Compass equivalence theorem explained

In geometry, the compass equivalence theorem is an important statement in compass and straightedge constructions. The tool advocated by Plato in these constructions is a divider or collapsing compass, that is, a compass that "collapses" whenever it is lifted from a page, so that it may not be directly used to transfer distances. The modern compass with its fixable aperture can be used to transfer distances directly and so appears to be a more powerful instrument. However, the compass equivalence theorem states that any construction via a "modern compass" may be attained with a collapsing compass. This can be shown by establishing that with a collapsing compass, given a circle in the plane, it is possible to construct another circle of equal radius, centered at any given point on the plane. This theorem is Proposition II of Book I of Euclid's Elements. The proof of this theorem has had a chequered history.^[1]

Construction

The following construction and proof of correctness are given by Euclid in his Elements.^[2] Although there appear to be several cases in Euclid's treatment, depending upon choices made when interpreting ambiguous instructions, they all lead to the same conclusion, and so, specific choices are given below.

Given points,, and, construct a circle centered at with radius the length of (that is, equivalent to the solid green circle, but centered at).

• Draw a circle centered at and passing through and vice versa (the red circles). They will intersect at point and form the equilateral triangle .
• Extend past and find the intersection of and the circle, labeled .
• Create a circle centered at and passing through (the blue circle).
• Extend past and find the intersection of and the circle, labeled .
• Construct a circle centered at and passing through (the dotted green circle)
• Because is an equilateral triangle, .
• Because and are on a circle around, .
• Therefore, .
• Because is on the circle, .
• Therefore, .

Alternative construction without straightedge

It is possible to prove compass equivalence without the use of the straightedge. This justifies the use of "fixed compass" moves (constructing a circle of a given radius at a different location) in proofs of the Mohr–Mascheroni theorem, which states that any construction possible with straightedge and compass can be accomplished with compass alone.

Given points,, and, construct a circle centered at with the radius, using only a collapsing compass and no straightedge.

• Draw a circle centered at and passing through and vice versa (the blue circles). They will intersect at points and .
• Draw circles through with centers at and (the red circles). Label their other intersection .
• Draw a circle (the green circle) with center passing through . This is the required circle.

There are several proofs of the correctness of this construction and it is often left as an exercise for the reader. Here is a modern one using transformations.

• The line is the perpendicular bisector of . Thus is the reflection of through line .
• By construction, is the reflection of through line .
• Since reflection is an isometry, it follows that as desired.

Notes and References

1. Toussaint . Godfried T. . Godfried Toussaint . January 1993 . A New Look at Euclid's Second Proposition . The Mathematical Intelligencer . en . 15 . 3 . 12–24 . 10.1007/bf03024252 . 0343-6993 . 1866-7414 . Springer US. 26811463 .
2. Book: Heath, Thomas L. . T. L. Heath . The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements . 2nd . 1925 . 1956 . Dover Publications . New York . 0-486-60088-2 . 244 . registration .