Debye length explained

In plasmas and electrolytes, the Debye length

λ _{\rm} (Debye radius or Debye–Hückel screening length), is a measure of a charge carrier's net electrostatic effect in a solution and how far its electrostatic effect persists.^[1] With each Debye length the charges are increasingly electrically screened and the electric potential decreases in magnitude by 1/e. A Debye sphere is a volume whose radius is the Debye length. Debye length is an important parameter in plasma physics, electrolytes, and colloids (DLVO theory). The corresponding Debye screening wave vector k _{\rm} =1 / λ _{\rm} for particles of density n , charge q at a temperature T is given by k ^{2=4 \pi} _{\rm D} n q ^{2 /(k} _{\rm B} T) in Gaussian units. Expressions in MKS units will be given below. The analogous quantities at very low temperatures (T \to 0 ) are known as the Thomas–Fermi length and the Thomas–Fermi wave vector. They are of interest in describing the behaviour of electrons in metals at room temperature.

The Debye length is named after the Dutch-American physicist and chemist Peter Debye (1884–1966), a Nobel laureate in Chemistry.

Physical origin

The Debye length arises naturally in the thermodynamic description of large systems of mobile charges. In a system of

N different species of charges, the j -th species carries charge q _{j} and has concentration n _{j(r)} at position r . According to the so-called "primitive model", these charges are distributed in a continuous medium that is characterized only by its relative static permittivity, \varepsilon _{r} .This distribution of charges within this medium gives rise to an electric potential \Phi( r ) that satisfies Poisson's equation:$$\backslash varepsilon\; \backslash nabla^2\; \backslash Phi(\backslash mathbf)\; =\; -\backslash ,\; \backslash sum\_^N\; q\_j\; \backslash ,\; n\_j(\backslash mathbf)\; -\; \backslash rho\_(\backslash mathbf),$$where \varepsilon \equiv \varepsilon _{r} \varepsilon _{0} , \varepsilon _{0} is the electric constant, and \rho _{\rm} is a charge density external (logically, not spatially) to the medium.

The mobile charges not only contribute in establishing

\Phi( r ) but also move in response to the associated Coulomb force, - q _{j} \nabla \Phi( r ) .If we further assume the system to be in thermodynamic equilibrium with a heat bath at absolute temperature T , then the concentrations of discrete charges, n _{j(r)} , may be considered to be thermodynamic (ensemble) averages and the associated electric potential to be a thermodynamic mean field.With these assumptions, the concentration of the j -th charge species is described by the Boltzmann distribution,$$n\_j(\backslash mathbf)\; =\; n\_j^0\; \backslash ,\; \backslash exp\backslash left(-\; \backslash frac\; \backslash right),$$where k _{\rm} is the Boltzmann constant and where n ^{0} _{j} is the meanconcentration of charges of species j .

Identifying the instantaneous concentrations and potential in the Poisson equation with their mean-field counterparts in the Boltzmann distribution yields the Poisson–Boltzmann equation:$$\backslash varepsilon\; \backslash nabla^2\; \backslash Phi(\backslash mathbf)\; =\; -\backslash ,\; \backslash sum\_^N\; q\_j\; n\_j^0\; \backslash ,\; \backslash exp\backslash left(-\; \backslash frac\; \backslash right)\; -\; \backslash rho\_(\backslash mathbf)\; .$$

Solutions to this nonlinear equation are known for some simple systems. Solutions for more general systems may be obtained in the high-temperature (weak coupling) limit,

q _{j} \Phi( r ) \ll k _{\rm} T , by Taylor expanding the exponential:$$\backslash exp\backslash left(-\; \backslash frac\; \backslash right)\; \backslash approx1\; -\; \backslash frac.$$

This approximation yields the linearized Poisson–Boltzmann equation$$\backslash varepsilon\; \backslash nabla^2\; \backslash Phi(\backslash mathbf)\; =\backslash left(\backslash sum\_^N\; \backslash frac\; \backslash right)\backslash ,\; \backslash Phi(\backslash mathbf)\; -\backslash ,\; \backslash sum\_^N\; n\_j^0\; q\_j\; -\; \backslash rho\_(\backslash mathbf)$$which also is known as the Debye–Hückel equation:^{[2] [3] [4] [5] [6]} The second term on the right-hand side vanishes for systems that are electrically neutral. The term in parentheses divided by

\varepsilon , has the units of an inverse length squared and bydimensional analysis leads to the definition of the characteristic length scale$$\backslash lambda\_\; =\backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right)^$$that commonly is referred to as the Debye–Hückel length. As the only characteristic length scale in the Debye–Hückel equation, λ _{D} sets the scale for variations in the potential and in the concentrations of charged species. All charged species contribute to the Debye–Hückel length in the same way, regardless of the sign of their charges. For an electrically neutral system, the Poisson equation becomes$$\backslash nabla^2\; \backslash Phi(\backslash mathbf)\; =\backslash lambda\_^\; \backslash Phi(\backslash mathbf)\; -\; \backslash frac$$To illustrate Debye screening, the potential produced by an external point charge \rho _{\rm} = Q\delta( r ) is$$\backslash Phi(\backslash mathbf)\; =\; \backslash frac\; e^$$The bare Coulomb potential is exponentially screened by the medium, over a distance of the Debye length: this is called Debye screening or shielding (Screening effect). λ _{\rm} as$$\backslash lambda\_\; =\backslash left(4\; \backslash pi\; \backslash ,\; \backslash lambda\_\; \backslash ,\; \backslash sum\_^N\; n\_j^0\; \backslash ,\; z\_j^2\backslash right)^,$$where z _{j} = q _{j/e} is the integer charge number that relates the charge on the j -th ionicspecies to the elementary charge e .

