Conformastatic spacetimes refer to a special class of static solutions to Einstein's equation in general relativity.
The line element for the conformastatic class of solutions in Weyl's canonical coordinates reads[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
(1) ds2=-e2dt2+e-2(d\rho2+dz2+\rho2d\phi2) ,
(2) Rab-
1 | |
2 |
Rgab=8\piTab .
\Psi(\rho,\phi,z)
\Psi(\rho,\phi,z)
In consistency with the conformastatic geometry Eq(1), the electrostatic field would arise from an electrostatic potential
Aa
(3) Aa=\Phi(\rho,z,\phi)[dt]a ,
Fab
(4) Fab=Ab;a-Aa;b ,
(5)
(EM) | |
T | |
ab |
=
1 | |
4\pi |
(Fac
c | ||
F | - | |
b |
1 | |
4 |
gabFcdFcd) .
Plug Eq(1) and Eqs(3)(4)(5) into "trace-free" (R=0) Einstein's field equation, and one could obtain the reduced field equations for the metric function
\Psi(\rho,\phi,z)
(6) \nabla2\Psi=e-\nabla\Phi\nabla\Phi
(7) \Psii\Psij=e-2\Phii\Phij
where
\nabla2=\partial\rho\rho+
1 | |
\rho |
\partial\rho+
1 | |
\rho2 |
\partial\phi\phi+\partialzz
\nabla=\partial\rho\hat{e}\rho+
1 | |
\rho |
\partial\phi\hat{e}\phi+\partialz\hat{e}z
i,j
[\rho,z,\phi]
The extremal Reissner–Nordström spacetime is a typical conformastatic solution. In this case, the metric function is identified as
(8) \PsiERN=ln
L | |
L+M |
, L=\sqrt{\rho2+z2} ,
which put Eq(1) into the concrete form
(9)
| ||||
ds |
| ||||
dt |
(d\rho2+dz2+\rho2d\varphi2) .
Applying the transformations
(10) L=r-M , z=(r-M)\cos\theta , \rho=(r-M)\sin\theta ,
one obtains the usual form of the line element of extremal Reissner–Nordström solution,
(11)
| ||||
ds |
)2
| ||||
dt |
)-2dr2+r2(d\theta2+\sin2\thetad\phi2) .
Some conformastatic solutions have been adopted to describe charged dust disks.
Many solutions, such as the extremal Reissner–Nordström solution discussed above, can be treated as either a conformastatic metric or Weyl metric, so it would be helpful to make a comparison between them. The Weyl spacetimes refer to the static, axisymmetric class of solutions to Einstein's equation, whose line element takes the following form (still in Weyl's canonical coordinates):
(12) ds2=-e2\psi(\rho,z)dt2+e2\gamma(\rho,z)-2\psi(\rho,z)(d\rho2+dz2)+e-2\psi(\rho,z)\rho2d\phi2.
\gamma(\rho,z)
\psi(\rho,z)
(13) \gamma(\rho,z)\equiv0 , \psi(\rho,z)\mapsto\Psi(\rho,\phi,z).
\gamma(\rho,z)
(14.a) \nabla2\psi=(\nabla\psi)2
(14.b) \nabla2\psi=e-2\psi(\nabla\Phi)2
(14.c)
2 | |
\psi | |
,\rho |
2 | |
-\psi | |
,z |
=e-2\psi
2 | |
(\Phi | |
,\rho |
2 | |
-\Phi | |
,z |
)
(14.d) 2\psi,\rho\psi,z=2e-2\psi\Phi,\rho\Phi,z
(14.e) \nabla2\Phi=2\nabla\psi\nabla\Phi,
where
\nabla2=\partial\rho\rho+
1 | |
\rho |
\partial\rho+\partialzz
\nabla=\partial\rho\hat{e}\rho+\partialz\hat{e}z
It is also noticeable that, Eqs(14) for Weyl are consistent but not identical with the conformastatic Eqs(6)(7) above.