Corossol crater explained

Corossol structure
Other Name:Corossol crater
Location:Gulf of Saint Lawrence, Côte-Nord, Quebec
Map:Canada Quebec
Coordinates:50.05°N -66.3833°W
Confidence:Possible
Diameter:4.1km (02.5miles)
Age:Between post-Middle Ordovician and pre-Quaternary
Exposed:Yes, seabottom at water depths from NaNm (-2,147,483,648feet)
Drilled:No
Country:Canada
Province:Québec
Municipality:Sept-Îles

The Corossol structure, which is also known as the Corossol crater, is a circular, 4.3by in diameter, underwater bedrock feature that is exposed on the gulf floor of the northwestern Gulf of Saint Lawrence 20km (10miles) offshore of the city of Sept-Îles, Quebec, in eastern Canada. It is hypothesized to be a possible pre-Pleistocene, extraterrestrial impact structure. It lies underwater at a depth of 40-. This underwater feature was found during the study of high-resolution bathymetric and sub-bottom profiler data collected south of the city of Sept-Iles in the northwestern Gulf of Saint Lawrence.[1] [2]

Geology

The Corossol structure has a maximum diameter of 4.3km (02.7miles) and rises 25m (82feet) above the surrounding sea floor. At its centre, there is central uplift is 0.9– in diameter and rises to the same elevation as the crater rim to a depth of about 755m (2,477feet) below the surface of the Gulf of St Lawrence. This uplift lies within a 2– in diameter and 185m (607feet) deep circular central cavity. The central cavity is surrounded by a 90– wide brim. In addition, three concentric rings form narrow (290m (950feet) wide), shallow, and discontinuous depressions around the central cavity.[1] [2]

The central uplift, associated central cavity, brim, and rings likely represent both deformation and differential erosion of sedimentary rocks of the Ordovician Saint. Lawrence Platform. The sedimentary strata surrounding the Corossol structure show no deformation. However, seismic data reveal that they are highly fractured by a series of 10– deep faults. These faults also are associated with the concentric rings and form the irregular topography of the structure's brim.[1] [2]

Less than 50m (160feet) of Quaternary sediments partially fill the central cavity. These sediments consist of glaciomarine and postglacial sediments. The central cavity and its sediment fill are interrupted by two diagonal 50m (160feet) high bedrock ridges that connect the brim to the central peak. Using high-resolution seismic, it was found that the bedrock is locally covered with a thin veneer of glacial till overlain by 5- of glaciomarine and postglacial sediments. The discontinuous nature of the rings results from either partial burial of the rings under these sediments or partial erosion of the rings.[1] [2]

Geomorphology

The gulf bottom surrounding the Corossol structure is characterized by a relict cuesta landscape consisting of partially eroded, gently inclined sedimentary rock layers that decreases southwards into a flat topography. The cuestas consist of steep northward-facing scarps and gentle southward-dipping slopes. Along its north side, the crater is truncated by a steep scarp of one of these cuestas and a 600m (2,000feet) wide and 248m (814feet) deep basin. Distinct 200– long and 75– wide streamlined glacial lineations cut across the southern half of the Corossol structure.[2] The cuestas and associated paleovalleys likely were created by fluvial erosion during regional sea-level lowstand(s) that likely predates Quaternary glaciations.[3] [4] The passage of the Laurentide Ice Sheet formed the streamlined glacial lineations that cut across the southern half of the Corossol structure. The orientation of these lineations indicate SE–SSE-directed ice flow that scoured the surface of the Corossol structure.[1] [2]

Origin

It is proposed that the Corossol structure was created as a result of the impact of a meteorite of about 300 metres (980 ft) in diameter. The impact origin of the Corossol structure is indicated by its associated geology, faulting, fracturing, and a rock fragment recovered from the crater surface. This rock fragment exhibits, under the microscope, impact melt and shock-induced structures.[1] [2] [5]

Age

The precise, absolute age of the Corossol structure remains undetermined. It geological setting and cross-cutting relationships indicate that it was created long after the Middle Ordovician (470 million years ago) and before the accumulation of glacial till and creation of streamlined lineations, which are interpreted as subglacially produced mega-scale glacial lineations, on its surface. The relict cuestas and evidence of fluvial erosion observed on the outer walls of the structure, imply it was formed during one of the periods of regional lowstand of sea level prior to the Quaternary glaciations.[1] [2] [3]

