Chesapeake Bay Explained

Chesapeake Bay
Location:Maryland and Virginia
Coordinates:37.8°N -76.1°W
Type:Estuary
Etymology:Algonquian languages: Chesepiooc, Algonquian for village "at a big river"
Inflow:Susquehanna River mouth
east of Havre de Grace, Maryland
Rivers:Deer Creek,
Bush River,
Gunpowder River,
Back River,
Patapsco River,
Severn River,
Patuxent River,
Potomac River,
Rappahannock River,
York River,
James River, Chester River, Choptank River, Nanticoke River, Pocomoke River
Outflow:Atlantic Ocean
north of Virginia Beach, Virginia
36.9958°N -75.9594°W
Catchment:64299sqmi
Basin Countries:United States
Length:200miles
Width:30miles
Area:4479sqmi
Depth:21feet
Residence Time:180 days
Cities:Annapolis, Baltimore, Cambridge, Cape Charles, Chesapeake, Chesapeake Beach, Elkton, Hampton, Havre de Grace, Newport News, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Virginia Beach
Caption Map:The Chesapeake Bay drainage basin extends into six states, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New York, and the federal capital of Washington, D.C.
Pushpin Map:Virginia

The Chesapeake Bay is the largest estuary in the United States. The Bay is located in the Mid-Atlantic region and is primarily separated from the Atlantic Ocean by the Delmarva Peninsula, including parts of the Eastern Shore of Maryland, the Eastern Shore of Virginia, and the state of Delaware. The mouth of the Bay at its southern point is located between Cape Henry and Cape Charles.[1] With its northern portion in Maryland and the southern part in Virginia, the Chesapeake Bay is a very important feature for the ecology and economy of those two states, as well as others surrounding within its watershed. More than 150 major rivers and streams flow into the Bay's 642990NaN0 drainage basin, which covers parts of six states (New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia) and all of Washington, D.C.[1] [2]

The Bay is approximately 200miles long from its northern headwaters in the Susquehanna River to its outlet in the Atlantic Ocean. It is 2.8miles wide at its narrowest (between Kent County's Plum Point near Newtown in the east and the Harford County western shore near Romney Creek) and 30miles at its widest (just south of the mouth of the Potomac River which divides Maryland from Virginia). Total shoreline including tributaries is 11684miles, circumnavigating a surface area of 4479sqmi. Average depth is 21feet, reaching a maximum of 174feet.[3] The Bay is spanned twice, in Maryland by the Chesapeake Bay Bridge from Sandy Point (near Annapolis) to Kent Island and in Virginia by the Chesapeake Bay Bridge–Tunnel connecting Virginia Beach to Cape Charles.

Known for both its beauty and bounty, the Bay has become "emptier", with fewer crabs, oysters and watermen (fishermen) since the mid-20th century.[4] Nutrient pollution and urban runoff have been identified as major components of impaired water quality in the bay stressing ecosystems and compounding the decline of shellfish due to overharvesting. Restoration efforts that began in the 1990s have continued into the 21st century and show potential for growth of the native oyster population.[5] [6] The health of the Chesapeake Bay improved in 2015, marking three years of gains over a four-year period.[7] Slight improvements in water quality were observed in 2021, compared to indicators measured in 2020.[8] The bay is experiencing other environmental concerns, including climate change which is causing sea level rise that erodes coastal areas and infrastructure and changes to the marine ecosystem.[9]

Etymology

The word Algonquian languages: Chesepiooc is an Algonquian word referring to a village 'at a big river'. It is the seventh-oldest surviving English placename in the United States, first applied as Chesepiook by explorers heading north from the Roanoke Colony into a Chesapeake tributary in 1585 or 1586. The name may also refer to the Chesapeake people or the Chesepian, a Native American tribe who inhabited the area now known as South Hampton Roads in the U.S. state of Virginia. They occupied an area that is now the Norfolk, Portsmouth, Chesapeake, and Virginia Beach areas.[10] In 2005, Algonquian linguist Blair Rudes "helped to dispel one of the area's most widely held beliefs: that 'Chesapeake' means something like 'great shellfish bay'. It does not, Rudes said. The name might have actually meant something like 'great water', or it might have just referred to a village location at the Bay's mouth."[11]

Physical geography

Geology and formation

The Chesapeake Bay is an estuary to the North Atlantic, lying between the Delmarva Peninsula to the east and the North American mainland to the west. It is the ria, or drowned valley, of the Susquehanna River, meaning that it was the alluvial plain where the river flowed when the sea level was lower. It is not a fjord, because the Laurentide Ice Sheet never reached as far south as the northernmost point on the Bay. North of Baltimore, the western shore borders the hilly Piedmont region of Maryland; south of the city the Bay lies within the state's low-lying coastal plain, with sedimentary cliffs to the west, and flat islands, winding creeks and marshes to the east. The large rivers entering the Bay from the west have broad mouths and are extensions of the main ria for miles up the course of each river.

The Bay's geology, its present form, and its very location were created by a bolide impact event at the end of the Eocene (about 35.5 million years ago), forming the Chesapeake Bay impact crater and much later the Susquehanna River valley. The Bay was formed starting about 10,000 years ago when rising sea levels at the end of the last ice age flooded the Susquehanna River valley.[2] Parts of the Bay, especially the Calvert County, Maryland, coastline, are lined by cliffs composed of deposits from receding waters millions of years ago. These cliffs, generally known as Calvert Cliffs, are famous for their fossils, especially fossilized shark teeth, which are commonly found washed up on the beaches next to the cliffs. Scientists' Cliffs is a beach community in Calvert County named for the desire to create a retreat for scientists when the community was founded in 1935.[12]

Hydrology

Much of the Bay is shallow. At the point where the Susquehanna River flows into the Bay, the average depth is 30feet, although this soon diminishes to an average of 10feet southeast of the city of Havre de Grace, Maryland, to about 35feet just north of Annapolis. On average, the depth of the Bay is 21feet, including tributaries;[13] over 24 percent of the Bay is less than 60NaN0 deep.[14]

Because the Bay is an estuary, it has fresh water, salt water and brackish water. Brackish water has three salinity zones: oligohaline, mesohaline, and polyhaline. The freshwater zone runs from the mouth of the Susquehanna River to north Baltimore. The oligohaline zone has very little salt. Salinity varies from 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand) to 10 ppt, and freshwater species can survive there. The north end of the oligohaline zone is north Baltimore and the south end is the Chesapeake Bay Bridge. The mesohaline zone has a medium amount of salt and runs from the Bay Bridge to the mouth of the Rappahannock River. Salinity there ranges from 1.07% to 1.8%. The polyhaline zone is the saltiest zone, and some of the water can be as salty as sea water. It runs from the mouth of the Rappahannock River to the mouth of the Bay. The salinity ranges from 1.87% to 3.6%. (3.6% is as salty as the ocean.)[15]

The climate of the area surrounding the Bay is primarily humid subtropical, with hot, very humid summers and cold to mild winters. Only the area around the mouth of the Susquehanna River is continental in nature, and the mouth of the Susquehanna River and the Susquehanna flats often freeze in winter. It is rare for the surface of the Bay to freeze in winter, something that happened most recently in the winter of 1976–77.[16]

The Chesapeake Bay is the end point of over 150 rivers and streams.[17] The largest rivers flowing directly into the Bay, in order of discharge,[18] [19] are:

For more information on Chesapeake Bay rivers, see the List of Chesapeake Bay rivers.

Flora and fauna

The Chesapeake Bay is home to numerous fauna that either migrate to the Bay at some point during the year or live there year-round. There are over 300 species of fish and numerous shellfish and crab species. Some of these include the Atlantic menhaden, striped bass, American eel, eastern oyster, Atlantic horseshoe crab, and the blue crab.[20]

Birds include ospreys, great blue herons, bald eagles,[21] and peregrine falcons, the last two of which were threatened by DDT; their numbers plummeted but have risen in recent years.[22] The piping plover is a near threatened species that inhabits the wetlands.[22]

Larger fish such as Atlantic sturgeon,[23] varieties of sharks,[24] [25] and stingrays visit the Chesapeake Bay. The waters of the Chesapeake Bay have been regarded as one of the most important nursery areas for sharks along the east coast.[26] Megafaunas such as bull sharks, tiger sharks, scalloped hammerhead sharks, and basking sharks and manta rays are also known to visit. Smaller species of sharks and stingrays that are known to be regular to occasional residents in the bay include the smooth dogfish, spiny dogfish, cownose ray, and bonnethead.

Bottlenose dolphins are known to live seasonally/yearly in the Bay.[27] There have been unconfirmed sightings of humpback whales in recent years.[28] [29] Endangered North Atlantic right whale[30] and fin, and minke and sei whales have also been sighted within and in the vicinity of the Bay.

