaissance, naval mine-laying and mine-sweeping, parachute unit transport and deployment, cargo and personnel transportation. They were deemed quite successful in their duties with the highest combat readiness factor in the entire U.S. air force (87%).

During the war, some 532 ships without airship escort were sunk near the U.S. coast by enemy submarines. Only one ship, the tanker Persephone, of the 89,000 or so in convoys escorted by blimps was sunk by the enemy. Airships engaged submarines with depth charges and, less frequently, with other on-board weapons. They were excellent at driving submarines down, where their limited speed and range prevented them from attacking convoys. The weapons available to airships were so limited that until the advent of the homing torpedo they had little chance of sinking a submarine.[115]

Only one airship was ever destroyed by U-boat: on the night of 18/19 July 1943, the K-74 from ZP-21 division was patrolling the coastline near Florida. Using radar, the airship located a surfaced German submarine. The K-74 made her attack run but the U-boat opened fire first. K-74s depth charges did not release as she crossed the U-boat and the K-74 received serious damage, losing gas pressure and an engine but landing in the water without loss of life. The crew was rescued by patrol boats in the morning, but one crewman, Aviation Machinist's Mate Second Class Isadore Stessel, died from a shark attack. The U-boat,, was slightly damaged and the next day or so was attacked by aircraft, sustaining damage that forced it to return to base. It was finally sunk on 24 August 1943 by a British Vickers Wellington near Vigo, Spain.[116] [117]

Fleet Airship Wing One operated from Lakehurst, New Jersey, Glynco, Georgia, Weeksville, North Carolina, South Weymouth NAS Massachusetts, Brunswick NAS and Bar Harbor Maine, Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, and Argentia, Newfoundland.

Some Navy blimps saw action in the European war theater. In 1944–45, the U.S. Navy moved an entire squadron of eight Goodyear K class blimps (K-89, K-101, K-109, K-112, K-114, K-123, K-130, & K-134) with flight and maintenance crews from Weeksville Naval Air Station in North Carolina to Naval Air Station Port Lyautey, French Morocco.[118] Their mission was to locate and destroy German U-boats in the relatively shallow waters around the Strait of Gibraltar where magnetic anomaly detection (MAD) was viable. PBY aircraft had been searching these waters but MAD required low altitude flying that was dangerous at night for these aircraft. The blimps were considered a perfect solution to establish a 24/7 MAD barrier (fence) at the Straits of Gibraltar with the PBYs flying the day shift and the blimps flying the night shift. The first two blimps (K-123 & K-130) left South Weymouth NAS on 28 May 1944 and flew to Argentia, Newfoundland, the Azores, and finally to Port Lyautey where they completed the first transatlantic crossing by nonrigid airships on 1 June 1944. The blimps of USN Blimp Squadron ZP-14 (Blimpron 14, aka The Africa Squadron) also conducted mine-spotting and mine-sweeping operations in key Mediterranean ports and various escorts including the convoy carrying United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill to the Yalta Conference in 1945. Airships from the ZP-12 unit took part in the sinking of the last U-boat before German capitulation, sinking the U-881 on 6 May 1945 together with destroyers USS Atherton and USS Moberly.

Other airships patrolled the Caribbean, Fleet Airship Wing Two, Headquartered at Naval Air Station Richmond, covered the Gulf of Mexico from Richmond and Key West, Florida, Houma, Louisiana, as well as Hitchcock and Brownsville, Texas. FAW 2 also patrolled the northern Caribbean from San Julian, the Isle of Pines (now called Isla de la Juventud) and Guantánamo Bay, Cuba as well as Vernam Field, Jamaica.

Navy blimps of Fleet Airship Wing Five, (ZP-51) operated from bases in Trinidad, British Guiana and Paramaribo, Suriname. Fleet Airship Wing Four operated along the coast of Brazil. Two squadrons, VP-41 and VP-42 flew from bases at Amapá, Igarapé-Açu, São Luís Fortaleza, Fernando de Noronha, Recife, Maceió, Ipitanga (near Salvador, Bahia), Caravelas, Vitória and the hangar built for the Graf Zeppelin at Santa Cruz, Rio de Janeiro.

Fleet Airship Wing Three operated squadrons, ZP-32 from Moffett Field, ZP-31 at NAS Santa Ana, and ZP-33 at NAS Tillamook, Oregon. Auxiliary fields were at Del Mar, Lompoc, Watsonville and Eureka, California, North Bend and Astoria, Oregon, as well as Shelton and Quillayute in Washington.

From 2 January 1942 until the end of war airship operations in the Atlantic, the blimps of the Atlantic fleet made 37,554 flights and flew 378,237 hours. Of the over 70,000 ships in convoys protected by blimps, only one was sunk by a submarine while under blimp escort.

The Soviet Union flew a single airship during the war. The W-12, built in 1939, entered service in 1942 for paratrooper training and equipment transport. It made 1432 flights with 300 metric tons of cargo until 1945. On 1 February 1945, the Soviets constructed a second airship, a Pobeda-class (Victory-class) unit (used for mine-sweeping and wreckage clearing in the Black Sea) that crashed on 21 January 1947. Another W-class – W-12bis Patriot – was commissioned in 1947 and was mostly used until the mid-1950s for crew training, parades and propaganda.

Postwar period

Although airships are no longer used for major cargo and passenger transport, they are still used for other purposes such as advertising, sightseeing, surveillance, research and advocacy.

There were several studies and proposals for nuclear-powered airships, starting with a 1954 study by F.W. Locke Jr for US Navy.[119] In 1957 Edwin J. Kirschner published the book The Zeppelin in the Atomic Age,[120] which promoted the use of atomic airships. In 1959 Goodyear presented a plan for nuclear-powered airship for both military and commercial use. Several other proposals and papers were published during the next decades.[121]

In the 1980s, Per Lindstrand and his team introduced the GA-42 airship, the first airship to use fly-by-wire flight control, which considerably reduced the pilot's workload.

An airship was prominently featured in the James Bond film A View to a Kill, released in 1985. The Skyship 500 had the livery of Zorin Industries.[122]

The world's largest thermal airship (300000ft3) was constructed by the Per Lindstrand company for French botanists in 1993. The AS-300 carried an underslung raft, which was positioned by the airship on top of tree canopies in the rain forest, allowing the botanists to carry out their treetop research without significant damage to the rainforest. When research was finished at a given location, the airship returned to pick up and relocate the raft.[123]

In June 1987, the U.S. Navy awarded a US$168.9 million contract to Westinghouse Electric and Airship Industries of the UK to find out whether an airship could be used as an airborne platform to detect the threat of sea-skimming missiles, such as the Exocet.[124] At 2.5 million cubic feet, the Westinghouse/Airship Industries Sentinel 5000 (Redesignated YEZ-2A by the U.S. Navy) prototype design was to have been the largest blimp ever constructed.[125] Additional funding for the Naval Airship Program was killed in 1995 and development was discontinued.

