Republic of Central Lithuania explained

Conventional Long Name:Republic of Central Lithuania
Common Name:Central Lithuania
National Anthem:Rota
Flag Type Article:Flag of Central Lithuania
Symbol Type Article:Coat of arms of Central Lithuania
Image Map Caption:Territory of the Republic of Central Lithuania (green).
Capital:Vilnius
Government Type:Republic
Title Leader:Commander-in-chief
Leader1:Lucjan Żeligowski
Year Leader1:1920–1922
Title Deputy:Chairman
Deputy1:Witold Abramowicz
Year Deputy1:1920–1921 (first)
Deputy2:Aleksander Meysztowicz
Year Deputy2:1921–1922 (last)
Era:Interwar period
Status:Puppet state of the Second Polish Republic
Event Start:Żeligowski's Mutiny
Date Start:12 October
Year Start:1920
Event1:General election
Date Event1:24 March 1922
Event End:Incorporation into Poland
Date End:18 April
Year End:1922
Demonym:Central Lithuanian
Legislature:Sejm
Area Km2:13490
Currency:Polish mark
P1:Republic of Lithuania (1918–1940)Lithuania
Flag P1:Flag of Lithuania 1918-1940.svg
P2:Second Polish RepublicPoland
Flag P2:Flag of Poland (1919–1928).svg
S1:Second Polish RepublicPoland
Flag S1:Flag of Poland (1919–1928).svg

The Republic of Central Lithuania (Polish: Republika Litwy Środkowej,), commonly known as the Central Lithuania, and the Middle Lithuania (Polish: Litwa Środkowa,, Belarusian: Сярэдняя Літва|translit=Siaredniaja Litva), was an unrecognized short-lived puppet state of Poland, that existed from 1920 to 1922.[1] It was founded on 12 October 1920, after successful Żeligowski's Mutiny, during which the volunteer 1st Lithuanian–Belarusian Division under command of general Lucjan Żeligowski seized the Vilnius Region that Lithuania made claims to.[2] It was incorporated into Poland on 18 April 1922.

The region centered around Vilnius, the historical capital of Lithuania, had majority-Polish population with Lithuanian population of only 2–3%.[3] Despite this, the Lithuanian authorities decided that the region should belong to the newly-established Lithuanian state and attempted to implement this idea using military force, ignoring the Foch Line and taking advantage of the fact that Poland was absorbed in the Polish–Soviet War. Lithuanians believed that for this reason Poland was temporarily unable to protect Polish population in disputed areas, but despite this, Lithuania failed to maintain control over the region. This and Lithuanian support for the Soviets in the war against Poland, led to the Polish–Lithuanian War, of which the Żeligowski Mutiny is also considered a part, and consequently to the establishment of the Republic of Central Lithuania.

The republic had features of a state administration, but actually was an imitation of a sovereign state which repressed Lithuanian organizations, education, censored and suspended Lithuanian publications.[4] After a variety of delays, a disputed election took place on 8 January 1922, and the territory was annexed by Poland. Several years later the Polish leader Józef Piłsudski confirmed that he personally ordered Żeligowski to stage a mutiny.

The Polish–Lithuanian border in the interwar period, was recognized by the Conference of Ambassadors of the Entente[5] [6] and the League of Nations.[7] It was not recognized by Kaunas-based Republic of Lithuania[8] until the Polish ultimatum of 1938. In 1931 an international court in The Hague stated that the Polish seizure of the region had been a violation of international law, but there were no political repercussions.

History

See main article: Ethnic composition of Central Lithuania. Following the partitions of Poland, most of the lands that formerly constituted the Grand Duchy of Lithuania were annexed by the Russian Empire. The Imperial government increasingly pursued a policy of Russification of the newly acquired lands, which escalated after the failed January Uprising of 1864.[9] The discrimination against local inhabitants included restrictions and outright bans on the usage of the Polish, Lithuanian (see Lithuanian press ban), Belarusian, and Ukrainian (see Valuyev circular) languages.[10] [11] These measures, however, had limited effects on the Polonisation effort undertaken by the Polish patriotic leadership of the Vilnius educational district.[12] [13] A similar effort was pursued during the 19th century Lithuanian National Revival, which sought to distance itself from both Polish and Russian influences.[14]

