De fato explained

De Fato
Author:Marcus Tullius Cicero
Language:Latin
Subject:Fate and free will
Genre:Dialogue
Pub Date:44 BC

De Fato (English: "Concerning Fate") is a partially lost philosophical treatise written by the Roman orator Cicero in 44 BC. Only two-thirds of the work exists; the beginning and ending are missing.[1] [2] It takes the form of a dialogue, although it reads more like an exposition,[1] [3] whose interlocutors are Cicero and his friend Aulus Hirtius.

In the work, Cicero analyzes the concept of Fate, and suggests that free will is a condition of Fate.[4] [5] Cicero, however, does not consciously deal with the distinction between fatalism and determinism.[6]

It appears that De Fato is an appendix to the treatise on theology formed by the three books of De Natura Deorum and the two books of De Divinatione.[7] These three books provide important information regarding Stoic cosmology and theology.[8]

History

De fato is part of the second group of Cicero's writings.[1] [9] The work was composed at Pozzuoli between April 17 and May 23 of 44 BC.[1] [3] In any case, the work would have most likely been completed prior to Cicero's abortive departure for Greece in July of that year.[1] [3] The work was written in haste, as Cicero was planning to return to the political arena.[1] [2]

Argumentation

Hirtius notes that Cicero has adopted the Academic method of investigation: arguing against all propositions.[10] Therefore, he outlines the positions of Democritus, Heraclitus, Empedocles, and Aristotle as those who maintained that everything happens by necessity. As such Cicero develops the propositions of fate and necessity as follows:

Cicero essentially dismisses this proposition as antithetical to what is observed, but postulates freedom as a necessity for moral life.[6] Ultimately, Cicero maintains this position as he is emotionally convinced that it is in man's power to achieve virtue for himself; if determinism were the order of things, then such ability would not be true.[6]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. R. W. Sharples. Cicero: On Fate (De fato) & Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy IV.5-7, V (Philosophiae Consolationis). Aris & Phillips Ltd, 1991.
  2. Preface, iv
  3. Introduction, 5
  4. [Cicero, Marcus Tullius]
  5. Cicero, De fato. I.
  6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/282901 Henry, Margaret Y. Cicero's Treatment of the Free Will Problem. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 58 pp. 32-42. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1927. Web.
  7. Cicero. On the Orator: Book 3. On Fate. Stoic Paradoxes. Divisions of Oratory, pg. 189. Translated by H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 349. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942.
  8. https://books.google.com/books?id=JokeAAAAIAAJ&dq=de+fato+cicero&pg=PA109 Colish, Marcia. The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages, Volume 1, pg 109
  9. Introduction, 3
  10. Cicero, De fato. II.