The SVAM CA-80 airship, which was produced in 2000 by Shanghai Vantage Airship Manufacture Co., Ltd., had a successful trial flight in September 2001. This was designed for advertisement and propagation, air-photo, scientific test, tour and surveillance duties. It was certified as a grade-A Hi-Tech introduction program (No. 20000186) in Shanghai. The CAAC authority granted a type design approval and certificate of airworthiness for the airship.[126]

In the 1990s the Zeppelin company returned to the airship business. Their new model, designated the Zeppelin NT, made its maiden flight on 18 September 1997. there were four NT aircraft flying, a fifth was completed in March 2009 and an expanded NT-14 (14,000 cubic meters of helium, capable of carrying 19 passengers) was under construction. One was sold to a Japanese company, and was planned to be flown to Japan in the summer of 2004. Due to delays getting permission from the Russian government, the company decided to transport the airship to Japan by sea. One of the four NT craft is in South Africa carrying diamond detection equipment from De Beers, an application at which the very stable low vibration NT platform excels. The project included design adaptations for high temperature operation and desert climate, as well as a separate mooring mast and a very heavy mooring truck. NT-4 belonged to Airship Ventures of Moffett Field, Mountain View in the San Francisco Bay Area, and provided sight-seeing tours.

Blimps are used for advertising and as TV camera platforms at major sporting events. The most iconic of these are the Goodyear Blimps. Goodyear operates three blimps in the United States, and The Lightship Group, now The AirSign Airship Group,[127] operates up to 19 advertising blimps around the world. Airship Management Services owns and operates three Skyship 600 blimps. Two operate as advertising and security ships in North America and the Caribbean. Airship Ventures operated a Zeppelin NT for advertising, passenger service and special mission projects. They were the only airship operator in the U.S. authorized to fly commercial passengers, until closing their doors in 2012.

Skycruise Switzerland AG owns and operates two Skyship 600 blimps. One operates regularly over Switzerland used on sightseeing tours.The Switzerland-based Skyship 600 has also played other roles over the years. For example, it was flown over Athens during the 2004 Summer Olympics as a security measure. In November 2006, it carried advertising calling it The Spirit of Dubai as it began a publicity tour from London to Dubai, UAE on behalf of The Palm Islands, the world's largest man-made islands created as a residential complex.

Los Angeles-based Worldwide Aeros Corp. produces FAA Type Certified Aeros 40D Sky Dragon airships.[128]

In May 2006, the U.S. Navy began to fly airships again after a hiatus of nearly 44 years. The program uses a single American Blimp Company A-170 nonrigid airship, with designation MZ-3A. Operations focus on crew training and research, and the platform integrator is Northrop Grumman. The program is directed by the Naval Air Systems Command and is being carried out at NAES Lakehurst, the original centre of U.S. Navy lighter-than-air operations in previous decades.

In November 2006 the U.S. Army bought an A380+ airship from American Blimp Corporation through a Systems level contract with Northrop Grumman and Booz Allen Hamilton. The airship started flight tests in late 2007, with a primary goal of carrying 2500lb of payload to an altitude of 15000feet under remote control and autonomous waypoint navigation. The program will also demonstrate carrying 1000lb of payload to 20000feet The platform could be used for intelligence collection. In 2008, the CA-150 airship was launched by Vantage Airship. This is an improved modification of model CA-120 and completed manufacturing in 2008. With larger volume and increased passenger capacity, it is the largest manned nonrigid airship in China at present.[129]

In late June 2014 the Electronic Frontier Foundation flew the GEFA-FLUG AS 105 GD/4[130] blimp AE Bates (owned by, and in conjunction with, Greenpeace) over the NSA's Bluffdale Utah Data Center in protest.[131]

Postwar projects

Hybrid designs such as the Heli-Stat airship/helicopter, the Aereon aerostatic/aerodynamic craft, and the CycloCrane (a hybrid aerostatic/rotorcraft), struggled to take flight. The Cyclocrane was also interesting in that the airship's envelope rotated along its longitudinal axis.

In 2005, a short-lived project of the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) was Walrus HULA, which explored the potential for using airships as long-distance, heavy lift craft.[132] [133] The primary goal of the research program was to determine the feasibility of building an airship capable of carrying 500ST of payload a distance of 12000miles and land on an unimproved location without the use of external ballast or ground equipment (such as masts). In 2005, two contractors, Lockheed Martin and US Aeros Airships were each awarded approximately $3 million to do feasibility studies of designs for WALRUS. Congress removed funding for Walrus HULA in 2006.

Modern

Military

In 2010, the U.S. Army awarded a $517 million (£350.6 million) contract to Northrop Grumman and partner Hybrid Air Vehicles to develop a Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence Vehicle (LEMV) system, in the form of three HAV 304s.[134] [135] [136] The project was cancelled in February 2012 due to it being behind schedule and over budget; also the forthcoming U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan where it was intended to be deployed.[137] Following this the Hybrid Air Vehicles HAV 304 Airlander 10 was repurchased by Hybrid Air Vehicles then modified and reassembled in Bedford, UK, and renamed the Airlander 10.[138] As of 2018, it was being tested in readiness for its UK flight test programme.[139]

, a French company, manufactures and operates airships and aerostats. For 2 years, A-NSE has been testing its airships for the French Army. Airships and aerostats are operated to provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) support. Their airships include many innovative features such as water ballast take-off and landing systems, variable geometry envelopes and thrust–vectoring systems.[140]

The U.S. government has funded two major projects in the high altitude arena. The Composite Hull High Altitude Powered Platform (CHHAPP) is sponsored by U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command. This aircraft is also sometimes called HiSentinel High-Altitude Airship. This prototype ship made a five-hour test flight in September 2005. The second project, the high-altitude airship (HAA), is sponsored by DARPA. In 2005, DARPA awarded a contract for nearly $150 million to Lockheed Martin for prototype development. First flight of the HAA was planned for 2008 but suffered programmatic and funding delays. The HAA project evolved into the High Altitude Long Endurance-Demonstrator (HALE-D). The U.S. Army and Lockheed Martin launched the first-of-its kind HALE-D on July 27, 2011.[141] After attaining an altitude of 32000feet, due to an anomaly, the company decided to abort the mission. The airship made a controlled descent in an unpopulated area of southwest Pennsylvania.[142] [143] [144]

On 31 January 2006 Lockheed Martin made the first flight of their secretly built hybrid airship designated the P-791. The design is very similar to the SkyCat, unsuccessfully promoted for many years by the British company Advanced Technologies Group (ATG).