The ethnic composition of the area has long been disputed, since censuses from that time and place are often considered unreliable. According to the first census of the Russian Empire in 1897, known to have been intentionally falsified,[15] the population of the Vilna Governorate was distributed as follows:[16] Belarusians at 56.1% (including Roman Catholics), Lithuanians at 17.6%, Jews at 12.7%, Poles at 8.2%, Russians at 4.9%, Germans at 0.2%, Ukrainians at 0.1%, Tatars at 0.1%, and 'Others' at 0.1% as well.[17]

The German censuses of 1915, 1916 and 1917 of the Vilnius Region (published in 1919) however, reported strikingly different numbers.[18] In 1917 in the Vilnius city Poles were at 53.65%, Jews at 41.45%, Lithuanians at 2.1%, Belarusians at 0.44%, Russians at 1.59%, Germans at 0,63% and 'Other' at 0.14%.[19] [20] According to the 1916 census, Poles constituted 89.8% of the inhabitants of Vilnius county (excluding the city) and Lithuanians only 4.3%.[21]

Censuses had encountered difficulties in the attempt to categorise their subjects. Ethnographers in the 1890s were often confronted with those who described themselves as both Lithuanians and Poles.[22] According to a German census analyst, "Objectively determining conditions of nationality comes up against the greatest difficulties."[23]

Aftermath of World War I

In the aftermath of the First World War, both Poland and Lithuania regained independence. The conflict between them soon arose as both Lithuania and Poland claimed Vilnius (known in Polish as Wilno) region.

Demographically, the main groups inhabiting Vilnius were Poles and Jews, with Lithuanians constituting a small fraction of the total population (2.0%–2.6%, according to the Russian census of 1897 and the German census of 1916).[16] [18] The Lithuanians nonetheless believed that their historical claim to Vilnius (former capital of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania) had precedence and refused to recognize any Polish claims to the city and the surrounding area.[24]

While Poland under Józef Piłsudski attempted to create a Polish-led federation in the area that would include a number of ethnically non-Polish territories (Międzymorze), Lithuania strove to create a fully independent state that would include the Vilnius region. Two early 20th-century censuses indicated that Lithuanian speakers, whose language in the second half of the 19th century was suppressed by the Russian policies and had unfavourable conditions within the Catholic church, became a minority in the region. Based on this, Lithuanian authorities argued that the majority of inhabitants living there, even if they at the time did not speak Lithuanian, were thus Polonized (or Russified) Lithuanians.[25] [26]

Further complicating the situation, there were two Polish factions with quite different views on creation of the modern state in Poland. One party, led by Roman Dmowski, saw modern Poland as an ethnic state, another, led by Józef Piłsudski, wished to rebuild the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth.[27] Both parties were determined to take the Poles of Vilnius into the new state. Piłsudski attempted to rebuild the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in a canton structure, as part of the Międzymorze federation:[27]

Eventually, Piłsudski's plan failed; it was opposed both by the Lithuanian government and by the Dmowski's faction in Poland. Stanisław Grabski, representative of Dmowski's faction, was in charge of the Treaty of Riga negotiations with the Soviet Union, in which they rejected the Soviet offer of territories needed for the Minsk canton (Dmowski preferred Poland that would be smaller, but with higher percentage of ethnic Poles).[27] The inclusion of territories predominant with non-Poles would have weakened support for Dmowski.[27]

Polish–Lithuanian War

See main article: Polish–Lithuanian War and Żeligowski's Mutiny. At the end of World War I, the area of the former Grand Duchy of Lithuania was divided between the Second Polish Republic, the short-lived unrecognized Belarusian People's Republic, and the Republic of Lithuania.[28] Following the start of the Polish–Soviet War, during the next two years, the control of Vilnius and its environs changed frequently. In 1919 the territory was briefly occupied by the Red Army, which defeated the local self-defense units, but shortly afterwards the Soviets were pushed back by the Polish Army. 1920 saw the Vilnius region occupied by the Red Army for the second time. However, when the Red Army was defeated in the Battle of Warsaw, the Soviets, knowing that they wouldn't be able to hold Vilnius, decided to hand it over to Lithuania. By making such a move, the Soviets hoped to intensify the Polish-Lithuanian dispute over the region.

