| DRACO | |||||||||||||||||
| Function: | Reusable orbital launcher | ||||||||||||||||
| Manufacturer: | Lockheed Martin | ||||||||||||||||
| Country-Origin: | United States | ||||||||||||||||
| Pcost: | $499 million (Phases 2 and 3)[1] | ||||||||||||||||
| Stagedata: |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Status: | In development | ||||||||||||||||
| First: | 2027 (planned) on a Vulcan Centaur | ||||||||||||||||
| Upright: | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
The Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) is an under-development launch vehicle by Lockheed Martin in partnership with BWX Technologies as part of a DARPA program to be demonstrated in space in 2027. The experimental vehicle is planned to be reusable and will utilize next-generation nuclear thermal propulsion technology and low-enriched uranium,[2] [3] [4] with the U.S. Space Force to provide the launch.[5] In 2023, NASA joined the DARPA program in developing the nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) to carry astronaut crews to deep-space destinations like Mars.[6] DRACO will be the world's first in-orbit demonstration of a NTR engine.[7] It will reportedly be launched aboard a Vulcan Centaur as a payload.[8]
Tabitha Dodson, DARPA program manager for DRACO says, "Unlike today's chemical systems, which have reached a limit in how far they can evolve, nuclear technologies are theorized to evolve to systems such as fusion and beyond. Spacecraft evolved to be maneuvered and powered by nuclear reactors will enable humanity to go farther, with a higher chance of survival and success for any mission type."[9]
According to Lockheed Martin, there are considerable efficiency and time gains from the nuclear thermal propulsion.[10] NASA believes the much higher efficiency will be two to three times more than chemical propulsion, and the nuclear thermal rocket is to cut the journey time to Mars in half.[11]
In May 1946, the U.S. Air Force launched the Nuclear Energy for Propulsion of Aircraft (NEPA) project to explore the potential of nuclear energy for powering aircraft.[12] [13] This initiative led to a collaborative effort of the Air Force and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) known as the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program, aimed at developing nuclear propulsion systems for aerospace vehicles. The ANP Program was canceled in March 1961 after investing $1 billion.
Using nuclear energy for space travel reportedly has also been discussed since the 1950s among industry experts. Freeman Dyson and Ted Taylor, through their involvement in Project Orion, aimed to create an early demonstration of the technology. Ultimately, the project received backing from Wernher von Braun, and reached the test flight stage of development, but the project ended early due to environmental concerns.[14]
In 1955, the Air Force partnered with AEC to develop reactors for nuclear rockets under Project Rover.[15] In mid-1958, NASA replaced the Air Force and built Kiwi reactors to test nuclear rocket principles in a non-flying nuclear engine. With the next phase's Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application (NERVA), NASA and AEC sought to develop a nuclear thermal rocket for "both long-range missions to Mars and as a possible upper-stage for the Apollo Program."[16] Due to funding issues, NERVA ended in 1973 without a flight test.
In 2020, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, at the request of NASA, convened an ad hoc Space Nuclear Propulsion Technologies Committee to identify primary technical and programmatic challenges and risks for the development of space nuclear propulsion technologies for use in future exploration of the solar system. With regard to nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) systems, the committee identified the following technological challenges:[17]
The committee also emphasized the lack of adequate ground-based test facilities, noting that "There are currently no facilities in the United States that could conduct a full-power ground test of a full-scale NTP reactor comparable to the Rover/NERVA experiments."[17] Nevertheless, the committee's report concluded "An aggressive program could develop an NTP system capable of executing the baseline mission [a crewed mission to Mars during [[opposition (astronomy)|opposition]]] in 2039."[17]
In April 2021, DARPA announced the start of DRACO by awarding 18-month Phase 1 contracts to General Atomics for the nuclear reactor concept design ($22 million), and to Blue Origin ($2.5 million) and Lockheed Martin ($2.9 million) for their competing operation system and demonstration system concept designs.[18] [19]
In January 2023, NASA and DARPA announced their collaboration on DRACO, dividing the $499 million program between them for Phases 2 and 3. NASA is to be responsible for the propulsion system and nuclear reactor, and DARPA is to lead the vehicle and integration requirements, mission concept of operations, nuclear regulatory approvals and launch authority. The U.S. Space Force plans to launch DRACO on either a SpaceX Falcon 9 or a United Launch Alliance Vulcan Centaur.
On July 26, 2023, DARPA and NASA announced the awarding of a contract to Lockheed Martin and BWX Advanced Technologies (BWXT) for DRACO Phases 2 and 3 to design, build and demonstrate the experimental NTR for the 2027 launch.[20] [21] BWXT is slated to design and build the reactor, manufacture the fuel and deliver the complete subsystem for integration into the DRACO vehicle.[22]
The main design features of DRACO include the following:[23]
According to a 2019 presidential memorandum,[25] approval for the launch of a spacecraft using uranium having enrichment below 20% (a so-called “Tier 2” vehicle) is required only by the head of the sponsoring agency (in this case, the Secretary of Defense) rather than the White House.[26]
Phase 2 of the DRACO program will involve a test of the NTR engine without nuclear fuel, while Phase 3 will include assembly of the fueled NTR with the stage, environmental testing, and space launch to conduct experiments on the NTR and its reactor.[29] The U.S. Department of Energy will provide HALEU metal to BWX Technologies for processing into low-enriched fuel.[30] The amount of HALEU utilized for the vehicle has sparked some safety concerns among industry experts and the science community.[31]
In Phase 2, the engine will be evaluated in a cold-flow test with a nonnuclear engine mock-up to assess the mechanical integrity of the core. Such tests were conducted during the Rover/NERVA program in order to study ways to prevent the core from being destroyed from the pressure and high mass flow rates due to the engine’s turbomachinery.[32]
Phase 3 will address launch and space environments testing, assembly integration and testing of the host platform, loads testing, and learning how to interface and command the engine before it is sent to space. During the Phase 3 demonstration, the spacecraft will be launched into a high orbit around Earth, between 435 and 1,240 miles (700 to 2,000 kilometers) above the surface. Once in space, DRACO's reactor is not planned to be activated until it is established in a safe orbit. The minimum orbital altitude is determined by the estimated time it would take for the fission products to decay to the radioactivity level present at launch. In the case of the DRACO reactor, that is about 300 years, which requires an orbit above about 700 km if the orbital decay time is to exceed that value.
According to a timeline in NASA's FY 2025 Budget Estimate document presented to Congress, the project aims to begin the implementation phase in September 2024.[33]