Dirigibles have been used in the War in Afghanistan for reconnaissance purposes, as they allow for constant monitoring of a specific area through cameras mounted on the airships.[145]

Passenger transport

In the 1990s, the successor of the original Zeppelin company in Friedrichshafen, the Zeppelin Luftschifftechnik GmbH, reengaged in airship construction. The first experimental craft (later christened Friedrichshafen) of the type "Zeppelin NT" flew in September 1997. Though larger than common blimps, the Neue Technologie (New Technology) zeppelins are much smaller than their giant ancestors and not actually Zeppelin-types in the classical sense. They are sophisticated semirigids. Apart from the greater payload, their main advantages compared to blimps are higher speed and excellent maneuverability. Meanwhile, several Zeppelin NT have been produced and operated profitably in joyrides, research flights and similar applications.

In June 2004, a Zeppelin NT was sold for the first time to a Japanese company, Nippon Airship Corporation, for tourism and advertising mainly around Tokyo. It was also given a role at the 2005 Expo in Aichi. The aircraft began a flight from Friedrichshafen to Japan, stopping at Geneva, Paris, Rotterdam, Munich, Berlin, Stockholm and other European cities to carry passengers on short legs of the flight. Russian authorities denied overflight permission, so the airship had to be dismantled and shipped to Japan rather than following the historic Graf Zeppelin flight from Germany to Japan.

In 2008, Airship Ventures Inc. began operations from Moffett Federal Airfield near Mountain View, California and until November 2012 offered tours of the San Francisco Bay Area for up to 12 passengers.

Exploration

In November 2005, De Beers, a diamond mining company, launched an airship exploration program over the remote Kalahari desert. A Zeppelin NT, equipped with a Bell Geospace gravity gradiometer, was used to find potential diamond mines by scanning the local geography for low-density rock formations, known as kimberlite pipes. On 21 September 2007, the airship was severely damaged by a whirlwind while in Botswana. One crew member, who was on watch aboard the moored craft, was slightly injured but released after overnight observation in hospital.

Thermal

Several companies, such as Cameron Balloons in Bristol, United Kingdom, build hot-air airships. These combine the structures of both hot-air balloons and small airships. The envelope is the normal cigar shape, complete with tail fins, but is inflated with hot air instead of helium to provide the lifting force. A small gondola, carrying the pilot and passengers, a small engine, and the burners to provide the hot air are suspended below the envelope, beneath an opening through which the burners protrude.

Hot-air airships typically cost less to buy and maintain than modern helium-based blimps, and can be quickly deflated after flights. This makes them easy to carry in trailers or trucks and inexpensive to store. They are usually very slow moving, with a typical top speed of 25–. They are mainly used for advertising, but at least one has been used in rainforests for wildlife observation, as they can be easily transported to remote areas.

Unmanned remote

Remote-controlled (RC) airships, a type of unmanned aerial system (UAS), are sometimes used for commercial purposes such as advertising and aerial video and photography as well as recreational purposes. They are particularly common as an advertising mechanism at indoor stadiums. While RC airships are sometimes flown outdoors, doing so for commercial purposes is illegal in the US.[146] Commercial use of an unmanned airship must be certified under part 121.

Adventures

In 2008, French adventurer Stephane Rousson attempted to cross the English Channel with a muscular pedal powered airship.[147] [148] [149]

Stephane Rousson also flies the Aérosail, a sky sailing yacht.[150] [151] [152]

Current design projects

Today, with large, fast, and more cost-efficient fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters, it is unknown whether huge airships can operate profitably in regular passenger transport though, as energy costs rise, attention is once again returning to these lighter-than-air vessels as a possible alternative. At the very least, the idea of comparatively slow, "majestic" cruising at relatively low altitudes and in comfortable atmosphere certainly has retained some appeal. There have been some niches for airships in and after World War II, such as long-duration observations, antisubmarine patrol, platforms for TV camera crews, and advertising; these generally require only small and flexible craft, and have thus generally been better fitted for cheaper (non-passenger) blimps.

Heavy lifting

It has periodically been suggested that airships could be employed for cargo transport, especially delivering extremely heavy loads to areas with poor infrastructure over great distances. This has also been called roadless trucking.[153] Also, airships could be used for heavy lifting over short distances (e.g. on construction sites); this is described as heavy-lift, short-haul.[154] In both cases, the airships are heavy haulers. One recent enterprise of this sort was the Cargolifter project, in which a hybrid (thus not entirely Zeppelin-type) airship even larger than Hindenburg was projected. Around 2000, CargoLifter AG built the world's largest self-supporting hall, measuring 360m (1,180feet) long, 210m (690feet) wide and 107m (351feet) high about 60km (40miles) south of Berlin. In May 2002, the project was stopped for financial reasons; the company had to file bankruptcy. The enormous CargoLifter hangar was later converted to house the Tropical Islands Resort. Although no rigid airships are currently used for heavy lifting, hybrid airships are being developed for such purposes. AEREON 26, tested in 1971, was described in John McPhee's The Deltoid Pumpkin Seed.

An impediment to the large-scale development of airships as heavy haulers has been figuring out how they can be used in a cost-efficient way. In order to have a significant economic advantage over ocean transport, cargo airships must be able to deliver their payload faster than ocean carriers but more cheaply than airplanes. William Crowder, a fellow at the Logistics Management Institute, has calculated that cargo airships are only economical when they can transport 500 to 1,000 tons, approximately the same as a super-jumbo aircraft.[155] The large initial investment required to build such a large airship has been a hindrance to production, especially given the risk inherent in a new technology. The chief commercial officer of the company hoping to sell the LMH-1, a cargo airship currently being developed by Lockheed Martin, believes that airships can be economical in hard-to-reach locations such as mining operations in northern Canada that currently require ice roads.

Metal-clad airships

See main article: Metal-clad airship.

A metal-clad airship has a very thin metal envelope, rather than the usual fabric. The shell may be either internally braced or monocoque as in the ZMC-2, which flew many times in the 1920s, the only example ever to do so. The shell may be gas-tight as in a non-rigid blimp, or the design may employ internal gas bags as in a rigid airship. Compared to a fabric envelope the metal cladding is expected to be more durable.

