Axiomatic foundations of topological spaces explained

In the mathematical field of topology, a topological space is usually defined by declaring its open sets. However, this is not necessary, as there are many equivalent axiomatic foundations, each leading to exactly the same concept. For instance, a topological space determines a class of closed sets, of closure and interior operators, and of convergence of various types of objects. Each of these can instead be taken as the primary class of objects, with all of the others (including the class of open sets) directly determined from that new starting point. For example, in Kazimierz Kuratowski's well-known textbook on point-set topology, a topological space is defined as a set together with a certain type of "closure operator," and all other concepts are derived therefrom. Likewise, the neighborhood-based axioms (in the context of Hausdorff spaces) can be retraced to Felix Hausdorff's original definition of a topological space in Grundzüge der Mengenlehre.

Many different textbooks use many different inter-dependences of concepts to develop point-set topology. The result is always the same collection of objects: open sets, closed sets, and so on. For many practical purposes, the question of which foundation is chosen is irrelevant, as long as the meaning and interrelation between objects (many of which are given in this article), which are the same regardless of choice of development, are understood. However, there are cases where it can be useful to have flexibility. For instance, there are various natural notions of convergence of measures, and it is not immediately clear whether they arise from a topological structure or not. Such questions are greatly clarified by the topological axioms based on convergence.

Standard definitions via open sets

A topological space is a set

X

together with a collection

S

of subsets of

X

satisfying:

X

are in

S.

S

is also in

S.

S

is also in

S.

Equivalently, the intersection of any finite collection of sets in

S

is also in

S.

Given a topological space

(X,S),

one refers to the elements of

S

as the open sets of

X,

and it is common only to refer to

S

in this way, or by the label topology. Then one makes the following secondary definitions:

Y,

a function

f:X\toY

is said to be continuous if and only if for every open subset

U

of

Y,

one has that

f-1(U)

is an open subset of

X.

C

of

X

is closed if and only if its complement

X\setminusC

is open.

A

of

X,

the closure is the set of all points such that any open set containing such a point must intersect

A.

A

of

X,

the interior is the union of all open sets contained in

A.

x

of

X,

one says that a subset

A

is a neighborhood of

x

if and only if

x

is contained in an open subset of

X

which is also a subset of

A.

Some textbooks use "neighborhood of

x

" to instead refer to an open set containing

x.

x

of

X

if for any open set

U

containing

x,

the net is eventually contained in

U.

X,

a filter is a collection of nonempty subsets of

X

that is closed under finite intersection and under supersets. Some textbooks allow a filter to contain the empty set, and reserve the name "proper filter" for the case in which it is excluded. A topology on

X

defines a notion of a filter converging to a point

x

of

X,

by requiring that any open set

U

containing

x

is an element of the filter.

X,

a filterbase is a collection of nonempty subsets such that every two subsets intersect nontrivially and contain a third subset in the intersection. Given a topology on

X,

one says that a filterbase converges to a point

x

if every neighborhood of

x

contains some element of the filterbase.

Definition via closed sets

Let

X

be a topological space. According to De Morgan's laws, the collection

T

of closed sets satisfies the following properties:

X

are elements of

T

T

is also in

T.

T

is also in

T.

Now suppose that

X

is only a set. Given any collection

T

of subsets of

X

which satisfy the above axioms, the corresponding set

\{U:X\setminusU\inT\}

is a topology on

X,

and it is the only topology on

X

for which

T

is the corresponding collection of closed sets. This is to say that a topology can be defined by declaring the closed sets. As such, one can rephrase all definitions to be in terms of closed sets:

Y,

a function

f:X\toY

is continuous if and only if for every closed subset

U

of

Y,

the set

f-1(U)

is closed as a subset of

X.

C

of

X

is open if and only if its complement

X\setminusC

is closed.

A

of

X,

the closure is the intersection of all closed sets containing

A.

A

of

X,

the interior is the complement of the intersection of all closed sets containing

X\setminusA.

Definition via closure operators

Given a topological space

X,

the closure can be considered as a map

\wp(X)\to\wp(X),

where

\wp(X)

denotes the power set of

X.

