Columbia-class submarine explained

The upcoming Columbia-class (formerly known as the Ohio Replacement Submarine and SSBN-X Future Follow-on Submarine) nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines of the United States Navy are designed to replace the .[1] Construction of the first vessel began on 1 October 2020.[2] She is scheduled to enter service in 2031.[3] [4] [5]

On 3 June 2022, the Navy announced that the lead boat of her class will be named USS District of Columbia (SSBN-826), because there is already an attack submarine named USS Columbia (SSN-771).[6] Nevertheless, the Navy has since continued to refer to the class as the Columbia class.[7] [8]

Overview

The Columbia class is to replace the Ohio class of ballistic missile submarines, whose remaining boats are to be decommissioned, one per year, beginning in 2028. The Columbia class will take over the role of submarine presence in the United States’ strategic nuclear force.

Electric Boat designed the new class with help from Newport News Shipbuilding. A total of 12 submarines are planned, and construction of the lead boat began in 2021. Each submarine will have 16 missile tubes, each carrying one UGM-133 Trident II D5LE missile. (The ninth and later Columbias are to receive the upgraded D5LE2s.)[9] [10] The submarines will be 560feet long and 43feet in diameter, as long as the Ohio-class design, and 10NaN0 larger in diameter.

To determine how many submarines would be needed for the U.S. strategic nuclear force, Navy planners calculated how many missiles would be needed at sea and on station at any given time, how many each submarine should carry, and the likelihood that a submarine will remain undiscovered by the enemy and be able to launch. They also explored how required maintenance would affect availability.[11] Cost-reduction studies explored design and construction possibilities, including adding missile tubes to the design of the attack submarine, building Ohio-class replacement submarines using updated Ohio-class designs, and developing an entirely new Ohio Replacement Submarine design.[12]

The Navy concluded that a new design would be the least expensive option that could meet all of the technical requirements.[11] For example, while the modified Virginia-class and updated Ohio-class design options would have required an expensive mid-life refueling, each Columbia-class nuclear core will last as long as the submarine is in service.[13] [14]

The design and technology development of the Columbia class is projected to cost $4.2 billion (fiscal 2010 dollars), with technology and components from the Ohio and Virginia classes included where possible to save money. The cost to build District of Columbia, the lead boat of the class, will be an estimated $6.2 billion (fiscal 2010 dollars). The Navy has a goal of reducing the average cost of the remaining 11 planned hulls in the class to $4.9 billion each (fiscal 2010 dollars). The total lifecycle cost of the entire class is estimated at $347 billion. The high cost of the submarines is expected to cut deeply into Navy shipbuilding.[15]

In April 2014, the Navy completed a 300-page specification report for the Ohio Replacement Program submarines. There are 159 specifications including weapons, escape routes, fluid systems, hatches, doors, seawater systems, and a set length of 560feet, partly to allow for sufficient volume inside the pressure hull.

In March 2016, the U.S. Navy chose General Dynamics Electric Boat as the prime contractor and lead design yard.[16] Electric Boat, which built all 18 Ohio-class submarines,[17] will do most of the work on all 12 Columbia boats, including final assembly.[18] Huntington Ingalls Industries’ Newport News Shipbuilding will serve as the main subcontractor, participating in the design and construction and doing 22 to 23 percent of the work.[19]

In late 2016, some 3,000 Electric Boat employees were involved in the detailed-design phase of the program[20] and the procurement of the first submarine was scheduled for 2021.[21] Completion of the first submarine was scheduled for 2030, followed by its entry into service in 2031. All 12 submarines are expected to be completed by 2042 and remain in service until 2085.[21] [22]

On 28 July 2016, it was reported that the first submarine of the class will be named Columbia, to commemorate the District of Columbia, the capital of the United States.[23] The Columbia class was officially designated on 14 December 2016 by Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus, and the lead submarine will be the .[24] The Navy wanted to procure the first Columbia-class boat in FY2021.[25]

On 28 October 2020, U.S. Navy Secretary Kenneth J. Braithwaite announced that the second submarine would be named, after the U.S. state of the same name.[26]

On 7 June 2021, the U.S. Navy budget office announced that the total cost for District of Columbia would reach $15.03 billion, which includes planning costs for the entire program.[27] As of April 2023, the estimated construction cost of the twelve-boat program is $132 billion. Securing the supply chain and maintaining a skilled labor force are two major challenges for the program.[28]