Hybrid airships

See main article: Hybrid airship.

A hybrid airship is a general term for an aircraft that combines characteristics of heavier-than-air (aeroplane or helicopter) and lighter-than-air technology. Examples include helicopter/airship hybrids intended for heavy lift applications and dynamic lift airships intended for long-range cruising. Most airships, when fully loaded with cargo and fuel, are usually ballasted to be heavier than air, and thus must use their propulsion system and shape to create aerodynamic lift, necessary to stay aloft. All airships can be operated to be slightly heavier than air at periods during flight (descent). Accordingly, the term "hybrid airship" refers to craft that obtain a significant portion of their lift from aerodynamic lift or other kinetic means.

For example, the Aeroscraft is a buoyancy assisted air vehicle that generates lift through a combination of aerodynamics, thrust vectoring and gas buoyancy generation and management, and for much of the time will fly heavier than air. Aeroscraft is Worldwide Aeros Corporation's continuation of DARPA's now cancelled Walrus HULA (Hybrid Ultra Large Aircraft) project.[156]

The Patroller P3 hybrid airship developed by Advanced Hybrid Aircraft Ltd, BC, Canada, is a relatively small (85000ft3) buoyant craft, manned by the crew of five and with the endurance of up to 72 hours. The flight-tests with the 40% RC scale model proved that such a craft can be launched and landed without a large team of strong ground-handlers.[157] Design features a special "winglet" for aerodynamic lift control.[158]

Airships in space exploration

Airships have been proposed as a potential cheap alternative to surface rocket launches for achieving Earth orbit. JP Aerospace have proposed the Airship to Orbit project, which intends to float a multi-stage airship up to mesospheric altitudes of 55 km (180,000 ft) and then use ion propulsion to accelerate to orbital speed.[159] At these heights, air resistance would not be a significant problem for achieving such speeds. The company has not yet built any of the three stages.

NASA has proposed the High Altitude Venus Operational Concept, which comprises a series of five missions including crewed missions to the atmosphere of Venus in airships.[160] [161] [162] [163] Pressures on the surface of the planet are too high for human habitation, but at a specific altitude the pressure is equal to that found on Earth and this makes Venus a potential target for human colonization.

Hypothetically, there could be an airship lifted by a vacuum—that is, by material that can contain nothing at all inside but withstand the atmospheric pressure from the outside. It is, at this point, science fiction, although NASA has posited that some kind of vacuum airship could eventually be used to explore the surface of Mars.[164]

Cruiser feeder transport airship

EU FP7 MAAT Project[165] has studied an innovative cruiser/feeder airship system,[166] for the stratosphere with a cruiser remaining airborne for a long time and feeders connecting it to the ground and flying as piloted balloons.[167]

Airships for humanitarian and cargo transport

Google co-founder Sergey Brin founded LTA Research in 2015 to develop airships for humanitarian and cargo transport. The company's 124-meter-long airship Pathfinder 1 received from the FAA a special airworthiness certificate for the helium-filled airship in September 2023.[168]

The certificate allowed the largest airship since the ill-fated Hindenburg to begin flight tests at Moffett Field, a joint civil-military airport in Silicon Valley.

Comparison with heavier-than-air aircraft

The advantage of airships over aeroplanes is that static lift sufficient for flight is generated by the lifting gas and requires no engine power. This was an immense advantage before the middle of World War I and remained an advantage for long-distance or long-duration operations until World War II. Modern concepts for high-altitude airships include photovoltaic cells to reduce the need to land to refuel, thus they can remain in the air until consumables expire. This similarly reduces or eliminates the need to consider variable fuel weight in buoyancy calculations.

The disadvantages are that an airship has a very large reference area and comparatively large drag coefficient, thus a larger drag force compared to that of aeroplanes and even helicopters. Given the large frontal area and wetted surface of an airship, a practical limit is reached around 80–. Thus airships are used where speed is not critical.

The lift capability of an airship is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the airship. This assumes standard air-temperature and pressure conditions. Corrections are usually made for water vapor and impurity of lifting gas, as well as percentage of inflation of the gas cells at liftoff.[169] Based on specific lift (lifting force per unit volume of gas), the greatest static lift is provided by hydrogen (11.15 N/m3 or 71 lbf/1000 cu ft) with helium (10.37 N/m3 or 66 lbf/1000 cu ft) a close second.[170]

In addition to static lift, an airship can obtain a certain amount of dynamic lift from its engines. Dynamic lift in past airships has been about 10% of the static lift. Dynamic lift allows an airship to "take off heavy" from a runway similar to fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft. This requires additional weight in engines, fuel, and landing gear, negating some of the static lift capacity.

The altitude at which an airship can fly largely depends on how much lifting gas it can lose due to expansion before stasis is reached. The ultimate altitude record for a rigid airship was set in 1917 by the L-55 under the command of Hans-Kurt Flemming when he forced the airship to 24000abbr=onNaNabbr=on attempting to cross France after the "Silent Raid" on London. The L-55 lost lift during the descent to lower altitudes over Germany and crashed due to loss of lift.[171] While such waste of gas was necessary for the survival of airships in the later years of World War I, it was impractical for commercial operations, or operations of helium-filled military airships. The highest flight made by a hydrogen-filled passenger airship was 5500abbr=onNaNabbr=on on the Graf Zeppelin's around-the-world flight.[172]

The greatest disadvantage of the airship is size, which is essential to increasing performance. As size increases, the problems of ground handling increase geometrically.[173] As the German Navy changed from the P class of 1915 with a volume of over 1100000abbr=onNaNabbr=on to the larger Q class of 1916, the R class of 1917, and finally the W class of 1918, at almost 2200000abbr=onNaNabbr=on ground handling problems reduced the number of days the Zeppelins were able to make patrol flights. This availability declined from 34% in 1915, to 24.3% in 1916 and finally 17.5% in 1918.[174]

So long as the power-to-weight ratios of aircraft engines remained low and specific fuel consumption high, the airship had an edge for long-range or -duration operations. As those figures changed, the balance shifted rapidly in the aeroplane's favour. By mid-1917, the airship could no longer survive in a combat situation where the threat was aeroplanes. By the late 1930s, the airship barely had an advantage over the aeroplane on intercontinental over-water flights, and that advantage had vanished by the end of World War II.

