Coexistence (electoral systems) explained

In political science, coexistence involves different voters using different electoral systems depending on which electoral district they belong to.[1] This is distinct from other mixed electoral systems that use parallel voting (superposition) or compensatory voting. For example, the rural-urban proportional (RUP) proposal for British Columbia involved the use of a fully proportional system of list-PR or STV in urban regions, combined with MMP in rural regions.[2]

Coexistence of electoral systems exist in multiple countries, like the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Panama, as well as for elections of the European Parliament.

Types of coexistence

!Type!System!Example(s) for use
Coexistencee.g. FPTP/SMP in single-member districts, list-PR in multi-member districtsDemocratic Republic of the Congo, Panama
Supermixede.g. FPTP/SMP in single-member districts, conditional party block voting in multi-member districtsCameroon, Chad
Rural-urban proportional representation (RUP)Denmark (formerly), Iceland (formerly)

References

  1. Massicotte & Blais . 1999 . Mixed electoral systems: a conceptual and empirical survey . Electoral Studies . 18 . 3 . 341–366 . 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00063-8.
  2. In Search of Compensatory Mixed Electoral System for Québec . Massicotte . Louis . 2004.