General characteristics

Although still evolving, the following are some of the characteristics for the SSBN(X) design:[4] [29]

The U.S. Navy has also said that "owing to the unique demands of strategic relevance, SSBN(X)s must be fitted with the most up-to-date capabilities and stealth to ensure they are survivable throughout their full 40-year life span."[21]

In November 2012, the U.S. Naval Institute, citing Naval Sea Systems Command, revealed additional design information:

The Columbia-class submarine may also be equipped with a Submarine Warfare Federated Tactical System (SWFTS), a cluster of systems that integrate sonar, optical imaging, weapons control etc.[34] [35] [36]

Propulsion

See main article: Integrated electric propulsion.

In a bid to reduce life-cycle cost and acoustic signature,[37] [38] Columbia is to run on electric drive—that is, it will use an electric motor to turn its propellers instead of the reduction gearing and mechanical drive systems used on earlier nuclear-powered submarines.[39] [40] It will retain the nuclear reactor and steam turbines typical of U.S. Navy submarines. In such systems, the nuclear reactor heats water to steam, the turbines convert the heat in the steam into mechanical energy, and the generators convert that mechanical energy into electrical energy[41] for use by the propulsion motors and other onboard systems.[42]

Turbo-electric drives were successfully used on U.S. battleships and aircraft carriers in the first half of the 20th century,[43] and on the small nuclear-powered submarine in the late 1950s.[44] Another larger nuclear-powered submarine,, was equipped with a turboelectric drive but proved to be underpowered, unreliable, and maintenance-hungry.[45] [46], the only operational turboelectric-powered subs were the French Navy's s.[47]

In 2014, Northrop Grumman was chosen as the prime designer and manufacturer of the Columbia's turbine generator units.[48]

In 2014, Leonardo DRS was selected as the main propulsion motor and propulsion motor drive provider. The lead ship motor was delivered to Electric Boat in August 2022.[49]

Various types of electric motors have and are being developed for military and non-military vessels.[50] Types being considered for future U.S. submarines include permanent magnet motors (PMM) being developed by General Dynamics and Newport News Shipbuilding, and high-temperature superconducting synchronous motors, being developed by American Superconductors and General Atomics.[51] [52] More recent data shows that the U.S. Navy appears to be focusing on permanent-magnet, radial-gap electric propulsion motors. The design switched from PMM to an advanced induction motor.[53] In 2013, permanent magnet motors were tested on the Large Scale Vehicle II for possible application on late-production Virginia-class submarines, as well as future submarines.[54] [55] Siemens AG PMMs are used on Type 212 submarines in service with the German and Italian navies.[56]

The Royal Navy's, which is to replace the of ballistic missile submarines, may have submarine shaftless drive (SSD) with an electric motor mounted outside the pressure hull.[57] SSD was evaluated by the U.S. Navy, but it remains unknown whether the Columbia class will have it.[58] [59] On contemporary nuclear submarines, steam turbines are linked to reduction gears and a shaft rotating the propeller/pump-jet propulsor. With SSD, steam would drive electric turbogenerators, powered by steam turbines, that would be connected to a non-penetrating electric junction at the aft end of the pressure hull, with a watertight electric motor mounted externally, possibly an Integrated Motor Propulsor arrangement,[60] powering the pump-jet propulsor, although SSD concepts without pump-jet propulsors also exist.[61] In 2015, an Ohio-Replacement scale model at the Navy League’s 2015 Sea-Air-Space Exposition suggested that the sub would have a pump-jet propulsor visually similar to the one used on Virginia class[62] perhaps as part of the Navy's stated desire to reuse Virginia components to reduce risk and cost of construction.

