Black Sea slave trade explained

The Black Sea slave trade trafficked people across the Black Sea from Europe and the Caucasus to slavery in the Mediterranean and the Middle East. The Black Sea slave trade was a center of the slave trade between Europe and the rest of the world from antiquity until the 19th century.[1] One of the major and most significant slave trades of the Black Sea region was the trade of the Crimean Khanate, known as the Crimean slave trade.

The Black Sea was situated in a region historically dominated by the margins of empires, conquests and major trade routes between Europe, the Mediterranean and Central Asia, notably the Ancient Silk road, which made the Black Sea ideal for a slave trade of war captives sold along the trade routes.[2]

In the Early Middle Ages, the Byzantine Empire imported slaves from the Vikings, who transported European captives via the route from the Varangians to the Greeks to the Byzantine ports at the Black Sea. In the late Middle Ages, trading colonies of Venice and Genoa along the Northern Black Sea coasts used the instable political and religious border zones to buy captives and transport them as slaves to Italy, Spain, and the Ottoman Empire.

In the early modern period, the Crimean Khanate abducted Eastern Europeans by the Crimean–Nogai slave raids in Eastern Europe, who were transported to the rest of the Muslim world in collaboration with the Ottoman slave trade from the Crimea. The massive slave trade was at this time a major source of income for the Crimean Khanate.

When the Crimean slave trade was ended by the Russian conquest of the Crimea in 1783, the slave trade of Circassians from Caucasus was separated from it and became an independent slave trade. The Circassian slave trade of particularly women from Caucasus to the Muslim world via Anatolia and Constantinople continued until the 20th century.

Antiquity

See also: Slavery in antiquity.

In antiquity, enslaved people were sold, via the Ancient Greek and Roman city ports of the Black Sea, East to Asia via the Silk road; and West to the Ancient Mediterranean world.[3]

Ancient Greek slave trade

See also: Slavery in Ancient Greece.

In antiquity, the Black Sea was called the Pontic Sea and people from the region often simply called Pontics. Greek colonies were established along the Black Sea, which engaged in slave trade between the tribes of the interior North of the Black Sea and the Mediterranean. Slaves were sold by their families or as war captives to the Greek cities, who exported them West to the Mediterranean or East to Asia along the Silk road.

In 594 BC, the laws of Solon outlawed the citizens of Athens to enslave other Athenians citizens; it was a common trend in the Greek city states to outlaw the enslavement of citizens of their own cities, and this trend made it necessary for the Greek to maintain a slave trade with non-Greek non-citizens they termed "barbarians", from foreign lands such as the Balkans or the North of the Black Sea.[4]

In the 6th century BC, Greek city colonies expanded in the Northern shores of the Black Sea, which came to play an important role in the slave trade; it has even been hypothesized, that these cities were founded because of the Black Sea slave trade.[4] The Greek Black Sea slave trade is documented from at least the 6th century BC onward, when an inscription from Phanagoria describes the trafficking of a slave named Phaylles to Phanagoria (the Kerch Strait) from Borysthenes (Berezan by the Bug/Dnieper).[4]

Classic Greek authors described particularly the North Western shore of the Black Sea as a slave coast were the conditions ensured a steady supply of slaves; it was a border zone between the Thracians and the Scythians, where the nomadic Scythians conducted slave raids toward the Thracians, who were also known to sell their children to slave traders, and the inhabitants up the Danube traded slaves for salt.[4] The rural land around the Greek cities were inhabited by Hellenized Scythian farmers, who acted as go-betweens and sold the slaves captured by the nomadic Scythians to the Greeks in the cities.[4]

In the 3rd century BC, Polybius noted that the quantity of humans captured and shipped as slaves from the Northern Black Sea shores were bigger than anywhere in the known world.[4]

Roman slave trade

See also: Slavery in the Roman Empire.

The Black Sea slave trade continued after the Greek Black Sea cities had become vassals of the Roman Empire.

The Ancient Silk Road connecting Mediterranean world and China in East Asia may have existed as early as the 3rd century BC, since Chinese silk has been found in Rome has been dated to about 200 BC.[5] The Silk Road connected to the Mediterranean world via two routes. From China, the Silk Road continued over the Tian Shan, Hami, Turpan, Almalik, Tashkent, Samarkand and finally Bukhara, where it split in two main roads: a southern route from Bukhara to Merv and from there to Antioch, Trebizond, or Aleppo; or the northern route from Bukhara over the Karakum Desert to the Caspian Sea, Astrakhan and Kazan close to the Black Sea.[5] The Silk Road did not sell only textiles, jewels, metals, and cosmetics, but also slaves.[5] connecting the Silk Road slave trade to the Bukhara slave trade as well as the Black Sea slave trade.

In the 1st century, the Roman writer Strabo described Dioscurias, the major Black Sea port of the Caucasus, and the Greek city of Tanais, as major ports of the Pontic slave trade, from which "Pontic" slaves, such as Scythians or Paphlagonians, who had been sold as war captives by enemy tribes or sold by their families as adolescents, were exported to the Mediterranean and could be found in Ancient Athens.[6]

Middle Ages

During the Middle Ages, informal slave zones were formed alongside religious borders, which were also crossed at the Black Sea region. Both Christians and Muslims banned the enslavement of people of their own faith, but both approved of the enslavement of people of a different faith.[7]

The slave trade thus organized alongside religious principles. While Christians did not enslave Christians, and Muslims did not enslave Muslims, both did allow the enslavement of people they regarded to be heretics, which allowed Catholic Christians to enslave Orthodox Christians, and Sunni Muslims to enslave Shia Muslims.[8]

However, both Christians and Muslims approved of enslaving pagans, who came to be a preferred target of the slave trade in the Middle Ages, and Pagan war captives were sold by pagan enemies into the slave trade.[8]

Byzantine slave trade (5th–13th centuries)

See also: Saqaliba, Balkan slave trade, Prague slave trade, History of concubinage in the Muslim world, Islamic views on concubinage, Abbasid harem and Mamluk.

Background

The slave trade trafficking humans from the Black Sea region to the Mediterranean Sea during the Roman period continued during the Byzantine Empire, but the Byzantine slave trade is not fully documented, though it appear to have continued to function via the old principles war-captives and children sold by their families.[9]

During the Middle Ages, the slave market was organized alongside religious borders. Christian slaves could not be sold in Christian slave markets, and Muslim slaves could not be sold on Muslim slave markets. The slave trade adjusted to this, and the result was that pagans, who could be sold to both Christians and Muslims, came to be highly valued. Pagans from Eastern and Northern Europe came to be the most popular targets for slavery in both the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Arab world during the Early Middle Ages, where they were forced to convert to Christianity and Islam respectively after their enslavement.[10]

Slave trade

Various slave routes passed via the Black Sea and the Byzantine Crimea to the Byzantine Mediterranean world and the Islamic Middle East. Different people acquired captives and shipped them down to Byzantine Crimea and other ports around the Black Sea, from where they continued to the slave market of the Mediterranean via Byzantine Constantinople, and to the Middle East.

