Louvre Colonnade Explained

The Louvre Colonnade is the easternmost façade of the Louvre Palace in Paris. It has been celebrated as the foremost masterpiece of French Architectural Classicism since its construction, mostly between 1667 and 1674. The design, dominated by two loggias with trabeated colonnades of coupled giant columns, was created by a committee of three, the Petit Conseil, consisting of Louis Le Vau, Charles Le Brun, and Claude Perrault. Louis Le Vau's brother, François Le Vau, also contributed. Cast in a restrained classicizing baroque manner, it interprets rules laid down by the ancient Roman architect Vitruvius, whose works Perrault translated into French (1673).[1] Its flat-roofline design, previously associated with Italy and unprecedented in France, was immensely influential.

Description

Little that could be called Baroque can be identified in the Colonnade's cool classicism that looks back to the 16th century. The use of one central and two terminal pavilions is typically French, while the main entrance, a pedimented avant-corps, resembles a triumphal arch or temple front. The simple character of the ground floor basement sets off the paired Corinthian columns, modeled strictly according to Vitruvius, against a shadowed void. This scheme of coupled columns on a high podium goes back as far as Bramante's House of Raphael (1512).[2] The effect of the Colonnade has been likened to that of an ancient Roman temple whose elevations have "been flattened, as it were, into a single plane."[3] Crowned by an uncompromising Italian balustrade along its distinctly non-French flat roof, the whole ensemble represents a ground-breaking departure in French architecture.

History of the design

Louis Le Vau, the King's First Architect at the time of the death of Cardinal Mazarin in 1661, completed the south wing of the Louvre's Cour Carrée in 1663. He had already started designing the east wing around 1659 and by late 1663 began laying the foundation.[4]

On 1 January 1664, Jean-Baptiste Colbert purchased the post of Surintendant des Bâtiments du Roi from Antoine de Ratabon and suddenly halted all work on the east wing.[5] He invited other French architects to submit designs, in effect starting a competition. He later extended his invitation to four Roman architects, including Pietro da Cortona and Gian Lorenzo Bernini, and sent them Le Vau's designs. Among the French projects submitted at that time were two of special interest: one (lost) shown anonymously by Claude Perrault, a physician and scientist, and one by François Le Vau, Louis Le Vau's younger brother and an accomplished architect in his own right.[6]

Nevertheless, Colbert selected Bernini based on two preliminary projects and invited him to Paris to further revise and complete his designs. Bernini arrived in June 1665 and stayed until late October. During his stay he sculpted a portrait bust of Louis XIV, which is now in the Salon of Diana at the Palace of Versailles. Bernini's design for the Louvre was very Italianate and ambitious, encompassing the entire building rather than just the east wing. The foundation cornerstone was laid at a royal ceremony a few days before Bernini left for Rome.[7]

Bernini's plans were not well received by French architects, who objected and eventually won the upper hand. In April 1667, Colbert, with the king's approval, appointed Louis Le Vau, Charles Le Brun, and Claude Perrault to a committee, the Petit Conseil, to prepare new designs.[8] Charles Perrault, Claude Perrault's younger brother and Colbert's chief assistant, acted as the secretary of the committee and probably wrote the Registre ou Journal des déliberations..., which records the activities of the committee during April and May 1667.[9] The Registre begins by describing Colbert's dissatisfaction with the French and Italian projects and his decision to create a committee "to allow for mutual consultation."[9] Le Vau, Le Brun, and Perrault are instructed to work together "unanimously and conjointly on all designs for the construction of the Palais du Louvre, so the designs will be regarded as the work of the three equally, and for conservation of good collaboration, none should spoil by claiming to be the particular author to the detriment of the others."[10]

After several meetings, the Petit Conseil drew up two schemes, and, according to the Registre, "one was adorned with an order of columns forming a peristyle or gallery above the first floor [i.e., the ground floor], and the other was simpler and more unified, without an order of columns".[11] The architects of the designs were not identified.[12] On 14 May, at the royal Château de Saint-Germain-en-Laye,[12] two paintings[13] of the proposals were shown to Louis XIV, who chose the design with the colonnade.[12] In July 1667 Colbert finally informed Bernini that his plans had been abandoned.[14] The new façade was begun that summer and was mostly complete in 1674, when the stones of the central pediment were hoisted into place.[15]