A male manatee visited the Bay several times between 1994 and 2011, even though the area is north of the species' normal range. The manatee, recognizable due to distinct markings on its body, was nicknamed "Chessie" after a legendary sea monster that was allegedly sighted in the Bay during the 20th century.[31] [32] [33] The same manatee has been spotted as far north as Rhode Island, and was the first manatee known to travel so far north.[34] Other manatees are occasionally seen in the Bay and its tributaries, which contain sea grasses that are part of the manatee's diet.[35]

Loggerhead turtles are known to visit the Bay.

The Chesapeake Bay is also home to a diverse flora, both land and aquatic. Common submerged aquatic vegetation includes eelgrass and widgeon grass. A report in 2011 suggested that information on underwater grasses would be released, because "submerged grasses provide food and habitat for a number of species, adding oxygen to the water and improving water clarity."[36] Other vegetation that makes its home in other parts of the Bay are wild rice, various trees like the red maple, loblolly pine and bald cypress, and spartina grass and phragmites.[37] Invasive plants have taken a significant foothold in the Bay. Plants such as Phragmites, Purple loosestrife and Japanese stiltgrass have established high levels of permanency in Chesapeake wetlands.[38] Additionally, plants such as Brazilian waterweed, native to South America, have spread to most continents with the help of aquarium owners, who often dump the contents of their aquariums into nearby lakes and streams. It is highly invasive and has the potential to flourish in the low-salinity tidal waters of the Chesapeake Bay. Dense stands of Brazilian waterweed can restrict water movement, trap sediment and affect water quality. Various local K-12 schools in the Maryland and Virginia region often have programs that cultivate native bay grasses and plant them in the Bay.

History

Pre-Columbian

It is presumed that Chesapeake Bay was once inhabited by Paleoindians 11,000 years ago.[39] For thousands of years, Native American societies lived in villages of wooden longhouses close to water bodies where they fished and farmed the land. Agricultural products included beans, corn, tobacco, and squash. Villages often lasted between 10 and 20 years before being abandoned due to local resources such as firewood running out or soil depleting.[40] To produce enough food, labor was divided with men hunting while the women supervised the village's farming. All village members took part in the harvesting of fish and shellfish from the local bodies of water. As time went on, communities around Chesapeake Bay formed confederations such as the Powhatan, the Piscataway, and the Nanticoke. Each of these confederations consisted of a collection of smaller tribes falling under the leadership of a central chief.[41]

European exploration and settlement

In 1524, Italian explorer Giovanni da Verrazzano, (1485–1528), in service of the French crown, (famous for sailing through and thereafter naming the entrance to New York Bay as the "Verrazzano Narrows", including now in the 20th century, a suspension bridge also named for him) sailed past the Chesapeake, but did not enter the Bay.[42] Spanish explorer Lucas Vásquez de Ayllón sent an expedition out from Hispaniola in 1525 that reached the mouths of the Chesapeake and Delaware Bays. It may have been the first European expedition to explore parts of the Chesapeake Bay, which the Spaniards called "Bahía de Santa María" ("Bay of St. Mary") or "Bahía de Madre de Dios."("Bay of the Mother of God")[43] De Ayllón established a short-lived Spanish mission settlement, San Miguel de Gualdape, in 1526 along the Atlantic coast. Many scholars doubt the assertion that it was as far north as the Chesapeake; most place it in present-day Georgia's Sapelo Island.[44] In 1573, Pedro Menéndez de Márquez, the governor of Spanish Florida, conducted further exploration of the Chesapeake. In 1570, Spanish Jesuits established the short-lived Ajacan Mission on one of the Chesapeake tributaries in present-day Virginia.

The arrival of English colonists under Sir Walter Raleigh and Humphrey Gilbert in the late 16th century to found a colony, later settled at Roanoke Island (off the present-day coast of North Carolina) for the Virginia Company, marked the first time that the English approached the gates to the Chesapeake Bay between the capes of Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Three decades later, in 1607, Europeans again entered the Bay. Captain John Smith of England explored and mapped the Bay between 1607 and 1609, resulting in the publication in 1612 back in the British Isles of "A Map of Virginia".[45] Smith wrote in his journal: "Heaven and earth have never agreed better to frame a place for man's habitation." The Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, the first designated "all-water" National Historic Trail in the US, was established in 2006 by the National Park Service. The trail follows the route of Smith's historic 17th-century voyage.[46]

