| Christopher Columbus: The Discovery | |
| Director: | John Glen |
| Screenplay: | John Briley Cary Bates Mario Puzo |
| Story: | Mario Puzo |
| Producer: | Alexander Salkind Ilya Salkind[1] |
| Music: | Cliff Eidelman |
| Editing: | Matthew Glen |
| Cinematography: | Alec Mills |
| Studio: | Christopher Columbus Productions Quinto Centenario |
| Distributor: | Warner Bros. |
| Runtime: | 120 minutes |
| Language: | English |
| Country: | United States United Kingdom Spain |
| Budget: | $45 million[2] |
| Gross: | $8.6 million |
Christopher Columbus: The Discovery is a 1992 historical adventure film directed by John Glen. It was the last project developed by the father and son production team of Alexander and Ilya Salkind. The film follows events after the fall of the Emirate of Granada (an Arab principality which was located in the south of Spain), and leads up to the voyage of Columbus to the New World in 1492.
Its behind-the-scenes history involved an elaborate series of financial mishaps, which later brought about an emotional falling-out between Alexander and Ilya; as a frustrated Alexander would later lament in a November 1993 interview with the Los Angeles Times, "I know, after this, that I'll never make movies again."[3]
The film was released for the 500th anniversary of Columbus' voyage.[4] [5] The premiere took place at almost exactly the same time as , which has often led to confusion between the two films.
The titular Genoese navigator overcomes intrigue in the court of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain and gains financing for his expedition to the West Indies, which eventually leads to the European discovery of the Americas.
The initial director George P. Cosmatos left the production due to "creative differences",[6] with Cosmatos later suing the producers for millions with the matter settled out-of-court.[7] Cosmatos was then replaced by John Glen shortly before shooting began.[7] At one point during the production, the $42 million budget was being slashed with the producers considering scrapping the theatrical approach in favor of a TV miniseries. However, this was alleviated when Ilya Salkind was able to secure a budget of $50 million.
Marlon Brando received $5 million for the film, and his name remains in the credits despite his request that it be removed. Following Cosmatos' departure as director, actors Timothy Dalton and Isabella Rossellini soon followed suit with Dalton later filing a lawsuit against the producers for breach of contract and fraud, stating that they did not provide a bank guarantee for his $2.5 million salary.[8]
The film was not a commercial success, debuting at number 4 at the US box office[9] [10] and grossing $8.3 million in the United States and Canada. It grossed $500,000 in the United Kingdom.[11]
The film received mostly negative reviews,[12] [13] with a rotten 7% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 29 reviews, with the website's critical consensus reading "Ironically, for a biopic about a voyage many associate with people accepting that the world is round, Christopher Columbus: The Discovery falls completely flat."[14] Brando's performance in particular was singled out as his "worst".[15]
Roger Ebert agreed with this sentiment while giving the movie one out of four stars, stating "This movie takes one of history's great stories and treats it in such a lackluster manner that Columbus's voyage seems as endless to us as it did to his crew."[16] It is also on his "Most Hated" list.[17]
Film historian Leonard Maltin declared the picture a "BOMB" (he gave an only-slightly better rating, and conveyed his sentiments with this variation on the popular rhyme: "In nineteen-hundred-and-ninety-two, Columbus sailed two screen boo-boos.")...adding that the movie was hardly ripe for re-discovery, and lamenting "Is this any way to celebrate the 500th anniversary of Europe's finding America?"[18]
Audiences surveyed by CinemaScore gave the film a grade of "C" on scale of A+ to F.[19]
Director Ridley Scott had considered making a Christopher Columbus movie for the Salkinds but instead opted to direct a rival project from producer Alain Goldman and written by Roselyne Bosch: .[20] The Salkinds filed a lawsuit against Scott, alleging that the director stole ideas from their project. $40 million in damages were sought, in addition to a ruling barring Scott from proceeding with the Goldman-backed film. Throughout November 1990, various contemporary sources pointed out that the scripts for the two projects were rumored to be quite different: Scott's "biopic" would survey twenty-three years of Columbus's life, while Salkind's "adventure-epic" would focus on the singular event of discovering the Americas in 1492. Six months after filing the lawsuit against Scott, the Salkinds decided to abandon it. Goldman and Salkind acknowledged that releasing two films on the same subject at approximately the same time could split audiences and box office returns, but with both "Columbus" pictures angling for a release date to coincide with the 500-year anniversary, the conflict seemed unavoidable.
In September 1994, producer Ilya Salkind, along with Ilya's wife and the film's executive producer Jane Chaplin, sued Alexander Salkind, co-producer Bob Simmonds, and other creditors for $10 million.
Tom Selleck won the Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor. Marlon Brando was also nominated for Worst Supporting Actor and the film received another four Golden Raspberry Award nominations including; Worst Picture, Worst Director – John Glen, Worst New Star – Georges Corraface and Worst Screenplay – Mario Puzo.[21] At the 1992 Stinkers Bad Movie Awards, it received a nomination for Worst Picture.
The film was released on VHS and LaserDisc formats from Warner Home Video in 1993. It has not been released on DVD in North America, but is available in other format regions on DVD.