Magyars of Hungary

The slave trade from the Balkans was mainly directed toward the Balkan slave trade of the Adriatic Sea rather than the Black Sea. However, in the 9th century, the Magyars of Hungary conducted regular slave raids toward the Slavs, and sold their captives to the Byzantine slave traders in the Black Sea port of Kerch in exchange for brocades, wool, and other products.[11]

Ahmad ibn Rustah, a 10th-century Persian traveler, remembers it this way:

Viking slave trade

See also: Route from the Varangians to the Greeks, Khazar slave trade and Bukhara slave trade.

During the Early Middle Ages until the 11th century, the Black Sea was one of the two slave trade destinations of the Viking Volga trade route, which exported people to Slavery in the Abbasid Caliphate in the Middle East via the Caspian Sea, the Samanid slave trade and Iran; and to the Byzantine Empire and the Mediterranean via Dnieper and the Black Sea.[12] [13]

The so-called saqaliba, which was the term for white slaves in the Islamic Middle East (often provided by the Vikings), is not likely to stand for exclusively Slavic ethnicity in practice, since many victims of the Vikings' saqaliba slave trade was in fact other ethnicities such as Baltics, Lithuanians, and Finno-Ugric people.[14]

The Vikings also captured slaves in raids from all of Western Europe, from the British Isles to France and Spain. The people the Vikings captured in Christian Western Europe were taken first to Scandinavia, and from there trafficked South East, through pagan Eastern Europe, toward the Black Sea.

People taken captive during the Viking raids in Western Europe, could be sold to Moorish Spain via the Dublin slave trade[15] or transported to Hedeby or Brännö and from there via the Volga trade route to Russia, where slaves and furs were sold to Muslim merchants in exchange for Arab silver dirham and silk, which have been found in Birka, Wolin, and Dublin;[16] initially this trade route between Europe and the Abbasid Caliphate passed via the Khazar Kaghanate,[17] but from the early 10th century onward it went via Volga Bulgaria and from there by caravan to Khwarazm, to the Samanid slave market in Central Asia and finally via Iran to the Abbasid Caliphate.[18]

Archbishop Rimbert of Bremen (d. 888) reported that he witnessed a "large throng of captured Christians being hauled away" in the Viking port of Hedeby in Denmark, one of whom was a woman who sang psalms to identify herself as a Christian nun, and who the bishop was able to free by exchanging his horse for her freedom.[19]

Until the 9th century, the Vikings trafficked slaves from the Baltic Sea in the North, or the North Sea in the West, via the Wisla or the Donau rivers South East through Europe to the Black Sea.[20] In the 9th century, the Viking slave route was redirected, and until the 11th century the Vikings trafficked slaves from the Baltic Sea via Ladoga, Novgorod and the Msta river to the Black Sea (and the Byzantine Empire), or to the Caspian Sea (and the Middle East) via the Volga trade route.[20]

The Viking slave trade stopped in the 11th century, when Denmark, Norway, and Sweden became Christian themselves and thus could no longer trade in Christian slaves.

Baltics, Sweden, and Finland

Since both Christians and Muslims banned the enslavement of people of their own faith but viewed pagans as legitimate targets for slavery, the pagans of northeastern Europe became highly targeted by the slave traders when the rest of Europe had become Christian by the 12th century. The pagan Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians, Livonians, and Latgallians raided each other, Ingria and Novgorod during the 12th- and 13th-centuries, and sold war captives south to the Black Sea slave trade.[21]

The Christian Russians also raided the pagan Estonians to sell them in the slave trade, since they were viewed as a legitimate target because they were pagans.[21]

When the Norse Vikings became Christian and ended their piracy in the 11th century, they were succeeded by pagan pirates from the Baltics, who raided the coasts of the Baltic Sea, such as now Christian Sweden and Finland, for slaves.[22] The island of Saaremaa was a base for the Baltic pirates, who were noted for selling women captives to the slave trade.[23] In 1226, the pagan Baltic pirates from Saaremaa conducted a slave raid toward now Christian Sweden, where they captured many Swedish women and girls with the purpose to sell as slaves.[22]

When the Viking slave trade stopped in the mid-11th century, the old slave trade route between the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea and Central Asia via the Russian rivers was upheld by Pagan Baltic slave traders, who sold slaves via Daugava to the Black Sea and East, which was now the only remaining slave trade in Europe after the slave market in Western Europe had died out in the 12th century.[24]

Russian slave trade

When the Kievan Rus' started to disintegrate in internal warfare between the smaller Russian states in the 12th century, the various Russian princes and their Cuman (Kipchak) allies captured the subjects of enemy Russian princes during their wars, which were sold to the slave traders.[11]

The Bulgar Khan regularly conducted slave raids toward the Russian principalities and captured Russian "infidels" whom they sold to the Islamic Middle East via the Black Sea slave trade in exchange for weapons.[11]

Slave market

Slavery in the Byzantine Empire was still widely practiced during the early Middle Ages. Emperor Basil I owned 3,000 slaves, and when Emperor Manuel I manumitted all the slaves in the capital of Constantinople in the 12th century, Eustathius of Thessalonica noted that most of the slaves came from "beyond the Danube" by origin and have arrived via the "northern winds" from Pontic lands, likely a euphemism from slaves exported to Byzantine by the Vikings via the Black Sea slave trade.[25]

Abolition

Information about the Byzantine slave trade is fragmentary prior to the 13th century, when it was taken over by Genoese and Venetian merchants, who established colonies in the Crimea in the 13th century.[25]

Italian slave trade (13th–15th centuries)

See also: Balkan slave trade, History of concubinage in the Muslim world, Genoese slave trade, Venetian slave trade and Mamluk.

In the late Middle Ages (13th–15th centuries), the Black Sea was the center of the Genoese slave trade and the Venetian slave trade, which exported slaves from Eastern Europe via their controlled cities in Crimea to Spain and Italy and to the Islamic Middle East.[26] [27]

Background

Slavery died out in Western Europe after the 12th century, but the demand for laborers after the Black Death resulted in a revival of slavery in Southern Europe in Italy and in Spain, as well as an increase in the demand for slaves in Egypt.[28]

Italian merchants, particularly the Genoese and Venetians, who had a large web of contacts as traders in the Mediterranean Sea, early established themselves in the slave trade. Initially they did so as traveling merchants, but eventually they managed to acquire their own trading colonies in the Crimea.

