Conjunction elimination explained

Conjunction elimination
Type:Rule of inference
Field:Propositional calculus
Statement:If the conjunction

A

and

B

is true, then

A

is true, and

B

is true.
Symbolic Statement:
P\landQ
\thereforeP

,

P\landQ
\thereforeQ

(P\landQ)\vdashP,(P\landQ)\vdashQ

(P\landQ)\toP,(P\landQ)\toQ

In propositional logic, conjunction elimination (also called and elimination, ∧ elimination,[1] or simplification)[2] [3] [4] is a valid immediate inference, argument form and rule of inference which makes the inference that, if the conjunction A and B is true, then A is true, and B is true. The rule makes it possible to shorten longer proofs by deriving one of the conjuncts of a conjunction on a line by itself.

An example in English:

It's raining and it's pouring.

Therefore it's raining.

The rule consists of two separate sub-rules, which can be expressed in formal language as:

P\landQ
\thereforeP

and

P\landQ
\thereforeQ

The two sub-rules together mean that, whenever an instance of "

P\landQ

" appears on a line of a proof, either "

P

" or "

Q

" can be placed on a subsequent line by itself. The above example in English is an application of the first sub-rule.

Formal notation

The conjunction elimination sub-rules may be written in sequent notation:

(P\landQ)\vdashP

and

(P\landQ)\vdashQ

where

\vdash

is a metalogical symbol meaning that

P

is a syntactic consequence of

P\landQ

and

Q

is also a syntactic consequence of

P\landQ

in logical system;

and expressed as truth-functional tautologies or theorems of propositional logic:

(P\landQ)\toP

and

(P\landQ)\toQ

where

P

and

Q

are propositions expressed in some formal system.

Notes and References

  1. Book: David A. Duffy . Principles of Automated Theorem Proving . New York . Wiley . 1991 . Sect.3.1.2.1, p.46
  2. Copi and Cohen
  3. Moore and Parker
  4. Hurley