Common missile compartment

In December 2008, General Dynamics Electric Boat Corporation was selected to design the Common Missile Compartment that will be used on the Ohio-class successor. In 2012, the U.S. Navy announced plans for its SSBN(X) to share a common missile compartment (CMC) design with the Royal Navy's Dreadnought-class ballistic missile submarine.[21] The CMC will house SLBMs in "quad packs".[63] [64]

List of boats

!Name!Hull Number!Builder!Ordered!Laid down!Launched!Commissioned!Homeport!Status
USS District of ColumbiaSSBN-826General Dynamics Electric Boat, Groton, CT5 November 2020[65] 4 June 2022[66] Under construction
USS WisconsinSSBN-8275 November 2020[67] Under construction
SSBN-828

Bibliography

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: SSBN-X Future Follow-on Submarine . 24 July 2011 . GlobalSecurity.org . 24 July 2011.
  2. Web site: Navy: USS Columbia Will Have Most Complete Design Ever at Official Construction Start. 8 May 2019.
  3. https://media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/-1/1/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.PDF NUCLEAR POSTURE REVIEW FINAL REPORT media.defense.gov
  4. Web site: SENEDIA Defense Innovation Days . 5 September 2014 . Senedia.org . 20 August 2016.
  5. Web site: This story was written by Lt. Rebecca Rebarich, Commander Submarine Group Ten Public Affairs . 1,000 Trident Patrols: SSBNs the Cornerstone of Strategic Deterrence . Navy.mil . 20 August 2016.
  6. Web site: Burgess . Richard R. . 2022-06-06 . DC Congresswoman Pushes DC Statehood at Keel-Laying for Navy Submarine . 2024-04-10 . Seapower . en-US.
  7. Web site: SECNAV Names SSBN 826 USS District of Columbia . 2022-06-04 . United States Navy . en-US.
  8. Web site: CNO Visits Philadelphia for Submarine and Shipbuilding Updates . 2024-04-10 . United States Navy . en-US.
  9. Web site: Next Sub-Launched Ballistic Missile 'Won't Be Completely New'. Burgess. Richard R.. 2018-11-08. Seapower. en-US. 2020-05-22.
  10. Web site: Burgess . Richard R. . Navy's SSP Admiral: New Missile Planned for Introduction on 9th Columbia SSBN . Seapower . 10 June 2021 . 9 November 2022.
  11. Web site: Hans M. . Kristensen . SSBNX Under Pressure: Submarine Chief Says Navy Can't Reduce . FAS Strategic Security Blog . . 24 July 2013 . 17 August 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130906101555/http://blogs.fas.org/security/2013/07/ssbnx-numbers/ . 6 September 2013 . dead.
  12. Web site: Kelly . Jason . Facts We Can Agree Upon About Design of Ohio Replacement SSBN . Navylive.dodlive.mil . 17 August 2013.
  13. Web site: U.S. Nuclear Modernization Programs . https://web.archive.org/web/20100405072941/https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/USNuclearModernization . dead . 5 April 2010 . . 1 November 2012.
  14. Web site: Ohio-class Replacement Will Carry "Re-packaged and Re-hosted" Weapons System . Defense Media Network . 4 February 2011 . 6 February 2013.
  15. News: Gopal . Ratnam . Tony . Capaccio . U.S. Navy Sees 20-Year, $333 Billion Plan Missing Ship Goals . . 9 March 2011 . 9 March 2011.
  16. Web site: Grace Jean . USN taps General Dynamics Electric Boat as prime contractor for Ohio Replacement Programme . IHS Jane's 360, Janes.com . 30 March 2016 . 20 August 2016.
  17. Web site: 15 June 2011 . SSBN / SSGN Ohio Class Submarine . 20 August 2016 . Naval Technology.
  18. Web site: Ohio Replacement Plan Is Good News For Electric Boat . Breaking Defense . 29 March 2016 . 20 August 2016.
  19. Web site: Newport News Shipbuilding's share of Virginia-class submarine deliveries to grow | Defense & Shipyards . Pilotonline.com . 29 March 2016 . 20 August 2016 . 4 May 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160504152928/http://pilotonline.com/business/defense-shipyards/newport-news-shipbuilding-s-share-of-virginia-class-submarine-deliveries/article_b6e6e27d-f180-5186-ba0b-ab3eef76ffcf.html . dead .
  20. News: Bergman . Julia . Navy contracts mean Electric Boat will hire 14,000 over next 13 years . The Day . 10 December 2016 . limited.
