Cramér's conjecture explained
In number theory, Cramér's conjecture, formulated by the Swedish mathematician Harald Cramér in 1936, is an estimate for the size of gaps between consecutive prime numbers: intuitively, that gaps between consecutive primes are always small, and the conjecture quantifies asymptotically just how small they must be. It states that
where
pn denotes the
nth
prime number,
O is
big O notation, and "log" is the
natural logarithm. While this is the statement explicitly conjectured by Cramér, his
heuristic actually supports the stronger statement
and sometimes this formulation is called Cramér's conjecture. However, this stronger version is not supported by more accurate heuristic models, which nevertheless support the first version of Cramér's conjecture. Neither form has yet been proven or disproven.
Conditional proven results on prime gaps
Cramér gave a conditional proof of the much weaker statement that
pn+1-pn=O(\sqrt{pn}logpn)
on the assumption of the
Riemann hypothesis. The best known unconditional bound is
due to Baker,
Harman, and
Pintz.
In the other direction, E. Westzynthius proved in 1931 that prime gaps grow more than logarithmically. That is,[1]
His result was improved by
R. A. Rankin,
[2] who proved that
Paul Erdős conjectured that the left-hand side of the above formula is infinite, and this was proven in 2014 by
Kevin Ford,
Ben Green,
Sergei Konyagin, and
Terence Tao,
[3] and independently by
James Maynard.
[4] The two sets of authors improved the result by a
factor later that year.
[5] Heuristic justification
Cramér's conjecture is based on a probabilistic model—essentially a heuristic—in which the probability that a number of size x is prime is 1/log x. This is known as the Cramér random model or Cramér model of the primes.[6]
In the Cramér random model,
with probability one. However, as pointed out by
Andrew Granville,
[7] Maier's theorem shows that the Cramér random model does not adequately describe the distribution of primes on short intervals, and a refinement of Cramér's model taking into account divisibility by small primes suggests that
c\ge2e-\gamma ≈ 1.1229\ldots
, where
is the
Euler–Mascheroni constant. János Pintz has suggested that the
limit sup may be infinite,
[8] and similarly
Leonard Adleman and Kevin McCurley write
As a result of the work of H. Maier on gaps between consecutive primes, the exact formulation of Cramér's conjecture has been called into question [...] It is still probably true that for every constant
, there is a constant
such that there is a prime between
and
.
[9] Similarly, Robin Visser writes
In fact, due to the work done by Granville, it is now widely believed that Cramér's conjecture is false. Indeed, there some theorems concerning short intervals between primes, such as Maier's theorem, which contradict Cramér's model.[10] (internal references removed).
Related conjectures and heuristics
Daniel Shanks conjectured the following asymptotic equality, stronger than Cramér's conjecture,[11] for record gaps:
J.H. Cadwell has proposed the formula for the maximal gaps:
G(x)\simlog2x-logxloglogx,
which is formally identical to the Shanks conjecture but suggests a lower-order term.
Marek Wolf has proposed the formula for the maximal gaps
expressed in terms of the
prime-counting function
G(x)\sim
(2log\pi(x)-logx+c),
where
and
is twice the
twin primes constant; see, . This is again formally equivalent to the Shanks conjecture but suggests lower-order terms
G(x)\simlog2x-2logxloglogx-(1-c)logx.
.
Thomas Nicely has calculated many large prime gaps.[12] He measures the quality of fit to Cramér's conjecture by measuring the ratio
}.
He writes, "For the largest known maximal gaps,
has remained near 1.13."
See also
References
- Book: Guy, Richard K. . Richard K. Guy . Unsolved problems in number theory . . 3rd . 2004 . 978-0-387-20860-2 . 1058.11001 . A8 .
- János Pintz . Pintz . János . Cramér vs. Cramér. On Cramér's probabilistic model for primes . 2363833 . 2007 . Functiones et Approximatio Commentarii Mathematici . 37 . 2 . 361–376 . 1226.11096 . 0208-6573 . 10.7169/facm/1229619660. free .
- Book: Soundararajan, K. . Kannan Soundararajan . The distribution of prime numbers . Granville . Andrew . Andrew Granville . Rudnick . Zeév . Equidistribution in number theory, an introduction. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on equidistribution in number theory, Montréal, Canada, July 11--22, 2005 . Dordrecht . . NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry . 237 . 59–83 . 2007 . 978-1-4020-5403-7 . 1141.11043 .
Notes and References
- .
- R. A. Rankin, The difference between consecutive prime numbers, J. London Math. Soc. 13 (1938), 242-247
- Ford . Kevin . Green . Ben . Konyagin . Sergei . Tao . Terence . Large gaps between consecutive prime numbers . Annals of Mathematics . Second series . 183 . 2016 . 3 . 935–974 . 10.4007/annals.2016.183.3.4 . free. 1408.4505 .
- Maynard . James . Large gaps between primes . Annals of Mathematics . Second series . 183 . 2016 . 3 . 915–933 . 10.4007/annals.2016.183.3.3 . free. 1408.5110 .
- Ford . Kevin . Green . Ben . Konyagin . Sergei . Maynard . James . Tao . Terence . Long gaps between primes . Journal of the American Mathematical Society . 31 . 2018 . 65–105 . 10.1090/jams/876. 1412.5029 .
- [Terry Tao]
- .
- János Pintz, Very large gaps between consecutive primes, Journal of Number Theory 63:2 (April 1997), pp. 286–301.
- [Leonard Adleman]
- Robin Visser, Large Gaps Between Primes, University of Cambridge (2020).
- .
- .