Direct comparison test explained
In mathematics, the comparison test, sometimes called the direct comparison test to distinguish it from similar related tests (especially the limit comparison test), provides a way of deducing whether an infinite series or an improper integral converges or diverges by comparing the series or integral to one whose convergence properties are known.
For series
In calculus, the comparison test for series typically consists of a pair of statements about infinite series with non-negative (real-valued) terms:[1]
converges and
for all sufficiently large
n (that is, for all
for some fixed value
N), then the infinite series
also converges.
diverges and
for all sufficiently large
n, then the infinite series
also diverges.Note that the series having larger terms is sometimes said to
dominate (or
eventually dominate) the series with smaller terms.
[2] Alternatively, the test may be stated in terms of absolute convergence, in which case it also applies to series with complex terms:[3]
is absolutely convergent and
for all sufficiently large
n, then the infinite series
is also absolutely convergent.
is not absolutely convergent and
for all sufficiently large
n, then the infinite series
is also not absolutely convergent.Note that in this last statement, the series
could still be
conditionally convergent; for real-valued series, this could happen if the
an are not all nonnegative.
The second pair of statements are equivalent to the first in the case of real-valued series because
converges absolutely if and only if
, a series with nonnegative terms, converges.
Proof
The proofs of all the statements given above are similar. Here is a proof of the third statement.
Let
and
be infinite series such that
converges absolutely (thus
converges), and
without loss of generality assume that
for all positive integers
n. Consider the partial sums
Sn=|a1|+|a2|+\ldots+|an|, Tn=|b1|+|b2|+\ldots+|bn|.
Since
converges absolutely,
for some real number
T. For all
n,
0\leSn=|a1|+|a2|+\ldots+|an|\le|a1|+\ldots+|an|+|bn+1|+\ldots=Sn+(T-Tn)\leT.
is a nondecreasing sequence and
is nonincreasing.Given
then both
belong to the interval
, whose length
decreases to zero as
goes to infinity.This shows that
is a
Cauchy sequence, and so must converge to a limit. Therefore,
is absolutely convergent.
For integrals
The comparison test for integrals may be stated as follows, assuming continuous real-valued functions f and g on
with
b either
or a real number at which
f and
g each have a vertical asymptote:
[4]
converges and
for
, then the improper integral
also converges with
diverges and
for
, then the improper integral
also diverges.
Ratio comparison test
Another test for convergence of real-valued series, similar to both the direct comparison test above and the ratio test, is called the ratio comparison test:[5]
converges and
,
, and
for all sufficiently large
n, then the infinite series
also converges.
diverges and
,
, and
for all sufficiently large
n, then the infinite series
also diverges.
See also
Notes
- Ayres & Mendelson (1999), p. 401.
- Munem & Foulis (1984), p. 662.
- Silverman (1975), p. 119.
- Buck (1965), p. 140.
- Buck (1965), p. 161.
References
- Book: Ayres. Frank Jr.. Mendelson. Elliott. Elliott Mendelson. Schaum's Outline of Calculus. 4th. McGraw-Hill. New York. 1999. 0-07-041973-6.
- Book: Buck, R. Creighton. Robert Creighton Buck. Advanced Calculus. 2nd. 1965. McGraw-Hill. New York.
- Book: Knopp, Konrad. Konrad Knopp. Infinite Sequences and Series. Dover Publications. New York. 1956. § 3.1. 0-486-60153-6.
- Book: Munem. M. A.. Foulis. D. J.. Calculus with Analytic Geometry. 2nd. 1984. Worth Publishers. 0-87901-236-6.
- Book: Silverman. Herb. Complex Variables. 1975. Houghton Mifflin Company. 0-395-18582-3.
- Book: Whittaker. E. T.. E. T. Whittaker. Watson. G. N.. G. N. Watson. A Course in Modern Analysis. 4th. Cambridge University Press. 1963. § 2.34. 0-521-58807-3.