Clostridioides difficile toxin A explained

Clostridioides difficile toxin A
Organism:Clostridioides difficile
Taxid:1496
Symbol:toxA
Altsymbols:tcdA
Entrezgene:4914076
Refseqprotein:YP_001087137.1
Uniprot:P16154
Ecnumber:2.4.1.-
Chromosome:genome
Entrezchromosome:NC_009089.1
Genloc Start:794622
Genloc End:805194

Clostridioides difficile toxin A (TcdA) is a toxin produced by the bacteria Clostridioides difficile, formerly known as Clostridium difficile.[1] It is similar to Clostridium difficile Toxin B. The toxins are the main virulence factors produced by the gram positive, anaerobic,[2] Clostridioides difficile bacteria. The toxins function by damaging the intestinal mucosa and cause the symptoms of C. difficile infection, including pseudomembranous colitis.

TcdA is one of the largest bacterial toxins known. With a molecular mass of 308 kDa, it is usually described as a potent enterotoxin,[3] but it also has some activity as a cytotoxin.[4] The toxin acts by modifying host cell GTPase proteins by glucosylation, leading to changes in cellular activities. Risk factors for C. difficile infection include antibiotic treatment, which can disrupt normal intestinal microbiota and lead to colonization of C. difficile bacteria.[5]

tcdA gene

The gene contains an open reading frame (ORF) of 8,133 nucleotides, coding for 2,710 amino acids. TcdA and TcdB share 63% homology in their amino acid sequences.[6] These genes are expressed during late log phase and stationary phase in response to environmental factors. Environmental stresses such as antibiotics and catabolite repression can influence toxin expression.[7]

Pathogenicity locus

The tcdA and tcdB genes are situated on the Clostridioides difficile chromosome in a 19.6-kb pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) found only in toxigenic strains of C. difficile. Non toxigenic strains contain a 127 base pair fragment replacing the PaLoc.[8] This locus also contains three other accessory genes tcdC, tcdR, and tcdE.[9] TcdC expression is high during early exponential phase and declines as growth moves into stationary phase, consistent with increases in tcdA and tcdB expression. Accordingly, expression patterns have indicated tcdC as a possible negative regulator of toxin production. tcdR may serve as a positive regulator of toxin production.[7] tcdE has been speculated to facilitate release of TcdA and TcdB through lytic activity on the bacterial cell membrane. Due to its homology with other proteins of similar function, as well as the location of the gene between tcdA and tcdB, tcdE is predicted to function as the lytic protein that facilitates release since TcdA and TcdB lack a signal peptide for secretion.[8]

Structure

The protein contains three domains. The amino N-terminal domain contains the active site, responsible for the glucosylating activity of the toxin. Both TcdA and TcdB use this highly conserved N-terminal region (74% homology between both toxins) to alter identical substrates.[7]

The carboxy C-terminal domain contains repeating units that are responsible for receptor binding on target cell surfaces. These short homologous repeating units have been termed combined repetitive oligopeptide (CROPs).[7] [10] A recent study demonstrates that the CROPs determine the potency of TcdA through interactions with structures on the cell surface. These CROP regions range from 21-50 residues and play a role in receptor binding.[7] This C-terminal repetitive region is designated as the immuno-dominant region since ligand binding can be blocked by monoclonal antibodies specific to this region.[11] [12] This region contains the most hydrophilic portion of the molecule.[10]

A centrally located hydrophobic domain containing a cluster of 172 highly conserved hydrophobic amino acids is thought to be important for translocation of the enzymatic portion of the protein.[5] [6]

Mechanism of action

TcdA must be internalized into the host cell via endocytosis in order to access the cytosol. Receptor binding is the first step required for entry into the cell via endocytosis in an acidic endosome.[6] Low pH in the endosome induces structural changes such as exposure of the hydrophobic domains that are crucial for TcdA function.[7] [13]

The N-terminal domain of TcdA functions to catalyze a glucotransferase reaction, which transfers a glucose molecule from UDP-Glucose and covalently attaches it to conserved amino acids in target molecules.[6] Therefore, TcdA catalyzes glucosylation and the subsequent irreversible inactivation of target molecules in the Ras family of small GTPases.[9] These target molecules include RhoA, Rac, and Cdc42, which are regulatory proteins of the eukaryotic actin cytoskeleton and modulators of many various cell signaling pathways.[7]

Intracellular targets

TcdA primarily targets Rho, Rac, and Cdc42. These molecules are important regulators of cell signaling. Small GTPases such as Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 regulate their activity by alternating between an active GTP-bound state, and an inactive GDP-bound state.[7] Guanine exchange factors (GEFs) regulate the exchange of GTP and GDP.[14]