Notes and References

  1. News: Leslie . Kaufman . More Blue Crabs, but Chesapeake Bay Is Still at Risk, Report Says . The New York Times . December 28, 2010 . 2011-04-20 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110412144707/http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/28/more-blue-crabs-but-chesapeake-bay-still-is-at-risk-report-says/ . April 12, 2011 . dead.
  2. Web site: Fact Sheet 102-98 – The Chesapeake Bay: Geologic Product of Rising Sea Level . U. S. Geological Survey . 1998-11-18 . 2008-01-13 .
  3. Web site: Chesapeake Bay, VA/MD (M130) Bathymetric Digital ElevationModel (30 meter resolution) Derived From Source Hydrographic Survey Soundings Collected by NOAA . . 2013-05-17 . 2015-01-21 . dead . http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20150411050717/http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/chesapeake-bay-va-md-m130-bathymetric-digital-elevationmodel-30-meter-resolution-derived-from-s . 2015-04-11 .
  4. News: David A. . Fahrenthold . Way of Life Slipping Away Along Chesapeake's Edge . The Washington Post . 2008-12-28 . 2011-04-20.
  5. News: Signs of a Chesapeake Bay oyster comeback . 19 November 2013 . The Washington Post.
  6. News: Maryland oysters making a comeback . Brian . Kuebler . 2015-02-01 . ABC News . dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20150402105443/http://www.abc2news.com/news/region/eastern-shore/maryland-oysters-making-a-comeback . 2 April 2015.
  7. Web site: Cox . Jeremy . Report: Chesapeake Bay at healthiest level in years . 2016-05-18 . Delmarva Now . Gannett.
  8. News: Lai . Stephanie . The Chesapeake Bay's water quality is inching in the right direction, scientists say . 2021-06-22 . The Washington Post.
  9. Web site: Climate Change . 2020-12-16 . Chesapeake Bay Program . Annapolis, MD.
  10. Also shown as Chisupioc (by John Smith) and Chisapeack, in Algonquian Algonquian languages: che means 'big' or 'great', Algonquian languages: sepi means river, and the Algonquian languages: oc or Algonquian languages: ok ending indicated something (a village, in this case) 'at' that feature. Algonquian languages: Sepi is also found in another placename of Algonquian origin, Mississippi. The name was soon transferred by the English from the big river and the village at that site to the entire bay. Book: Stewart, George . Names on the Land: A Historical Account of Place-Naming in the United States . registration . George R. Stewart . 1945 . Random House . New York . 23 .
  11. News: A Dead Indian Language Is Brought Back to Life . Farenthold . David A. . . 2006-12-12 . A1 . 2007-03-19 .
  12. Web site: FAQ . Scientists Cliffs community . 2008-05-08 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20090107050207/http://www.scientistscliffs.org/HTML/FAQs/FAQs.htm . January 7, 2009 .
  13. Web site: Geography . Chesapeake Bay Foundation . 2008-04-21 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20071014181514/http://www.cbf.org/site/PageServer?pagename=exp_sub_watershed_geography . October 14, 2007 . Other sources give values of 25 feet (e.g. Web site: Charting the Chesapeake 1590–1990 . Maryland State Archives . 2008-04-21 . 2021-02-15 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210215094045/https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/speccol/sc2200/sc2269/html/chartfront.html . dead .) or 30feet deep (Web site: Healthy Chesapeake Waterways . University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science . 2008-04-21 . https://web.archive.org/web/20080626004705/http://ian.umces.edu/pdfs/iannewsletter1.pdf . 2008-06-26 .)
  14. Web site: Chesapeake Bay Program: A Watershed Partnership: Facts & Figures . Chesapeake Bay Program Office . 2010-05-04 . 2010-10-29 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20101204081804/http://www.chesapeakebay.net/factsandfigures.aspx?menuitem=14582 . 2010-12-04 .
  15. Web site: Figure 1. Map of the Chesapeake Bay and salinity zones. Salinity zones... . ResearchGate .
  16. Time . The Big Freeze . 1977-01-31 . https://web.archive.org/web/20080308235254/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,918620-2,00.html . dead . March 8, 2008 . 2007-03-19 .
  17. Web site: Facts & Figures . 18 August 2021 . Chesapeake Bay Program.
  18. Zhang . Qian . Brady . Damien C. . Boynton . Walter R. . Ball . William P. . Long-term trends of nutrients and sediment from the nontidal Chesapeake watershed: An assessment of progress by river and season . Journal of the American Water Resources Association . 2015 . 51 . 6 . 1534–1555 . 10.1111/1752-1688.12327. 2015JAWRA..51.1534Z . 129432081 .
  19. Sprague . Lori A. . Langland . Michael J. . Yochum . Steven E. . Edwards . Robert E. . Blomquist . Joel D. . Phillips . Scott W. . Shenk . Gary W. . Preston . Stephen D. . Factors Affecting Nutrient Trends in Major Rivers of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Water Resources Investigations Report 00-4218 . 2000 .
  20. Book: A Comprehensive List of Chesapeake Bay Basin Species . 2007 . Chesapeake Bay Program . 11 October 2015.
  21. News: Elton Dunn, Demand Media . Chesapeake Bay Kayak Tours . USA Today . 2011-04-20 . 2011-04-20 . 2023-06-01 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230601102801/https://traveltips.usatoday.com/chesapeake-bay-kayak-tours-2207.html . dead .
  22. Blankenship . Karl . September 1995 . Endangered Species Around the Chesapeake . 5 . 6 . Chesapeake Bay Journal . 2011-04-02 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110623020828/http://bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=916 . 2011-06-23 . dead .
  23. Web site: Atlantic Sturgeon . Chesapeake Bay Program . December 21, 2014 . November 8, 2014 . https://web.archive.org/web/20141108034822/http://www.chesapeakebay.net/fieldguide/critter/atlantic_sturgeon . dead.
  24. The Chesapeake Bay News. 2010. Are there sharks in the Chesapeake Bay?. Retrieved on December 21. 2014
  25. Shinkman D.P. Sharks in the Chesapeake: More likely than thought. The WTOP-FM. Retrieved on December 21. 2014
  26. The National Aquarium. Sharks Among Us: Chesapeake Bay Species . Retrieved on December 22. 2014
  27. Web site: Bottlenose Dolphin . Chesapeake Bay Program . December 21, 2014 . December 21, 2014 . https://web.archive.org/web/20141221184415/http://www.chesapeakebay.net/fieldguide/critter/bottlenose_dolphin . dead.
  28. O'BRIEN D.. 1992. Whale in Chesapeake Provides Reminders About Nature . The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved on December 21. 2014
  29. The Southside Sentinel. 2010. Whale sighted in the Chesapeake Bay . Retrieved on December 21. 2014
  30. [National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration]
  31. Web site: Four rare Chesapeake Bay "oddities" to learn about this leap year . Chesapeake Bay Program . February 27, 2012 . December 21, 2014.
  32. Web site: Chessie the manatee is back in the Bay . The Baltimore Sun . July 15, 2011 . Kilar, Steve . Wheeler, Timothy B. . January 29, 2017 . September 23, 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160923190436/http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2011-07-15/features/bs-gr-manatee-20110715_1_manatee-beck-usgs . dead .
  33. Web site: Famous Manatee "Chessie" Sighted in Chesapeake Bay After Long Absence . Sound Waves . U.S. Geological Survey . September 2011 . Beck, Cathy . Pawlitz, Rachel . Bloomer, Jen . January 29, 2017 . November 4, 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20171104062319/https://soundwaves.usgs.gov/2011/10/fieldwork5.html . dead .
  34. Web site: Manatee Traveler in Northeastern Waters Not Chessie . Sound Waves . U.S. Geological Survey . September 2006 . Hamilton, Hannah . Puckett, Catherine . January 29, 2017 . February 2, 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170202054640/https://soundwaves.usgs.gov/2006/09/research2.html . dead .
  35. Web site: Manatee spotted in tributary off Chesapeake Bay near Waldorf, Md. . The Washington Post . July 16, 2015 . Hedgpeth, Dana . January 29, 2017.
  36. News: Associated Press . Chesapeake Bay Program to release new data on underwater grasses in bay, rivers . The Washington Post . April 20, 2011 . 2011-04-20.
  37. Domes S., Lewis M., Moran R., Nyman D.. “Chesapeake Bay Wetlands”. Emporia State University. May 2009. Retrieved 2010-03-14.
  38. Web site: Wetlands . 2024-04-09 . Chesapeake Bay . en-US.
  39. Book: Arnett . Earl . Brugger . Robert J. . Papenfuse . Edward C. . Maryland: A New Guide to the Old Line State . 3 May 1999 . JHU Press . 978-0-8018-5980-9 . 128 .
  40. Web site: History & Culture—Chesapeake Bay . 2021-03-07 . National Park Service.
  41. Book: Tayac, Gabrielle . 2006 . We Have A Story To Tell: Native Peoples of the Chesapeake Region; A Guide for Teachers . March 6, 2021 . National Museum of the American Indian, Smithsonian Institution.
  42. Book: Parramore . Thomas . Norfolk: The First Four Centuries . 2000 . 1–16 . University of Virginia Press . 2011-11-05 . 9780813919881 .
  43. Web site: Spanish in the Chesapeake . 2010-07-08 . Grymes . Charles A.
  44. Book: Weber, David . The Spanish Frontier in North America . 1994 . Yale University Press. New Haven, CT . 36–37.
  45. Web site: Smith's Maps . Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historical Trail . National Park Service . 12 June 2012 . 29 May 2012 . https://web.archive.org/web/20120529141445/http://www.smithtrail.net/captain-john-smith/smiths-maps/ . dead .
  46. News: Kendra Bailey . Morris . Consider the Chesapeake Bay Oyster . NPR . November 21, 2007 . April 20, 2011.
  47. Web site: Patel . Sonal . 2022-11-01 . A Half-Century of Reliability: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant . 2024-02-24 . POWER Magazine . en-US.
  48. Web site: CBBT Facts. 2015-05-21. https://web.archive.org/web/20150428072417/http://www.cbbt.com/facts.html. 2015-04-28. dead.
  49. News: J.D. . Wollf . Fishing at the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel . USA Today . April 20, 2011 . April 20, 2011 . July 23, 2011 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110723180104/http://traveltips.usatoday.com/fishing-chesapeake-bay-bridge-tunnel-33269.html . dead .
  50. Wang, D.-P. 1979. Subtidal Sea Level Variations in the Chesapeake Bay and Relations to Atmospheric Forcing. Journal of Physical Oceanography. Vol. 9. pp. 413–421.
  51. Wang, D-P. and A.J. Elliott. Non-Tidal Variability in the Chesapeake Bay and Potomac River: Evidence for Non-Local Forcing. Journal of Physical Oceanography. Vol. 8. pp. 225–232.
  52. News: William . Grimes . William W. Warner, Chesapeake Bay Author, Dies at 88 . The New York Times . April 30, 2008 . April 20, 2011.
  53. Web site: Chesapeake Bay Workboats. Chesapeake Bay Gateway Network. 2007-03-19. https://web.archive.org/web/20070407172549/http://baygateways.net/workboats.cfm. 2007-04-07. dead.
  54. Book: Hall . S. J. . Delaporte . A. . Phillips . M. J. . Beveridge . M. . O'Keefe . M. . Blue Frontiers: Managing the Environmental Costs of Aquaculture . 2011 . The WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia .
  55. Web site: Oyster Restoration Projected to Provide Significant Boost to Bay Grasses While Removing Nitrogen Pollution from the Bay . https://web.archive.org/web/20060903090534/http://www.dnr.state.md.us/dnrnews/pressrelease2005/081505.html . dead . 2006-09-03 . Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
  56. Web site: 2022 . Striped Bass Regulations for 2022 . 2023-06-24 . Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
  57. Web site: Shad . Chesapeake Bay Magazine . 5 April 2018 . 21 October 2021.
  58. Nepal . Vaskar . Fabrizio . Mary C. . Patterson . Heather M. . High salinity tolerance of invasive blue catfish suggests potential for further range expansion in the Chesapeake Bay region . PLOS ONE . Public Library of Science (PLoS) . 14 . 11 . 5 November 2019 . 1932-6203 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0224770 . e0224770 . 31689331 . 6830772 . 2019PLoSO..1424770N . free .
  59. Web site: Atlantic Menhaden . Chesapeake Bay Program . 21 October 2021.
  60. Web site: Maryland Sea Grant. Maryland Sea Grant. en. 2018-09-12.
