Common court (Poland) explained

See main article: Judiciary of Poland.

In Poland, the common courts, according to article 177 of the Constitution, are the courts of general jurisdiction, i.e. they rule on all cases in which the jurisdiction has not been explicitly transferred to other courts. This includes a broad range of cases, including civil, criminal, labour, economic and insurance law.[1] The other types of courts recognised in Poland are administrative courts and military courts. The territorial jurisdiction of these courts and their creation is regulated by the minister of justice.[2]

Poland has a three-tier system of common courts. Most of the cases land in one of 318 regional courts, whose rulings may be appealed to 47 district courts . The latter courts also hear some cases in their original jurisdiction, which tend to be cases where high sums of money are disputed, the ones about serious crimes, and some that deal with narrow subjects, like intellectual property, surveillance, competition law, and personal rights. District court rulings issued in the original jurisdiction may be appealed to an appeal court ; despite the name, the appeal courts will also serve as the courts of original jurisdiction in disciplinary cases against common court judges. After the courts of two instances have reviewed their cases, a cassation or its equivalent may be lodged in the Supreme Court.[3] [4]

Apart from their strictly judicial duties, the common courts in Poland maintain several registries. The National Court Register (Krajowy Rejestr Sądowy) maintains information about most companies in Poland; other such databases include the land and mortgage registry, the register of press outlets, the register of political parties, the register of pension and investment funds, the registry of ships, and the register of pledges.

Sąd rejonowy

See main article: Sąd rejonowy.

A sąd rejonowy, translated by the Ministry of Justice into regional court, or, by some other organisations, into district court,[5] is the trial court for the vast majority of cases, reviewing them by default unless the authority was transferred to a higher court. In fact, according to the Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland, out of about 14,381,500 cases solved in Poland in 2020, about 13,477,800 originated in these courts.[6] There are currently 318 such courts, each normally spanning several gminas; however, some large cities, like Warsaw, Kraków, Łódź, Wrocław, Poznań, Gdańsk, Szczecin, Lublin and Katowice, are split between two or more such courts. The Minister of Justice, as authorised by article 19 of the Law on the organisation of common courts, may create through a regulation a local branch division of a sąd rejonowy located in a town other than the main seat of the court and consisting of replicated divisions mirroring those operating at the main seat (either all or selected), with both locations supported by a single administrative apparatus.[7]

All such courts hear trials in at least three divisions (wydziały): a civil (cywilny), a criminal (karny) and a family and minors (rodzinny i nieletnich) one. In addition to that, the courts based in the cities that at the same time host a sąd okręgowy or other located in a city with powiat rights also include an economic (gospodarczy) division; and in most cases also a labour and social insurance (pracy i ubezpieczeń społecznych) division.[8] If a dispute (e.g. between two companies or between an employer and an employee) occurs within the jurisdiction of a court without the relevant chamber, the case must be tried in the nearest court that includes it (as indicated by the minister of justice - this often happens to be the seat of the sąd okręgowy).[9] Since 1 January 2020, some courts may also create an enforcement division (wydział egzekucyjny), dealing mostly with enforcing court's orders to seize assets in order to cover liabilities.[10] Additionally, one of the two regional courts for Lublin additionally operates a nationwide civil division for cases filed using a simplified procedure of the electronic writ of payment (Polish: elektroniczne postępowanie upominawcze), regardless of the sum in dispute.[11]

Most regional courts also have land and mortgage registry divisions (wydział ksiąg wieczystych), which record various transactions with respect to real estate and land titles. 21 courts in largest cities additionally operate 27 (duplicate in the cases of the busiest courts) economic divisions designated specifically for maintaining the National Court Register (Krajowy Rejestr Sądowy), which is the company register for all companies except those formed under sole proprietorship, and 52 courts operate an information point providing access to and excerpts from data of the Register.[12] These, however, they have been losing importance, as the Register may nowadays be searched online free of charge.

In addition, 11 courts (serving the cities where appeal courts are located) maintain also a further economic division, designated for operating the containing entries on all registered pledges and voluntary liens granted on collaterals other than real estate,[13] but ship mortgage and maritime liens are entered in a separate Registry of Ships. In addition, the Register of Pledges does not cover collaterals under tax liens, registered in the separate operated by the National Revenue Administration.

Sąd okręgowy

See main article: Sąd okręgowy.

