Darwin–Fowler method explained

In statistical mechanics, the Darwin–Fowler method is used for deriving the distribution functions with mean probability. It was developed by Charles Galton Darwin and Ralph H. Fowler in 1922–1923.[1]

Distribution functions are used in statistical physics to estimate the mean number of particles occupying an energy level (hence also called occupation numbers). These distributions are mostly derived as those numbers for which the system under consideration is in its state of maximum probability. But one really requires average numbers. These average numbers can be obtained by the Darwin–Fowler method. Of course, for systems in the thermodynamic limit (large number of particles), as in statistical mechanics, the results are the same as with maximization.

Darwin–Fowler method

In most texts on statistical mechanics the statistical distribution functions

f

in Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics, Bose–Einstein statistics, Fermi–Dirac statistics) are derived by determining those for which the system is in its state of maximum probability. But one really requires those with average or mean probability, although – of course – the results are usually the same for systems with a huge number of elements, as is the case in statistical mechanics. The method for deriving the distribution functions with mean probability has been developed by C. G. Darwin and Fowler[2] and is therefore known as the Darwin–Fowler method. This method is the most reliable general procedure for deriving statistical distribution functions. Since the method employs a selector variable (a factor introduced for each element to permit a counting procedure) the method is also known as the Darwin–Fowler method of selector variables. Note that a distribution function is not the same as the probability – cf. Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, Bose–Einstein distribution, Fermi–Dirac distribution. Also note that the distribution function

fi

which is a measure of the fraction of those states which are actually occupied by elements, is given by

fi=ni/gi

or

ni=figi

, where

gi

is the degeneracy of energy level

i

of energy

\varepsiloni

and

ni

is the number of elements occupying this level (e.g. in Fermi–Dirac statistics 0 or 1). Total energy

E

and total number of elements

N

are then given by

E=\sumini\varepsiloni

and

N=\sumni

.

The Darwin–Fowler method has been treated in the texts of E. Schrödinger,[3] Fowler[4] and Fowler and E. A. Guggenheim,[5] of K. Huang,[6] and of H. J. W. Müller–Kirsten.[7] The method is also discussed and used for the derivation of Bose–Einstein condensation in the book of R. B. Dingle.[8]

Classical statistics

For

N=\sumini

independent elements with

ni

on level with energy

\varepsiloni

and

E=\sumini\varepsiloni

for a canonical system in a heat bath with temperature

T

we set

Z=

-E/kT
\sum
arrangementse

=\sumarrangements\prodiz

ni
i

,   zi=

-\varepsiloni/kT
e

.

The average over all arrangements is the mean occupation number

(ni)av=

\sumjnjZ
Z

=

z
j\partial
\partialzj

lnZ.

Insert a selector variable

\omega

by setting

Z\omega=\sum\prodi(\omega

ni
z
i)

.

In classical statistics the

N

elements are (a) distinguishable and can be arranged with packets of

ni

elements on level

\varepsiloni

whose number is
N!
\prodini!

,

so that in this case

Z\omega=

N!\sum
ni
\prod
i
(\omega
ni
z
i)
ni!

.

Allowing for (b) the degeneracy

gi

of level

\varepsiloni

this expression becomes

Z\omega=

infty
N!\prod
i=1
\left(\sum
ni=0,1,2,\ldots
(\omega
ni
z
i)
ni!
gi
\right)

=

\omega\sumigizi
N!e

.

The selector variable

\omega

allows one to pick out the coefficient of

\omegaN

which is

Z

. Thus

Z=\left(\sumigiz

N,
i\right)
and hence

(nj)av=

z
j\partial
\partialzj

lnZ=N

-\varepsilonj/kT
g
je
\sum
-\varepsiloni/kT
ie
ig

.

This result which agrees with the most probable value obtained by maximization does not involve a single approximation and is therefore exact, and thus demonstrates the power of this Darwin–Fowler method.

Quantum statistics

We have as above

Z\omega=\sum\prod(\omega

ni
z
i)

,  

-\varepsiloni/kT
z
i=e

,

where

ni

is the number of elements in energy level

\varepsiloni

. Since in quantum statistics elements are indistinguishable no preliminary calculation of the number of ways of dividing elements into packets

n1,n2,n3,...

is required. Therefore the sum

\sum

refers only to the sum over possible values of

ni

.

