Chorzów Factory case explained

The Chorzów Factory case (French: Affaire relative à l'usine de Chorzów|links=no) was a case heard before the Permanent Court of International Justice in 1927.^{[1] [2]} It was an early authority in international law that established a number of precedents in International Law. ^{[3] [4]}

Background

In the Upper Silesia plebiscite a majority of 31,864 voters voted to remain in Germany while 10,764 votes were given for Poland.^[5] Following three Silesian uprisings, the eastern part of Upper Silesia, including Chorzów and Królewska Huta, was separated from Germany and awarded to Poland in 1922. Migrations of people followed. Because of its strategic value, the case of the nitrogen factory Oberschlesische Stickstoffwerke was argued for years before the Permanent Court of International Justice, finally setting some new legal precedences on what is "just" in international relations.^[6]

Significance

The Court held that:

• A State is held responsible for expropriation of alien property
• Under International Law, a nation is responsible for acts of Government organs or officers.
• It is a general principle of international law that reparation is to be made for violations of international law. Regarding this, the PCIJ held: "reparation must, as far as possible, wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and reestablish the situation which would, in all probability, have existed if that act had not been committed".^[7] The reparation should thereby consist of a restitution in kind, or if this is impossible, the payment of a sum that corresponds to the value as compensation.

See also

• Chorzów#In Poland (1922–1939)

References

1. http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf Judgment of the Court in the Chorzów Factory Case
2. http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110810104611711 Factory at Chorzow (Germ. v. Pol.), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 9 (July 26)
3. Rosenne, Shabtai (2006). The Law and Practice of the International Court, 1920–2005 (4th ed.). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. .
4. Bedjaoui, Mohammed (2012). "An International Contentious Case on the Threshold of the Cold War". In Bannelier, Karine; Christakis, Theodore; Heathcote, Sarah. The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case. (London: Routledge, 2012). p15. .
5. http://www.herder-institut.de/startseite/dokumente-und-materialien/moduluebersicht/zweite-polnische-republik/materialien.html?tx_himmat_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=169&cHash=64c5894541f8d9b304ebee841028f938 Herder Institut
6. "The Seventh Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice", Manley O. Hudson, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 23, No. 1 (Jan., 1929), pp. 1-29,,
7. Factory at Chorzów (Claim for Indemnity, Merits) PCIJ Series A, no. 17, 13 September 1928, page 47.