Commonwealth v. Donoghue explained

Commonwealth v. Donoghue
Court:	Kentucky Court of Appeals
Full Name:	Commonwealth v. Donoghue
Citations:	250 Ky. 343 63 S.W.2d 3
Decision By:	Stanley
Italic Title:	yes

Commonwealth v. Donoghue, 250 Ky. 343, 63 S.W.2d 3 (1933),^[1] was a case decided by the Kentucky Court of Appeals involving conspiracy based on common law criminal offenses imported through reception statutes.

Background

M. Donoghue and others ran the Boone Loan Company in Kenton County, which was accused of charging usury rates of interest, or loan sharking. The judge created the crime in the case: "a nefarious plan for the habitual exaction of gross injury".^[2]

Decision

The Court of Appeals upheld the ability of judges to create common law crimes in the state of Kentucky.

Later developments

In 1975 a Kentucky state statute, KRS 500.020, prohibited the prosecution of common law crimes in Kentucky, rendering the decision in Commonwealth v. Donoghue to be of no further effect.^[3]

See also

• State v. Palendrano, a similar case in New Jersey which reached a different conclusion.

Notes and References

1. Commonwealth v. Donoghue, 250 Ky. 343, 63 S.W.2d 3 (1933).
2. Dressler, J. Understanding Criminal Law, Fifth Edition. Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. Newark, New Jersey: 2009, p. 28
3. Web site: KRS 500.020 . July 4, 2012 . June 7, 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130607175703/http://www.lrc.ky.gov/KRS/500-00/020.PDF . dead .