A sąd okręgowy, also translated inconsistently, with variants including circuit, provincial or regional court[14] (the Polish MoJ translates the name into district court), is higher in the hierarchy of the common courts compared to the sąd rejonowy. There are currently 47 district courts, located mainly in larger cities; the newest one in Sosnowiec was opened on 1 April 2022.[15] Warsaw is the only city to be split between two district courts (Warsaw and Warsaw-Praga district courts). In 2020, they heard an estimated 808,600 cases.

The district court serves both as a court of original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction. As an appellate court, it hears appeals from the sąd rejonowy courts within its territory (known as okręg). There is also a specified catalogue of cases where the court has original jurisdiction, as determined by law. As a rule of thumb, these will tend to be cases with high sums at stake, those about serious crimes, and those about intellectual property and personal rights. Some of the items are listed below:[16]

The district courts always include a criminal and a civil division, as well as a labour and social insurance division; some may additionally have a commercial division as well as an inspection division (wydział wizytacyjny) tasked with administrative auditing and oversight of the subordinate courts; a penitentiary division for cases related to prisons, an execution division with similar roles to sąd rejonowy court's enforcement division, and others according to the court's needs as determined by the minister of justice. The district courts will often feature separate appellate sections or, in the case of smaller courts, appeal panels within the sections.[18] They are authorised to issue European arrest warrants (article 607a of KPK) and maintain a list of court experts for the district.[19] The district courts also maintain the, which is obligatory for most media publications;[20] the one in Warsaw also has the registries of political parties,[21] investment funds and pension funds.[22]

Selected district courts will handle cases in some niche domains. Intellectual property lawsuits, on the basis of article 47990 of KPC, are heard in five district courts, with the most complicated cases heard exclusively in Warsaw.[23] [24] Appeals from several regulators in competition law,[25] as well appeals against the decisions of the (a quasi-judicial public procurement arbiter)[26] are also processed in the district court in Warsaw. The Warsaw district court additionally reviews telecommunications, postal or Internet data surveillance requests from the central government organs, such as ABW or CBA.[27] The Szczecin and Gdańsk district courts have affiliated quasi-judicial bodies named (in Szczecin and in Gdynia, respectively), and the latter court features an appellate maritime chamber.[28]

Sąd apelacyjny

Sąd apelacyjny (translated as appeal court by the Ministry of Justice), as the name suggests, primarily functions in appellate jurisdiction. These 11 courts hear appeals from rulings made by a common sąd okręgowy court in its original jurisdiction; additionally, they hear requests to cancel a decision of a Polish arbitration court (article 1208 of), and generally review appeals from rulings of quasi-judicial bodies of some statutory professional regulatory colleges of the so-called self-regulating professions, unless these by law are subject to cassation to the Supreme Court.[29] [30] [31] Each appeal court also has an affiliated disciplinary court hearing in the first instance the majority of charges against common court justices. Its verdicts can be appealed to the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court, with the exception of the most grave cases specified in the Polish Supreme Court Disciplinary Chamber law, heard both in first and in second instance by that Supreme Court chamber.

Three divisions are normally formed within these courts: the criminal division, the labour and social insurance division and the civil division, which hears appeals from verdicts in civil, family, economic law and intellectual law lawsuits. An inspection chamber may also be formed for auditing and oversight of the subordinate courts within the appeal court's jurisdiction (known in Polish as apelacja, not to be confused with another meaning of this word, namely, an appeal). The court is tasked with making a budget of all the courts within its jurisdiction and control the expenditures of the district and regional courts.[32]

