David Pascoe | |
Office: | Solicitor for the First Judicial Circuit of South Carolina |
Term Start: | January 2005 |
Predecessor: | Walter Bailey |
Birth Date: | 2 March 1967 |
Birth Place: | Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S. |
Education: | The Citadel (BA) University of South Carolina (JD) |
Occupation: | First Circuit Solicitor |
Party: | Democratic |
Children: | 3 |
David Michael Pascoe (born March 2, 1967) is an American lawyer serving as the First Circuit Solicitor in the state of South Carolina since 2005. The First Circuit comprises Dorchester, Calhoun, and Orangeburg counties. In 2016, Pascoe won a Supreme Court case against the South Carolina Attorney General where the Attorney General attempted to remove Pascoe as the special prosecutor in a corruption probe involving the General Assembly.[1] Pascoe oversaw the investigation and secured convictions on five powerful South Carolina General Assembly members that included the House speaker, President Pro Tem of the Senate, Chairman of the House Judiciary, and two former House Majority Leaders.[2]
Pascoe is a Magna Cum Laude graduate of The Citadel and the University of South Carolina School of Law.[3] He served as assistant state prosecutor from 1993 to 2005 successfully trying over 200 violent crimes. Included in those prosecutions is a "no body" case in which the Defendant was convicted of murder even though the victim's body was never found.[4] He earned a reputation as being a hard line prosecutor on violent crimes but progressive in dealing with juvenile offenders and non-violent offenders.[5]
Pascoe is a Democrat who rarely gets involved in other candidate's elections, believing prosecutors should stay out of politics. Joe Biden is the only candidate Pascoe has ever endorsed.[6] He endorsed Vice President Joe Biden for President on January 23, 2020. In his endorsement, Pascoe stated that he had personally known the Vice President for over a decade and "that he is the most decent man I have ever met in American politics".[7] Pascoe was considered to be one of the frontrunners to become the U.S. Attorney for South Carolina under the Biden administration.[8]
After taking office in 2005, Pascoe immediately put a plan together to aggressively combat violent crime in the circuit while at the same time establishing a progressive agenda to curb juvenile crime.[9] He implemented a number of new programs.[10] He recruited churches and organizations to start a Youth Mentor Program.[11] The First Circuit Solicitor's Youth Mentor Program was recognized by the South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice as the 2011 Diversion Program of the Year.[11] Pascoe also implemented the Circuit's first youth and adult drug court programs.[12] Pascoe continues to garner his reputation as being tough on violent offenders and successfully convicted and received death sentences on two murderers, Mikal Mahdi and Kenneth Justus.[13] [14] Pascoe served as President of the South Carolina Solicitor's Association from 2011 to 2013.
See also: South Carolina Statehouse corruption investigation.
On December 5, 2013, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) submitted an investigative report to the Office of the Attorney General regarding the conduct of South Carolina Speaker of the House of Representatives Robert "Bobby" Harrell.[15] A State Grand Jury case was initiated on the basis of the SLED report.[16] Counsel for Speaker Harrell moved to have Attorney General Alan Wilson recused from the case. Pascoe accepted Attorney General Alan Wilson's designation as special prosecutor in the matter prior to a judge ruling on the recusal motion. On September 10, 2014, Pascoe indicted Speaker Harrell for multiple violations of state ethics laws.[17] Speaker Harrell was removed from office on October 22, 2014, and received a sentence of three years probation after pleading guilty to six counts of misuse of campaign funds.[18]
On October 1, 2014, Pascoe sent an email to Attorney General Wilson referencing the December SLED report and stating that he believed legislators named in the report should be investigated as part of a corruption probe.[19] Approximately nine months later on July 17, 2015, the Attorney General's Office requested SLED forward the report to Pascoe for a prosecutive decision. In March 2016, Pascoe and SLED Chief Mark Keel referred the case to the State Grand Jury by signing a case initiation form. Shortly thereafter, a dispute arose in which the Attorney General's Office claimed that Pascoe did not have the authority to initiate a State Grand Jury investigation, and that only the elected Attorney General could legally sign the initiation form. The Attorney General then sent an e-mail to Pascoe purporting to fire him from the case.[20] In an unprecedented move, Pascoe filed a petition for declaratory judgement with the South Carolina Supreme Court seeking a declaration that the Attorney General recused himself from the case and vested authority in Pascoe to conduct the investigation. Pascoe argued the case himself while the Attorney General's Office retained the law firm of Nelson Mullins to argue on its behalf. The case was heard by the South Carolina Supreme Court on June 16, 2016, and the Court ruled in favor of Pascoe, holding that a strict interpretation requiring the personal signature of the elected office holder "would lead to an absurd result."[21] The Court also gave Pascoe the "full authority to act as the Attorney General for purposes of the investigation."[22]
Pascoe and SLED proceeded to thoroughly investigate two legislators who had served previously as House Majority Leaders, Representatives James "Jimmy" Merrill and Richard "Rick" Quinn Jr. Throughout the course of the grand jury investigation, Pascoe and his team discovered criminal conduct by other legislators as well as a political consulting firm associated with these legislators. Pascoe faced numerous challenges by targets of the investigation who sought to remove him, however, Pascoe prevailed in each courtroom battle.[23] These discoveries, as well as other findings and conclusions, were summarized in a comprehensive grand jury report issued by the State Grand Jury on June 21, 2018.