TcdA glucosylates RhoA by transferring a glucose molecule from UDP-glucose, a nucleotide sugar, to Thr-37 of the RhoA GTPase. In Rac and Cdc42, the sugar moiety is transferred to the Thr-35. The glucosylation prevents proper binding of GTP and blocks activation.[7] TcdA acts preferentially on the GDP-bound form of the GTPase proteins since this configuration exposes the threonine residue that is glucosylated by the toxin.[5]

RhoA regulates the actin cytoskeleton and forms stress fibers and focal adhesions.[15] When RhoA is inactivated via TcdA, its interaction with downstream effectors is inhibited. This leads to changes in the actin cytoskeleton that increase permeability of the intestinal epithelium. Rac and Cdc42 are involved in filopodium formation crucial for movement and cell migration. Overall, Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 all regulate processes in cells that are dependent on actin polymerization. Many of the physiologic effects that cells experience after exposure to TcdA can be linked to disregulation of actin polymerization and cellular pathways controlled by TcdA targets.[7]

Physiologic effects

Cell morphology

Exposure to TcdA leads to immediate changes in cell morphology, including loss of structural integrity due to a decrease in filamentous actin (F-actin), and an increase in globular actin.[16] Disorganization of actin filaments and the cytoskeleton leads to increased permeability of tight junctions resulting in severe epithelial cell damage and fluid secretion.[17] [18] Fluid accumulation and secretion are secondary to mucosal damage that occurs after exposure to TcdA. Distinct changes in the microfilament system lead to cell rounding and cell death.[16] These changes result from the inactivation of Rho proteins, which play an important role in regulating tight junctions.[7] [19]

Apoptosis

Apoptosis is the most likely mechanism accounting for death of cells exposed to TcdA. Rho inactivation can activate caspase-3 and caspase-9; two key components of the apoptotic pathway. TcdA has been linked to mitochondrial membrane disruption and release of cytochrome C through caspase activation and Rho inactivation, further suggesting that TcdA is capable of inducing apoptosis.[20] [21]

Clinical significance

Clostridioides difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD)

Animal models have shown TcdA includes diarrhea, neutrophil infiltration, inflammation of intestinal mucosa, and necrosis of epithelial cells. This toxin is considered the main cause of CDAD.[17] TcdA damages intestinal villous tips, which disrupts the brush border membrane, leading to cell erosion and fluid leakage from the damaged area. This damage and associated fluid response causes the diarrhea associated with Clostridioides difficile infection.[16]

Pseudomembranous colitis

TcdA can induce the physiological changes that occur in C. difficile related pseudomembranous colitis (PMC), a severe ulceration of the colon. Toxin damage to the colonic mucosa promotes accumulations of fibrin, mucin, and dead cells to form a layer of debris in the colon (pseudomembrane), causing an inflammatory response.[5] TcdA damage causes increased epithelial permeability, cytokine and chemokine production, neutrophil infiltration, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), mast cell activation, and direct damage to the intestinal mucosa.[22] All can be attributed to TcdA induced inactivation of Rho GTPase proteins.[19] Loss of tight junctions can provide entry for neutrophils into the intestines, leading to neutrophil accumulation; a hallmark of PMC. TcdA induced cytokine production of IL-8 and other inflammatory mediators contributes to the stages of inflammation seen in PMC. Infiltration by neutrophils, macrophages, and mast cells in response to TcdA damage increases the inflammatory response through production and release of other mediators such as tumor necrosis factor alpha, IL-1, IL-6, and other monokines. These mediators cause additional damage to intestinal mucosa and further increase the inflammatory response, influencing PMC persistence.[23] If extensive damage to the intestinal wall occurs, bacteria can enter the bloodstream and cause septic shock and death.[5]

Toxin detection and diagnosis

TcdA and TcdB are present in supernatant fluids of C. difficile cultures and can be purified from filtrates. Both toxins are consistently detected in fecal samples from humans and animals[24] and are now used as markers to diagnose C. difficile infection.[7] Over 90% of patients infected with C. difficile were found to have cytotoxic activity in their stool. Glucosylation of Rho GTPases inactivates the GTPase proteins, leading to collapse of the cytoskeleton, resulting in cell rounding. A tissue culture assay has been developed to detect C. difficile toxins in stool samples.[16] A cell rounding assay (cytotoxicity assay) has been developed to diagnose C. difficile infection.[25] Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) have been used to detect TcdA and TcdB with specific antibodies. When used with an ELISA, the cytotoxicity assay is the "gold standard" when used on Vero cells for C. difficile diagnosis.[25]