This is in face-to-face tactical situations. Currently, a high-altitude airship project is planned to survey hundreds of kilometres as their operation radius, often much farther than the normal engagement range of a military aeroplane. For example, a radar mounted on a vessel platform 30m (100feet) high has radio horizon at 20km (10miles) range, while a radar at 18000m (59,000feet) altitude has radio horizon at 480km (300miles) range. This is significantly important for detecting low-flying cruise missiles or fighter-bombers.

Safety

The most commonly used lifting gas, helium, is inert and therefore presents no fire risk.[175] A series of vulnerability tests were done by the UK Defence Evaluation and Research Agency DERA on a Skyship 600. Since the internal gas pressure was maintained at only 1–2% above the surrounding air pressure, the vehicle proved highly tolerant to physical damage or to attack by small-arms fire or missiles. Several hundred high-velocity bullets were fired through the hull, and even two hours later the vehicle would have been able to return to base. Ordnance passed through the envelope without causing critical helium loss. The results and related mathematical model have presented in the hypothesis of considering a Zeppelin NT size airship.[176] In all instances of light armament fire evaluated under both test and live conditions, the airship was able to complete its mission and return to base.[177]

Licensing

See main article: Pilot licensing and certification.

In the United Kingdom, the basic pilot licence for airships is the PPL(As), or private pilot licence, which requires a minimum of 35 hours instruction on airships.[178] To fly commercially, an Commercial Pilot Licence (Airships) is required.