In the 13th century, Byzantine control in the Crimea weakened by the fall of Constantinople 1204, and Italian trade colonies took control over the Black Sea slave trade, with the Republic of Venice establishing in Sudak in the Crimea in 1206 and later in Tana, and the Republic of Genoa in Caffa in 1266.[29]

Slave trade

The majority of the slaves in the Italian Black Sea slave trade came to be enslaved via three main methods; as war captives during warfare, such as the Mongol invasions, the wars between the Golden Horde and the Ilkhanate, and the conquests of Timur; via slave raids; or through parents selling their own children or relatives to slavery, which occurred because of poverty and was a regular and common occurrence especially after the Black Death, when the demand for slaves was high in both Southern Europe and the Middle East.[30]

Common targets of slavery were Pagan Finno-Ugric and Turkish people.[31]

Baltics and Finland

In this time period, religious conviction was an important factor in who was considered legitimate to enslave. Christians could not be enslaved by Christians, and Muslims could not be enslaved by Muslims.[31] However, since both Christians and Muslims regarded pagans to be legitimate targets of slavery, the remaining pagans of northeastern Europe became an economical choice for the slave traders.[31]

In the 13th century, all of Europe had become Christian with the exception of the Baltics, Eastern Finland and Karelia, which became supply zones for slaves to the Black Sea slave trade, from where they were trafficked by Italian slave traders to Southern Europe and the Islamic Middle East.[32]

Caucasus

Genoese slave traders bought slaves from a number of different ethnic groups in the Caucasus, such as Abkhazians, Mingrelians, and Circassians, from which families sold their own children and adolescents to slave traders.[33]

People from the Caucasus were not only sold by their families but also taken captive in slave raids.In the 14th century, a contemporary witness from Sultaniyyah described how Circassian tribal noblemen conducted slave raids toward other Circassian tribes, "go out from one village to another publicly, or else secretly if they can, and violently seize children and adults of the other village, and immediately sell [them] to merchants by the sea. And in the same way as the Tatars were accustomed to sell theirs, so too these wretched people", after which the slaves were taken to the Crimea, where a witness statement noted that slave traders were "selling Christians for a price on market days, where they are dragged with a rope tied from the tail of a horse to the neck of those who are sold".[34]

However, the slave trade was not confined to the Caucasus, but extended along the entire Black Sea coastline, the official slave sale records of the town notaries of the Crimean town of Kaffa lists the following nations: "many Armeni, Ziqui, Gothi, Tat, Valachus, Rus, Ivlach, Alani, Avari, Kumuch" then a little later again lists more slaves by ethnicity in the document "Ziqui, Abhaz, Lech, Georgi, Rus, unknown, Borgar, Ungalus, Maniar."[35]

Mongol Empire

See also: Slave trade in the Mongol Empire.

In parallel with the establishment of the Venetian and Genoese colonies in the Crimea, the Mongol Empire conquered Russia, and the Italian Black Sea slave trade expanded in parallel with the Mongol warfare, with the Mongols encouraging the trade, using it to dispose of particularly Russian slaves; up until the Russian uprising of 1262, for example, the Mongols sold Russian peasants who were unable to pay tribute to the Italian slave traders in the Crimea.[36]

Slave market

The Italian slave trade had two main routes; from the Crimea to Byzantine Constantinople, and via Crete and the Balearic Islands to Italy and Spain; or to the Mamluk Sultanate in Egypt, which received the majority of the slaves.[37]

From at least 1382 onward, the majority of the Mamluks of the Egyptian Mamluk Sultanate with slave origin came from the Black Sea slave trade; around a hundred Circassian males intended for Mamluks were being trafficked via the Black Sea slave trade until the 19th century.[38]

The majority of the slaves trafficked to South Europe (Italy and Spain) were girls, since they were intended to become ancillae maid servants, while the majority of the slaves, around 2,000 annually, were trafficked to the Egyptian Mamluk Sultanate, in that case most of them boys, since the Mamluk Sultanate needed slave soldiers.[39]

Abolition

After the fall of Constantinople in 1453, the Ottomans closed the trade between the Crimea and the West.[37] The slave trade gradually diminished, and in 1472, only 300 slaves are registered to have been trafficked from Caffa.[40]

From the 1440s, Spain and Portugal started to import their slaves from first the Canary Islands, and then from Africa; initially via the trans-Saharan slave trade from Libya, and then by starting the Atlantic slave trade.[41]

The Ottoman Empire and the Crimean Khanate conquered the Venetian and Genoese cities in region in 1475, and the slave trade was then taken over by Muslim slave traders.[42]

Crimean slave trade (15th–18th centuries)

See also: Crimean–Nogai slave raids in Eastern Europe, Slavery in the Ottoman Empire and Devshirme.

During the Early Modern age the Crimean Khanate (1441–1783) was a major center of the international slave trade. The Crimean slave trade was the main source of income of the Khanate, and one of the biggest sources of slaves to the Ottoman Empire. The Crimean slave trade in Eastern Europe, and the Barbary slave trade in West and South Europe, were the two main sources of European slaves to the Ottoman Empire.

During this period the Crimea was the destination of the Crimean–Nogai slave raids in Eastern Europe, and European slaves were trafficked to the Middle East via the Crimea.[43]

Background

When the Crimean Khanate was founded in the 1440s, the Crimean Tatars initially taxed the Italian slave trade in the Italian ruled cities – mainly Caffa – in the Crimea.

The Crimean Khanate had a small population and a rudimentary agriculture and needed another source of income as well as a supply of laborers for the estates they founded. They therefore started to tax the Italian slave trade and conduct raids to supply more slaves.[44]

The Italian ruled cities in Crimea were taken by the Ottoman Empire by 1475. In 1462 the Venetian and Genoese had started to hire Polish mercenaries, which made the Ottoman Sultan concerned that Crimea would come under Polish hegemony.[42] This resulted in an Ottoman campaign taking advantage of internal instability in the Crimean Khanate to conquer the Venetian and Genoese ruled cities in the region, and by 1475 all those cities were under Ottoman control, and the Crimean Khan had submitted to the Ottoman Sultan as a vassal, uniting their forces to the Ottomans.[42]

Caffa was transformed in to an Ottoman province, after which the slave trade was taken over by Muslim Ottoman slave traders in collaboration with the Crimea Khanate, connecting the Crimean slave trade to the Ottoman slave trade and a joint venture between the Crimean Khanate and the Ottoman Empire.[45] The Crimean slave trade was also connected to the Khivan slave trade and the Bukhara slave trade further east in Central Asia, as the slave market in Khiva and Bukhara was also provided with Europeans (mostly Russians) captured by the Crimean Tatars.[46]

Slave trade

The Nogai Horde were vassals of the Crimean Khanate and economically dependent upon the slave trade, and performed the slave raids independently, or in collaboration with the Crimean Tatars, who were dependent on slave trade and slave labor on their estates.[44]

The slaves were captured in southern Russia, Poland–Lithuania, Moldavia, Wallachia, and Circassia by Tatar horsemen in a trade known as the "harvesting of the steppe". Slave raids were conducted by the Nogai Horde and or the Crimean Tatars toward Russia, Poland–Lithuania, and the Caucasus twice every year; during the harvest and during the winter.[47]

A Ukrainian folk song remembered the despair and devastation of the slave raids:

"The fires are burning behind the river.

The Tatars are dividing their captives.

Our village is burnt and our property plundered.