In 2013, it was stated that the Corossol structure is related to a proposed impact event[6] that is hypothesized to have taken place at the start of the Younger Dryas Episode and it supports the hypothesis that a meteorite impact triggered this cooling episode.[7] A later paper[1] argues that their interpretation is based on the misreading of preliminary results, including a radiocarbon date, published in a conference abstract.[8] Later papers conclude on the basis of regional studies and the presence of till and glacial lineations cutting across the Corossol structure that the radiocarbon date only indicates that it was formed before deglaciation, which occurred approximately 12.7 and 12.4 cal. ka BP. Furthermore, the conference abstract did not take into account the fluvial erosion of the cuestas which support a Pre-Quaternary, possibly Paleogene or older, age for the Corossol structure. As a result, it was concluded that this structure has never been "provisionally dated to 12.9 cal. ka BP" as stated in 2013.[1] [2] Moreover, the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis has now been refuted by earth scientists and planetary impact specialists.[9]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Lajeunesse, P., St‐Onge, G., Locat, J., Duchesne, M.J., Higgins, M.D., Sanfaçon, R. and Ortiz, J., 2013. The Corossol structure: A possible impact crater on the seafloor of the northwestern Gulf of St. Lawrence, Eastern Canada. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 48(12), pp. 2542–2558.
  2. Lajeunesse, P., Duchesne, M.J., St-Onge, G., Locat, J., Higgins, M., Sanfaçon, R. and Ortiz, J., 2016. The Corossol Structure: a glaciated crater of possible impact origin in the northwestern Gulf of St Lawrence, eastern Canada. In Dowdeswell, J. A., Canals, M., Jakobsson, M., Todd, B. J., Dowdeswell, E. K. & Hogan, K. A. (eds) 2016. Atlas of Submarine Glacial Landforms: Modern, Quaternary and Ancient. Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 46(1), pp.127–128.
  3. Lajeunesse, P., 2014. Buried preglacial fluvial gorges and valleys preserved through Quaternary glaciations beneath the eastern Laurentide Ice Sheet. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 126(3–4), pp. 447–458.
  4. Loring, D.H. & Nota, D.J.G. 1973. Morphology and sediments of the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 182, pp. 1–147.
  5. Higgins, M.D., P. Lajeunesse, G. St-Onge, R. Sanfacon, and M. Duchesne, 2013, Impact Breccia Clast from the Corossol Crater, Canada. 76th Annual Meteoritical Society Meeting. Meteoritics and Planetary Science Supplement. id.5190.
  6. Holliday . Vance . Surovell . Todd . Meltzer . David . Grayson . Donald . Boslough . Mark . 2014-08-01 . The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: A cosmic catastrophe . Journal of Quaternary Science . 29 . 6 . 515–530 . 10.1002/jqs.2724. 2014JQS....29..515H . 18644154 .
  7. Wu, Y., Sharma, M., LeCompte, M.A., Demitroff, M.N. and Landis, J.D., 2013. Origin and provenance of spherules and magnetic grains at the Younger Dryas boundary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(38), pp.E3557-E3566.
  8. Higgins, M.D., Lajeunesse, P., St-Onge, G., Locat, J., Duchesne, M., Ortiz, J. and Sanfacon, R., 2011, Bathymetric and petrological evidence for a young (Pleistocene?) 4-km diameter impact crater in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence, Canada. In Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (Vol. 42, p. 1504).
  9. Holliday . Vance T. . Daulton . Tyrone L. . Bartlein . Patrick J. . Boslough . Mark B. . Breslawski . Ryan P. . Fisher . Abigail E. . Jorgeson . Ian A. . Scott . Andrew C. . Koeberl . Christian . Marlon . Jennifer . Severinghaus . Jeffrey . Petaev . Michail I. . Claeys . Philippe . 2023-07-26 . Comprehensive refutation of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH) . Earth-Science Reviews . en . 104502 . 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104502. free .