Short Title: | Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 |
Parliament: | Parliament of the United Kingdom |
Long Title: | An Act to make provision about criminal procedure and criminal investigations. |
Year: | 1996 |
Statute Book Chapter: | 1996 c. 25 |
Royal Assent: | 4 July 1996 |
Status: | current |
Use New Uk-Leg: | yes |
Original Text: | http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/25/contents/enacted |
Revised Text: | http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/25/contents |
The Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 or CPIA [1] is a piece of statutory legislation in the United Kingdom that regulates the procedures of investigating and prosecution of criminal offences.
Following a section of introductory text, the act outlines the relevance of its content in the first section to persons charged with a summary offence, indictable offence or one that is triable either way, as well as the criminal investigation into such an offence and as to whether such a person should be charged with the offence or found guilty of it once charged.[2] It details the procedures for disclosure and continued disclosure by the prosecution to the defence any information "which is in the prosecutor’s possession, and came into his possession in connection with the case for the prosecution against the accused." It also defines a defence statement, defence witnesses and the means by which they should be interviewed, and confidentiality of disclosed information, and other statutory and common law rules of a court.
The second part of the act defines a criminal investigation as "an investigation conducted by police officers with a view to it being ascertained whether a person should be charged with an offence, or whether a person charged with an offence is guilty of it." It outlines the codes of practice for any investigation set out by the Secretary of State and the means by which such a code could be revised.[3]
Section 54 of the act includes the follow administration of justice offences:
In 2009, twenty six environmental protesters were pre-emptively arrested and later charged with conspiracy to commit aggravated trespass. It was claimed that Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station was the intended target. In 2011, their cases were quashed when it was revealed police withheld recordings made by undercover police officer Mark Kennedy. Non-disclosure to the Crown Prosecution Service and defence teams is a breach of the act.