In the case of Fermi–Dirac statistics we have

ni=0

or

ni=1

per state. There are

gi

states for energy level

\varepsiloni

.Hence we have

Z\omega=(1+\omega

g1
z
1)

(1+\omega

g2
z
2)

… =\prod(1+\omega

gi
z
i)

.

In the case of Bose–Einstein statistics we have

ni=0,1,2,3,\ldotsinfty.

By the same procedure as before we obtain in the present case

Z\omega=(1+\omegaz1+(\omega

2
z
1)

+(\omega

3
z
1)

+

g1
)

(1+\omegaz2+(\omega

2
z
2)

+

g2
)

.

But

1+\omegaz1+(\omega

2
z
1)

+=

1
(1-\omegaz1)

.

Therefore

Z\omega=\prodi(1-\omega

-gi
z
i)

.

Summarizing both cases and recalling the definition of

Z

, we have that

Z

is the coefficient of

\omegaN

in

Z\omega=\prodi(1\pm\omega

\pmgi
z
i)

,

where the upper signs apply to Fermi–Dirac statistics, and the lower signs to Bose–Einstein statistics.

Next we have to evaluate the coefficient of

\omegaN

in

Z\omega.

In the case of a function

\phi(\omega)

which can be expanded as

\phi(\omega)=a0+a1\omega+

2
a
2\omega

+,

the coefficient of

\omegaN

is, with the help of the residue theorem of Cauchy,

aN=

1
2\pii

\oint

\phi(\omega)d\omega
\omegaN+1

.

We note that similarly the coefficient

Z

in the above can be obtained as
Z=1\oint
2\pii
Z\omega
\omegaN+1

d\omega\equiv

1
2\pii

\intef(\omega)d\omega,

where

f(\omega)=\pm\sumigiln(1\pm\omegazi)-(N+1)ln\omega.

Differentiating one obtains

f'(\omega)=

1
\omega
\left[\sum
igi
(\omega
-1
z
i)
\pm1

-(N+1)\right],

and

f''(\omega)=

N+1
\omega2

\mp

1
\omega2
\sum
igi
[(\omega
-1
z
i)
\pm1]2

.

One now evaluates the first and second derivatives of

f(\omega)

at the stationary point

\omega0

at which

f'(\omega0)=0.

. This method of evaluation of

Z

around the saddle point

\omega0

is known as the method of steepest descent. One then obtains

Z=

f(\omega0)
e
\sqrt{2\pif''(\omega0)
}.We have

f'(\omega0)=0

and hence

(N+1)=

\sum
igi
(\omega
-1
i)
\pm1
0z
(the +1 being negligible since

N

is large). We shall see in a moment that this last relation is simply the formula

N=\sumini.

We obtain the mean occupation number

(ni)av

by evaluating

(nj)av=

z
jd
dzj

lnZ=

gj
(\omega
-1
j)
\pm1
0z

=

gj
(\varepsilonj-\mu)/kT
e\pm1

,e\mu/kT=\omega0.

This expression gives the mean number of elements of the total of

N

in the volume

V

which occupy at temperature

T

the 1-particle level

\varepsilonj

with degeneracy

gj

(see e.g. a priori probability). For the relation to be reliable one should check that higher order contributions are initially decreasing in magnitude so that the expansion around the saddle point does indeed yield an asymptotic expansion.

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Darwin–Fowler method. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. en. 2018-09-27.
  2. C. G. . Darwin . R. H. . Fowler . On the partition of energy . Phil. Mag. . 44 . 1922 . 450–479, 823–842 . 10.1080/14786440908565189 .
  3. Book: Schrödinger, E. . Statistical Thermodynamics . Cambridge University Press . 1952 .
  4. Book: Fowler, R. H. . Statistical Mechanics . Cambridge University Press . 1952 .
  5. Book: Fowler, R. H. . E. . Guggenheim . Statistical Thermodynamics . Cambridge University Press . 1960 .
  6. Book: Huang, K. . Statistical Mechanics . Wiley . 1963 .
  7. Book: Müller–Kirsten, H. J. W. . Basics of Statistical Physics . 2nd . World Scientific . 2013 . 978-981-4449-53-3 .
  8. Book: Dingle, R. B. . Asymptotic Expansions: Their Derivation and Interpretation . Academic Press . 1973 . 267–271 . 0-12-216550-0 .