Importance of TcdA and TcdB in C. difficile infection

Since the 1980s and early 1990s, the roles of TcdA and TcdB in C. difficile infection have been much debated. Previous reports with purified toxins indicated that TcdA alone was enough to cause symptoms of infection and TcdB was unable to do so unless combined with TcdA.[7] A more recent experiment indicated that TcdB was, in fact, essential for virulence.[26] Earlier research established TcdA strictly as an enterotoxin, and TcdB as a cytotoxin, but later both toxins were found to have the same mechanism of action.[6] To fully investigate the role of both toxins in pathogenesis of C. difficile infection, a gene knockout system in a hamster infection model was developed. By permanently knocking out tcdA, tcdB, or both (double knockout), it was shown that C. difficile producing one or both toxins was capable of cytotoxic activity, and this activity translated directly to virulence in vivo. It was also found that a double tcdAtcdB knockout was completely attenuated in virulence. Overall, this research has demonstrated the importance of both TcdA and TcdB in C. difficile infection, showing that either toxin is capable of cytotoxicity.[9]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Planche T, Aghaizu A, Holliman R, Riley P, Poloniecki J, Breathnach A, Krishna S . Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review . The Lancet Infectious Diseases . 8 . 12 . 777–84 . December 2008 . 18977696 . 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70233-0 .
  2. Edwards AN, Suárez JM, McBride SM . Culturing and maintaining Clostridium difficile in an anaerobic environment . Journal of Visualized Experiments . 79 . e50787 . September 2013 . 24084491 . 3871928 . 10.3791/50787 .
  3. Peterson LR, Holter JJ, Shanholtzer CJ, Garrett CR, Gerding DN . Detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A (enterotoxin) and B (cytotoxin) in clinical specimens. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test . American Journal of Clinical Pathology . 86 . 2 . 208–11 . August 1986 . 3739972 . 10.1093/ajcp/86.2.208. free .
  4. Tucker KD, Carrig PE, Wilkins TD . Toxin A of Clostridium difficile is a potent cytotoxin . Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 28 . 5 . 869–71 . May 1990 . 2112562 . 267826 . 10.1128/JCM.28.5.869-871.1990.
  5. Book: Winkler ME, Wilson BJ, Salyers AA, Whitt DD . Bacterial Pathogenesis: A Molecular Approach . ASM . Metals Park, Ohio . 2010 . 978-1-55581-418-2 .
  6. Chaves-Olarte E, Weidmann M, Eichel-Streiber C, Thelestam M . Toxins A and B from Clostridium difficile differ with respect to enzymatic potencies, cellular substrate specificities, and surface binding to cultured cells . Journal of Clinical Investigation . 100 . 7 . 1734–41 . October 1997 . 9312171 . 508356 . 10.1172/JCI119698 .
  7. Voth DE, Ballard JD . Clostridium difficile toxins: mechanism of action and role in disease . Clinical Microbiology Reviews . 18 . 2 . 247–63 . April 2005 . 15831824 . 1082799 . 10.1128/CMR.18.2.247-263.2005 .
  8. Tan KS, Wee BY, Song KP . Evidence for holin function of tcdE gene in the pathogenicity of Clostridium difficile . J. Med. Microbiol. . 50 . 7 . 613–9 . July 2001 . 11444771 . 10.1099/0022-1317-50-7-613. free .
  9. Kuehne SA, Cartman ST, Heap JT, Kelly ML, Cockayne A, Minton NP . The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile infection . Nature . 467 . 7316 . 711–3 . October 2010 . 20844489 . 10.1038/nature09397 . 2010Natur.467..711K . 10044/1/15560 . 4417414 . free .
  10. Dove CH, Wang SZ, Price SB, Phelps CJ, Lyerly DM, Wilkins TD, Johnson JL . Molecular characterization of the Clostridium difficile toxin A gene . Infection and Immunity . 58 . 2 . 480–8 . February 1990 . 2105276 . 258482 . 10.1128/IAI.58.2.480-488.1990.
  11. Sullivan NM, Pellett S, Wilkins TD . Purification and characterization of toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile . Infection and Immunity . 35 . 3 . 1032–40 . March 1982 . 7068210 . 351151 . 10.1128/IAI.35.3.1032-1040.1982.
  12. von Eichel-Streiber C, Laufenberg-Feldmann R, Sartingen S, Schulze J, Sauerborn M . Comparative sequence analysis of the Clostridium difficile toxins A and B . Molecular Genetics and Genomics . 233 . 1–2 . 260–8 . May 1992 . 1603068 . 10.1007/bf00587587. 7052419 .