The investigation is often referred to as "Pascoe's corruption probe," though Pascoe has only referred to it as the "State Grand Jury's investigation".[24] The investigation resulted in conviction and removal from office of some of South Carolina's most powerful legislators. It also held corporate entities accountable.[25] The business at the center of the investigation is Richard Quinn and Associates and was at one time arguably the most powerful consulting company in the state. Many of the state's most powerful figures were once clients of RQA including Attorney General Alan Wilson.[26] The corporation pleaded guilty to unlawful lobbying on December 13, 2017, and is believed to be the only conviction recorded for the offense in the state.
In September 2018 Pascoe negotiated agreements with five of the state's most powerful corporations to settle potential criminal liability stemming from their dealings with Richard Quinn and Associates. The agreements, which were referred to as "corporate integrity agreements", were unprecedented in the state, however Pascoe argued that the agreements are a permissible use of his prosecutive authority.
On June 21, 2018, the State Grand Jury issued a comprehensive report that detailed its findings and conclusions after two years of investigation. The issuance of reports discussing the investigative work of a grand jury is not common in South Carolina and subjects of the report attempted to block its public release.[27] Pascoe sought, and ultimately won the approval of the presiding judge of the state grand jury to publicly release the document without redactions. The report detailed the manner in which Quinn's consulting firm profited from its significant political connections by receiving lucrative retainers from corporations interested in expanding their political influence. The report also discussed the prevalence of undisclosed "dark money" spent by large corporations to influence elections and the problematic relationship between the Attorney General and the targets of the investigation.
South Carolina is one of the few states where Supreme Court Justices are elected by the legislature.[35] The Supreme Court upheld Harrison's perjury conviction and 18 month prison sentence, but granted him a new trial on the other charges by a 3-2 decision.[36] The majority opinion commended Pascoe for bringing the corruption to light, but that he lacked jurisdiction to prosecute the case due to the confusion of the Court's decision in Pascoe v. Wilson. The Court stated in its 36 page opinion that, "This is a difficult case, one that has resulted in a sharply divided Court."
Pascoe's string of public corruption convictions and removals from office of some of the state's most powerful lawmakers has been hailed as "a unique achievement in state politics in the modern era", but came to an end with his letter to the Attorney General's Office on February 16, 2021.[37] Pascoe delivered the remaining pending prosecutions to the Attorney General's Office. His letter states "The citizens of this State deserve justice in matters of public corruption...Prosecuting legislative corruption is a Sisyphean task- this is even more true in our State, as emphasized by the 28th State Grand Jury in their report. But the effort spent bringing corruption to light is unquestionably worthwhile."
A Confederate Naval Jack has been on display in The Citadel's Summerall Chapel since 1939.[38] On July 22, 2020, Pascoe wrote a letter to the college's President General Glenn M. Walters asking that he remove the flag from above the Chapel. Pascoe noted in his letter that, "the presence of the Confederate battle flag in our sacred chapel is a moral stain that runs contrary to The Citadel's teachings. Simply put, the flag persists as a symbol of slavery, prejudice, and defiance of the American promise in the right of all people to be free...The flag should go."