See also

References

Bibliography

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Definition of AIRSHIP . merriam-webster.com . 4 October 2016 .
  2. Web site: Discovery of Helium in Natural Gas at the University of Kansas . National Historic Chemical Landmarks . American Chemical Society . 2014-02-21 .
  3. Mowthorpe, C. E. S. Battlebags, British Airships of the First World War, Phoenix Mill, United Kingdom. Alan Sutton Publishing, 1995, p. xx. .
  4. Web site: Online Etymology Dictionary . EtymOnline.com . 2016-09-04 .
  5. http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth172915/ US patent 467069
  6. [Ezekiel Airship]
  7. http://gustavewhitehead.org/news_journalism/1901_-_flying.html The Bridgeport Herald, August 18, 1901
  8. Cooley Airship of 1910, also called the Cooley monoplane.http://www.wright-brothers.org/History_Wing/Aviations_Attic/UFOs/UFOs.htmWeb site: Round Aircraft Designs . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120402075442/http://celticowboy.com/Round%20Aircraft%20Designs.htm . 2012-04-02 . 2011-09-07. – a heavier-than-air monoplane.
  9. Frater, A.; The Balloon Factory, Picador (2009), p. 163 – Wright brothers' "airship".
  10. http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=879 George Griffith, The angel of the Revolution, 1893
  11. http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&d=AS19190224.2.104 Auckland Star, 24 February 1919
  12. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article17455790 The Sydney Morning Herald, Monday 11 April 1938
  13. http://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/america-by-air/online/innovation/innovation16.cfm Smithsonian, America by air
  14. Liao, L., & Pasternak, I. (2009). "A review of airship structural research and development". Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 45(4), 83–96.
  15. Web site: Inertia Factors of Ellipsoids for Use in Airship Design . Louis Bryant Jr.. Tuckerman . January 1, 1926 . . ntrs.nasa.gov.
  16. Ege (1973).
  17. Web site: Home : Oxford English Dictionary. 2018-01-18.
  18. Book: Principles of Integrated Maritime Surveillance Systems. limited. Ince. A. Nejat. Topuz. Ercan. Panayirci. Erdal. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC. 1998. 9781461374046. New York. 204.
  19. News: Giant Aerostats Developed For Rural Cell Phone Service. Brewin. Bob. Computerworld. 2018-08-29. en.
  20. Book: Tactical Communications for the Digitized Battlefield. limited. Ryan. Michael. Frater. Michael. Artech House. 2002. 9781580533232. Boston, Massachusetts. 315.
  21. News: Google's Loon Project Puts Balloon Technology in Spotlight. https://web.archive.org/web/20130620173300/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/06/130618-google-balloon-wireless-communication-internet-hap-satellite-stratosphere-loon-project/. dead. June 20, 2013. Handwerk. Brian. 2013-06-18. 2018-08-29.
  22. Book: El-Sayed, Ahmed F.. Fundamentals of Aircraft and Rocket Propulsion. 2016. Springer. 9781447167969. en.
  23. Wragg, D; Historical Dictionary of Aviation, History Press (2008) p. 27.
  24. Mackinnon, Jim, "Piece by piece, Goodyear's new airship arrives at Wingfoot hangar", September 6, 2012, updated September 7, 2012, Akron Beacon Journal, Akron, Ohio (Goodyear blimps' base), retrieved June 28, 2021
  25. Cf. Zeppelin NT.
  26. Book: de Syon, Guillaume . 2002 . Zeppelin!: Germany and the airship, 1900–1939 . . 978-0-8018-8634-8 .
  27. Book: Hartcup, Guy . Guy Hartcup . 1974 . The Achievement of the Airship: A History of the Development of Rigid, Semi-rigid, and Non-rigid Airships . . 978-0-7153-6551-9 .
  28. Web site: Buerge . B. T. . 2009 . The Suitability of Hybrid vs. Conventional Airships for Persistent Surveillance Missions . Unpublished report from Dr. Charles Perkins . 2016-09-24 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20160924190844/http://www.enu.kz/repository/2010/AIAA-2010-1014.pdf . 2016-09-24.
  29. The Rebirth of Airships . Prentice . B. E. . Beilock . R. E. . Phillips . A. J. . Thomson . J. . October 2010 . Journal of the Transportation Research Forum . 44 . 1.
  30. Web site: Khoury, G. A. (2012). Airship technology (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press.. 2016-09-24. https://web.archive.org/web/20160924173202/http://airshipposter.de/files/2012_cambridge_university_-_airship_technology_-_second_edition.pdf. 2016-09-24. dead.
  31. Web site: Von Karman, Theodor. "Calculation of pressure distribution on airship hulls." (1930)..
  32. [#Dooley|Dooley]
  33. [#Dooley|Dooley]
  34. http://nasgi.org/zmc2.htm NAS Grosse Ile
  35. National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution. 2008. Slate Aircraft Corporation City of Glendale Negatives, Accession number 2006-0039
  36. City of Glendale. Photo Album. Retrieved 3 September 2008.
  37. Web site: Freudenrich . Craig . How Blimps Work . . 2023-10-18 .
  38. "Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1980–81", pp. 609–610
  39. Book: Brew, Alec . Sunbeam Aero-engines . 1998 . Airlife . 1-84037-023-8 . 41, 43, 92.
  40. Web site: Hydrogen and Helium in Airship Operations .
  41. Contractor Report NASA/CR—2003-212724. Initial Feasibility Assessment of a High Altitude Long Endurance Airship. Anthony. Colozza. James. Dolce. December 1, 2003. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center. ntrs.nasa.gov.
  42. Miller . Gerry D. . Stoia . Tina R. . Harmala . Devin A. . Atreya . Shailesh . 2005-09-26 . Operational Capability of High Altitude Solar Powered Airships . AIAA 5th ATIO and16th Lighter-Than-Air Systems Tech. and Balloon Systems Conferences . en . American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics . AIAA Paper, 7487 . 10.2514/6.2005-7487 . 978-1-62410-067-3.
  43. Web site: Solar-powered Future: Airships are making a comeback. 2019-10-16. Big Think. en. 2019-12-08.
  44. Web site: Dormehl . Luke . Zeppelins could make a comeback with this solar-powered airship cargo mover . 8 October 2019 . 13 October 2021.
  45. Hunt. Julian David. Byers. Edward. Balogun. Abdul-Lateef. Leal Filho. Walter. Colling. Angeli Viviani. Nascimento. Andreas. Wada. Yoshihide. 2019-09-01. Using the jet stream for sustainable airship and balloon transportation of cargo and hydrogen. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 3. 100016. 10.1016/j.ecmx.2019.100016. 2590-1745. free. 2019ECMX....300016H .
  46. News: Filling the Friendly Skies With Hot Air. Bloomberg.com. 10 March 2019 . 2019-12-08.
  47. Web site: Francesco Lana-Terzi, S.J. (1631–1687); The Father of Aeronautics . 24 July 2010 . 24 April 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210424104423/http://www.faculty.fairfield.edu/jmac/sj/scientists/lana.htm . dead .
  48. Web site: Would a balloon filled with vacuum instead of helium float? . April 2000 . 24 July 2010.
  49. Web site: Chronology of Aviation History from 1700 to 1799. 2021-02-20. www.skytamer.com.
  50. Web site: Science Source Stock Photos & Video – Passarola, Bartolomeu de Gusmao's Airship, 1709. 2021-02-20. www.sciencesource.com.
  51. Winter & Degner (1933), pp. 26–27.
  52. McPherson, Gregg (2010) Rufus Porter and the Dream of Flight Technology Almanac
  53. Web site: Airship Honours for Australia. – Bland's Remarkable Invention More Than 70 Years Ago. – The Argus (Melbourne, Vic. : 1848–1957) – 13 Sep 1924. nla.gov.au. 4 October 2016.
  54. Web site: Visions of a flying machine . National – smh.com.au. 11 May 2006. 4 October 2016.