  13. Florin I, Thelestam M . Internalization of Clostridium difficile cytotoxin into cultured human lung fibroblasts . Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research . 763 . 4 . 383–92 . December 1983 . 6652117 . 10.1016/0167-4889(83)90100-3.
  14. Zhou K, Wang Y, Gorski JL, Nomura N, Collard J, Bokoch GM . Guanine nucleotide exchange factors regulate specificity of downstream signaling from Rac and Cdc42 . Journal of Biological Chemistry . 273 . 27 . 16782–6 . July 1998 . 9642235 . 10.1074/jbc.273.27.16782. free .
  15. Just I, Selzer J, von Eichel-Streiber C, Aktories K . The low molecular mass GTP-binding protein Rho is affected by toxin A from Clostridium difficile . Journal of Clinical Investigation . 95 . 3 . 1026–31 . March 1995 . 7883950 . 441436 . 10.1172/JCI117747 .
  16. Lyerly DM, Krivan HC, Wilkins TD . Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins . Clinical Microbiology Reviews . 1 . 1 . 1–18 . January 1988 . 3144429 . 358025 . 10.1128/cmr.1.1.1.
  17. Warny M, Vaerman JP, Avesani V, Delmée M . Human antibody response to Clostridium difficile toxin A in relation to clinical course of infection . Infection and Immunity . 62 . 2 . 384–9 . February 1994 . 8300199 . 186119 . 10.1128/IAI.62.2.384-389.1994.
  18. Hecht G, Pothoulakis C, LaMont JT, Madara JL . Clostridium difficile toxin A perturbs cytoskeletal structure and tight junction permeability of cultured human intestinal epithelial monolayers . Journal of Clinical Investigation . 82 . 5 . 1516–24 . November 1988 . 3141478 . 442717 . 10.1172/JCI113760 .
  19. Nusrat A, Giry M, Turner JR, Colgan SP, Parkos CA, Carnes D, Lemichez E, Boquet P, Madara JL . Rho protein regulates tight junctions and perijunctional actin organization in polarized epithelia . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 92 . 23 . 10629–33 . November 1995 . 7479854 . 40665 . 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10629. 1995PNAS...9210629N . free .
  20. Hippenstiel S, Schmeck B, N'Guessan PD, Seybold J, Krüll M, Preissner K, Eichel-Streiber CV, Suttorp N . 7033902 . Rho protein inactivation induced apoptosis of cultured human endothelial cells . American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology . 283 . 4 . L830–8 . October 2002 . 12225960 . 10.1152/ajplung.00467.2001 .
  21. Brito GA, Fujji J, Carneiro-Filho BA, Lima AA, Obrig T, Guerrant RL . Mechanism of Clostridium difficile toxin A-induced apoptosis in T84 cells . The Journal of Infectious Diseases . 186 . 10 . 1438–47 . November 2002 . 12404159 . 10.1086/344729 . free .
  22. Kelly CP, Becker S, Linevsky JK, Joshi MA, O'Keane JC, Dickey BF, LaMont JT, Pothoulakis C . Neutrophil recruitment in Clostridium difficile toxin A enteritis in the rabbit . Journal of Clinical Investigation . 93 . 3 . 1257–65 . March 1994 . 7907603 . 294078 . 10.1172/JCI117080 .
  23. Flegel WA, Müller F, Däubener W, Fischer HG, Hadding U, Northoff H . Cytokine response by human monocytes to Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B . Infection and Immunity . 59 . 10 . 3659–66 . October 1991 . 1910012 . 258935 . 10.1128/IAI.59.10.3659-3666.1991.
  24. Lima AA, Lyerly DM, Wilkins TD, Innes DJ, Guerrant RL . Effects of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in rabbit small and large intestine in vivo and on cultured cells in vitro . Infection and Immunity . 56 . 3 . 582–8 . March 1988 . 3343050 . 259330 . 10.1128/IAI.56.3.582-588.1988.
  25. Olling A, Goy S, Hoffmann F, Tatge H, Just I, Gerhard R . The repetitive oligopeptide sequences modulate cytopathic potency but are not crucial for cellular uptake of Clostridium difficile toxin A . PLOS ONE . 6 . 3 . e17623 . 2011 . 21445253 . 3060812 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0017623 . 2011PLoSO...617623O . free .
  26. Lyras D, O'Connor JR, Howarth PM, Sambol SP, Carter GP, Phumoonna T, Poon R, Adams V, Vedantam G, Johnson S, Gerding DN, Rood JI . Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile . Nature . 458 . 7242 . 1176–9 . April 2009 . 19252482 . 2679968 . 10.1038/nature07822 . 2009Natur.458.1176L .