Old mother is sabred and my dear is taken into captivity."[48]

The majority of the slaves captured were forced into slave caravans by land and then by sea to the city of Caffa, which was an Ottoman province in the Crimean Khanate and a major center of the Crimean slave trade.[49] There were reportedly always around 30,000 slaves in Caffa.[50] The Lithuanian Mikhalon Litvin referred to Caffa in the 16th century as: "not a town, but an abyss into which our blood is pouring".[51] From Caffa, the captives were distributed between the Ottomans and the Crimean Tatars, and some were distributed to the smaller slave markets in the Crimean Khanate,[49] while the rest were sold in Caffa and trafficked to the rest of the Ottoman Empire and the Islamic Middle East.[52]

The Crimean slave trade is estimated to have been as large in numbers as the Transatlantic slave trade until the 18th century, when the Atlantic slave trade exploded and surpassed the Crimean slave trade in numbers.[49]

Balkans and Hungary

The Crimean slave raids to the Balkans were conducted in collaboration with the Ottomans, or with Ottoman approval, since the majority of the Balkans were under Ottoman Suzerainty, and Islamic law banned the enslavement of people living under Islamic rule. Raids were conducted when the various territories were in conflict with the Ottoman Empire and thus defined as enemy territory.

Until 1699, Habsburg Hungary was the only part of the Balkans not under Ottoman suzerainty. Between 1521 and 1717, the Crimean Khanate conducted slave raids to Hungary in collaboration with or with permission from the Ottoman Empire during the warfare between the Ottoman Empire and the Habsburg monarchy.[53]

During the war between the Ottoman Empire and the Principality of Transylvania in the 1660s, the Crimean Khanate conducted raids as far West as Moravia.[53]

The last Crimean slave raid to Hungary was conducted in 1717, during which 1,464 people were captured in the Ugocsa County, 861 of whom succeeded in escaping from the caravan going back to the Crimea.[54]

Circassia and Caucasus

The slave trade with Circassians from Caucasus had been a big slave route already during the Italian slave trade period, but during the Crimean slave trade it came to be a permanent luxury slave trade route providing elite slaves to the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East.[55] [56]

The question how Muslims Circassians could be enslaved by Muslims despite the Islamic law allowing Muslims to take only non-Muslims as slaves, has been an item of speculation.[57] Circassians in Caucasus were, however, split between Muslims, Christians, and pagans until the late 18th century, with different religions dominating in different regions and different social classes.[57]

The Crimean Khan regarded the Circassians tribal princes as their vassals, defined them as infidels and thus viewed them as legitimate targets for slave tributes for the Crimean Khanate as well as the Ottoman Empire, as well as punitive slave raid expeditions in collaboration with Ottoman troops.[57] The Circassian elite gradually converted to Islam between the 16th and 18th centuries, and were therefore able to participate themselves in the raids for slave tributes performed by the Crimean-Ottoman against other Circassians.[57]

The Circassian slave trade of elite slaves to the Ottoman Empire came to be so essential for the Middle Eastern slave market that it survived the fall of the Crimean Khanate in 1783. After the annexation of the Crimea by Russia, the Circassian slave trade was redirected from the Crimea and came to be conducted directly by Ottoman slave traders from the Caucasus, a trade that continued during the 19th century.[57]

Poland–Lithuania and Ukraine

In this time period, Poland and Lithuania were united, and Ukraine was a part of Poland–Lithuania. The first major Crimean–Nogai raid were conducted toward South Eastern Poland in 1468.

It is not documented exactly how many raids were conducted, where and how, and exactly the number of people abducted between the late 15th century and the late 18th century. Between 1474 and 1569, 75 major slave raids are estimated to have been conducted toward Polish–Lithuanian territory.[58] During the year of 1676 alone, circa 40,000 people are estimated to have been abducted from the territory of Volhynia-Podolia-Galicia, and at least 20,000 people are estimated to have been abducted from the territory of Poland–Lithuania every year between 1500 and 1644, or at least one million people.[50]

A Polish proverb described death as a better fate than being captured by a slave raid: "O how much better to lie on one's bier, than to be captive on the way to Tatary".[48]

Polish captives were marched down to the port of Ochakiv, where they were loaded on to slave ships and trafficked to Caffa in the Crimea.[48]

Polish was such a common ethnicity for a slave in the Crimea Khanate, that the Polish language was the second language in the Crimea.[59]

Among the most known victims of the Crimean slave raids from Poland were Roxelana.[48]

Russia

Muscovite Russia and the Crimean Khanate were both the vassals of the Golden Horde, which initially protected Russia from being subjected to the slave raids the Crimean Khanate conducted toward Poland and Lithuania. However, when the Golden Horde fell in 1502, Russia's protective status against the Crimean Khanate ended and from that point onward the Crimean raids where conducted against Russia as well as Poland.

From 1507 onward, Russia was a constant target of the Crimean-Nogai raids. It is not documented exactly how many raids were conducted, where and how, and exactly the number of people abducted, but at least 43 major raids were documented toward Russia between 1500 and 1550.[58]

In the period of circa 1600 and 1650, between 150,000 and 200,000 Russians are estimated to have been abducted in the raids; in the period of 1633–1646, around 15,115 people were either killed or abducted during raids toward Kursk alone.[50]

The last major Crimean-Nogai raid were reportedly conducted toward Russian territory in 1769, during the Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774), when 20,000 people were abducted.[59]

Among the victims of the Crimean slave raids from Russia were Turhan Sultan.

Sweden, Finland, and the Baltics

Between the 16th century and the end of the Great Northern War (1700–1721), the Baltics was a part of the Swedish Empire, as was Finland.

The slave raids conducted by private Russian slave traders over the border into Eastern Finland, capturing Finns and trafficking them south to the Black Sea, had been conducted since the Middle Ages and are estimated to have continued throughout the 17th century.[60]

During the Great Northern war between 1700 and 1721, Russia invaded the Eastern Swedish provinces of Finland, Estonia and Livonia in the Baltics. Since the 15th century, the Russian Army had allowed private soldiers to capture and sell war captives, and during the Great Northern War many Russian soldiers captured Swedes, Finns, and Baltic civilians (particularly children) from the Swedish provinces and sold them, some of which ended up in the Black Sea slave trade and Persia.[61] One of these occasions was the fall of Narva, were Lovisa von Burghausen was a famous victim of those captured to Russian soldiers with intent to sell.[62] Another case was that of Annika Svahn and Afrosinya. Lovisa, together with two other female slaves, one from Finland and one from Narva, were sold on the Russian slave market in Moscow; the Finnish woman was sold to an Armenian, the woman from Narva to a Russian clerk, and Lovisa to a Turkish-Ottoman merchant.[63] [64]

The Swedish province of Finland was subjected to severe oppression during the Russian invasion and occupation known as the Great Wrath (1714–1721). Among the atrocities were the abductions and enslavement of people by Russian military, many of whom were trafficked via Russia and the Crimean slave trade to Persia and the Middle East, where blonde people were exotic; between 20,000 and 30,000 people are estimated to have been abducted[65] and about a quarter of the Finnish farm houses were reportedly empty at the end of the occupation.[66] Between 10,000 and 20,000 people were taken to serve as slave laborers during the building of Saint Petersburg,[67] about 2,000 men were forcibly enlisted to the Russian army,[68] but many women and children were also abducted as serfs or sex slaves by Russian officers, who in some cases sold them on to the Crimean slave trade; about 4,600 people, the majority of whom were children, were abducted from Österbotten and Eastern Finland.[69]

Many of the Swedish citizens captured and sold by Russian soldiers ended up via the Crimean slave trade in the slave market in Constantiople, where the Swedish ambassador to Constantinople managed to buy some of them free, many of whom were women.[61]

From June 1710, the Swedish ambassador Thomas Funck made trips to the slave market in Constantiople to buy Swedish citizens, tours which were noted by his legation priest Sven Agrell. Agrell noted, for example, the purchase of a "carpenter's daughter from Narva" for §82, a "Captain's wife" for §240, Catharina Pereswetoff-Morath, age 18, for §275, and an entire Swedish-Livonian family, Anders Jonsson with his wife and children.[61] Those bought free with Swedish funds were probably escorted to the war camp of King Charles XII of Sweden in Bender and returned to Sweden with him. It was noted however, that though many Swedish citizens were bought free by the Swedish ambassador, it was impossible to buy everyone on sale for the limited financial funds during wartime, many young women and children being far too expensive, and that many were therefore purchased on market by actual buyers and left in the Ottoman Empire.[61]

Slave market

See also: History of concubinage in the Muslim world and Islamic views on concubinage.