  55. Winter & Degner (1933), p. 36.
  56. Glazer, Stephen D. "Rutgers in the Civil War", Journal of the Rutgers University Libraries Vol. 66 (2014), p. 102
  57. [#Brooks1992|Brooks 1992]
  58. Winter & Degner (1933), p. 44.
  59. Bento S. Mattos, Short History of Brazilian Aeronautics (PDF), 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 9–12 January 2006.
  60. News: Hendrick . Bill . First in flight – a case for Georgian . December 29, 2020 . The Atlanta Journal-Constitution . August 11, 2012.
  61. Web site: Patent Images. uspto.gov. 4 October 2016.
  62. Web site: Micajah dyee. google.com. 4 October 2016.
  63. Web site: Georgia: First in Flight?. therevivalist.info. 9 March 2014. 4 October 2016.
  64. Web site: Georgia's Pioneer Aviator, Micajah Clark Dyer – From A Leading Self Publishing Company. yourbook.com. 4 October 2016.
  65. Winter & Degner (1933), pp. 49–50.
  66. Web site: Scientific American – 27 July 1889. https://web.archive.org/web/20110512192026/http://www.scripophily.net/noairshco.html. dead. May 12, 2011.
  67. [#Brooks1992|Brooks 1992]
  68. http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f62/mercedes-benz-museum-trip-ii-beginning-52297/ Mercedes-Benz Museum (Trip II): The beginning
  69. http://www.zeppelin-tourismus.de/en/rund0208e.pdf Member's Circular Letter February 2008
  70. [#Brooks1992|Brooks 1992]
  71. Bill Welker. Airships of Konstantin Danilewsky. Then-and-Now project, publication January 2018
  72. (2019) AirBike...1897. Ed. by A. B. Akimov and W. J. Welker. Sapphire Publications, US, 342 p. (Digital edition) Free download. Late 1800s work of Dr. Konstantin Dalilewsky to solve the problem of human flight presented for the first time in English. Including reproduction of the original Russian and German 1900 editions.
  73. Niccoli, R. The Book of Flight: From the flying machines of Leonardo da Vinci to the conquest of space, New York, Friedman/Fairfax, 2002, p. 24.
  74. Toland (1957), pp. 25–37.
  75. http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&d=TS19031231.2.12&cl=&srpos=0&e=-------10-PubMetaTS-1-byDA---2%2522cashmere+road%2522-- Papers Past – Christchurch Star, 31 December 1903, Ways of Airships (p. 2)
  76. Toland (1957), pp. 49–51.
  77. La dirección de globos y un inventor español . La Época . 1902 .
  78. Francisco A. González Redondo. Leonardo Torres Quevedo, 1902–1908. The Foundations for 100 years of Airship designs In book: Proceedings of the 7th International Airship Convention, pp. 1–12, Publisher: German Society for Aeronautics and Astronautics (DGLR), October 2008.
  79. Web site: Francisco A. González Redondo. 2019. 88. Revista de la Asociación Española de Ensayos No Destructivos. Leonardo Torres Quevedo: Ingeniero, Matemático, Inventor.
  80. Book: Ambrose Talbot, Frederick Arthur. https://books.google.com/books?id=q346DQAAQBAJ&pg=PT30. Aeroplanes and Dirigibles of War. 2020. Prabhat Prakashan. 978-8184305012. 30–32. Airships of War. en.
  81. Book: Whale, George. British Airships – Past, Present And Future. 2013. Read Books Ltd. 978-1473391529. Airship design. en.
  82. Web site: Starkings. Peter. Japanese Military Airships 1910–1945. 8 September 2015.
  83. Francisco A. González Redondo. The Mooring Mast: History and Controversy, pp. 12–17, The Airship Heritage Trust (1753-2175): No. 69, 2013.
  84. Book: González-Redondo. F.. The Controversial Origins of the Mooring Mast for Airships: An Historical Overview of a Neglected Branch of Aeronautical Technology that has Great Potential for Future Use. Camplin. G.. International Committee for the History of Technology. 2015. 81–108. 21.
  85. (see Fig.1)
  86. [#Lueger1920|Lueger 1920]
  87. [#Lig|Ligugnana, Sandro]
  88. Web site: Death of the aeronaut Auguste Severo and his mechanic George Sache. lookandlearn.com. 4 October 2016.
  89. Web site: La belle époque. 1890–1905.. e-monsite.com. 4 October 2016. 5 October 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20161005121233/http://cabanus.e-monsite.com/pages/les-dirigeables/la-belle-epoque-1890-1905.html. dead.
  90. http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1912/1912%20-%200298.html With the Dirigibles at Tripoli
  91. Ventry & Koesnik (1982), p. 85.
  92. Robinson (1973), pp. 126–127.
  93. Robinson 1994, p. 360.
  94. Cole, Christopher and Cheesman, E. F. The Air Defence of Great Britain 1914–1918. London: Putnam, 1984. . p. 449
  95. Robinson (1994), pp. 340–341.
  96. Higham (1961), p. 111.
  97. Mowthorpe, Ces, Battlebags, Stroud, Gloucs, Allan Sutton Publishing, 1995, p. xxiii.
  98. Patrick Abbott and Nick Walmsley, British Airships in Pictures: An Illustrated History, House of Lochar 1998, (pp. 59–69)
  99. Ventry & Koesnik (1982), p. 97.
  100. Higham (1961), p. 138.
  101. Higham (1961), p. 176.
  102. Navy's First Dirigible Meets Disaster. 819. Popular Mechanics. June 1916. 25. 6. 4 October 2016. Google Books.
  103. Higham 1961, pp. 222–223.
  104. Swanborough, G. and Bowyers, P. M. United States Navy Aircraft Since 1912. London: Putnam, 1976 (2nd ed.), p. 586
  105. Web site: USS Shenandoah (ZR-1), Airship 1923–1925 -Construction and Christening, 1922–1923 . https://web.archive.org/web/20021206160908/http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/ac-usn22/z-types/zr1-v.htm . dead. December 6, 2002 . Naval Historical Center . December 28, 2011 .
  106. Althoff, William F., USS Los Angeles, Washington DC, Brassey's, 2004, p. 48,
  107. Countryman, Barry, R100 in Canada, Erin, Ontario, Boston Mills, 1982,
  108. Botting, Douglas, Dr. Eckener's Dream Machine. New York: Henry Hold, 2001.
  109. Smith (1965), pp. 171–174.
  110. Smith (1965), pp. 157–161.
  111. 2010. Intercity Dirigible Service. The Engines of Our Ingenuity. Lienhard. John H.. 2571.
  112. Botting, Douglas, Dr. Eckener's Dream Machine. New York, Henry Hold, 2001, p. 235,
  113. Dick, Harold G., with Robinson, Douglas H., Graf Zeppelin & Hindenburg, Washington DC, Smithsonian Institution Press, 1985, p. 83,
  114. Theodore Richard, Reconsidering the Letter of Marque: Utilizing Private Security Providers Against Piracy (April 1, 2010). Public Contract Law Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 411–464 at 429 n. 121, Spring 2010. Available at SSRN
  115. Book: Vaeth, J. Gordon . Blimps & U-Boats . Annapolis, Maryland . U.S. Naval Institute Press . 1992 . 1-55750-876-3.
  116. https://web.archive.org/web/20010612154236/http://www.history.navy.mil/download/lta-08.pdf U.S. Navy LTA history
  117. http://uboat.net/boats/u134.htm U-134 history
  118. Kaiser . Don . 2011 . K-Ships Across the Atlantic . dead . Naval Aviation News . 93 . 2 . 20–23 . https://web.archive.org/web/20150217071129/http://naval-airships.org/resources/documents/NAN_vol93_no2_KShips_feature.pdf . 2015-02-17 . 2013-06-19.
  119. http://www.historynet.com/atomic-airships.htm Atomic Airships
  120. The Zeppelin in the Atomic Age: The Past, Present, and Future of the Rigid Lighter-Than-Air Aircraft, Kirschner, Edwin J. Published by University of Illinois Press (1957)
  121. Jurich . Leo. The Nuclear Powered Airship. 1 January 1960. SAE Mobilus. SAE Technical Paper Series. 1. SAE International. 10.4271/600278.
  122. Web site: IMDb . .
  123. http://www.lindstrandtech.com/thermal_airships.html Thermal Airships
