Completion of a ring explained

In abstract algebra, a completion is any of several related functors on rings and modules that result in complete topological rings and modules. Completion is similar to localization, and together they are among the most basic tools in analysing commutative rings. Complete commutative rings have a simpler structure than general ones, and Hensel's lemma applies to them. In algebraic geometry, a completion of a ring of functions R on a space X concentrates on a formal neighborhood of a point of X: heuristically, this is a neighborhood so small that all Taylor series centered at the point are convergent. An algebraic completion is constructed in a manner analogous to completion of a metric space with Cauchy sequences, and agrees with it in the case when R has a metric given by a non-Archimedean absolute value.

General construction

Suppose that E is an abelian group with a descending filtration

E=F0E\supsetF1E\supsetF2E\supset

of subgroups. One then defines the completion (with respect to the filtration) as the inverse limit:

\widehat{E}=\varprojlim(E/FnE)=\left\{\left.(\overline{an})n\geq0\in\prodn\geq0(E/FnE)\right|ai\equiv

iE}
a
j\pmod{F

foralli\leqj\right\}.

This is again an abelian group. Usually E is an additive abelian group. If E has additional algebraic structure compatible with the filtration, for instance E is a filtered ring, a filtered module, or a filtered vector space, then its completion is again an object with the same structure that is complete in the topology determined by the filtration. This construction may be applied both to commutative and noncommutative rings. As may be expected, when the intersection of the

FiE

equals zero, this produces a complete topological ring.

Krull topology

I=ak{m}

is especially important, for example the distinguished maximal ideal of a valuation ring. The basis of open neighbourhoods of 0 in R is given by the powers In, which are nested and form a descending filtration on R:

F0R=R\supsetI\supsetI2\supset,FnR=In.

(Open neighborhoods of any rR are given by cosets r + In.) The (I-adic) completion is the inverse limit of the factor rings,

\widehat{R}I=\varprojlim(R/In)

pronounced "R I hat". The kernel of the canonical map from the ring to its completion is the intersection of the powers of I. Thus is injective if and only if this intersection reduces to the zero element of the ring; by the Krull intersection theorem, this is the case for any commutative Noetherian ring which is an integral domain or a local ring.

There is a related topology on R-modules, also called Krull or I-adic topology. A basis of open neighborhoods of a module M is given by the sets of the form

x+InMforx\inM.

The I-adic completion of an R-module M is the inverse limit of the quotients

\widehat{M}I=\varprojlim(M/InM).

This procedure converts any module over R into a complete topological module over

\widehat{R}I

. [that is wrong in general! Only if the ideal is finite generated it is the case.]

Examples

\Zp

is obtained by completing the ring

\Z

of integers at the ideal (p).

ak{m}=(x1,\ldots,xn)

be the maximal ideal generated by the variables. Then the completion

\widehat{R}ak{m

} is the ring Kx1,...,xn of formal power series in n variables over K.

R

and an ideal

I=(f1,\ldots,fn),

the

I

-adic completion of

R

is an image of a formal power series ring, specifically, the image of the surjection[1]

\begin{cases}R[[x1,\ldots,xn]]\to\widehat{R}I\xi\mapstofi\end{cases}

The kernel is the ideal

(x1-f1,\ldots,xn-fn).

Completions can also be used to analyze the local structure of singularities of a scheme. For example, the affine schemes associated to

\Complex[x,y]/(xy)

and the nodal cubic plane curve

\Complex[x,y]/(y2-x2(1+x))

have similar looking singularities at the origin when viewing their graphs (both look like a plus sign). Notice that in the second case, any Zariski neighborhood of the origin is still an irreducible curve. If we use completions, then we are looking at a "small enough" neighborhood where the node has two components. Taking the localizations of these rings along the ideal

(x,y)

and completing gives

\Complex[[x,y]]/(xy)

and

\Complex[[x,y]]/((y+u)(y-u))

respectively, where

u

is the formal square root of

x2(1+x)

in

\Complex[[x,y]].

More explicitly, the power series:

u=x\sqrt{1+x}=

infty
\sum
n=0
(-1)n(2n)!
(1-2n)(n!)2(4n)

xn+1.

Since both rings are given by the intersection of two ideals generated by a homogeneous degree 1 polynomial, we can see algebraically that the singularities "look" the same. This is because such a scheme is the union of two non-equal linear subspaces of the affine plane.

Properties

Moreover, if M and N are two modules over the same topological ring R and fM → N is a continuous module map then f uniquely extends to the map of the completions:

\widehat{f}:\widehat{M}\to\widehat{N},

where

\widehat{M},\widehat{N}

are modules over

\widehat{R}.

\widehat{M}=MR\widehat{R}.

Together with the previous property, this implies that the functor of completion on finitely generated R-modules is exact: it preserves short exact sequences. In particular, taking quotients of rings commutes with completion, meaning that for any quotient R-algebra

R/I

, there is an isomorphism

\widehat{R/I}\cong\widehatR/\widehatI.

ak{m}

and residue field K. If R contains a field, then

R\simeqK[[x1,\ldots,xn]]/I

for some n and some ideal I (Eisenbud, Theorem 7.7).

See also

References

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Stacks Project — Tag 0316. stacks.math.columbia.edu. 2017-01-14.