The slave market was in practice divided in two parallel sources of income. One category was made up of rich captives, who were kept in captivity in the Crimea during the negotiations of their ransom, after which they were released and allowed to depart.[52] Another category was made up of poor people, who were not expected to be ransomed, and who were instead sold on the slave market. The Crimean Khanate received its main income from the trade in captives, and the ransom for a rich captive, as well as the sale of a poor captive as a slave, was seen as an equally legitimate income for the Khanate state.[70]

Ransom captives

The kin of rich prisoners were given the opportunity to buy back the hostage by paying ransom money, which was normally always the case when the captive belonged to the upper class, after which the prisoner was allowed to leave with a certificate of free passing and liberation.[71]

The ransom for a captive was normally the market price that would have been paid for the person if they were sold on the slave market or, if the prisoner was from a rich family, double that amount.[72]

A common go-between during the negotiations for ransom were Polish Armenians. Polish Armenians were normally able to speak Turkish languages and had contacts with the Armenian communities in the Crimea, and they often acted as agents, negotiated for the ransom and escorted the hostages back home from the Crimea.[52]

Slave captives

The majority of the captives were brought to Kefe (Caffa), which was the center of the slave trade.[49] In Caffa there were already existing accommodations for slave trade since the Italian slave trade, but they were significantly enlarged, since the Crimean slave trade was much bigger than the Italian had been. In Caffa, the captives were handed over to Ottoman slave traders. The Ottoman slave traders were often Jews, Greek or Armenian Ottomans.[48] The prisoners were divided between the different participants according to age, sex and aptitude for resale and market price.[48] Evliya Celebi described the process:

A fifth of the captives were gifted from the Crimean Khan to the Ottoman sultan as a vassal tribute, since the Khan was formally the vassal of the Sultan; another share was divided between the Crimean-Tatar tribal aristocracy as field slaves, the Khan's officials and the Nogai-Tatars as slave-shepherds, and the final share was sold, either in the domestic Crimean markets of Bakhchisarai, Karaseibazar and Evpatoria, or in Kaffa, from where they were exported to the rest of the Ottoman Empire.[50] Slaves trafficked from the Crimean slave trade could be sold far away in the Mediterranean and the Middle East; a Convent in Sinai in Egypt is for example noted to have bought a male slave originating from Kozlov in Russia.[50]

The Crimean Khan received 12 percent of the price for every slave sold in the Crimean slave trade.[73]

In this period, African slaves provided by the trans-Saharan slave trade, the Red Sea slave trade, and the Indian Ocean slave trade trade were popular for use as domestic servants and laborers, and white slaves provided by the Barbary slave trade and the Black Sea slave trade were used for different purposes in the Middle East. In the 18th century, slave soldiers (Mamluk) in the Middle East were still often made up of white male slaves – janissary, from the Barbary slave trade or the Crimean slave trade. Men without particular skills were used for hard agricultural labor on the estates of the Crimean tribal aristocrats.[74] The worst fate for a male slave was reportedly to become a galley slave; every Ottoman galley required 200 galley slaves, and the Ottoman fleet consisted of between 45,000 and 60,000 galleys in the late 18th century, and these galleys were supplied with many slaves from the Crimean slave trade.[75] In 1642, when an Ottoman galley was captured, 200 galley slaves were liberated, 207 of whom were from Ukraine and 20 were Russian men, some of whom had spent 40 years in captivity.[50] In 1645, the Ottoman Sultan Ibrahim reportedly approved of a slave raid to Poland and Russia specifically because he was constructing 100 new galley ships and required galley slaves to man them.[50] A young healthy Russian man was sold for 50–100 rubles, while Polish and Ukrainian men were more expensive.[50]

While African slave women were foremost bought as domestic laborers, white slave women were preferred for exclusively sexual slavery; as concubines or as wives. The Crimean slave trade was one of the biggest suppliers of women to the Ottoman Imperial Harem. The Imperial Harem was a big institution with 104 female slaves during the reign of Murad III (1574–1595), increasing in size with 295 in 1622, 433 in 1633, 446 during the reign of Mahmud I (r. 1730–1754) and 720 during Selim III (r. 1789–1807); the harem population begun to shrink gradually only during the second half of the 19th century. Girls to the Imperial Harem were sent there as war captives during military campaigns, but also as gifts, or through purchase. Young virgin girls (normally arriving as children) were gifted to the Sultan from local statesmen, family members, grand dignitaries and provincial governors, and particularly from the Crimean Khan; Ahmed III received one hundred Circassian virgin girl slaves as presents upon his accession to the throne. Other girls were bought to the harem by the vizier or by private slave dealers, in private or from the Avrat bazar slave market. Except for the maidservants and the concubines, the harem also required wet nurses (daye cariyes) for the Sultan's children, who were required to be Circassian or Georgian.[76] Since they were bought for sexual purposes, the price of female slaves varied according to the girl's beauty, and the price of female slaves therefore varied greatly between different individuals; the prices of Georgian and Russian girls bought for the Imperial Harem of Ahmed III varied between 150 kuruş and 250 kuruş, while others cost up to 320 kuruş.[76] Preserved documentation does not clearly provide the place of origin for the majority of the slaves to the Imperial Harem, but it is clear that some of the European female slaves were from Greece, Hungary, Poland, Wallachia, and Malta, some of whom were acquired from local Ottoman governors, though more Circassian, Georgian, Abkhasian, and Russian (meaning the arrived via the Crimean slave trade).[76]

The Imperial Harem was a model for the private harems of other rich men in the Middle East. Circassian women were popular as slave concubines by the Crimean Tatar aristocrats,[77] and Ebulgazi Bahadir stated that many Crimean-Tatar men preferred enslaved women as wives because of their beauty.[78]

The male Mamluk aristocrats of Ottoman Egypt, who themselves were often of white slave origin (often Circassian or from Georgia), preferred to marry women of similar ethnicity, while black slave women were used as domestic maids.[79] The white slave women bought to become concubines and wives of the Mamluks, such as for example Nafisa al-Bayda, were often from the Caucasus, Circassians or Georgian.[80]

Outside of the Ottoman Empire, girls from the Black Sea region were also trafficked to Persia during this period. The slave concubines (and later mothers) of the Safavid imperial harem of the Persian Shah mainly consisted of enslaved Circassian, Georgian, and Armenian women, captured as war booty, bought at the slave market, or received as gifts from local potentates.[81] Even some of the slave concubines in the Mughal harem in India were of the same origin as the victims of the Crimean slave trade, such as for example Udaipuri Mahal, who has sometimes been referred to as a Georgian or Circassian, and Aurangabadi Mahal (d. 1688), who was said to be either "Circassian or Georgian", which was likely a term for Russian or Eastern European[82] which would mean they both likely arrived via the Crimean slave trade, perhaps via the Bukhara slave trade.