In a plasma

For a weakly collisional plasma, Debye shielding can be introduced in a very intuitive way by taking into account the granular character of such a plasma. Let us imagine a sphere about one of its electrons, and compare the number of electrons crossing this sphere with and without Coulomb repulsion. With repulsion, this number is smaller. Therefore, according to Gauss theorem, the apparent charge of the first electron is smaller than in the absence of repulsion. The larger the sphere radius, the larger is the number of deflected electrons, and the smaller the apparent charge: this is Debye shielding. Since the global deflection of particles includes the contributions of many other ones, the density of the electrons does not change, at variance with the shielding at work next to a Langmuir probe (Debye sheath). Ions bring a similar contribution to shielding, because of the attractive Coulombian deflection of charges with opposite signs.

This intuitive picture leads to an effective calculation of Debye shielding (see section II.A.2 of ^[7]). The assumption of a Boltzmann distribution is not necessary in this calculation: it works for whatever particle distribution function. The calculation also avoids approximating weakly collisional plasmas as continuous media. An N-body calculation reveals that the bare Coulomb acceleration of a particle by another one is modified by a contribution mediated by all other particles, a signature of Debye shielding (see section 8 of ^[8]). When starting from random particle positions, the typical time-scale for shielding to set in is the time for a thermal particle to cross a Debye length, i.e. the inverse of the plasma frequency. Therefore in a weakly collisional plasma, collisions play an essential role by bringing a cooperative self-organization process: Debye shielding. This shielding is important to get a finite diffusion coefficient in the calculation of Coulomb scattering (Coulomb collision).

In a non-isothermic plasma, the temperatures for electrons and heavy species may differ while the background medium may be treated as the vacuum and the Debye length is$$\backslash lambda\_\; =\; \backslash sqrt$$where

• λ_D is the Debye length,
• ε₀ is the permittivity of free space,
• k_B is the Boltzmann constant,
• q_e is the charge of an electron,
• T_e and T_i are the temperatures of the electrons and ions, respectively,
• n_e is the density of electrons,
• n_j is the density of atomic species j, with positive ionic charge z_jq_e

Even in quasineutral cold plasma, where ion contribution virtually seems to be larger due to lower ion temperature, the ion term is actually often dropped, giving$$\backslash lambda\_\; =\; \backslash sqrt$$although this is only valid when the mobility of ions is negligible compared to the process's timescale.^[9]

Typical values

In space plasmas where the electron density is relatively low, the Debye length may reach macroscopic values, such as in the magnetosphere, solar wind, interstellar medium and intergalactic medium. See the table here below:^[10]

Plasma	Density	Electron temperature	Magnetic field	Debye length
Solar core	10^32	10^7		10^−11
Tokamak	10^20	10^8	10	10^−4
Gas discharge	10^16	10^4		10^−4
Ionosphere	10^12	10^3	10^−5	10^−3
Magnetosphere	10^7	10^7	10^−8	10^2
Solar wind	10^6	10^5	10^−9	10
Interstellar medium	10^5	10^4	10^−10	10
Intergalactic medium	1	10^6		10^5
+ align="bottom" style="style="caption-side: bottom"

In an electrolyte solution

In an electrolyte or a colloidal suspension, the Debye length^{[11] [12] [13]} for a monovalent electrolyte is usually denoted with symbol κ⁻¹$$\backslash kappa^\; =\; \backslash sqrt$$

where

• I is the ionic strength of the electrolyte in number/m³ units,
• ε₀ is the permittivity of free space,
• ε_r is the dielectric constant,
• k_B is the Boltzmann constant,
• T is the absolute temperature in kelvins,

e is the elementary charge,

or, for a symmetric monovalent electrolyte,$$\backslash kappa^\; =\; \backslash sqrt$$where

• R is the gas constant,
• F is the Faraday constant,
• C₀ is the electrolyte concentration in molar units (M or mol/L).

Alternatively,$$\backslash kappa^\; =\; \backslash frac$$where

λ _{\rm} is the Bjerrum length of the medium in nm,and the factor 10 ^{-24} derives from transforming unit volume from cubic dm to cubic nm.

For deionized water at room temperature, at pH=7, λ_B ≈ 1μm.

