Comet HLLV explained

Comet HLLV
Function:Crew / Cargo Launch Vehicle
Country-Origin:United States
Height:410feet
Diameter:11.5m (37.7feet)
Stages:3
Capacities:
Location:LEO
Kilos:254400kg (560,900lb)
Location:TLI
Kilos:60600-
Status:Proposed and cancelled
Sites:Kennedy Space Center
Stagedata:
Type:booster
Stageno:F1-A booster
Length:155feet
Diameter:260inches
Empty:75678kg (166,841lb)
Propmass:985368kg (2,172,365lb)
Engines:2 Rocketdyne F-1A
Thrust:16013kNeach on sea level
Fuel:RP-1/LOX
Type:stage
Stageno:First
Length:160.4feet
Diameter:33feet
Empty:209030kg (460,830lb)
Propmass:2729770kg (6,018,110lb)
Engines:5 Rocketdyne F-1A
Thrust:40050kN sea level
Fuel:RP-1/LOX
Type:stage
Stageno:Second
Length:103feet
Diameter:33feet
Empty:60767kg (133,968lb)
Propmass:634439kg (1,398,699lb)
Engines:6 Rocketdyne J-2S
Thrust:7750kN vacuum
Fuel:LH2/LOX
Type:stage
Stageno:Translunar Injection
Length:55.6feet
Diameter:33feet
Empty:21336kg (47,038lb)
Propmass:135392kg (298,488lb)
Engines:1 Rocketdyne J-2S
Thrust:1180kN vacuum
Fuel:LH2/LOX

The Comet HLLV was a proposed super heavy-lift launch vehicle designed for NASA's First Lunar Outpost program, which was in the design phase from 1992 to 1993 under the Space Exploration Initiative. It was a Saturn V-derived launch vehicle with modernized engines, stretched fuel tanks, and strap-on boosters. Its main goal was to support the First Lunar Outpost program and future human mission to Mars. It was designed to be inexpensive and simple while relying on existing technology to lower development costs.

Design

The Comet would have been capable of putting 254.4 tons into low Earth orbit and 97.6 tons to trans-lunar injection, roughly twice that of the Saturn V, making it one of the largest rockets ever designed in terms of payload.[1] The vehicle resembled a Saturn V, but with stretched first and second stages, an increased-diameter third stage, and new side boosters. Additionally, the engines were updated to the F-1A and J-2S, and a sixth engine was added to the second stage. Each of the two side boosters had two F-1A engines. Development costs were expected to be modest due to reliance on Apollo-era technology.[2]

A nuclear-powered variant of the third stage, with two 222.5-kN engines, was also considered. It would have reduced the rocket's size, but at a predicted development cost of $2 billion over a chemical-only design. The nuclear option was planned to be developed later to support crewed Mars missions.[3] To this end, NASA's Lewis Research Center established a Nuclear Systems Office to develop and test a fully functional nuclear engine by 2005.

NLS derived launch vehicle

See main article: National Launch System. An alternate version of the launcher based on the then-in-development National Launch System was proposed. NASA's Marshall Spaceflight Center looked into the Comet rocket or a possible configuration with four F-1A boosters added to the basic 2-stage NLS vehicle. The main expected advantage was that the vehicle could rely on technology currently flying rather than having to resurrect 20 year old technology and manufacturing equipment.

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Lunar Base Studies – 1992: First Lunar Outpost (FLO)National Space Society. 3 August 2017 . en-US. 2020-02-26.
  2. Web site: First Lunar Outpost. https://web.archive.org/web/20160820174234/http://www.astronautix.com/f/firstlunaroutpost.html. dead. August 20, 2016. www.astronautix.com. 2020-01-09.
  3. Book: Young, Anthony. The Saturn V F-1 Engine: Powering Apollo into History. 2019-02-19. Springer. 978-0-387-09630-8. en.