Slaves from Eastern Europe were known as far away as in the slavery in the Maldives, where they were called Charukeysi (Circassian).[83]

Abolition

The last slave raid was conducted in 1769, during the Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774), when 20,000 people were taken captive.[52]

In the peace negotiations with Russia in 1773, all Russians captives were released home from the Crimea without needing to pay ransom.[52] After the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca of 1774, all slaves and captives in the Crimea regardless of nationality were released.[52] The emancipation of such a large slave population as the one in the Crimea was a major project that could not be fulfilled quickly or easily, and in 1775, thousands of slaves were reported to still be left in the Crimea.[52]

In 1783, the Crimean Khanate was dissolved after the Russian annexation of Crimea.As late as 1805 and 1811, when Crimea had been a Russian province for over two decades, thousands of people were still registered in slavery (yasyr) under the Crimea Tatars in the Crimea.[52]

Circassian slave trade (18th–20th centuries)

See also: Circassian beauty.

Background

See also: History of concubinage in the Muslim world, Islamic views on concubinage, Qiyan, Jarya, Abd (Arabic) and white slave trade.

The Crimean slave trade was ended with the Russian annexation of Crimea in the late 18th century. However, the slave trade with Circassians from the Caucasus to the Middle East was redirected from the Crimea and instead went directly from the Caucasus to the Ottoman Empire, and was significantly expanded and continued until the early 20th century. The Circassian slave trade has also been referred to as the "Caucasian slave trade".[84]

The Circassian slave trade was heavily (though not entirely) focused on girls. In the Islamic Middle East, African women – trafficked via the trans-Saharan slave trade, the Red Sea slave trade and the Indian Ocean slave trade – were primarily used as domestic house servants and not exclusively for sexual slavery, while white women, trafficked via the Black Sea slave trade and the Barbary slave trade, where preferred for the use of concubines (sex slaves) or wives, and there was therefore a constant demand for them in the Middle East.[85]

From the late 18th century onward, when first the Crimean Khanate slave trade ended with the Russian annexation of 1783, followed by the end of the Barbary slave trade after the Barbary Wars, the Circassian slave trade became the main source of white slaves to the Islamic Middle East, and these slaves were referred to as "Circassians".[86]

In the context of the Circassian slave trade, the term Circassians did not necessarily refer to ethnic Circassians, but was used as an umbrella term for a number of different ethnicities from the Caucasus region, such as Georgians, Adyge, and Abkhazians, in the same fashion as the term "Abbyssinians" was used as a term also for African slaves who were not from Abyssinia.[87]

Muslims were banned from enslaving other people who were Muslims before their capture; technically, this made enslaving ethnic Circassians a problem, since many of them were Muslims before their enslavement, but in practice, the fact that so many Circassian slave girls were already Muslims were tolerated as an "open secret" within the slave trade.[88]

Slave trade

The Caucasus was an ideal area for slave trade, since it was a fragmented border zone affected by constant warfare and political instability.[86] Prior to the Russian conquest, many Circassian tribal leaders and princes acknowledged the suzerainty of the Ottoman sultan and converted to Islam, conducted warfare toward other Circassians and sold the children of their own Circassian serfs to Ottoman slave traders as a way to secure their own finances.[86] Circassian parents became notorious for their alleged willingness to sell their children to Ottoman slave traders, because their poverty made the high demand for Circassian girls highly lucrative.[86]

There was a tendency by Ottomans to claim that slavery was beneficial to the Circassians, since it delivered them from "primitimism to civilisation, from poverty and need to prosperity and happiness", and that they became slaves willingly: "Circassians came to Istanbul willingly 'to become wives of the Sultan and the Pachas, and the young men to become Beys and Pachas'".[89] It was commonly claimed that Circassian girls were eager to be enslaved and asked their parents to sell them to the traders, because it was the only way for them to enhance their class status.[86] It was commonly known that Circassian girls were mainly bought to become wives or concubines to rich men, which made the Circassian slave trade to be viewed as a form of marriage market, with the girls being raised by the slave traders as "apprentices" for marriage and then sold to become the wives or concubines of rich men.[86] The purported willingness to be sold to a rich man and thus escape the poverty of the Caucasus did not apply only to "marriage" as such: concubinage was more common and often a preliminary stage of marriage, but was also seen as social advancement, and the demand for concubines on the Ottoman Middle East slave market grew significantly during the 18th century.[90] A common claim was also that Circassian girls were seen laughing and joking at the slave market, which was seen as another sign that they participated willingly.[86]

The official policy of the Russians since 1805 was to abolish the slave trade in their newly conquered territories, and thus the Circassian slave trade or Caucasian slave trade was officially and gradually abolished as the Russian conquest of the Caucasus progressed between the early 1800s and the 1860s.[84] In the Treaty of Adrianople, the Russians were given control over the Ottoman forts along the Black Sea coast between Anatolia and the Caucasus, significantly reducing the Circassian slave trade, which caused the price of white women on the markets of Constantinople and Cairo to skyrocket.[85] In the 1840s, the Ottoman Empire agreed to stop their attacks on Russian forts along the Black Sea in exchange for the Russians turning a blind eye to the Circassian slave trade in now Russian Caucasus, which the Russians agreed to silently tolerate.[85]

In 1854, the Ottoman Empire banned the slave trade in white women after pressure from Great Britain and France.[91] However, in March 1858 the Ottoman governor of Trapezunt informed the British Consul that the 1854 ban had been a temporary war time ban due to foreign pressure, and that he had been given orders to allow slave ships on the Black Sea pass on their way to Constantinople, and in December formal tax regulations was introduced, legitimizing the Circassian slave trade again.[91]

Between 1856 and 1866, at least half a million Circassians were exiled from the Caucasus by the Russians.[86] The Circassian refugee colonies in Anatolia and Constantinople continued to sell girls, in this case, Circassians are noted to have sold the children of their own Circassian slaves or serfs directly to the Ottoman slave traders, or to the buyers themselves.[92] The New York Daily Times reported on August 6, 1856:

The slave trade from the Caucasus itself also continued. In 1872–1873, British sources and press reported that Circassian slaves were now transported over the Black Sea via regular ships – some of whom owned by European companies – from Black Sea ports such as Trabzon and Samsun to Constantinople.[92]