One has the following Kuratowski closure axioms:

A\subseteq\operatorname{cl}(A)

\operatorname{cl}(\operatorname{cl}(A))=\operatorname{cl}(A)

\operatorname{cl}(A\cupB)=\operatorname{cl}(A)\cup\operatorname{cl}(B)

\operatorname{cl}(\varnothing)=\varnothing

If

X

is a set equipped with a mapping satisfying the above properties, then the set of all possible outputs of cl satisfies the previous axioms for closed sets, and hence defines a topology; it is the unique topology whose associated closure operator coincides with the given cl. As before, it follows that on a topological space

X,

all definitions can be phrased in terms of the closure operator:

Y,

a function

f:X\toY

is continuous if and only if for every subset

A

of

X,

one has that the set

f(\operatorname{cl}(A))

is a subset of

\operatorname{cl}(f(A)).

A

of

X

is open if and only if

\operatorname{cl}(X\setminusA)=X\setminusA.

C

of

X

is closed if and only if

\operatorname{cl}(C)=C.

A

of

X,

the interior is the complement of

\operatorname{cl}(X\setminusA).

Definition via interior operators

See also: Interior (topology). Given a topological space

X,

the interior can be considered as a map

\wp(X)\to\wp(X),

where

\wp(X)

denotes the power set of

X.

It satisfies the following conditions:

\operatorname{int}(A)\subseteqA

\operatorname{int}(\operatorname{int}(A))=\operatorname{int}(A)

\operatorname{int}(A\capB)=\operatorname{int}(A)\cap\operatorname{int}(B)

\operatorname{int}(X)=X

If

X

is a set equipped with a mapping satisfying the above properties, then the set of all possible outputs of int satisfies the previous axioms for open sets, and hence defines a topology; it is the unique topology whose associated interior operator coincides with the given int. It follows that on a topological space

X,

all definitions can be phrased in terms of the interior operator, for instance:

X

and

Y,

a function

f:X\toY

is continuous if and only if for every subset

B

of

Y,

one has that the set

f-1(\operatorname{int}(B))

is a subset of

\operatorname{int}(f-1(B)).

Definition via exterior operators

Given a topological space

X,

the boundary can be considered as a map

\wp(X)\to\wp(X),

where

\wp(X)

denotes the power set of

X.

It satisfies the following conditions:[1]

\operatorname{ext}(\varnothing)=X

A\cap\operatorname{ext}(A)=\varnothing

\operatorname{ext}(X\setminus\operatorname{ext}(A))=\operatorname{ext}(A)

\operatorname{ext}(A\cupB)=\operatorname{ext}(A)\cap\operatorname{ext}(B)

If

X

is a set equipped with a mapping satisfying the above properties, then we can define the interior operator and vice versa. More precisely, if we define

\operatorname{int}\operatorname{ext}:\wp(X)\to\wp(X),\operatorname{int}\operatorname{ext}=\operatorname{ext}(X\setminusA)

,

\operatorname{int}\operatorname{ext}

satisfies the interior operator axioms, and hence defines a topology.[2] Conversely, if we define

\operatorname{ext}\operatorname{int}:\wp(X)\to\wp(X),\operatorname{ext}\operatorname{int}=\operatorname{int}(X\setminusA)

,

\operatorname{ext}\operatorname{int}

satisfies the above axioms. Moreover, these correspondence is 1-1. It follows that on a topological space

X,

all definitions can be phrased in terms of the exterior operator, for instance:

\operatorname{cl}\operatorname{ext}:\wp(X)\to\wp(X),\operatorname{cl}\operatorname{ext}(A)=X\setminus\operatorname{ext}(A)

.

Y,

a function

f:X\toY

is continuous if and only if for every subset

A

of

X,

one has that the set

f(X\setminus\operatorname{ext}(A))

is a subset of

X\setminus\operatorname{ext}(f(A)).

Equivalently,

f

is continuous if and only if for every subset

B

of

Y,

one has that the set

f-1(\operatorname{ext}(X\setminusB))

is a subset of

\operatorname{ext}(X\setminusf-1(B)).