  124. News: Reuters . Navy Awards Blimp Order . . 6 June 1987 . 6 November 2007 . https://web.archive.org/web/20071215035457/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DEFDC1E30F935A35755C0A961948260. 15 December 2007 . live.
  125. Book: Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1992–93 . Janes Information Group . 1992 . 0710609876 . Lambert . Mark.
  126. Web site: 2000 . Model CA-80 Non-rigid Airship . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20160303183256/http://www.vantageship.com/en_ca80data.htm . 2016-03-03 . Shanghai Vantage Airship Manufacture Co., Ltd..
  127. Web site: Aerial Advertising & Airplane Banner Towing . www.airsign.com.
  128. Web site: Worldwide Aeros Corp .
  129. Web site: CA-150 型软式载人飞艇 . CA-150 Non-rigid Manned Airship . Shanghai Vantage Airship Manufacture Co., Ltd..
  130. Web site: Protesters Launch a 135-Foot Blimp Over the NSA's Utah Data Center . slashdot.org. 27 June 2014 . 4 October 2016.
  131. Protestors Launch a 135-Foot Blimp Over the NSA's Utah Data Center. Andy. Greenberg. wired.com. 4 October 2016.
  132. http://www.darpa.mil/news/2005/walrus.pdf "Contractors for Walrus Program announced"
  133. http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2005/10/us-cbo-gives-ok-to-hula-airships-for-airlift/index.php "US CBO Gives OK to HULA Airships for Airlift"
  134. http://www.economist.com/node/21009008?fsrc=scn/fb/wl/ar/hybridair "The Difference Engine: Not all hot air"
  135. http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=194252 "Photo Release – Northrop Grumman Awarded $517 Million Agreement for US Army Airship With Unblinking Eye"
  136. Web site: 250-Foot Long Hybrid Airship Will Spy Over Afghanistan Battlefields in 2011 . Gizmodo . 2009-09-23 . 2010-07-29 . https://web.archive.org/web/20101111232347/http://gizmodo.com/5366082/250+foot-long-hybrid-airship-will-spy-over-afghanistan-battlefields-in-2011 . 2010-11-11 . dead.
  137. Web site: InsideDefense.com – February 13, 2013: Army Deflates LEMV Airship; Cost And Schedule Cited. https://web.archive.org/web/20130320111016/http://insidedefense.com/201302132424647/Inside-Defense-General/Public-Articles/army-deflates-lemv-airship-cost-and-schedule-cited/menu-id-926.html. dead. March 20, 2013.
  138. Web site: Massive new Airship to enter commercial service at British dirigible base. The Register.
  139. News: Longest aircraft in crash repair tests. BBC News. 4 February 2017.
  140. Web site: Vers un retour du dirigeable pour les missions de surveillance maritime? . fr . Mer et Marine . 2011-10-17 . 2012-11-15.
  141. Web site: HALE-D Short B-Roll . https://web.archive.org/web/20110804113932/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2mYxoPGghA&gl=US&hl=en&has_verified=1. 2011-08-04 . dead. YouTube . 2011-07-27 . 2012-11-15.
  142. Web site: Lockheed Martin's HALE-D airship learns to fly, makes a crash landing . 28 July 2011 . Engadget . 2012-11-15.
  143. Web site: Lockheed Martin blimp goes down . https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211031/P42voAU3rtM. 2021-10-31 . live. WEWS NewsChannel5 . 2011-07-27 . 2012-11-15.
  144. Web site: Lockheed Martin High Altitude Airship's Maiden Voyage Aborted . The Lighter Than Air Society . 2014-04-06.
  145. News: In Afghanistan, Spy Balloons Now Part of Landscape. Bowley. Graham. 2012-05-12. The New York Times. 2019-12-09. en-US. 0362-4331.
  146. http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/design_approvals/uas/reg/media/frnotice_uas.pdf FAA Docket FAA-2006-25714
  147. Web site: Pedal-power Channel pioneer is beaten by a breeze . . 28 September 2008.
  148. News: Stephane Rousson fails in attempt at first channel crossing by pedal powered airship. Smyth. Chris.
  149. Web site: French cyclist to attempt channel crossing on pedal-powered airship . May 2008.
  150. Web site: Stéphane Rousson: Aerosail: motorless zeppelin *photos* . Redbull.com . 2 August 2016. 2022-02-28.
  151. Web site: Stéphane Rousson, ce " merveilleux fou volant dans ses drôles de machines " entre ciel et mer.
  152. Web site: Le Niçois Stéphane Rousson prêt à faire décoller l'aerosail de Monaco . 27 March 2015.
  153. http://www.dynalifter.com/Dynaliftercom/RoadlessTrucking.htm "Roadless trucking"
  154. http://www.deagel.com/news/Boeing-and-SkyHook-International-to-Build-JHL-40-Heavy-Lift-Rotorcraft_n000004518.aspx "Boeing and SkyHook International to Build JHL-40 Heavy-Lift Rotorcraft"
  155. News: Helium Dreams . Laskas . Jeanne Marie . 2016-02-29 . The New Yorker . 0028-792X . 2016-03-08 .
  156. Web site: Aeroscraft.com . 24 July 2010.
  157. Vollrath, Jurgen. http://us8.campaign-archive2.com/?u=75a62b9c3c8ad40b366660cc6&id=34305657e6&e=537312e165 From the Hindenburg airship to the Goodyear Blimp – and now Hybrid Aircraft. Exponential Technology Counsel, Episode 39, 2016
  158. Blake, Bruce. http://www.patrollerairships.com/technical-information/ Patroller 3 hybrid aircraft. Onboard System specifications. AHA Ltd web-publication. January, 2017
  159. Web site: Airship to Orbit.
  160. Web site: HAVOC. 14 June 2022.
  161. Web site: A way to explore Venus. https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211031/0az7DEwG68A. 2021-10-31 . live. YouTube. 10 October 2014.
  162. Web site: NASA concept would send astronauts to Venus. 20 December 2014.
  163. News: NASA's floating 'habitat' above Venus?. CNN.
  164. Web site: The Age of the Airship May Be Dawning Again. Justin. Ling. 12 January 2024 .
  165. Web site: Multibody Advanced Airship for Transport | MAAT | Project | Fact sheet | FP7 | CORDIS | European Commission.
  166. Dumas A, Trancossi M, Madonia M, Giuliani I. Multibody advanced airship for transport. SAE Technical Paper; 2011 Oct 18. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michele_Trancossi/publication/257333742_Multibody_Advanced_Airship_for_Transport/links/55d44d6708ae7fb244f5b3ac/Multibody-Advanced-Airship-for-Transport.pdf
  167. Trancossi M, Dumas A, Cimarelli A, Pascoa J. MAAT cruiser/feeder airship design: Intrinsic stability and energetic flight model. In ASME IMECE 2015 Nov 13 (Vol. 57342, p. V001T01A011). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michele_Trancossi/publication/311131309_MAAT_CruiserFeeder_Airship_Design_Intrinsic_Stability_and_Energetic_Flight_Model/links/583ea40408ae8e63e617b3f9/MAAT-Cruiser-Feeder-Airship-Design-Intrinsic-Stability-and-Energetic-Flight-Model.pdf
  168. Web site: Harris . Mark . 25 October 2023 . EXCLUSIVE: Google Founder's Airship Gets FAA Clearance Sergey Brin's Pathfinder 1 can now take to the skies . 26 October 2023 . IEEE Spectrum.
  169. Ausrotas, R. A., "Basic Relationships for LTA Technical Analysis", MIT Flight Transportation Library, 1975
  170. Layton, D. M., Basic Aerostatics – A Tutorial, 1985
  171. Robinson (1994), p. 294.
  172. "Honors to Dr. Hugo Eckener: The First Airship Flight Around the World", National Geographic, Vol. LVII, No. 6, June 1930, p. 679.
  173. [#Brooks1992|Brooks 1992]
  174. Robinson (1994), p. 373.
  175. Stwertka, Albert, Guide to the Elements: Revised Edition. New York; Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 24.
  176. Trancossi M, Pascoa J, Cannistraro G. "Safety Analysis of an Airship Which Loses Lifting Gas from the Hull". SAE Technical Paper; 2018 October 30.
  177. http://www.worldskycat.com/images/SkyCat.pdf High Safety Level (p. 5) and Structural Vulnerability Tests (p. 7)
  178. Web site: PPL (As) requirements . CAA.co.uk . United Kingdom Civil Aviation Authority . 14 May 2023.