Colony Shale Oil Project Explained

Colony Shale Oil Project was an oil shale development project at the Piceance Basin near Parachute Creek, Colorado. The project consisted of an oil shale mine and pilot-scale shale oil plant, which used the TOSCO II retorting technology, developed by Tosco Corporation. Over time the project was developed by a consortium of different companies until it was terminated by Exxon on 2 May 1982 a day which is known amongst locals as "Black Sunday".[1] [2] [3]

History

The project started in 1964 when Tosco, Standard Oil of Ohio, and Cleveland Cliffs Iron Company formed the Colony Development joint venture.[4] The aim of the newly formed joint venture was to develop the Colony Oil Shale Project and to commercialize the TOSCO II technology. Starting in 1965 the consortium operated a shale oil pilot plant and in 1968 the Colony Development started preparations to build a commercial-scale plant.[5]

In 1969 Atlantic Richfield Company joined the project acquiring part of Tosco's stake.[5] [6] However the commercial project was delayed by economic uncertainties and then resurrected in the 1970s after the Arab oil embargo. In 1972 the consortium stopped the pilot plant and the development of the commercial plant was suspended in November 1974 when more detailed economic studies indicated a more than three times higher cost than previously anticipated.[4] [5] [7] [8]

In 1974 Ashland Oil and Shell Oil Company joined the project.[7] [9] In the late 1970s Standard Oil of Ohio, Cleveland Cliffs Iron Company, Shell and Ashaland Oil sold their shares to Atlantic Richfield Company.[7] [10] [11] As a result of these transactions Tosco owned 40% of shares and Atlantic Richfield Company owned 60% of shares in the project.

In 1980 Atlantic Richfield Company sold its share to Exxon for $300 million.[6] In 1981 the Colony Development started a construction of the commercial scale shale oil plant.[3] On 2 May 1982 Exxon announced the termination of the project because of low oil-prices and increased expenses laying off more than 2,000 workers resulting in the date becoming known among locals as "Black Sunday".[1] [2] [3] According to the shareholders agreement in a case of project termination Exxon had an obligation to buy out Tosco's shares. It paid $380 million worth of compensation.[6]

During its existence the project produced of shale oil.[4]

Location

The Colony Development's property located in the southern edge of the Piceance Basin in northwestern Colorado, approximately 200miles west of Denver.[9] It located next to the Union Shale Oil property, developed by Unocal Corporation.[5]

Technical description

See also: TOSCO II process. The pilot stage of the project consisted of underground room-and-pillar type oil shale mine and aboveground shale oil pilot plant with input capacity of 1,000 ton of oil shale per day which used TOSCO II retort a horizontal rotating kiln-type retort classified as a hot recycled solids technology.[5] [12] Mining was conducted in a 60feet-thick portion of the Mahogany Zone in the Parachute Creek Member of the Green River Formation at depths of 860feet and 600feet by a one-bench system. Pillar dimensions were 58feet by 58feet and rooms were 55feet wide.[9]

The planned commercial scale plant was to contain six TOSCO II retorts with total input capacity of 66,000 ton of oil shale per day. The proposed plant was to produce about 46000oilbbl of shale oil per day.[5] The project was also to consists of shale oil upgrading plant for hydrogen treating to remove nitrogen and sulfur compounds. This plant was scheduled to produce about of premium petroleum products, 52,000 long ton of sulfur, and 41,000 long tons of ammonia per year.[13] At the moment of cancellation the estimated costs would exceed $5.5 billion in then-year dollars or about $10 billion in 2005 dollars.[3]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Oil shale—enormous potential but...? . Division of Minerals and Geology of Colorado Geological Survey . RockTalk . April 2004 . 7 . 2 . 28 July 2007 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20070713182214/http://geosurvey.state.co.us/pubs/rocktalk/rtv7n2.pdf . 13 July 2007 .
  2. News: Collier, Robert . Coaxing oil from huge U.S. shale deposits . San Francisco Chronicle . 4 September 2006. 14 May 2008.
  3. Book: Bartis, James T. . LaTourrette, Tom . Dixon, Lloyd . Peterson, D.J. . Cecchine, Gary . Oil Shale Development in the United States. Prospects and Policy Issues. Prepared for the National Energy Technology Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy . . 2005 . 978-0-8330-3848-7 . 17 January 2009.
  4. Andrews . Anthony . Oil Shale: History, Incentives, and Policy . Congressional Research Service . 13 April 2006. 17 January 2009 . RL33359.
  5. An Assessment of Oil Shale Technologies . June 1980 . NTIS order #PB80-210115 . 17 January 2009.
  6. Web site: Tosco Corporation . Funding Universe . 17 January 2009.
  7. Laherrère . Jean . Jean Laherrère . Review on oil shale data . Hubbert Peak . 2005 . 17 January 2009 . 28 September 2007. https://web.archive.org/web/20070928004607/http://www.hubbertpeak.com/laherrere/OilShaleReview200509.pdf . dead.
  8. Recommendations for a synthetic fuels commercialization program. Volume 1: Overview report . Synfuels Interagency Task Force . November 1975 . 1 . 1975rsfc....1...... . 17 January 2009.
  9. Agapito. J. F. T. . Page, J. B. . A Case Study of Long-Term Stability in the Colony Oil Shale Mine, Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado . 17th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics . Snowbird, Utah . 1976.
  10. Oil Shale . 2005 . Colorado School of Mines . 17 January 2009 .
  11. Mahogany Research Project . Royal Dutch Shell . 17 January 2009.
  12. Burnham . Alan K. . McConaghy . James R. . Comparison of the acceptability of various oil shale processes . 16 October 2006. Golden . 26th Oil shale symposium . UCRL-CONF-226717 . 17 January 2009 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160213164539/https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/341283.pdf . 13 February 2016. dead .
  13. Knutson . Carroll F. . Oil Shale . AAPG Bulletin . 10 . 65 . 1981 . 2283–2289 . American Association of Petroleum Geologists . 10.1306/03b59986-16d1-11d7-8645000102c1865d.