In 1873, there were many Circassian slave women in Istanbul who were sold by their Circassian immigrant slave owners to Ottoman citizens but escaped and tried to sue the government for their freedom, and a contemporary report described: "Being slaves of Circassian immigrants and being sold by their owners to buyers in Istanbul, most slave women, after being sold, are applying to the government with claims of freedom", and how these women were kept in the homes of officials until their a court of law could determine if they could be free or was legally slaves.[93] Some women who applied for freedom to a legal court were indeed manumitted, but being a free single woman in an Islamic society created significant difficulties, unless she was able to be given protection by a family who could arrange a marriage for her.[93]

Officially, slave trade was prohibited in the Ottoman Empire in 1889, but this was mainly an issue of international diplomacy and not actually in practice, though the open slave markets disappeared and the slave purchases came to be officially termed "adoptions".[94] There was a greater reluctance from Ottoman authorities to prohibit the Circassian slave trade than the African slave trade, because the Circassian slave trade was regarded as in effect a marriage market, and it continued until the end of the Ottoman Empire (1922).[95] The Ottoman elite disliked free employed female servants and preferred slave maids, and while the slaves of the Ottoman Imperial Harem was officially freed in 1909, the rest of the Ottoman elite kept their own household slaves.[94]

Slave market

Constantinople was the center of the Circassian slave trade. From 1846 onward, white slave girls were no longer sold in the open slave market such as the Avret Pazarları, but to the buyer directly in the residence of the slave trader.[96] The Circassian girls were bought by the slave traders very young, were raised by the slave trader and his family as "foster daughters" to become ideal wives, and sold via a "marriage broker" to the buyer for money in the residence of the slave trader.[95] The hidden nature of the Circassian slave trade made it invisible to foreign diplomats, and exposed it to less public criticism than the more open African slave trade.

The Circassian slave trade was considered a luxury trade. White women were sold for six times as much as the ethnic category that was regarded as second best, the Galla (Oromo) women from Abyssinia, who sold for between a tenth or a 3rd of the price of a white woman, depending on how light her skin was.[85]

The preference of white girls over African girls as sex slaves was noted by the international press, when the slave market was flooded by white girls in the 1850s due to the Circassian genocide, which resulted in the price for white slave girls to become cheaper and Muslim men who were not able to buy white girls before now exchanged their black slave women for white ones. The New York Daily Times reported on August 6, 1856:

White women slaves were primarily bought to become wives or concubines (sex slaves) for rich men. To buy a daughter-in-law was seen as a good alternative when arranging a marriage, since she was likely to become a humble wife, lacking both her own money as well as relatives, and completely dependent upon her new family.[85] Since white women were very expensive on the slave market, this essentially functioned as a marriage market for the upper classes, and many of the consorts of the Ottoman and Egyptian rulers and other rich men were former victims of the Circassian slave trade, which made it a sensitive subject for Western diplomats to criticize.[97] During the entire 19th century, many consorts of the Ottoman sultans were described as Circassian women who had been entrusted to the harem as children and brought up as foster daughters of the female family members of the Ottoman dynasty, and then presented to the Ottoman Imperial Harem, where they became the consorts – a euphemism for slave concubines – to the Ottoman sultans. The slave concubines in the Qajar harem in Iran were also Georgian and Armenian girls, some war captives, but also bought on the slave markets and presented as gifts to the shah from the provinces.[98] [99]

The Circassian slave trade was maintained in the early 20th century under the guise of a marriage market. The American journalist E. Alexander Powell described the slave trade to the harems of North African Maghreb in 1912, that when a rich Muslim man wished to enlarge his harem:

However, the Circassian slave trade did not exclusively trade in female slaves. During the Qajar dynasty of Iran, slave soldiers,, were still used for the royal guard, and they were mainly white slaves from Caucasus.[100] The 1828 war with Russia put an end to the import of white slaves from the Russian Empire borderlands as it undermined the trade in Circassians and Georgians, which caused the end of slave military in Iran, when free Iranians were employed in the royal guard instead of the still available African slaves.[100]