  61. Web site: Harvey M. Katz . Chesapeake Bay Executive Order | Targeting Resources to Better Protect the Chesapeake Bay is Aim of U.S. Department of Agriculture's 202(b) Report . Executiveorder.chesapeakebay.net . 2009-08-27 . 2014-02-28 . 2014-03-05 . https://web.archive.org/web/20140305050928/http://executiveorder.chesapeakebay.net/post/Targeting-Resources-to-Better-Protect-the-Chesapeake-Bay-is-Aim-of-US-Department-of-Agriculture.aspx . dead .
  62. News: Anne . Glusker . A Treasure Chest of Fun on Chesapeake Bay . The New York Times . October 9, 2005 . 2011-04-20.
  63. Web site: Grisham . Carrie . The Economic Importance of the Bay . Chesapeake Bay Foundation . 1 November 2020.
  64. Book: Shields . John . Chesapeake Bay Cooking . Johns Hopkins University Press.
  65. News: Sindya N. . Bhanoo . Amish Farming Draws Rare Government Scrutiny . The New York Times . 2010-06-08 .
  66. Web site: Bad Water and the Decline of Blue Crabs in the Chesapeake Bay . Chesapeake Bay Foundation . December 2008 . 2009-01-21 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20100617053029/http://www.cbf.org/Document.Doc?id=172 . 2010-06-17.
  67. Web site: Agricultural Runoff . Threats to the Bay . 2022-12-24 . Chesapeake Bay Program.
  68. Web site: Pimental . Alicia . Report details effects of pollution from lawn fertilizer on Chesapeake Bay . 2011-03-29 . Chesapeake Bay Program.
  69. News: Darryl . Fears . Lawns are adding to Chesapeake Bay pollution, study says . The Washington Post . 2011-03-28 .
  70. Web site: Air Pollution . Threats to the Bay. 2022-12-24 . Chesapeake Bay Program.
  71. News: Md. Gets Tough on Chicken Farmers . David A. . Fahrenthold . The Washington Post . 2008-09-12 .
  72. Oysters: Gem of the Ocean . The Economist . December 8, 2008.
  73. Web site: Oyster Reefs: Ecological importance . US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) . 2007-11-06 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20081003114619/http://habitat.noaa.gov/restorationtechniques/public/habitat.cfm?HabitatID=2&HabitatTopicID=11 . October 3, 2008 .
  74. Web site: Estimating Net Present Value in the Northern Chesapeake Bay Oyster Fishery . NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office . 2008-11-07 . 2009-09-08 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20090629143549/http://www.nao.usace.army.mil/OysterEIS/PeerReviews/ResearchDocs/OysterNPV1107_rev_1.pdf . June 29, 2009 .
  75. Web site: Research – Shellfish Diseases . Virginia Institute of Marine Science . Gloucester Point, VA . 2007-03-16 . 2008-02-22 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20070211013712/http://www.vims.edu/env/research/shellfish/ . February 11, 2007 .
  76. Chesapeake Bay Program: Findings and Recommendations . September 1983 . U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . Philadelphia, PA . EPA 903/R-83/008.
  77. News: Franklin . Ben A. . Chesapeake Bay Study Citing Pollution Threats . 1983-09-27 . The New York Times . A24.
  78. Web site: History . 2022-01-15 . About Us . Chesapeake Bay Commission . Annapolis, MD.
  79. Web site: Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) . Annapolis, MD . 1983 . 1983 Chesapeake Bay Agreement.
  80. Web site: 1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement . 1987 . CBP.
  81. News: In Maryland, Focus on Poultry Industry Pollution . The New York Times . 2008-11-29 . Ian . Urbina . A14.
  82. CBP (2000). "Chesapeake 2000."
  83. Web site: Chesapeake Bay Progress: Wastewater Pollution Reduction Leads the Way . June 2016 . U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . Philadelphia, PA.
  84. Web site: Water Quality Criteria . 2021-11-17 . EPA.
  85. Web site: What are Water Quality Standards? . 2021-02-26 . EPA.
  86. Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load for Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment . Section 3. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Standards . https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-12/documents/cbay_final_tmdl_exec_sum_section_1_through_3_final_0.pdf= . 2010-12-29 . EPA.
  87. http://www.somdnews.com/stories/08122009/rectop152311_32182.shtml Program turns pork into oysters
  88. News: Oysters Are on the Rebound in the Chesapeake Bay . Henry . Fountain . The New York Times . August 3, 2009.
  89. News: Fahrenthold . David A. . Bay Advocates Sue EPA . 2009-01-06 . The Washington Post.
  90. Chesapeake Bay TMDL Executive Summary . 2010-12-29 . EPA.
  91. News: Fears . Darryl . Supreme Court ends challenge to the Chesapeake Bay cleanup plan . 2016-03-01 . The Washington Post.
  92. News: Finley . Ben . Lawsuit: EPA fails to enforce Chesapeake Bay pollution caps . 2020-09-10 . The Washington Post . Associated Press.
  93. Web site: Chesapeake Bay Milestones . 2021-12-15 . Chesapeake Bay TMDL . EPA.
  94. For example, see "Maryland's Two-Year Milestones", documents issued biennially outlining the state's projects and goals for pollution reduction. The state intends to initiate "all necessary pollution reduction actions" by 2025. Web site: Maryland's Two-Year Milestones . 2021-12-24 . Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) . Baltimore, MD.
  95. Web site: Riparian Forest Buffer; Conservation Practice Job Sheet . 1997 . U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service . Washington, D.C. . 2021-12-29 . 2021-12-29 . https://web.archive.org/web/20211229172006/https://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/ftpref/wntsc/strmRest/buffers/RiprarianForestBufferJobSheet.pdf . dead .
  96. Book: National Research Council, Committee on Reducing Stormwater Discharge Contributions to Water Pollution . http://www.nap.edu/read/12465/chapter/7 . Urban Stormwater Management in the United States . 5. Stormwater Management Approaches . 2009 . National Academies Press . Washington, D.C. . 978-0-309-12540-6.
  97. Web site: Pimental . Alicia . Maryland passes law to reduce pollution from lawn fertilizer . 2011-05-23 . Chesapeake Bay Program.
  98. Web site: Pimental . Alicia . Va. governor signs bill banning phosphorus lawn fertilizer . 2011-08-18 . Chesapeake Bay Program.
  99. For example, see the Maryland Stormwater Design Manual, Volumes I and II . May 2009 . MDE.
  100. Constructing Stormwater Retrofits in Maryland: Challenges & Recommendations for Cost Estimation . January 2019 . Center for Watershed Protection . Ellicott City, MD.
  101. News: Terry Smith (commentator), Michele Norris (host) . The Chesapeake Bay, Scenic and Unhealthy . NPR . April 13, 2006 . 2011-04-20.
  102. News: David A. . Fahrenthold . Failing the Chesapeake Bay—Broken Promises on the Bay . The Washington Post . 2008-12-27 .
  103. News: Two Million Dead Fish Appear in Chesapeake Bay . CBS News . 2011-01-05 . 2011-04-20 . 2011-04-25 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110425114644/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/01/05/national/main7216597.shtml . dead .
  104. State of the Bay 2022 . 2022 . Chesapeake Bay Foundation.
  105. Web site: Report card gives Chesapeake Bay a C+, its best grade in 21 years . Maryland Matters. 12 July 2024 .
  106. Web site: Bay Health . Eco Report Card . 17 July 2024.
  107. Web site: 2017-04-04 . Climate change already affecting Chesapeake Bay region . 2020-12-16 . University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science . Cambridge, MD.
  108. Web site: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay . 2020-12-16 . The Conservation Fund . Arlington, VA.
  109. Web site: Portrait of an Island Part I: What used to be home . 20 June 2018 . 2022-12-25 . Chesapeake Bay Program.
  110. Irby . Isaac D. . Friedrichs . Marjorie A. M. . Da . Fei . Hinson . Kyle E. . The competing impacts of climate change and nutrient reductions on dissolved oxygen in Chesapeake Bay . Biogeosciences . Copernicus GmbH . 15 . 9 . 4 May 2018 . 1726-4189 . 10.5194/bg-15-2649-2018 . 2649–2668. 2018BGeo...15.2649I . free .
  111. News: After decades of waterfront living, climate change is forcing communities to plan their retreat from the coasts . The Washington Post.
  112. Web site: August 2016 . What Climate Change Means for Maryland . EPA.
  113. Orth . Robert J. . Dennison . William C. . Lefcheck . Jonathan S. . Gurbisz . Cassie . Hannam . Michael . Keisman . Jennifer . Landry . J. Brooke . Moore . Kenneth A. . Murphy . Rebecca R. . Patrick . Christopher J. . Testa . Jeremy . Weller . Donald E. . Wilcox . David J. . Submersed Aquatic Vegetation in Chesapeake Bay: Sentinel Species in a Changing World . BioScience . Oxford University Press (OUP) . 67 . 8 . 14 June 2017 . 0006-3568 . 10.1093/biosci/bix058 . 698–712. free .
  114. Web site: Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoy System . Home . 23 December 2021 . 3 March 2022.
  115. Web site: Water Quality Monitoring . Virginia Institute of Marine Science . 3 March 2022.
  116. Web site: [//eyesonthebay.dnr.maryland.gov/eyesonthebay/index.cfm Eyes on the Bay: Your home for Maryland tidal water quality data, downloads and visualizations ]. Eyes on the Bay . 22 February 2022 . 3 March 2022.
  117. Web site: Home . Virginia DEQ . 20 September 2011 . 3 March 2022.
  118. Web site: Maryland Maritime Archaeology Program . Maryland Historical Trust . Crownsville, MD . 2020-11-16.
  119. Web site: Lewis . Nancy Breslau . Underwater Archaeology: History From the Deep . Inside Annapolis . Backyard Publications, LLC . 2006 . 2020-11-16.
  120. Web site: Shipwrecks . 2020-11-16 . Chesapeake Bay Program.
  121. Web site: Tia . Ghose . Fisherman Pulls Up Beastly Evidence of Early Americans . 2014-08-11 . Live Science . Future US, Inc. . New York.
  122. Web site: Chesapeake Flotilla . 2020-11-16 . NHHC.
  123. Web site: Digging into Underwater Archaeology . Archaeology in the Community . Washington, D.C. . 2016-07-27 . 2020-11-16 . 2016-11-13 . https://web.archive.org/web/20161113164017/http://www.archaeologyincommunity.com/digging-into-underwater-archaeology/ . dead .
  124. Web site: State Submerged Resources: Maryland . Archeology Program . National Park Service . Washington, D.C. . 2020-11-16.
  125. News: Kimberlin . Joanne . Revolutionary War shipwrecks near Yorktown getting their first good look in years . 2019-05-18 . The Virginian-Pilot . Norfolk, VA.
  126. Web site: Bay Journal: Independent environmental news for the Chesapeake region . Bay Journal . 23 February 2022.
  127. Web site: Bay Weekly -. Bay Weekly.
  128. News: April 22, 2011 . Top Stories . The Capital Newspaper . . https://web.archive.org/web/20090208051821/http://hometownannapolis.com/cgi-bin/read/TOP.html . February 8, 2009.
  129. April 22, 2011 . Chesapeake Bay Magazine.
  130. News: April 22, 2011 . PropTalk . PropTalk Media LLC . https://web.archive.org/web/20110501075156/http://www.proptalk.com/ . May 1, 2011 . dead .
  131. News: April 22, 2011 . SpinSheet . SpinSheet Publishing Co..
  132. Web site: Annapolis Magazine - Eastern Shore Magazine - West County Magazine . What's Up? Media . 21 February 2022 . 23 February 2022.
  133. News: 'Chesapeake Requiem' Chronicles Life On An Endangered Island. 2021-07-03. NPR. 27 August 2018. en. Mayer. Petra.
  134. Book: Wennersten, J. . The Oyster Wars of Chesapeake Bay . Eastern Branch Press . 2007 . 978-0-615-18250-6 . 23 February 2022 .
  135. Web site: Expedition Chesapeake . Expedition Chesapeake . 23 February 2022.
  136. Web site: Center . Whitaker . Arts . the . Expedition Chesapeake . Whitaker Center . 21 July 2021 . 23 February 2022.
  137. Web site: Expedition Chesapeake Official Trailer . YouTube . 23 February 2022 . 23 February 2022.
  138. Web site: Callaghan . Ryan . Season 8, Episode 3 Gear: Ghosts of the Chesapeake . MeatEater Hunting . 31 October 2019 . 23 February 2022.
  139. News: Jenna . Johnson . Tom Wisner; Chesapeake Bay served as bard's muse; at 79 . . April 9, 2010 . 20 April 2011 . The Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC.
  140. Web site: H.R. 5466 [109th] Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Designation Act |url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h109-5466 |publisher=GovTrack.us |access-date=December 16, 2007 |archive-date=November 3, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111103143204/http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h109-5466 |url-status=dead }} Because of economic hardships and civil strife in the "Mother Land", there was a mass migration of southern English Cavaliers and their servants to the Chesapeake Bay region between 1640 and 1675, to both of the new colonies of the Province of Virginia and the Province of Maryland.

