Derrick's theorem explained
Derrick's theorem is an argument by physicist G. H. Derrickwhich shows that stationary localized solutions to a nonlinear wave equationor nonlinear Klein - Gordon equationin spatial dimensions three and higher are unstable.
Original argument
Derrick's paper,[1] which was considered an obstacle tointerpreting soliton-like solutions as particles,contained the following physical argumentabout non-existence of stable localized stationary solutionsto the nonlinear wave equation
\nabla2\theta-
| \partial2\theta | = |
\partialt2 |
f'(\theta),
\theta(x,t)\in\R, x\in\R3,
now known under the name of Derrick's Theorem. (Above,
is a differentiable function with
.)
The energy of the time-independent solution
is given by
E=\int\left[(\nabla\theta)2+f(\theta)\right]d3x.
A necessary condition for the solution to be stable is
. Suppose
is a localized solution of
. Define
where
is an arbitrary constant, and write
,
. Then
Eλ
=\int\left[(\nabla\theta
d3x
=I1/λ
Whence
dEλ/dλ\vertλ=1=-I1-3I2=0.
and since
,
\right|λ=1=2I1+12I2=-2I1<0.
That is,
for a variation corresponding toa uniform stretching of the
particle.Hence the solution
is unstable.
Derrick's argument works for
,
.
Pokhozhaev's identity
More generally,[2] let
be continuous, with
.Denote
.Let
u\in
(\Rn),
\nablau\inL2(\Rn),
G(u( ⋅ ))\inL1(\Rn),
n\in\N,
be a solution to the equation
,
in the sense of distributions. Then
satisfies the relation
known as
Pokhozhaev's identity (sometimes spelled as
Pohozaev's identity).
[3] This result is similar to the
virial theorem.
Interpretation in the Hamiltonian form
We may write the equation
in the
Hamiltonian form
,
\partialtv=-\deltauH(u,v)
,where
are functions of
,the Hamilton function is given by
and
,
are thevariational derivatives of
.
Then the stationary solution
has the energy
H(\theta,0)=\int | | \left( |
| \Rn | |
f(\theta)
\right)dnx
and satisfies the equation
0=\partialt\theta(x)=-\partialuH(\theta,0)=
E'(\theta),
with
denoting a variational derivativeof the
functional
[\vert\nabla\theta\vert2+f(\theta)]dnx
.Although the solution
is a critical point of
(since
),Derrick's argument shows that
at
,hence
is not a point of the local minimum of the energy functional
.Therefore, physically, the solution
is expected to be unstable.A related result, showing non-minimization of the energy of localized stationary states(with the argument also written for
, although the derivation being valid in dimensions
) was obtained by R. H. Hobart in 1963.
[4] Relation to linear instability
A stronger statement, linear (or exponential) instability of localized stationary solutionsto the nonlinear wave equation (in any spatial dimension) is provedby P. Karageorgis and W. A. Strauss in 2007.[5]
Stability of localized time-periodic solutions
| -i\omegat |
u(x,t)=\phi | |
| \omega(x)e |
with frequency
may be
orbitally stable if the Vakhitov - Kolokolov stability criterion is satisfied.
See also
References
- G. H. Derrick. Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models for elementary particles. J. Math. Phys.. 5. 9. 1252 - 1254. 1964. 10.1063/1.1704233. 1964JMP.....5.1252D . free.
- Berestycki, H. and Lions, P.-L.. Nonlinear scalar field equations, I. Existence of a ground state. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.. 82. 4. 1983. 313 - 345. 10.1007/BF00250555. 1983ArRMA..82..313B. 123081616.
- Pokhozhaev, S. I.. On the eigenfunctions of the equation
. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 165. 36 - 39. 1965.
- R. H. Hobart. On the instability of a class of unitary field models. Proc. Phys. Soc.. 82. 2. 201 - 203. 1963. 10.1088/0370-1328/82/2/306. 1963PPS....82..201H.
- P. Karageorgis and W. A. Strauss. Instability of steady states for nonlinear wave and heat equations. J. Differential Equations. 241. 184 - 205. 2007. 1. 10.1016/j.jde.2007.06.006 . math/0611559. 2007JDE...241..184K. 18889076.
- Вахитов, Н. Г. and Колоколов, А. А.. Стационарные решения волнового уравнения в среде с насыщением нелинейности. Известия высших учебных заведений. Радиофизика. 16. 1973. 1020 - 1028 . N. G. Vakhitov and A. A. Kolokolov. Stationary solutions of the wave equation in the medium with nonlinearity saturation. Radiophys. Quantum Electron.. 16. 7. 1973. 783 - 789. 10.1007/BF01031343. 1973R&QE...16..783V . 123386885.