The Chronicon universale usque ad annum 741 is an anonymous Latin chronicle from the creation of the world to AD 741. It was written in Francia, probably in Burgundy, between 741 and 775. It survives wholly or partially in at least six manuscripts.
Nothing is known about the compiler of the Chronicon universale, his place of activity (other than Francia) or his motivation. It has been suggested that he worked in Burgundy. The manuscript tradition is associated with the monasteries of that region and the text includes a Burgundian origin myth.
There is a consensus that the Chronicon was written during the reign of the Byzantine emperor Constantine V (741–775). More precise—and speculative—datings include: shortly after 741, in 741–761, in 751–761, in 768–775 and shortly after 774. There are dissenters who place is composition later, either in 775–778 or around 801.
It has been suggested that the Chronicon was composed at the Carolingian court under royal patronage.
Written in Latin, the Chronicon universale is a world chronicle divided into six sections corresponding to the traditional six ages of the world covering all of history from Creation to 741. It is a compilation with relatively little original material. The base text is the Chronica maiora of Bede, heavily interspersed with additions drawn from other sources and with a continuation in annalistic form from 721 to 741.
The compiler generally copied texts verbatim. His additions to Bede can be divided into two kinds. One set is drawn from works chronicles already used by Bede, namely the Chronicon of Jerome, the History Against the Pagans of Orosius and the Chronica maiora of Isidore. Another set is drawn from Frankish sources: the chronicle of Pseudo-Fredegar with its continuations and the Liber historiae Francorum. From 710 onwards, information is also drawn from the Frankish annals, specifically the Annales Mosellani and the Annales Flaviniacenses. The Chronicon universale was the first universal history produced in Francia since the work of Pseudo-Fredegar in the middle of the seventh century. Its Latinity is superior to the latter's. The account of Scandinavian origin of the Burgundians is shared with and may be derived from the Passio sancti Sigismundi regis.
The Chronicon universale is unique among Frankish chronicles in providing two set of anno mundi dates: one providing the years from Creation according to the Hebrew calendar (and the Latin Vulgate bible) and another providing the years according to the Byzantine calendar (and the Septuagint).
The Chronicon universale is preserved in whole or in part in six manuscripts:
None of the copies is the autograph and all include changes introduced to the text between 801 and 814. Three of the manuscripts contain the whole chronicle, while the other three contain only parts. All but the Brussels manuscript incorporate the Chronicon (or part of it) into Bede's Reckoning of Time (of which his Chronica maiora is an integral part). The Besançon and Leiden copies have been called a "first edition" and the Munich copy a "second edition", since it was expanded with further additions. The Munich text, although twice as long, does not extend beyond 741. It introduces the Chronicon section with the rubric INCIPIT LIBER CHRONICORUM EX DIUERSIS OPUSCULIS AUCTORUM COLLECTA IN UNUM ('[here] begins the book of the chronicles [taken] from the diverse works of authors collected in one').
The Würzburg manuscript contains a copy of Bede's Reckoning with only a part of the prologue lifted from the Chronicon universale. The Paris manuscript likewise contains only Bede's text embellished by borrowings from the Chronicon in the prologue and final section covering the sixth age. Neither contains any post-725 material. The Brussels manuscript is a collection of extracts copied by Corneille-François de Nélis in 1783, including a selection of the Chronicon universale from 710 to 741 and its continuation down to 811, the Annales Maximiniani.
Although it is the first universal history of the Carolingian era, the Chronicon universale is a relatively neglected and deprecated piece of Frankish historiography. François Louis Ganshof called it "a mediocre work". As a compilation made from other works, often used verbatim, it contains little that is original. It is noted mainly as the base text for the Chronicle of Moissac. It has received only a partial critical edition by Georg Waitz of the latter part of the text. Waitz used only the Leiden, Munich and Brussels copies. He supplied the text with the name by which it is now known, correctly identifying it as a world chronicle even though he only edited the latter parts concerned with Germanic history.
The manuscript transmission of the Chronicon demonstrates that neither the first nor the second edition were conceived "as stand-alone historiographies". In its "openness to constant revision" it is similar to the Frankish "minor annals" of the eighth century, on at least two of which it drew.