    American Revolution to the present

    The Chesapeake Bay was the site of the Battle of the Chesapeake (also known as the "Battle of the Capes", Cape Charles and Cape Henry) in 1781, during which the French fleet defeated the Royal Navy in the decisive naval battle of the American Revolutionary War. The British defeat enabled General George Washington and his French allied armies under Comte de Rochambeau to march down from New York and bottle up the rampaging southern British Army of Lord Cornwallis from the North and South Carolinas at the siege of Battle of Yorktown in Yorktown, Virginia. Their marching route from Newport, Rhode Island through Connecticut, New York State, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware to the "Head of Elk" by the Susquehanna River along the shores and also partially sailing down the Bay to Virginia. It is also the subject of a designated National Historic Trail as the Washington–Rochambeau Revolutionary Route.

    The Bay would again see conflict during War of 1812. During the year of 1813, from their base on Tangier Island, British naval forces under the command of Admiral George Cockburn raided several towns on the shores of the Chesapeake, treating the Bay as if it were a "British Lake". The Chesapeake Bay Flotilla, a fleet of shallow-draft armed barges under the command of U.S. Navy Commodore Joshua Barney, was assembled to stall British shore raids and attacks. After months of harassment by Barney, the British landed on the west side of the Patuxent at Benedict, Maryland, the Chesapeake Flotilla was scuttled, and the British trekked overland to rout the U.S. Army at Bladensburg and burn the U.S. Capitol in August 1814. A few days later in a "pincer attack", they also sailed up the Potomac River to attack Fort Washington below the National Capital and raided the nearby port town of Alexandria, Virginia.

    There were so-called "Oyster Wars" in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Until the mid-20th century, oyster harvesting rivaled the crab industry among Chesapeake watermen, a dwindling breed whose skipjacks and other workboats were supplanted by recreational craft in the latter part of the century.[46]

    In the 1960s, the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant on the historic Calvert Cliffs in Calvert County on the Western Shore of Maryland began using water from the Bay to cool its reactor.[47]

    Navigation

    The Chesapeake Bay forms a link in the Intracoastal Waterway, of the bays, sounds and inlets between the off-shore barrier islands and the coastal mainland along the Atlantic coast connecting the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal (linking the Bay to the north and the Delaware River) with the Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal (linking the Bay, to the south, via the Elizabeth River, by the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth to the Albemarle Sound and Pamlico Sound in North Carolina and further to the Sea Islands of Georgia). A busy shipping channel (dredged by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers since the 1850s) runs the length of the Bay, is an important transit route for large vessels entering or leaving the Port of Baltimore, and further north through the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal to the ports of Wilmington and Philadelphia on the Delaware River.

    During the later half of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century, the Bay was plied by passenger steamships and packet boat lines connecting the various cities on it, notably the Baltimore Steam Packet Company ("Old Bay Line").

    In the later 20th century, a series of road crossings were built. One, the Chesapeake Bay Bridge (also known as the Governor William Preston Lane, Jr. Memorial Bridge) between the state capital of Annapolis, Maryland and Matapeake on the Eastern Shore, crossing Kent Island, was constructed 1949–1952. A second, parallel, span was added in 1973. The Chesapeake Bay Bridge–Tunnel, connecting Virginia's Eastern Shore with its mainland (at the metropolitan areas of Virginia Beach, Norfolk, Portsmouth, and Chesapeake), is approximately 20miles long; it has trestle bridges as well as two stretches of 2miles tunnels that allow unimpeded shipping; the bridge is supported by four 5.25acres man-made islands. The Chesapeake Bay BridgeTunnel was opened for two lanes in 1964 and four lanes in 1999.[48] [49]

    Tides

    Tides in the Chesapeake Bay exhibit an interesting and unique behavior due to the nature of the topography (both horizontal and vertical shape), wind-driven circulation, and how the Bay interacts with oceanic tides. Research into the peculiar behavior of tides both at the northern and southern extents of the Bay began in the late 1970s. One study noted sea level fluctuations at periods of 5 days, driven by sea level changes at the Bay's mouth on the Atlantic coast and local lateral winds, and 2.5 days, caused by resonant oscillations driven by local longitudinal winds,[50] while another study later found that the geometry of the Bay permits for a resonant period of 1.46 days.[51]

    A good example of how the different Chesapeake Bay sites experience different tides can be seen in the tidal predictions published by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (see figure at right).

    At the Chesapeake Bay Bridge–Tunnel (CBBT) site, which lies at the southernmost point of the Bay where it meets the Atlantic Ocean near Norfolk, Virginia, and the capes of Charles and Henry, there is a distinct semi-diurnal tide throughout the lunar month, with small amplitude modulations during spring (new/full moon) vs. neap (one/three quarter moon) tidal periods. The main forcing of the CBBT tides are typical, semi-diurnal ocean tides that the East Coast of the United States experiences.

    Baltimore, in the northern portion of the Bay, experiences a noticeable modulation to form its mixed tidal nature during spring vs. neap tides. Spring tides, when the sun-earth-moon system forms a line, cause the largest tidal amplitudes during lunar monthly tidal variations. In contrast, neap tides, when the sun-earth-moon system forms a right angle, are muted, and in a semi-diurnal tidal system (such as that seen at the CBBT site) this can be seen as a lowest intertidal range.

    Two interesting points that arise from comparing these two sites at opposite ends of the Bay are their tidal characteristics - semi-diurnal tide for CBBT and mixed tide for Baltimore (due to resonance in the Bay) - and the differences in amplitude (due to dissipation in the Bay).

    Economy

    Fishing industry

    The Bay is well-known for its seafood, especially blue crabs,[52] clams, and oysters. In the middle of the 20th century, the Bay supported 9,000 full-time watermen, according to one account. Today, the body of water is less productive than it used to be because of runoff from urban areas (mostly on the Western Shore) and farms (especially on the Eastern Shore and in the Susquehanna River watershed), over-harvesting, and invasion of foreign species.