The authorship of the Colonnade's design has remained controversial ever since. Le Vau may have been responsible for the use of the colonnade, possibly based on the 1664 design of his brother François, which employed paired, free-standing columns.[16] A change in the order from Composite to Corinthian may have been due to the influence of Roland Fréart de Chambray, who was called to Paris to become a member of the Petit Conseil in 1668.[17] At some point that same year the decision was made to double the width of the south wing. This resulted in the widening and redesign of both the south and north pavilions of the east façade.[18] Perrault probably became the main designer in 1668 and was responsible for the final design.[19]

The severely designed colonnade overlooking the Place du Louvre — for which buildings including the Hôtel du Petit-Bourbon were demolished to provide the necessary urban space — became widely celebrated.

The pediment sculpture of 'Minerva surrounded by the Muses of Victory crowning the bust of Napoleon' is by François-Frédéric Lemot (1808–1810). Napoleon was later replaced by Louis XIV, although the face was kept.

Interior

Between 1807 and 1811, Percier and Fontaine created monumental staircases at the southern and northern ends of the wing behind the Colonnade, and projected a suite of prestige rooms between the two staircases on the first floor. The architectural sculpture of the southern staircase (Escalier du Midi) were created in the early 1810s by François Gérard, Auguste Marie Taunay, Augustin Félix Fortin, and .[20]

Digging out of the moat

In 1964, the French Minister of Culture, André Malraux, ordered the digging out of the dry moat in front of the Colonnade. A characteristic feature of pre-classical French architecture, it is shown in nearly every project and early drawing of the east façade, and its reexcavation revealed the original soubassement, or podium (see the engraving from Blondel's book). The moat may have been filled in around 1674 to facilitate construction (see the engraving by Sébastien Leclerc) and not restored due to lack of funds to build the contrescarpe after Louis XIV's attention shifted to the Palace of Versailles. However, in 1981 Germain Bazin argued that the reconstruction of the moat was misguided, since for aesthetic reasons Louis XIV had never wanted it.[21]

Influence

For centuries, the Colonnade has provided a model for many grand edifices in Europe and America:

See also

Bibliography

48.8602°N 2.3396°W

Notes and References

  1. Neumann 2013, pp. 296–297.
  2. Summerson 1963, plates 14 and 47.
  3. Neumann 2013, p. 297.
  4. Berger 1994, pp. 28–29.
  5. Berger 1993, p. 20; Berger 1994, p. 20.
  6. Berger 1994, pp. 20, 28–29.
  7. Berger 1994, p. 33.
  8. Berger 1993, pp. 25–26; Neumann 2013, pp. 296–297; Summerson 1963, plate 47; Wischermann 1997, p. 35; and Bottineau-Fuchs 1996, p. 162. Sutcliffe 1993, p. 31, credits Perrault alone.
  9. Berger 1993, p. 26.
  10. Petzet 2000, p. 561, reproduces the Registre in the original French. The quote in French is: "...ils travaillassant unanimement & conjointement à tous les dessein qu'il y auroit à faire pour l'achevement du Palais du Louvre, en sorte que ses desseins seroient regardés comme l'ouvrage d'eux trois également, & que pour conserver l'union et bonne intelligence, aucun ne pourroit s'en dire l'auteur particulierement au préjudice des autres."
  11. Berger 1993 p. 26. Berger's translation with the bracketed explanatory material added by him.
  12. Berger 1993, p. 27.
  13. Burchard 2016, p. 57. Burchard writes, "one can assume that Le Brun would have used this medium to his advantage."
  14. Bottineau-Fuchs 1996, p. 162.
  15. Berger 1993, p. 48.
  16. Neumann 2013, p. 297, Berger 1994, pp. 34–35.
  17. Berger 1994, p. 35.
  18. Berger 1993, p. 35.
  19. Berger 1994, p. 35; Ayers 2003, pp. 31 and 36.
  20. Book: Christiane Aulanier . Le Musée Charles X et le Département des Antiquités Egyptiennes . Paris . Editions des Musées Nationaux . 1961 . 18.
  21. Berger 1993, p. 63. Berger cites Whiteley & Braham 1969 and Bazin 1981.
  22. Ayers 2003, p. 37.
  23. Web site: William Thornton (1759–1828) . Library of Congress . July 7, 2007.