  21. Web site: Ronald . O'Rourke . Navy Navy SSBN(X) Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress . R41129 . . 17 September 2017 . 23 September 2017 . Federation of American Scientists.
  22. Web site: Kris Osborn . Navy Finishes Specs for Future Nuclear Sub . Dodbuzz.com . 8 April 2014 . 20 August 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160515170309/http://www.dodbuzz.com/2014/04/08/navy-finishes-blueprints-for-future-nuclear-sub/ . 15 May 2016 . dead.
  23. Web site: Sam LaGrone . New U.S. Navy Nuclear Sub Class to Be Named for D.C.. News.usni.org . 28 July 2016 . 20 August 2016.
  24. https://news.usni.org/2016/12/13/secnav-mabus-to-officially-designate-first-orp-boat-uss-district-of-columbia-ssbn-826 "SECNAV Mabus to Officially Designate First ORP Boat USS Columbia (SSBN-826)"
  25. https://news.usni.org/2020/05/19/report-columbia-class-nuclear-ballistic-missile-submarine-program "Report on the Columbia-class Nuclear Ballistic Missile Submarine Program"
  26. News: Santos. Babs. October 29, 2020. U.S. Navy to name submarine after Wisconsin. WLUK-TV. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20201105155646/https://fox11online.com/news/state/us-navy-to-name-submarine-after-wisconsin. November 5, 2020.
  27. Web site: Cost Estimates for Lead Boat in Columbia-class Program Grow by $637M. USNI News. 7 June 2021. 18 August 2021.
  28. News: Capaccio . Anthony . April 12, 2023 . Pentagon Muzzles GAO's Doubts About Nuclear-Armed Submarine's Schedule . Bloomberg . May 26, 2023 . https://archive.today/20230414140655/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-04-12/pentagon-muzzles-gao-s-doubts-about-nuclear-armed-submarine-s-schedule?leadSource=uverify%20wall . April 14, 2023.
  29. https://web.archive.org/web/20141213041334/http://www.ssbn.pl/files/OHIO_Replacement_Program_Naval_Submarine_League.pdf OHIO Replacement Program Naval Submarine League ssbn.pl
  30. Web site: Ohio Replacement Submarine Starts Early Construction. 24 October 2013.
  31. News: CMC Program to Define Future SSBN Launchers for UK, USA. Defense Industry Daily. 25 November 2012. 3 December 2012.
  32. Web site: An Analysis of the Navy's Fiscal Year 2013 Shipbuilding Plan. Congressional Budget Office. 3 December 2012.
  33. News: Ohio-class Replacement Details. US Naval Institute. 1 November 2012. 3 December 2012.
  34. Web site: On Watch 2011. Navsea.navy.mil. 6 February 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20130303015649/http://www.navsea.navy.mil/OnWatch2011/ohioclass.html. 3 March 2013. dead.
  35. Web site: Keller . John . Lockheed Martin to adapt submarine combat systems for network-centric warfare operations at sea . Military & Aerospace Electronics, Militaryaerospace.com . 15 April 2012 . 2 February 2014.
  36. https://web.archive.org/web/20091030142545/http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Newswire2009/JUN18-04.aspx NAVSEA News
  37. Web site: 6 July 2006 . Propulsion Systems for Navy Ships and Submarines . Government Accounting Office.
  38. Book: Technology for the United States Navy and Marine Corps, 2000–2035 Becoming a 21st-Century Force: Volume 2: Technology . 1 June 2003 . Nap.edu . 978-0-309-05897-1 . 10.17226/5863 . 30 May 2013.
  39. Web site: An Integrated Electric Power System: the Next Step . Navy.mil . 6 February 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20121128004930/http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_9/power_system.html . 28 November 2012 . dead.
  40. Web site: Going Electric . Defense Media Network . 14 June 2010 . 6 February 2013.
  41. Web site: Bowman (ADM USN, Director Naval Nuclear Propulsion) . Frank "Skip" . Fall 2000 . Undersea Warfare Fall 2000, Vol 3, No 1 - An Integrated Power System: The Next Step .
  42. Web site: Kris Osborn . Ohio Replacement Subs To Shift To Electric Drive . 20 August 2016 . Defensetech.org.
  43. Web site: Tony DiGiulian . Turboelectric Drive in American Capital Ships . Navweaps.com . 6 February 2013.
  44. Web site: Paul Lambert . USS Tullibee – History . USS Tullibee SSN 597 . 6 February 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20140517121715/http://www.usstullibee.com/tullibeehistory.html . 17 May 2014 . dead.