    The plentiful oyster harvests led to the development of the skipjack, the state boat of Maryland, which is the only remaining working boat type in the United States still under sail power. Other characteristic bay-area workboats include sail-powered boats such as the log canoe, the pungy, the bugeye, and the motorized Chesapeake Bay deadrise, the state boat of Virginia.[53]

    In addition to harvesting wild oysters, oyster farming is a growing industry in the Bay. Oyster aquaculture is passive in that the Bay provides all the natural oyster food needed, making it an environmentally friendly practice in contrast to other kinds of fish farming.[54] Oyster farms provide jobs as well as a natural effort for filtering excess nutrients from the water in an effort to reduce the effects of eutrophication pollution (too much algae). The Chesapeake Bay Program promotes oyster restoration projects to reduce the amount of nitrogen compounds entering the bay.[55]

    The Bay is famous for its rockfish, a regional name for striped bass. Once on the verge of extinction, rockfish have made a significant comeback because of legislative action that put a moratorium on rockfishing, which allowed the species to re-populate. Rockfish can now be fished in strictly controlled and limited quantities.[56]

    Other popular recreational fisheries in the Chesapeake Bay include shad,[57] cobia, croaker, and redfish, winter flounder, and summer flounder. Recently, non-native blue catfish have proliferated in tributaries like the James River and may be moving to other areas of the Bay.[58] A commercial fishery exists for menhaden, too oily for human consumption but instead used for bait, fish oil, and livestock feed.[59]

    Tourism and recreation

    The Chesapeake Bay is a main feature for tourists who visit Maryland and Virginia each year.[60] Fishing, crabbing, swimming, boating, kayaking, and sailing are extremely popular activities enjoyed on the waters of the Chesapeake Bay. As a result, tourism has a notable impact on Maryland's economy.[61] One report suggested that Annapolis was an appealing spot for families, water sports and boating.[62] Commentator Terry Smith spoke about the Bay's beauty:

    One account suggested how the Chesapeake attracts people:

    The Chesapeake Bay plays an extremely important role in Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania's economies, in addition to the ecosystem. The nature-based recreation of wildlife, boating, and ecotourism are dependent on enforcement of the Clean Water Act (CWA), which regulates pollutant discharges and supports related pollution control programs. In 2006, "roughly eight million wildlife watchers spent $636 million, $960 million, and $1.4 billion in Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania" according to the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.[63]

    Cuisine

    In colonial times, simple cooking techniques were used to create one pot meals like ham and potato casserole, clam chowder, or stews with common ingredients like oysters, chicken or venison. When John Smith landed in Chesapeake in 1608, he wrote: "The fish were so thick, we attempted to catch them with frying pans". Common regional ingredients in the local cuisine of Chesapeake included terrapins, smoked hams, blue crab, shellfish, local fish, game meats and various species of waterfowl. Blue crab continues to be an especially popular regional specialty.[64]

    Environmental issues

    Pollution

    In the 1970s, the Chesapeake Bay was found to contain one of the planet's first identified marine dead zones, where waters were so depleted of oxygen that they were unable to support life, resulting in massive fish kills. In 2010 the bay's dead zones were estimated to kill 75,000 tons of bottom-dwelling clams and worms each year, weakening the base of the estuary's food chain and robbing the blue crab in particular of a primary food source. Crabs are sometimes observed to amass on shore to escape pockets of oxygen-poor water, a behavior known as a "crab jubilee". Hypoxia results in part from large algal blooms, which are nourished by the runoff of residential, farm and industrial waste throughout the watershed. A 2010 report criticized Amish farmers in Pennsylvania for raising cows with inadequate controls on the manure that they generate. Farms in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania generate large quantities of manure that washes into tributaries of the bay.[65]

    The pollution entering the bay has multiple components that contribute to algal blooms, principally the nutrients phosphorus and nitrogen. The algae prevents sunlight from reaching the bottom of the bay while alive and deoxygenates the bay's water when it dies and rots. Soil erosion and runoff of sediment into the bay, exacerbated by devegetation, construction and the prevalence of pavement in urban and suburban areas, also block vital sunlight. The resulting loss of aquatic vegetation has depleted the habitat for much of the bay's animal life. Beds of eelgrass, the dominant variety in the southern Chesapeake Bay, have shrunk by more than half there since the early 1970s. Overharvesting, pollution, sedimentation and disease have turned much of the bay's bottom into a muddy wasteland.[66]

    The principal sources of nutrient pollution in the bay are surface runoff from farms, as well as runoff from urban and suburban areas. About half of the nutrient pollutant loads in the bay are generated by manure and poultry litter.[67] Extensive use of lawn fertilizers[68] [69] and air pollution from motor vehicles and power plants are also significant nutrient sources.[70]

    One particularly harmful source of toxicity is Pfiesteria piscicida, which can affect both fish and humans. Pfiesteria caused a small regional panic in the late 1990s when a series of large blooms started killing large numbers of fish while giving swimmers mysterious rashes; nutrient runoff from chicken farms was blamed for the growth.[71]

    Depletion of oysters

    While the bay's salinity is ideal for oysters and the oyster fishery was at one time the bay's most commercially viable,[72] the population has in the last fifty years been devastated. Maryland once had roughly 200000acres of oyster reefs. In 2008 there were about 36000acres. It has been estimated that in pre-colonial times, oysters could filter the entirety of the bay in about 3.3 days; by 1988 this time had increased to 325 days.[73] The harvest's gross value decreased 88% from 1982 to 2007.[74] One report suggested the bay had fewer oysters in 2008 than 25 years earlier.The primary problem is overharvesting. Lax government regulations allow anyone with a license to remove oysters from state-owned beds, and although limits are set, they are not strongly enforced. The overharvesting of oysters has made it difficult for them to reproduce, which requires close proximity to one another. A second cause for the oyster depletion is that the drastic increase in human population caused a sharp increase in pollution flowing into the bay. The bay's oyster industry has also suffered from two diseases: MSX and Dermo.[75]

    The depletion of oysters has had a particularly harmful effect on the quality of the bay. Oysters serve as natural water filters, and their decline has further reduced the water quality of the bay. Water that was once clear for meters is now so turbid that a wader may lose sight of his feet while his knees are still dry.

    Institutional responses to pollution problems

    Concern about the increasing discoveries of bay pollution problems, and of the institutional challenges of organizing bay restoration programs over a large geographical area, led to Congress directing the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to take a greater role in studying the scientific and technical aspects of the problems beginning in the late 1970s. The agency conducted its research over a seven-year period and published a major report in 1983. The report stated that the bay was an "ecosystem in decline" and cited numerous instances of declines in the populations of oysters, crabs, freshwater fish and other wildlife.[76] [77]

    The growing concerns about pollution also prompted the legislatures of Maryland and Virginia to establish the Chesapeake Bay Commission, an advisory body, in 1980. The commission consults with the state legislatures and executive agencies, as well as Congress, about environmental, economic and social issues related to the bay.[78]

    As an initial follow-up to the EPA report, the Chesapeake Bay Commission and EPA developed the Chesapeake Bay Agreement in 1983. The agreement was signed by the governors of Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania; the Mayor of the District of Columbia; and the EPA Administrator. The parties agreed to:

    • Creation of an "Executive Council" consisting of cabinet-level appointees from each state and Washington, D.C., and the EPA Regional Administrator
    • The council's creation of an implementation committee to coordinate technical issues and development management plans for bay restoration
    • The establishment of the Chesapeake Bay Program as a liaison office for all of the participating organizations. The program's office, based in Annapolis, is partially funded by EPA and staffed by experts from the member states, EPA and other federal agencies, and academic institutions.[79]

    Concurrent with the 1983 agreement EPA began providing matching grants to the bay states for research and restoration projects.

