Charlton v. Kelly explained

Litigants:Charlton v. Kelly
Arguedate:April 18
Argueyear:1913
Decidedate:June 10
Decideyear:1913
Fullname:Paul Charlton, as Next Friend of Porter ter Charlton, Appt., v. James J. Kelly, Sheriff of Hudson County, New Jersey, et al.
Usvol:229
Uspage:447
Parallelcitations:33 S. Ct. 945; 57 L. Ed. 1274
Holding:Court recognized authority of the executive department to waive a breach of treaty by Italy and to remain bound thereby.
Majority:Lurton
Joinmajority:unanimous

Charlton v. Kelly, 229 U.S. 447 (1913), is a case pertaining to extradition of a U.S. citizen to Italy.[1] In 1910, Porter Charlton confessed in New York to having murdered his wife in Italy.[2] The Italian vice consul requested Charlton's extradition.[3] Hon. John A. Blair, one of the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of New Jersey, suspended Charlton's petition for a writ of habeas corpus and a warrant was issued for his arrest.[4] This order for extradition was approved by Secretary of State Philander C. Knox.[5]

Opinion of the Court

In an opinion written by Justice Horace Harmon Lurton, the Court held that the United States had the right to waive a breach of its extradition treaty with Italy, and by waiving the breach, the countries would remain bound by the treaty.[6]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. .
  2. Charlton, 229 U.S. at 470.
  3. Charlton, 229 U.S. at 448, 470-71.
  4. Charlton, 229 U.S. at 448-49.
  5. Charlton, 229 U.S. at 465.
  6. Charlton, 229 U.S. at 475-76.