Definition via boundary operators

See also: Boundary (topology). Given a topological space

X,

the boundary can be considered as a map

\wp(X)\to\wp(X),

where

\wp(X)

denotes the power set of

X.

It satisfies the following conditions:

\partialA=\partial(X\setminusA)

\partial(\partial(A))\subseteq\partial(A)

\partial(A\cupB)\subseteq\partial(A)\cup\partial(B)

A\subseteqB\partialA\subseteqB\cup\partialB

\partial(\varnothing)=\varnothing

If

X

is a set equipped with a mapping satisfying the above properties, then we can define closure operator and vice versa. More precisely, if we define

\operatorname{cl}\partial:\wp(X)\to\wp(X),\operatorname{cl}\partial(A)=A\cup\partial(A)

,

\operatorname{cl}\partial

satisfies closure axioms, and hence boundary operation defines a topology. Conversely, if we define

\partial\operatorname{cl}:\wp(X)\to\wp(X),\partial\operatorname{cl}=\operatorname{cl}(A)\cap\operatorname{cl}(X\setminusA)

,

\partial\operatorname{cl}

satisfies above axioms. Moreover, these correspondence is 1-1. It follows that on a topological space

X,

all definitions can be phrased in terms of the boundary operator, for instance:

\operatorname{int}\partial:\wp(X)\to\wp(X),\operatorname{int}\partial(A)=A\setminus\partial(A)

\partial(A)\capA=\varnothing

.

\partial(A)\subseteqA

.

Definition via derived sets

See also: Derived set (mathematics).

S

of a topological space

X

is the set of all points

x\inX

that are limit points of

S,

that is, points

x

such that every neighbourhood of

x

contains a point of

S

other than

x

itself. The derived set of

S\subseteqX

, denoted

S*

, satisfies the following conditions:

\varnothing*=\varnothing

x\inX,x\not\in\{x\}*

A**\subseteqA\cupA*

(A\cupB)*=A*\cupB*

Since a set

S

is closed if and only if

S\subseteqS*

,[3] the derived set uniquely defines a topology. It follows that on a topological space

X,

all definitions can be phrased in terms of derived sets, for instance:

\operatorname{cl}(A)=A\cupA*

.

X

and

Y,

a function

f:X\toY

is continuous if and only if for every subset

B

of

Y,

one has that the set

f(B*)

is a subset of

{f(B)}*\cupf(B)

.[4]

Definition via neighbourhoods

See also: Neighbourhood system and Neighbourhood (mathematics).

Recall that this article follows the convention that a neighborhood is not necessarily open. In a topological space, one has the following facts:

U

is a neighborhood of

x

then

x

is an element of

U.

x

is a neighborhood of

x.

Equivalently, the intersection of finitely many neighborhoods of

x

is a neighborhood of

x.

V

contains a neighborhood of

x,

then

V

is a neighborhood of

x.

U

is a neighborhood of

x,

then there exists a neighborhood

V

of

x

such that

U

is a neighborhood of each point of

V

.If

X

is a set and one declares a nonempty collection of neighborhoods for every point of

X,

satisfying the above conditions, then a topology is defined by declaring a set to be open if and only if it is a neighborhood of each of its points; it is the unique topology whose associated system of neighborhoods is as given. It follows that on a topological space

X,

all definitions can be phrased in terms of neighborhoods:

Y,

a map

f:X\toY

is continuous if and only for every element

x

of

X

and every neighborhood

B

of

f(x),

the preimage

f-1(B)

is a neighborhood of

x.

X

is open if and only if it is a neighborhood of each of its points.

A

of

X,

the interior is the collection of all elements

x

of

X

such that

A

is a neighbourhood of

x

.

A

of

X,

the closure is the collection of all elements

x

of

X

such that every neighborhood of

x

intersects

A.

Definition via convergence of nets

See also: Net (mathematics) and Fréchet–Urysohn space.

Convergence of nets satisfies the following properties:

  1. Every constant net converges to itself.
  2. Every subnet of a convergent net converges to the same limits.
  3. If a net does not converge to a point

    x

    then there is a subnet such that no further subnet converges to

    x.