    In 1987 the parties agreed to set a goal of reducing the amount of nutrients that enter the bay by 40 percent by 2000. In 1992, the bay program partners agreed to continue the 40 percent reduction goal beyond 2000 and to attack nutrients at their source: upstream, in the bay tributaries.[80]

    Restoration efforts

    Efforts of federal, state and local governments, working in partnership through the Chesapeake Bay Program along with the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and other nonprofit environmental groups, to restore or at least maintain the current water quality, have had mixed results. One particular obstacle to cleaning up the bay is that much of the polluting substances are discharged far upstream in states far removed from the bay: New York and Pennsylvania. Despite the State of Maryland spending over $100 million to restore the bay, conditions have continued to grow worse. In the mid-20th century, the Bay supported over 6,000 oystermen. As of 2008, there were fewer than 500.[81]

    In June 2000, the Chesapeake Bay Program adopted Chesapeake 2000, an agreement adopted by the member jurisdictions, intended to guide restoration activities throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed through 2010.[82] One component of this agreement was a series of upgrades to sewage treatment plants throughout the watershed. In 2016 EPA stated that the upgrades "have resulted in steep reductions in nitrogen and phosphorus pollution... despite increases in human population and wastewater volume."[83]

    EPA published a series of scientific documents on water quality criteria for the bay between 2004 and 2010. The criteria documents, which describe specific pollutants and their effects on aquatic species,[84] are used by the states to develop water quality standards (WQS) for individual water bodies.[85] Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia adopted WQS for various Chesapeake Bay tributaries in the mid-2000s, referencing the EPA criteria documents, as well as their own extensive data gathering and modeling efforts.[86]

    Restoration efforts that began in the 1990s have continued into the 21st century and show potential for growth of the native oyster population. Efforts to repopulate the bay using oyster hatcheries have been carried out by a group called the Oyster Recovery Partnership, with some success. In 2011 the group placed 6 million oysters on 8acres of the Trent Hall sanctuary.[87] Scientists from the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at the College of William & Mary claim that experimental reefs created in 2004 now house 180 million native oysters, Crassostrea virginica, which is far fewer than the billions that once existed.[88]

    Regulatory actions

    In 2009 the Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) filed suit against EPA for its failure to finalize a total maximum daily load (TMDL) ruling for the bay, pursuant to the Clean Water Act. The TMDL would restrict water pollution from farms, land development, power plants and sewage treatment plants.[89] EPA, which had been working with the states on various components of the TMDL since the 1980s (e.g. water quality criteria, standards for individual tributaries, improvements in data gathering and modeling techniques), agreed to settle the lawsuit and issued its TMDL for nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment pollution on December 29, 2010. This was the largest, most complex TMDL document that EPA had issued to date.[90] The TMDL was challenged in litigation by the agriculture and construction industries, but EPA's document was upheld by the courts.[91]

    In 2020 the CBF filed another lawsuit against EPA for its failure to require the states of New York and Pennsylvania to comply with their TMDL goals and reduce pollution in the bay.[92]

    EPA's 2010 TMDL document requires all states in the bay watershed region to develop detailed implementation plans for pollutant reduction.[93] The states have been developing their plans for years, in many cases building upon restoration projects that they had initiated before EPA's TMDL was finalized.[94] These plans are long and complex, involving regular consultation with many stakeholders (i.e. governments, industry, agriculture, citizen groups). The plans include multiple milestone goals for project initiation or continued progress in water quality, through the use of pollution control upgrades (such as at sewage treatment plants) and more widespread utilization of various best management practices (BMPs). The BMPs are designed for specific sites to control pollution from nonpoint sources, principally agriculture, land development and urban runoff. For example, a farmer may install vegetated stream buffers along a stream bank to reduce runoff of sediment, nutrients and other pollutants.[95] A land developer may install stormwater management facilities such as infiltration basins or constructed wetlands during the construction of housing or commercial buildings.[96]

    In 2011 both Maryland and Virginia enacted laws to reduce the effects of lawn fertilizer use, by restricting nitrogen and phosphorus content.[97] The Virginia law also banned deicers containing urea, nitrogen or phosphorus.[98]

    Installation of stormwater management facilities is already a requirement for most new construction projects in the bay region, under various state and local government requirements. These facilities reduce erosion and keep sediment and other pollutants from entering tributaries and the bay.[99] However retrofitting such facilities into existing developed areas is often expensive due to high land costs, or difficult to install among existing structures. As a result, the extent of such retrofit projects in the bay region has been limited.[100]

    Water quality improvements

    In 2010 bay health improved slightly in terms of the overall health of its ecosystem, earning a rating of 31 out of 100, up from a 28 rating in 2008. An estimate in 2006 from a "blue ribbon panel" said cleanup costs would be $15 billion.[101] Compounding the problem is that 100,000 new residents move to the area each year. A 2008 Washington Post report suggested that government administrators had overstated progress on cleanup efforts as a way to "preserve the flow of federal and state money to the project."[102] In January 2011, there were reports that millions of fish had died, but officials suggested it was probably the result of extremely cold weather.[103]

    The health of the Chesapeake Bay improved in 2015, marking three years of gains over a four-year period, according to a 2016 report by the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (UMCES). In 2021 scientists at the UMCES reported slight improvements in bay water quality compared to levels measured in 2020. The greatest improvements were seen in the lower bay areas, while the Patapsco River and Back River (Maryland) regions showed minimal improvement. Positive indicators included decreased nitrogen levels and increases in dissolved oxygen.

    The CBF reported that as of 2022 pollution control efforts in the bay have continued to show mixed results, with no improvement in levels of toxic contaminants, nitrogen and dissolved oxygen, and a small decrease in water clarity compared to 2020 levels (measured as Secchi depth). Oyster and rockfish populations in the bay have improved, but blue crab populations have continued to decline.[104]

    In the 2023 annual report the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science rated the Chesapeake Bay's overall health a C-plus or 55%, its highest score since 2002.[105] [106]

    Climate change

    The Chesapeake Bay is already experiencing the effects of climate change. Key among these is sea level rise: water levels in the bay have already risen one foot, with a predicted increase of 1.3 to 5.2 feet in the next 100 years. This has related environmental effects, causing changes in marine ecosystems, destruction of coastal marshes and wetlands, and intrusion of saltwater into otherwise brackish parts of the bay. Sea level rise also compounds the effects of extreme weather on the bay, making coastal flooding as part of the events more extreme and increasing runoff from upstream in the watershed.[107]

    With increases in flooding events and sea level rise, the 11,600 miles of coastline, which include significant historic buildings and modern infrastructure, will be at risk of erosion. Islands such as Holland Island have disappeared due to the rising sea levels.[108] [109]

    Beyond sea level rise, other changes in the marine ecosystem due to climate change, such as ocean acidification and temperature increases, will put increasing pressure on marine life. Projected effects include decreasing dissolved oxygen, more acidic waters making it harder for shellfish to maintain shells and changing the seasonal cycles important for breeding and other lifecycle activities. Seasonal shifts and warmer temperatures also mean that there is a greater likelihood of pathogens to stay active in the ecosystem.

    Climate change may worsen hypoxia. However, compared to the current effects of nutrient pollution and algal blooms, climate change’s effect to increase hypoxia is relatively small. Warmer waters can hold less dissolved oxygen. Therefore, as the Bay warms, there may be a longer duration of hypoxia each summer season in the deep central channel of the Bay. However, comparing the effects of climate change and nutrient pollution, reduced nutrient pollution would increase oxygen concentrations more dramatically than if climate change were to level out.[110]

    Climate change adaptation and mitigation programs in Maryland and Virginia often include significant programs to address the communities in the Chesapeake Bay.[111] Key infrastructure in Virginia, such as the port of Norfolk, and major agriculture and fishing industries of the Eastern Shore of Maryland will be directly impacted by the changes in the Bay.[112]

    Scientific research

    Researchers work in the Chesapeake Bay to collect information about water quality, plant and animal abundances, shoreline erosion, tides, waves, and harmful algal blooms. For example, the Virginia Institute of Marine Science monitors the abundance of submerged aquatic vegetation in the shallow areas of the Chesapeake Bay each summer.[113] Many organizations run continuous monitoring programs. Monitoring programs set out instruments at fixed stations on buoys, moorings, and docks throughout the Bay to record things like temperature, salinity, chlorophyll-a concentration, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity over time.[114] [115] [116]

    Organizations actively collecting data in the Chesapeake Bay include, but are not limited to:

    Underwater archaeology

    Underwater archaeology is a subfield of archaeology that focuses on the exploration of submerged archaeological sites in seas, rivers, and other bodies of water. In 1988, the Maryland Maritime Archeology Program (MMAP) was established with the goal to manage and explore the various underwater archaeological sites that line the Chesapeake Bay. This was in response to the National Abandoned Shipwreck Act passed in 1987, which gave ownership of historically significant shipwrecks to those states with proper management programs.[118]

    Water makes up 25% of the State of Maryland and there are over 550 submerged archaeological sites that have been located across the Chesapeake Bay and its surrounding watersheds. Ranging from 12,000-year-old, precolonial native settlements to shipwrecks from as recent as World War II, the MMAP researches thousands of years' worth of history in these archaeological sites. Susan Langley has been Maryland's State Underwater Archaeologist, one of only nine state-appointed underwater archaeologists in the United States, since assuming the role in 1995. Before Langley was hired, only 1% of the underwater archaeological sites in the bay area had been examined. Over the next 10 years, Langley made significant improvements to the MMAP's marine technology, allowing her and her team to explore 34% of the underwater archaeological sites by 2004.