  45. Web site: Submarine Technology thru the Years . Navy.mil . 19 July 1997 . 6 February 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20120212063112/http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/history/subhistory3.html . 12 February 2012 . dead.
  46. Sam LaGrone . Secret Nuclear Redesign Will Keep U.S. Subs Running Silently for 50 Years . Wired . Danger Room, Wired.com . 28 March 2013 . 30 May 2013.
  47. Web site: SSBN Triomphant Class . Naval Technology . 15 June 2011 . 6 February 2013.
  48. Web site: News . Northrop Grumman.
  49. Web site: August 31, 2022 . Leonardo DRS Delivers Electric Propulsion Equipment for 1st Columbia Submarine . 2022-12-04 . Naval News . en.
  50. Web site: Concept study of 20 MW highspeed permanent magnet synchronous motor for marine propulsion . Bogomolov . M.D. . 22 January 2013 . Eindhoven University of Technology.
  51. Web site: Navy Ship Propulsion Technologies: Options for Reducing Oil Use — Background for Congress . 11 December 2006 . Ronald . O'Rourke . . RL33360.
  52. Web site: Sonal Patel . Superconductor Motor for Navy Passes Full-Power Test :: POWER Magazine . Powermag.com . 1 March 2009 . 30 May 2013 . 19 April 2009 . https://web.archive.org/web/20090419215043/http://www.powermag.com/issues/departments/global_monitor/Superconductor-Motor-for-Navy-Passes-Full-Power-Test_1759.html . dead .
  53. Web site: DDG-1000 Zumwalt Class Destroyer . Defense.about.com . 1 November 2012 . 6 February 2013 . 21 January 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130121131428/http://defense.about.com/od/Navy/a/Ddg-1000-Zumwalt-Class-Destroyer.htm . dead .
  54. Web site: Small Subs Provide Big Payoffs for Submarine Stealth . Navy.mil . 6 February 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130313053142/http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_11/submarine_stealth.html . 13 March 2013 . dead.
  55. Web site: Dan Petty . The US Navy – Fact File: Large Scale Vehicle – LSV 2 . Navy.mil . 6 February 2013.
  56. Web site: SINAVY CIS Permasyn . Siemens . 2009 . 30 May 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20140220073523/http://www.industry.usa.siemens.com/verticals/us/en/marine-shipbuilding/brochures/Documents/SINAVY-Permasyn-en.pdf . 20 February 2014.
  57. Web site: SSBN "Strategic Successor Submarine" project . Harpoon Headquarters . 17 August 2013.
  58. Web site: Tango Bravo: breaking down barriers in submarine design . Janes.com . 23 March 2007 . 30 May 2013.
  59. Web site: Tango Bravo R&D Project to Drive Down Sub Size . Defenseindustrydaily.com . 30 May 2013.
  60. Web site: Torpedoes and the Next Generation of Undersea Weapons . Navy.mil . 1 June 2013 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20150420224306/http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_14/torpedoes.html . 20 April 2015.
  61. Web site: The Rim Electric Drive – Internal Submarine . Dave . Kuhn . Joe . Torrez . William . Fallier . . Naval Construction and Engineering . 2006 . 30 May 2013 . 4 August 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160804222116/http://web.mit.edu/2n/Abst-ExecSum/2006/Conversion/RIM%20ELECT%20DRI-INTER%20SUB.pdf . dead .
  62. Web site: GDEB Unveils New Ohio Replacement (SSBN-X) Detailed Model at Sea-Air-Space 2015 Exposition . Navyrecognition.com . 14 April 2015 . 20 August 2016.
  63. Web site: Navy Signs Specification Document for the Ohio Replacement Submarine Program, Sets forth Critical Design Elements . Navy News Service . 6 September 2012 . 21 April 2013 . NNS120906-13.
  64. Web site: Patani . Arif . Next Generation Ohio-Class . Navylive.dodlive.mil . 24 September 2012 . 21 April 2013.
  65. Web site: Naval Vessel Register - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (SSBN 826) . 4 October 2023 . nvr.navy.mil.
  66. Web site: Keel Laying Ceremony Held for First Columbia-Class Ballistic Missile Submarine .
  67. Web site: Naval Vessel Register - WISCONSIN (SSBN 827) . 4 October 2023 . nvr.navy.mil.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Columbia-class submarine".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.