At room temperature (20°C), one can consider in water the relation:^[14] $$\backslash kappa^(\backslash mathrm)\; =\; \backslash frac$$where

• κ⁻¹ is expressed in nanometres (nm)
• I is the ionic strength expressed in molar (M or mol/L)

There is a method of estimating an approximate value of the Debye length in liquids using conductivity, which is described in ISO Standard,^[11] and the book.

In semiconductors

The Debye length has become increasingly significant in the modeling of solid state devices as improvements in lithographic technologies have enabled smaller geometries.^{[15] [16] [17]}

The Debye length of semiconductors is given:$$L\_\; =\; \backslash sqrt$$where

• ε is the dielectric constant,
• k_B is the Boltzmann constant,
• T is the absolute temperature in kelvins,
• q is the elementary charge, and
• N_dop is the net density of dopants (either donors or acceptors).

When doping profiles exceed the Debye length, majority carriers no longer behave according to the distribution of the dopants. Instead, a measure of the profile of the doping gradients provides an "effective" profile that better matches the profile of the majority carrier density.

In the context of solids, Thomas–Fermi screening length may be required instead of Debye length.

See also

• Bjerrum length
• Debye–Falkenhagen effect
• Plasma oscillation
• Shielding effect
• Screening effect

Further reading

• Book: Goldston & Rutherford . Introduction to Plasma Physics . . Philadelphia . 1997 .
• Book: Lyklema . Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science . . NY . 1993 .

Notes and References

1. Zur Theorie der Elektrolyte. I. Gefrierpunktserniedrigung und verwandte Erscheinungen . Debye . P. . Hückel . E. . 1923 . The theory of electrolytes. I. Freezing point depression and related phenomenon . . 24 . 9 . 185–206 . Michael J. . Braus . 2019 .
2. Book: Kirby, B. J. . Micro- and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices . New York . Cambridge University Press . 2010 . 978-0-521-11903-0 .
3. Book: Li, D. . Electrokinetics in Microfluidics . Academic Press . 0-12-088444-5 . 2004 .
4. Book: Electrodynamics of particles and plasmas . PC Clemmow & JP Dougherty . 978-0-201-47986-7 . 1969 . . Redwood City CA . § 7.6.7, p. 236 ff .
5. Book: Electrolyte solutions . 76 . RA Robinson &RH Stokes. 978-0-486-42225-1 . . Mineola, NY . 2002.
6. See Brydges. David C.. Martin. Ph. A.. Journal of Statistical Physics. 96. 5/6. 1999. 1163–1330. 10.1023/A:1004600603161. Coulomb Systems at Low Density: A Review. cond-mat/9904122 . 1999JSP....96.1163B . 54979869.
7. Meyer-Vernet N (1993) Aspects of Debye shielding. American journal of physics 61, 249-257
8. Escande, D. F., Bénisti, D., Elskens, Y., Zarzoso, D., & Doveil, F. (2018). Basic microscopic plasma physics from N-body mechanics, A tribute to Pierre-Simon de Laplace, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics, 2, 1-68
9. I. H. Hutchinson Principles of plasma diagnostics
10. Book: Chapter 20: The Particle Kinetics of Plasma . Applications of Classical Physics . Kip Thorne . 2012 . http://www.pmaweb.caltech.edu/Courses/ph136/yr2012/1220.1.K.pdf . September 7, 2017.
11. International Standard ISO 13099-1, 2012, "Colloidal systems – Methods for Zeta potential determination- Part 1: Electroacoustic and Electrokinetic phenomena"
12. Book: Dukhin . A. S. . Goetz . P. J. . Characterization of liquids, nano- and micro- particulates and porous bodies using Ultrasound . Elsevier . 2017 . 978-0-444-63908-0 .
13. Book: Russel . W. B. . Saville . D. A. . Schowalter . W. R. . Colloidal Dispersions . Cambridge University Press . 1989 . 0-521-42600-6 .
14. Book: Israelachvili, J. . Intermolecular and Surface Forces . Academic Press . 1985 . 0-12-375181-0 .
15. 10.1021/nl071792z. 7. 11. 3405–3409. Stern. Eric. Robin Wagner . Fred J. Sigworth . Ronald Breaker . Tarek M. Fahmy . Mark A. Reed . Importance of the Debye Screening Length on Nanowire Field Effect Transistor Sensors. Nano Letters. 2007-11-01. 2007NanoL...7.3405S . 17914853 . 2713684.
16. Guo. Lingjie. Effendi Leobandung. Stephen Y. Chou. 199. A room-temperature silicon single-electron metal–oxide–semiconductor memory with nanoscale floating-gate and ultranarrow channel. Applied Physics Letters. 70. 7. 850. 1997ApPhL..70..850G. 10.1063/1.118236.
17. Tiwari. Sandip. Farhan Rana. Kevin Chan. Leathen Shi. Hussein Hanafi. 1996 . Single charge and confinement effects in nano-crystal memories. Applied Physics Letters . 69 . 9. 1232. 1996ApPhL..69.1232T. 10.1063/1.117421.