Complete Heyting algebra explained

In mathematics, especially in order theory, a complete Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is complete as a lattice. Complete Heyting algebras are the objects of three different categories; the category CHey, the category Loc of locales, and its opposite, the category Frm of frames. Although these three categories contain the same objects, they differ in their morphisms, and thus get distinct names. Only the morphisms of CHey are homomorphisms of complete Heyting algebras.

Locales and frames form the foundation of pointless topology, which, instead of building on point-set topology, recasts the ideas of general topology in categorical terms, as statements on frames and locales.

Definition

Consider a partially ordered set (P, ≤) that is a complete lattice. Then P is a complete Heyting algebra or frame if any of the following equivalent conditions hold:

(x\land)

has a right adjoint (also called the lower adjoint of a (monotone) Galois connection), for each element x of P.

x\landveess=vees(x\lands).

x\land(y\lorz)=(x\landy)\lor(x\landz)

and the meet operations

(x\land)

are Scott continuous (i.e., preserve the suprema of directed sets) for all x in P.

The entailed definition of Heyting implication is

a\tob=vee\{c\mida\landc\leb\}.

Using a bit more category theory, we can equivalently define a frame to be a cocomplete cartesian closed poset.

Examples

The system of all open sets of a given topological space ordered by inclusion is a complete Heyting algebra.

Frames and locales

The objects of the category CHey, the category Frm of frames and the category Loc of locales are complete Heyting algebras. These categories differ in what constitutes a morphism:

The relation of locales and their maps to topological spaces and continuous functions may be seen as follows. Let

f:X\toY

be any map. The power sets P(X) and P(Y) are complete Boolean algebras, and the map

f-1:P(Y)\toP(X)

is a homomorphism of complete Boolean algebras. Suppose the spaces X and Y are topological spaces, endowed with the topology O(X) and O(Y) of open sets on X and Y. Note that O(X) and O(Y) are subframes of P(X) and P(Y). If

f

is a continuous function, then

f-1:O(Y)\toO(X)

preserves finite meets and arbitrary joins of these subframes. This shows that O is a functor from the category Top of topological spaces to Loc, taking any continuous map

f:X\toY

to the map

O(f):O(X)\toO(Y)

in Loc that is defined in Frm to be the inverse image frame homomorphism

f-1:O(Y)\toO(X).

Given a map of locales

f:A\toB

in Loc, it is common to write

f*:B\toA

for the frame homomorphism that defines it in Frm. Using this notation,

O(f)

is defined by the equation

O(f)*=f-1.

Conversely, any locale A has a topological space S(A), called its spectrum, that best approximates the locale. In addition, any map of locales

f:A\toB

determines a continuous map

S(A)\toS(B).

Moreover this assignment is functorial: letting P(1) denote the locale that is obtained as the power set of the terminal set

1=\{*\},

the points of S(A) are the maps

p:P(1)\toA

in Loc, i.e., the frame homomorphisms

p*:A\toP(1).

For each

a\inA

we define

Ua

as the set of points

p\inS(A)

such that

p*(a)=\{*\}.

It is easy to verify that this defines a frame homomorphism

A\toP(S(A)),

whose image is therefore a topology on S(A). Then, if

f:A\toB

is a map of locales, to each point

p\inS(A)

we assign the point

S(f)(q)

defined by letting

S(f)(p)*

be the composition of

p*

with

f*,

hence obtaining a continuous map

S(f):S(A)\toS(B).

This defines a functor

S

from Loc to Top, which is right adjoint to O.

Any locale that is isomorphic to the topology of its spectrum is called spatial, and any topological space that is homeomorphic to the spectrum of its locale of open sets is called sober. The adjunction between topological spaces and locales restricts to an equivalence of categories between sober spaces and spatial locales.

Any function that preserves all joins (and hence any frame homomorphism) has a right adjoint, and, conversely, any function that preserves all meets has a left adjoint. Hence, the category Loc is isomorphic to the category whose objects are the frames and whose morphisms are the meet preserving functions whose left adjoints preserve finite meets. This is often regarded as a representation of Loc, but it should not be confused with Loc itself, whose morphisms are formally the same as frame homomorphisms in the opposite direction.

Literature

Still a great resource on locales and complete Heyting algebras.

Includes the characterization in terms of meet continuity.

Surprisingly extensive resource on locales and Heyting algebras. Takes a more categorical viewpoint.