    Location and research processes

    The Chesapeake Bay watershed has been heavily impacted by natural forces such as erosion, tides, and a history of hurricanes and other storms. Along with environmental factors, the bay has been negatively impacted by humans since being settled in the 17th century, bringing with them problems like pollution, construction, and destruction of the environment. All of these circumstances have made it increasingly difficult for the MMAP to identify potential underwater archaeological sites. As sea levels rise and historically significant areas are sunk and covered in sediment, the MMAP relies on various pieces of equipment to locate these man-made anomalies but also ensure that the material being examined is kept intact. Using marine magnetometers (detects iron/absent space), side-scan sonar (detects objects on sea floor), along with precise global positioning systems, Langley and the MMAP have been much more successful in locating submerged archaeological sites. After locating the site, Langley and her team have a strict process in order to preserve the site and its contents, allowing more accurate and thorough research to be conducted. The remains of nearly every site have been submerged in saltwater for sometimes centuries, the integrity of shipwrecks and other materials are fragile and careful precaution must be used when working with them. Taking photos and videos, creating maps, and constructing models are all a part of the process of preserving remains. Susan Langley notes herself, “If you have only ten percent of a ship’s hull, you can reconstruct the ship. Construction techniques can tell us about the people who built the vessels, artifacts can tell us about the people who profited from the ship’s trade, and eco-facts—evidence of insect infestation and organic remains, such as seeds, that are preserved in anaerobic, muddy environments—can tell us about the climate and season when a ship sank."[119] Still, the MMAP makes it a point to publish their data and information once a site is officially identified; however, the details of the location are left out to sway would-be looters, who have plagued marine archaeologists for decades.

    Significant sites

    Altogether there are more than 1,800 ship and boat wrecks that scatter the bottom of the Chesapeake Bay and its surrounding waterways.[120] Dozens of precolonial era canoes and artifacts have been extracted from the bay, helping to portray a better picture of the lives of Native Americans (e.g., Powhatan, Pamunkey, Nansemond) In 1974, scallop fishermen dredged up the skull of a prehistoric mastodon, which through carbon dating was found to be 22,000 years old. Along with the skull, a carved blade was also discovered in the same area. Unable to accurately carbon date the stone tool, archaeologists looked at similar styles of blade carving in order to gauge when it was made. The technique was similar to the Solutrean tools that were crafted in Europe between 22,000 and 17,000 years ago and it was noted that the stone tool must be at least 14,000 years old. The Solutrean hypothesis challenges the previous theory regarding the first inhabitants of North America, whereas it is commonly accepted amongst anthropologists that the Clovis people were the first to settle the region somewhere around 13,000 years ago. There is some controversy surrounding these findings; many anthropologists have disputed this, claiming that the environment and setting make properly identifying the origins of these artifacts nearly impossible.[121]

    The Chesapeake Bay Flotilla, which was constructed using shallow barges and ships to provide a blockade to the British during the War of 1812. After holding strong for some months, the British eventually dispersed the flotilla and dozens of these vessels were burnt and sunk. Starting in 1978, there were numerous expeditions launched in hopes of successfully discovering what was left of the Chesapeake Bay Flotilla. Since then, hundreds of artifacts and remains have been extracted from the submerged ships such as weapons, personal items, and many other objects. Underwater archaeologists have also been successful in constructing accurate models and maps of the wreckage amongst the sea floor.[122]

    In October 1774, a British merchant ship arrived at the port of Annapolis loaded with tea disguised as linens and garments. The tea was hidden by the British to avoid conflict with the colonists as the recently imposed tea tax had created hostility and uncertainty among the colonies. Named Peggy Stewart, the British vessel arrived and attempted to tax the colonists for the purchased tea. The colonists refused to pay the tax and after a few days of public meetings, the colonists decided to burn Peggy Stewart and the contents of it. The British ship was sunk in what became known as the 'Annapolis Tea Party' and has since become an important site for underwater archaeologists in the Chesapeake Bay.[123] In 1949, after the Nazi's defeat in World War 2, the United States seized a German U-1105 built with sonar-evading rubber sheathing for study purposes. It was sunk the same year in the Potomac River off of the Chesapeake Bay following a high explosives test hosted by the U.S. Navy and has since been a popular site for underwater archaeologists.[124]

    Maryland has controlled the majority of underwater archaeology research around the Chesapeake Bay; however, Virginia's Department of Historic Resources has had a State Underwater Archaeologist since the 1970s. In 1982, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources along with the first State Underwater Archaeologist, John Broadwater, led an expedition to explore and research a sunken fleet of Revolution-era battleships. In September 1781, during the Revolutionary War, the British intentionally sunk more than a dozen ships in the York River, near the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay. Led by Lord Charles Cornwallis, a fleet of British ships was pushed back towards the rivers of the Chesapeake, in a desperate attempt to avoid surrendering, Cornwallis began burning and sinking his own vessels with the hopes of stalling the incoming French and American ships. Cornwallis was eventually forced to surrender on October 19 and the ships along with its contents were at the bottom of the York River. One of the British ships, called Betsy, has been explored more than any other and over 5,000 relics were removed from Betsy on their original expedition in 1982, including weapons, personal objects, and some valuable metals. Broadwater and his team were awarded a 20-page article in the magazine National Geographic for their findings. Virginia has recently been granted funding for further research of these sunken vessels and expeditions are currently underway with the goal to fully explore this destroyed fleet of British ships. Unfortunately, following the publicity of these sunken ships, many divers have taken it upon themselves to explore the wreckage for 'treasure'.[125]

    Publications

    There are several magazines and publications that cover topics directly related to the Chesapeake Bay and life and tourism within the Bay region:

    • The Bay Journal provides environmental news for the Chesapeake Bay watershed region.[126]
    • Bay Weekly is the Chesapeake Bay region's independent newspaper.[127]
    • The Capital, a newspaper based in Annapolis, reports about news pertaining to the Western Shore of Maryland and the Annapolis area.[128]
    • Chesapeake Bay Magazine and PropTalk focus on powerboating in the Bay,[129] [130] and SpinSheet focuses on sailing.[131]
    • What's Up Magazine is a free monthly publication with special issues focused on Annapolis and the Eastern Shore.[132]

    Cultural depictions

    In literature

    • (1976), a Pulitzer Prize-winning non-fiction book by William W. Warner about the Chesapeake Bay, blue crabs, and watermen.
    • Chesapeake (1978), a novel by author James A. Michener.
    • Chesapeake Requiem: A Year with the Watermen of Vanishing Tangier Island (2018), by Earl Swift, a New York Times bestselling nonfiction book about the crabbing community of Chesapeake Bay.[133]
    • Dicey's Song (1983) and the rest of Cynthia Voigt's Tillerman series are set in Crisfield on the Chesapeake Bay.* John Barth wrote two novels featuring Chesapeake Bay
    • Jacob Have I Loved (1980) by Katherine Paterson, winner of the 1981 Newbery Medal. This is a novel about the relationship between two sisters in a waterman family who grow up on an island in the Bay.
    • Patriot Games (1987), in which protagonist Jack Ryan lives on the fictional Peregrine Cliffs overlooking the Chesapeake Bay, and Without Remorse (1993), in which protagonist John Kelly (later known as John Clark when he goes to work for the CIA), lives on a boat and an island in the Bay, both by Tom Clancy.
    • Red Kayak (2004) by Priscilla Cummings portrays class conflict between waterman people and wealthy newcomers.
    • (1982) centered on a yacht race through the Bay, and The Tidewater Tales (1987) detailed a married couple telling stories to each other as they cruise the Bay, both novels by John Barth.
    • The Oyster Wars of Chesapeake Bay (1997) by John Wennersten, on the Oyster Wars in the decades following the Civil War.[134]

    In film

    In TV

    • In Chesapeake Shores, the O'Brien family lives in a small town in the Bay, not far from Baltimore.
    • In MeatEater by Steven Rinella, Season 8, Episode 3-4 "Ghosts of the Chesapeake" features the Chesapeake Bay eastern shore.[138]

    Other media

    • Singer and songwriter Tom Wisner recorded several albums, often about the Chesapeake Bay. The Boston Globe wrote that Wisner "always tried to capture the voice of the water and the sky, of the rocks and the trees, of the fish and the birds, of the gods of nature he believed still watched over it all." He was known as the "Bard of the Chesapeake Bay."[139]
    • The Chesapeake Bay is referenced in the hit musical Hamilton, in the song "Yorktown (The World Turned Upside Down)." It describes the famous Battle of Yorktown, the last battle in the Revolutionary War. When describing the US army's plan for attack, Hamilton sings: "When we finally drive the British away, Lafayette is there waiting in Chesapeake Bay!"

    See also

    Further reading

    • Cleaves, E.T. et al. (2006). Quaternary geologic map of the Chesapeake Bay 4º x 6º quadrangle, United States [Miscellaneous Investigations Series; Map I-1420 (NJ-18)]. Reston, VA: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
    • Crawford, S. 2012. Terrapin Bay Fishing. Chesapeake Bay Tides and Currents
    • Meyers, Debra and Perrealt, Melanie (eds.) (2014). Order and Civility in the Early Modern Chesapeake. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
    • Phillips, S.W., ed. (2007). Synthesis of U.S. Geological Survey science for the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem and implications for environmental management [U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1316]. Reston, VA: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
    • Thomas, William G., III. "The Chesapeake Bay." Southern Spaces, April 16, 2004.
    • William W. Warner, Beautiful Swimmers, about the history, ecology and anthropology of the Chesapeake Bay, published 1976

    External links

    .