    Equivalently, if

    x\bull

    is a net such that every one of its subnets has a sub-subnet that converges to a point

    x,

    then

    x\bull

    converges to

    x.

  4. /Convergence of iterated limits. If

    \left(xa\right)a\tox

    in

    X

    and for every index

    a\inA,

    i\right)
    \left(x
    i\inIa
    is a net that converges to

    xa

    in

    X,

    then there exists a diagonal (sub)net of
    i\right)
    \left(x
    a\inA,i\inIa
    that converges to

    x.

    i\right)
    \left(x
    a\inA,i\inIa

    .

    • The notation
    i\right)
    \left(x
    a\inA,i\inIa
    denotes the net defined by

    (a,i)\mapsto

    i
    x
    a
    whose domain is the set

    {stylecup\limitsa

    } A \times I_a ordered lexicographically first by

    A

    and then by

    Ia;

    explicitly, given any two pairs

    (a1,i1),\left(a2,i2\right)\in{stylecup\limitsa

    } A \times I_a, declare that

    (a1,i1)\leq\left(a2,i2\right)

    holds if and only if both (1)

    a1\leqa2,

    and also (2) if

    a1=a2

    then

    i1\leqi2.

If

X

is a set, then given a notion of net convergence (telling what nets converge to what points) satisfying the above four axioms, a closure operator on

X

is defined by sending any given set

A

to the set of all limits of all nets valued in

A;

the corresponding topology is the unique topology inducing the given convergences of nets to points.

Given a subset

A\subseteqX

of a topological space

X:

A

is open in

X

if and only if every net converging to an element of

A

is eventually contained in

A.

A

in

X

is the set of all limits of all convergent nets valued in

A.

A

is closed in

X

if and only if there does not exist a net in

A

that converges to an element of the complement

X\setminusA.

A subset

A\subseteqX

is closed in

X

if and only if every limit point of every convergent net in

A

necessarily belongs to

A.

A function

f:X\toY

between two topological spaces is continuous if and only if for every

x\inX

and every net

x\bull

in

X

that converges to

x

in

X,

the net

f\left(x\bull\right)

[5] converges to

f(x)

in

Y.

Definition via convergence of filters

See also: Filters in topology.

A topology can also be defined on a set by declaring which filters converge to which points. One has the following characterizations of standard objects in terms of filters and prefilters (also known as filterbases):

Y,

a function

f:X\toY

is continuous if and only if it preserves convergence of prefilters.

A

of

X

is open if and only if every filter converging to an element of

A

contains

A.

A

of

X

is closed if and only if there does not exist a prefilter on

A

which converges to a point in the complement

X\setminusA.

A

of

X,

the closure consists of all points

x

for which there is a prefilter on

A

converging to

x.

A

of

X

is a neighborhood of

x

if and only if it is an element of every filter converging to

x.

Citations

Notes

Notes and References

  1. Lei . Yinbin . Zhang . Jun . August 2019 . Generalizing Topological Set Operators . Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science . 345 . 63–76 . 10.1016/j.entcs.2019.07.016 . 1571-0661. free .
  2. Book: Bourbaki, Nicolas . Elements of mathematics. Chapters 1/4: 3. General topology Chapters 1 - 4 . 1998 . Springer . 978-3-540-64241-1 . Softcover ed., [Nachdr.] - [1998] . Berlin Heidelberg.
  3. Book: Baker, Crump W. . Introduction to topology . 1991 . Wm. C. Brown Publishers . 978-0-697-05972-7 . Dubuque, IA.
  4. Book: Hocking, John G. . Topology . Young . Gail S. . 1988 . Dover Publications . 978-0-486-65676-2 . New York.
  5. Assuming that the net

    x\bull

    is indexed by

    I

    (so that

    x\bull=\left(xi\right)i,

    which is just notation for function

    x\bull:I\toX

    that sends

    i\mapstoxi

    ) then

    f\left(x\bull\right)

    denotes the composition of

    x\bull:I\toX

    with

    f:X\toY.

    That is,

    f\left(x\bull\right):=f\circx\bull=\left(f\left(xi\right)\right)i

    is the function

    f\circx\bull:I\toY.