Girls from the Caucasus and the Circassian colonies in Anatolia were still trafficked to the Middle East in the 1920s. In 1924, the law prohibited the enslavement of white girls (normally Armenian or Georgian) on Kuwaiti territory, but in 1928 at least 60 white slave girls were discovered.[101] It became more and more rare to find white girls in the slave trade from the mid-19th century onward, and was gradually replaced by light skin women from Africa and Asia, a slave trade that continued until the 1960s and 1970s, when slavery in Saudi Arabia, slavery in the United Arab Emirates and Slavery in Oman was finally banned.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill. 3
  2. The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. (2023). Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. 160
  3. Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill. 19
  4. Parmenter, Christopher S. “Journeys into Slavery along the Black Sea Coast, c. 550–450 BCE.” Classical Antiquity 39.1 (2020): 57–94. Web.
  5. Mayers, K. (2016). The First English Explorer: The Life of Anthony Jenkinson (1529–1611) and His Adventures on the Route to the Orient. Storbritannien: Matador. p. 122-123
  6. Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill. 19
  7. Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill. 5
  8. Korpela, J. (2018). Slaves from the North: Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Nederländerna: Brill. 242
  9. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 19
  10. Pargas & Schiel, Damian A.; Juliane (2023). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 131
  11. Pargas & Schiel, Damian A.; Juliane (2023). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 161
  12. Pargas & Schiel, Damian A.; Juliane (2023). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 126
  13. The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. (2023). Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 126
  14. Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 242
  15. Web site: The Slave Market of Dublin. 23 April 2013.
  16. The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 3, C.900-c.1024. (1995). Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p. 91
  17. The World of the Khazars: New Perspectives. Selected Papers from the Jerusalem 1999 International Khazar Colloquium. (2007). Nederländerna: Brill. p. 232
  18. The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 3, C.900-c.1024. (1995). Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p. 504
  19. The slave trade of European women to the Middle East and Asia from antiquity to the ninth century. by Kathryn Ann Hain. Department of History The University of Utah. December 2016. Copyright © Kathryn Ann Hain 2016. All Rights Reserved. https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6616pp7. p. 244-246
  20. Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 35
  21. Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 38
  22. Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 39
  23. Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 38-41
  24. Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 41
  25. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 20
  26. Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill. 1
  27. Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill, p.
  28. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill, p. 19
  29. Eurasian Slavery, Ransom and Abolition in World History, 1200–1860. (2016). Storbritannien: Taylor & Francis. p 153
  30. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill, p.24-25
  31. Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 132
  32. Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 42
  33. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 21-22
  34. Pargas & Schiel, Damian A.; Juliane (2023). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 162
  35. Book: Tardy, Lajos . A Tatárországi Rabszolgakereskedelem és a Magyarok a XIII-XV. Században [The Tatar Slave Trade and the Hungarians in the XIII-XV Centuries] . Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Kiadó [Hungarian Academy of Sciences Publisher] . 1980 . Budapest . Hungarian.
  36. Eurasian Slavery, Ransom and Abolition in World History, 1200–1860. (2016). Storbritannien: Taylor & Francis. p 151-152
  37. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill, p. 35-36
  38. Eurasian Slavery, Ransom and Abolition in World History, 1200–1860. (2016). Storbritannien: Taylor & Francis. p. 9
  39. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 32-33
  40. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill, p. 27-28
  41. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill, p. 29-31
  42. Davies, Brian (2014). Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-55283-2. p. 7
  43. Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill.
  44. Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth – Early Eighteenth Centuries). Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 193
  45. Davies, Brian (2014). Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-55283-2. p. 43
  46. Mayers, K. (2016). The First English Explorer: The Life of Anthony Jenkinson (1529–1611) and His Adventures on the Route to the Orient. Storbritannien: Matador. p. 121
  47. Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth – Early Eighteenth Centuries). Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 194-195
  48. Peirce, L. (2017). Empress of the East: How a European Slave Girl Became Queen of the Ottoman Empire. USA: Basic Books.
  49. Antunes & Tagliacozzo, Cátia; Eric (2023). The Cambridge History of Global Migrations: Volume 1: Migrations, 1400–1800. The Cambridge History of Global Migrations. "1". Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-48754-2.
  50. Davies, Brian (2014). Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-55283-2. p. 25
  51. Davies, Brian (2014). Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-55283-2. p. 24-25
  52. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 173-176
  53. Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth – Early Eighteenth Centuries). Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 201
  54. Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth – Early Eighteenth Centuries). Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 203
  55. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill p. 337-385
  56. Yaşa, F. (2022). Review of Felicia Roșu (ed.) 2022. Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection between Christianity and Islam. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 75(2), 331, xxiii + 448 pp-340. https://doi.org/10.1556/062.2022.00250
  57. Yaşa, Fırat (2022-06-03). "Review of Felicia Roșu (ed.) 2022. Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection between Christianity and Islam" (på engelska). Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 75 (2): sid. 331–340. doi:10.1556/062.2022.00250. ISSN 0001-6446
  58. Davies, Brian (2014). Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-55283-2. p. 17
  59. Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill p. 173-176
  60. Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 237-238
  61. Karolinska förbundets årsbok. (1991). Sverige: Karolinska förbundet.. s. 7–10
  62. Åberg, A. (2001). Karolinska kvinnoöden. Sverige: Natur och Kultur.
  63. Åberg, Alf, (in Swedish) Karolinska kvinnoöden ['Fates of Carolinian Women'], Natur och kultur, Stockholm, 1999
  64. Åberg, Alf (1991). Fångars elände: karolinerna i Ryssland 1700–1723. ['Misery of prisoners. The Carolinians in Russia in 1700–1723'] Stockholm: Natur & Kultur. Libris 7228808. ISBN 91-27-02743-0 (in Swedish)
  65. Kustaa H. J. Vilkuna: Viha. Perikato, katkeruus ja kertomus isostavihasta., s. 120. Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura, 2005. Teoksen verkkoversio.
  66. Tarkiainen, Kari: Moskovalainen. Ruotsi, Suomi ja Venäjä 1478–1721, s. 304–310. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, 2022. ISBN 978-951-858-576-6.
  67. Zetterberg, Seppo (toim.): Suomen historian pikkujättiläinen. Helsinki: WSOY, 1990. ISBN 951-0-14253-0.
  68. Karonen, Pohjoinen suurvalta. Ruotsi ja Suomi 1521–1809
  69. Helsingin Sanomat månadsbilaga 7/2009, s. 28–33
  70. Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth – Early Eighteenth Centuries). Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 198
  71. Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth – Early Eighteenth Centuries). Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 215
  72. Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth – Early Eighteenth Centuries). Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 198
  73. Gregg, John R. (2018-07-30). Sex, the Illustrated History: Through Time, Religion, and Culture: Volume Iii; Sex in the Modern World; Europe from the 17Th Century to the 21St Century, Colonial North and South America to the 21St Century, Slavery and Homosexual Histories, and Bisexuality. Xlibris Corporation. ISBN 978-1-9845-2419-5.
  74. Roşu, Felicia (2021) . Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 173-176
  75. Pargas & Roşu, Damian Alan; Felicia (2017). Critical Readings on Global Slavery. Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-34661-1. p. 975
  76. Argit Bİ. The Imperial Harem and Its Residents. In: Life after the Harem: Female Palace Slaves, Patronage and the Imperial Ottoman Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020:38–77. doi:10.1017/9781108770316.002
  77. Pargas & Roşu, Damian Alan; Felicia (2017). Critical Readings on Global Slavery. Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-34661-1. p. 978-979
  78. Pargas & Roşu, Damian Alan; Felicia (2017). Critical Readings on Global Slavery. Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-34661-1. p. 980
  79. Jutta Sperling, Shona Kelly Wray, Gender, Property, and Law in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Communities in p. 256
  80. Mary Ann Fay, Unveiling the Harem: Elite Women and the Paradox of Seclusion in Eighteenth 256
  81. Sussan Babaie, Kathryn Babayan, Ina Baghdiantz-MacCabe, Mussumeh Farhad: Slaves of the Shah: New Elites of Safavid Iran, Bloomsbury Academic, 2004
  82. Sen Gupta, S. (2019). MAHAL: Power and Pageantry in the Mughal Harem. Indien: Hachette India.
  83. Kulikov . L.I. . 2014 . Traces of castes and other social strata in the Maldives: a case study of social stratification in a diachronic perspective (ethnographic, historic, and linguistic evidence) . Zeitschrift für Ethnologie . 139 . 2 . 199–213 [205] . 1887/32215 .
  84. Kurtynova-D'Herlugnan, L. (2010). The Tsar's Abolitionists: The Slave Trade in the Caucasus and Its Suppression. Nederländerna: Brill.
  85. Gordon, Murray (1989). Slavery in the Arab World. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-941533-30-0. p.79-89
  86. Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p. 126-127
  87. Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p.
  88. Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p. 210
  89. https://www.google.se/books/edition/Globalization/5tSUiR07g7UC?hl=sv&gbpv=1&dq=CIRCASSIAN+SLAVE+TRADE&pg=PA241&printsec=frontcover
  90. Šmigeľ M. (2020). Metamorphoses of the Circassian Slave Trade (13th–19th centuries): Aspects of Women as the "Live Goods". Slavery: Theory and Practice. 5(1): 19–36
  91. Toledano, Ehud R. (1998). Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle East. University of Washington Press. p. 31-32
  92. Toledano, Ehud R. (1998). Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle East. University of Washington Press. p. 31-33
  93. Globalization. (2001). Storbritannien: Duke University Press. p. 217-241
  94. B. Belli, “Registered female prostitution in the Ottoman Empire (1876–1909),” Ph.D. – Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2020.
  95. Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p. 217
  96. Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p. 177
  97. Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press.
  98. Book: ʿĀżod-al-Dawla, Solṭān-Aḥmad Mirzā . Tāriḵ-e ʿażodi . ʿAbd-al-Ḥosayn Navāʾi . Tehran . 1997 . 1376 Š. . 336.
  99. Encyclopedia: FATḤ-ʿALĪ SHAH QĀJĀR . 2012. Encyclopaedia Iranica .
  100. https://iranicaonline.org/articles/barda-iv BARDA and BARDA-DĀRI iv. From the Mongols to the abolition of slavery
  101. ZDANOWSKI, J. The Manumission Movement in the Gulf in the First Half of the Twentieth Century, Middle Eastern Studies, 47:6, 2011, p. 871.