Conjugate beam method explained

The conjugate-beam methods is an engineering method to derive the slope and displacement of a beam. A conjugate beam is defined as an imaginary beam with the same dimensions (length) as that of the original beam but load at any point on the conjugate beam is equal to the bending moment at that point divided by EI.[1]

The conjugate-beam method was developed by Heinrich Müller-Breslau in 1865. Essentially, it requires the same amount of computation as the moment-area theorems to determine a beam's slope or deflection; however, this method relies only on the principles of statics, so its application will be more familiar.[2]

The basis for the method comes from the similarity of Eq. 1 and Eq 2 to Eq 3 and Eq 4. To show this similarity, these equations are shown below.

Eq.1 dV
dx

=w

Eq.3 d2M
dx2

=w

Eq.2 d\theta=
dx
M
EI
Eq.4 d2v=
dx2
M
EI

Integrated, the equations look like this.

V=\intwdx

M=\int\left[\intwdx\right]dx

\theta=\int\left(M
EI

\right)dx

v=\int\left[\int\left(M
EI

\right)dx\right]dx

Here the shear V compares with the slope θ, the moment M compares with the displacement v, and the external load w compares with the M/EI diagram. Below is a shear, moment, and deflection diagram. A M/EI diagram is a moment diagram divided by the beam's Young's modulus and moment of inertia.

To make use of this comparison we will now consider a beam having the same length as the real beam, but referred here as the "conjugate beam." The conjugate beam is "loaded" with the M/EI diagram derived from the load on the real beam. From the above comparisons, we can state two theorems related to the conjugate beam:[2]

Theorem 1: The slope at a point in the real beam is numerically equal to the shear at the corresponding point in the conjugate beam.

Theorem 2: The displacement of a point in the real beam is numerically equal to the moment at the corresponding point in the conjugate beam.[2]

Conjugate-beam supports

When drawing the conjugate beam it is important that the shear and moment developed at the supports of the conjugate beam account for the corresponding slope and displacement of the real beam at its supports, a consequence of Theorems 1 and 2. For example, as shown below, a pin or roller support at the end of the real beam provides zero displacement, but a non zero slope. Consequently, from Theorems 1 and 2, the conjugate beam must be supported by a pin or a roller, since this support has zero moment but has a shear or end reaction. When the real beam is fixed supported, both the slope and displacement are zero. Here the conjugate beam has a free end, since at this end there is zero shear and zero moment. Corresponding real and conjugate supports are shown below. Note that, as a rule, neglecting axial forces, statically determinate real beams have statically determinate conjugate beams; and statically indeterminate real beams have unstable conjugate beams. Although this occurs, the M/EI loading will provide the necessary "equilibrium" to hold the conjugate beam stable.[2]

Real beam! colspan="2"
Conjugate beam
Fixed supportFree end

v=0

\theta=0

\overlineM=0

\overlineQ=0

Free endFixed support

v\not=0

\theta\not=0

\overlineM\not=0

\overlineQ\not=0

Hinged supportHinged support

v=0

\theta\not=0

\overlineM=0

\overlineQ\not=0

Middle supportMiddle hinge

v=0

\theta

continue

\overlineM=0

\overlineQ

continue

Middle hingeMiddle support

v

continue

\theta

discontinue

\overlineM

continue

\overlineQ

discontinue

Procedure for analysis

The following procedure provides a method that may be used to determine the displacement and deflection at a point on the elastic curve of a beam using the conjugate-beam method.

Conjugate beam

Equilibrium

See also

References

Notes and References

  1. Book: Strength of materials . 9788131808146 . 20 November 2014 . Bansal . R. K. . 2010.
  2. Book: Hibbeler, R.C. . Structural Analysis . limited . 2009 . Pearson . Upper Saddle River, NJ . 328–335 . 9780136020608.