Lie algebra cohomology explained
In mathematics, Lie algebra cohomology is a cohomology theory for Lie algebras. It was first introduced in 1929 by Élie Cartan to study the topology of Lie groups and homogeneous spaces[1] by relating cohomological methods of Georges de Rham to properties of the Lie algebra. It was later extended by to coefficients in an arbitrary Lie module.[2]
Motivation
If
is a compact
simply connected Lie group, then it is determined by its Lie algebra, so it should be possible to calculate its cohomology from the Lie algebra. This can be done as follows. Its cohomology is the
de Rham cohomology of the complex of
differential forms on
. Using an averaging process, this complex can be replaced by the complex of
left-invariant differential forms. The left-invariant forms, meanwhile, are determined by their values at the identity, so that the space of left-invariant differential forms can be identified with the
exterior algebra of the Lie algebra, with a suitable differential.
The construction of this differential on an exterior algebra makes sense for any Lie algebra, so it is used to define Lie algebra cohomology for all Lie algebras. More generally one uses a similar construction to define Lie algebra cohomology with coefficients in a module.
If
is a simply connected
noncompact Lie group, the Lie algebra cohomology of the associated Lie algebra
does not necessarily reproduce the de Rham cohomology of
. The reason for this is that the passage from the complex of all differential forms to the complex of left-invariant differential forms uses an averaging process that only makes sense for compact groups.
Definition
Let
be a Lie algebra over a commutative ring
R with
universal enveloping algebra
, and let
M be a
representation of
(equivalently, a
-module). Considering
R as a trivial representation of
, one defines the cohomology groups
}(R, M)
(see Ext functor for the definition of Ext). Equivalently, these are the right derived functors of the left exact invariant submodule functor
} := \.
Analogously, one can define Lie algebra homology as
}(R, M)
(see Tor functor for the definition of Tor), which is equivalent to the left derived functors of the right exact coinvariants functor
} := M / \mathfrak M.
Some important basic results about the cohomology of Lie algebras include Whitehead's lemmas, Weyl's theorem, and the Levi decomposition theorem.
Chevalley–Eilenberg complex
Let
be a Lie algebra over a field
, with a left action on the
-module
. The elements of the
Chevalley–Eilenberg complex
are called cochains from
to
. A homogeneous
-cochain from
to
is thus an alternating
-multilinear function
. When
is finitely generated as vector space, the Chevalley–Eilenberg complex is canonically isomorphic to the tensor product
, where
denotes the dual vector space of
.
The Lie bracket
[ ⋅ , ⋅ ]\colonΛ2ak{g} → ak{g}
on
induces a
transpose application
} \colon \mathfrak^* \rightarrow \Lambda^2 \mathfrak^* by duality. The latter is sufficient to define a derivation
} of the complex of cochains from
to
by extending
}^according to the graded Leibniz rule. It follows from the Jacobi identity that
} satisfies
}^2 = 0 and is in fact a differential. In this setting,
is viewed as a trivial
-module while
k\simΛ0ak{g}*\subseteqKer(dak{g
}) may be thought of as constants.
In general, let
\gamma\inHom(ak{g},End(M))
denote the left action of
on
and regard it as an application
. The Chevalley–Eilenberg differential
is then the unique derivation extending
and
}^ according to the
graded Leibniz rule, the nilpotency condition
following from the Lie algebra homomorphism from
to
and the
Jacobi identity in
.
Explicitly, the differential of the
-cochain
is the
-cochain
given by:
[3] \begin{align}
(df)\left(x1,\ldots,xn+1\right)=
&\sumi(-1)i+1xif\left(x1,\ldots,\hatxi,\ldots,xn+1\right)+\\
&\sumi<j(-1)i+jf\left(\left[xi,xj\right],x1,\ldots,\hatxi,\ldots,\hatxj,\ldots,xn+1\right),
\end{align}
where the caret signifies omitting that argument.
When
is a real Lie group with Lie algebra
, the Chevalley–Eilenberg complex may also be canonically identified with the space of left-invariant forms with values in
, denoted by
. The Chevalley–Eilenberg differential may then be thought of as a restriction of the covariant derivative on the trivial
fiber bundle
, equipped with the equivariant
connection \tilde{\gamma}\in\Omega1(G,End(M))
associated with the left action
\gamma\inHom(ak{g},End(M))
of
on
. In the particular case where
is equipped with the trivial action of
, the Chevalley–Eilenberg differential coincides with the restriction of the
de Rham differential on
to the subspace of left-invariant differential forms.
Cohomology in small dimensions
The zeroth cohomology group is (by definition) the invariants of the Lie algebra acting on the module:
} = \.
The first cohomology group is the space of derivations modulo the space of inner derivations
H1(ak{g};M)=Der(ak{g},M)/Ider(ak{g},M)
,where a derivation is a map
from the Lie algebra to
such that
and is called inner if it is given by
for some
in
.
The second cohomology group
is the space of equivalence classes of
Lie algebra extensions0 → M → ak{h} → ak{g} → 0
of the Lie algebra by the module
.
Similarly, any element of the cohomology group
gives an equivalence class of ways to extend the Lie algebra
to a "Lie
-algebra" with
in grade zero and
in grade
.
[4] A Lie
-algebra is a
homotopy Lie algebra with nonzero terms only in degrees 0 through
.
Examples
Cohomology on the trivial module
When
, as mentioned earlier the Chevalley–Eilenberg complex coincides with the de-Rham complex for a corresponding
compact Lie group. In this case
carries the trivial action of
, so
for every
.
- The zeroth cohomology group is
.
- First cohomology: given a derivation
,
for all
and
, so derivations satisfy
for all commutators, so the ideal
is contained in the kernel of
.
, as is the case for
simple Lie algebras, then
, so the space of derivations is trivial, so the first cohomology is trivial.
is abelian, that is,
, then any linear functional
is in fact a derivation, and the set of inner derivations is trivial as they satisfy
for any
. Then the first cohomology group in this case is
}. In light of the de-Rham correspondence, this shows the importance of the compact assumption, as this is the first cohomology group of the
-torus viewed as an abelian group, and
can also be viewed as an abelian group of dimension
, but
has trivial cohomology.
- Second cohomology: The second cohomology group is the space of equivalence classes of central extensions
Finite dimensional, simple Lie algebras only have trivial central extensions: a proof is provided here.
Cohomology on the adjoint module
When
, the action is the
adjoint action,
.
- The zeroth cohomology group is the center
- First cohomology: the inner derivations are given by
, so they are precisely the image of
The first cohomology group is the space of outer derivations.
See also
Notes and References
- Cartan. Élie. Élie Cartan. 1929. Sur les invariants intégraux de certains espaces homogènes clos. Annales de la Société Polonaise de Mathématique . 8. 181–225.
- Koszul. Jean-Louis. Jean-Louis Koszul. 1950. Homologie et cohomologie des algèbres de Lie. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France. 78. 65–127. 10.24033/bsmf.1410. 2019-05-03. https://web.archive.org/web/20190421184326/http://www.numdam.org/item/BSMF_1950__78__65_0/. 2019-04-21. live. free.
- Book: An introduction to homological algebra. Weibel. Charles A.. Charles Weibel. 1994. Cambridge University Press. 240.
- Baez. John C.. Crans. Alissa S.. John C. Baez. 2004. Higher-dimensional algebra VI: Lie 2-algebras . Theory and Applications of Categories. 12. 492–528 . math/0307263 . 10.1.1.435.9259 . 2003math......7263B .