City of Rome v. United States explained

Litigants:City of Rome v. United States
Arguedate:October 10
Argueyear:1979
Decidedate:April 22
Decideyear:1980
Fullname:City of Rome v. United States
Usvol:446
Uspage:156
Parallelcitations:100 S. Ct. 1548, 64 L.Ed.2d 119
Oralargument:https://www.oyez.org/cases/1979/78-1840
Prior:450 F. Supp. 378 (D.D.C. 1978), 472 F. Supp. 221 (D.D.C. 1979)
Majority:Marshall
Joinmajority:Burger, Brennan, White, Blackmun, Stevens
Concurrence:Blackmun
Concurrence2:Stevens
Dissent:Powell
Dissent2:Rehnquist
Joindissent2:Stewart

City of Rome v. United States,, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the majority upheld Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 against a challenge to its constitutionality. Justice Thurgood Marshall authored the majority opinion, which held that Section 5 "does not exceed Congress' power to enforce the Fifteenth Amendment" and "does not violate principles of federalism". The Court's decision also rejected a request by Rome, Georgia to "bail out" of coverage under the Voting Rights Act, asserting that such a request would have to be made by the entire state of Georgia, rather than by an individual city.