Notes and References

  1. Mikuli . Piotr . 2014 . Poland: Current Debates on the Supervision over the Administrative Activity of the Common Courts . European Public Law . 20 . 3 . 521–537 . 2022-03-18 . ResearchGate.
  2. Web site: Obwieszczenie Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 2 czerwca 2021 r. w sprawie ogłoszenia jednolitego tekstu rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości w sprawie ustalenia siedzib i obszarów właściwości sądów apelacyjnych, sądów okręgowych i sądów rejonowych oraz zakresu rozpoznawanych przez nie spraw . 2022-03-18 . isap.sejm.gov.pl.
  3. Web site: Nadzwyczajne środki zaskarżenia w działaniach Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich . Polish Ombudsman . pl.
  4. Web site: Chojniak . Łukasz . 2018 . Podstawy skargi nadzwyczajnej a postępowanie odwoławcze . Białystok University . pl.
  5. Web site: 2008 . Judgments - Pilecki (Appellant) v Circuit Court of Legnica, Poland (Respondents) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty's High Court of Justice) . House of Lords.
  6. 2021 . Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland 2021 . Rocznik Statystyczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej = Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland . Warsaw . Statistics Poland . 160, 164–5, 188 . 1506-0632.
  7. Web site: Ustawa z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych. . 2022-03-16 . isap.sejm.gov.pl.
  8. Web site: Sąd pracy i ubezpieczeń społecznych . 2022-03-18 . www.infor.pl . en.
  9. Web site: Bełczącki . Robert Marek . Wiśniewski . Tadeusz . 2015-07-08 . Badanie właściwości sądu ze względu na gospodarczy charakter sprawy . 2022-03-18 . OpenLEX . pl.
  10. Web site: 2019-12-31 . W nowym roku powstaną wydziały egzekucyjne w sądach . 2022-03-18 . Prawo.pl . pl.
  11. Web site: Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze . 2022-05-30 . Sąd Apelacyjny w Lublinie.
  12. Web site: 2016-01-23 . Sądy i oddziały Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego . 2022-03-18 . eKRS . pl-PL.
  13. Web site: Udzielanie informacji z Rejestru Zastawów . 2022-05-30 . Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości . pl-PL.
  14. Web site: 2020-01-14 . Opinion No. 977/2020: Amendments (*) to the Act on the system of common courts, the Act on the Supreme Court, the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary and certain other acts of 20 December 2019 . Venice Commission.
  15. Web site: 2022-04-01 . Otwarcie Sądu Okręgowego w Sosnowcu – lepszy dostęp do wymiaru sprawiedliwości . 2022-04-04 . Ministry of Justice of Poland - Government of Poland . pl-PL.
  16. Web site: Sawiński . Maciej . 2014-07-16 . Do którego sądu wnieść pozew? – część 1 . 2022-06-02 . pl-PL.
  17. Web site: Sawiński . Maciej . 2014-07-21 . 8 wskazówek jak obliczać wartość przedmiotu sporu . 2022-06-02 . pl-PL.
  18. Web site: Jakie wydziały funkcjonują w sądach powszechnych? . 2022-03-18 . Infor . pl.
  19. Web site: Biegli sądowi . 2022-06-02 . Poznań District Court.
  20. Web site: Informacja dotycząca rejestru dzienników i czasopism . 2022-06-02 . Lublin District Court.
  21. Web site: Ustawa o partiach politycznych . 2022-03-18 . Chancellery of the Sejm.
  22. Web site: Rejestr funduszy emerytalnych i inwestycyjnych . Ministry of Justice: Government of Poland.
  23. Web site: 2021-07-08 . Jak funkcjonują sądy własności intelektualnej po roku od ich powołania? . 2022-03-18 . Kancelaria Traple Konarski Podrecki i Wspólnicy . pl.
  24. Web site: XVII Wydział Własności Intelektualnej - Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku . 2022-04-12 . Gdańsk District Court.
  25. Web site: Sąd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów - Lexplay.pl . 2022-03-18 . Porady i usługi prawne online, pomoc prawna, prawo on line - Lexplay.pl . pl-PL.
  26. Web site: Ustawa z dnia 11 września 2019 r. - Prawo zamówień publicznych . 2022-03-19 . isap.sejm.gov.pl.
  27. Web site: Obwieszczenie Marszałka Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 14 października 2021 r. w sprawie ogłoszenia jednolitego tekstu ustawy o szczególnych formach sprawowania nadzoru przez ministra właściwego do spraw wewnętrznych . 2022-06-02 . isap.sejm.gov.pl.
  28. Web site: Ustawa z dnia 1 grudnia 1961 r. o izbach morskich. . 2022-06-03 . isap.sejm.gov.pl.
  29. Harla . Andrzej Grzegorz . 2021-12-21 . Odwołanie od orzeczeń Komorniczej Komisji Dyscyplinarnej . Przegląd Prawa i Administracji . pl . 126 . 183–201 . 10.19195/0137-1134.126.13 . 0137-1134 . 245550879. free .
  30. Web site: 2020-12-09 . Uchwała składu siedmiu sędziów Sądu Najwyższego (sygn. akt III PZP 2/20) . Supreme Court . 9–10 . pl.
  31. Uniwersytet w Białymstoku . Kulesza . Cezary . 2017 . Ewolucja wybranych procedur dyscyplinarnych w świetle konwencyjnego i konstytucyjnego standardu prawa do sądu . Białostockie Studia Prawnicze . 22 . 1 . 11–22 . 10.15290/bsp.2017.22.01.01. free .
  32. Web site: Właściwość - Sąd Apelacyjny w Krakowie . 2022-03-18 . Appeal Court in Kraków . pl.