The regular Polish–Lithuanian War broke out on 26 August 1920, when the Polish Army clashed with Lithuanian troops occupying Suwałki region during the Polish autumn offensive following the Battle of Warsaw. The League of Nations intervened and arranged negotiations in Suwałki. The League negotiated a cease-fire, signed on 7 October 7, placing the city of Vilnius in Lithuania.[29] The Suwałki Agreement was to have taken effect at 12:00 on 10 October.

The Lithuanian authorities entered Vilnius in late August 1920. The Grinius cabinet rejected the proposal to hold a plebiscite to confirm the will of the region's inhabitants, knowing that a plebiscite would inevitably legitimize Polish claims to the region. His declaration was promptly accepted by the Seimas, for the percentage of Lithuanian population in Vilnius was very small.[19] On 8 October, General Lucjan Żeligowski and the 1st Lithuanian-Belarusian Division numbering around 14,000 men, with local self-defense, launched the Żeligowski's Mutiny and engaged the Lithuanian 4th Infantry Regiment which promptly retreated.[3] Upon the Polish advance, on October 8, the Lithuanian government left the city for Kaunas, and during withdrawal, meticulously destroyed telephone lines and rail between the two cities, which remained severed for a generation. Żeligowski entered Vilnius on 9 October, to enthusiastic cheers of the overwhelmingly Polish population of the city. The French and the British delegation decided to leave the matter in the hands of the League of Nations. On October 27, while the Żeligowski's campaign still continued outside Vilnius, the League called for a popular referendum in the disputed area, which was again rejected by the Lithuanian representation.[30] Poland disclaimed all responsibility for the action, maintaining that Żeligowski had acted entirely on his own initiative.[3] This version of the event was redefined in August 1923 when Piłsudski, speaking in public at a Vilnius theater, stated that the attack was undertaken by his direct order.[31] Żeligowski, a native to Lithuania, proclaimed a new state, the Republic of Central Lithuania (Litwa Środkowa). According to historian Jerzy J. Lerski, it was a "puppet state" which the Lithuanian Republic refused to recognize.[32] [33]

The seat of Lithuanian government moved to Lithuania's second-largest city, Kaunas. Armed clashes between Kaunas and Central Lithuania continued for a few weeks, but neither side could gain a significant advantage. Due to the mediation efforts of the League of Nations, a new ceasefire was signed on November 21 and a truce six days later.[34]

Founding of the Republic of Central Lithuania

On 12 October 1920, Żeligowski announced the creation of a provisional government. Soon the courts and the police were formed by his decree of 7 January 1921, and the civil rights of Central Lithuania were granted to all people who lived in the area on January 1, 1919, or for five years prior to August 1, 1914. The symbols of the state were a red flag with Polish White Eagle and Lithuanian Vytis. Its coat of arms was a mixture of Polish, Lithuanian and Vilnian symbols and resembled the Coat of arms of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth.

Extensive diplomatic negotiations continued behind the scenes. Lithuania proposed creating a confederation of Baltic Western Lithuania (with Lithuanian as an official language) and Central Lithuania (with Polish as an official language). Poland added the condition that the new state must be also federated with Poland, pursuing Józef Piłsudski's goal of creating the Międzymorze Federation.[35] [36] [37] [38] [39] Lithuanians rejected this condition. With nationalistic sentiments rising all over Europe, many Lithuanians were afraid that such a federation, resembling the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth from centuries ago, would be a threat to Lithuanian culture, as during the Commonwealth times many of the Lithuanian nobility was Polonized.

General elections in Central Lithuania were decreed to take place on 9 January, and the regulations governing this election were to be issued prior to 28 November 1920. However, due to the League of Nations mediation, and the Lithuanian boycott of the voting, the elections were postponed.[40]

Mediation

Peace talks were held under the auspice of the League of Nations. The initial agreement was signed by both sides on 29 November 1920, and the talks started on 3 March 1921. The League of Nations considered the Polish proposal of a plebiscite on the future of Central Lithuania. As a compromise, the so-called "Hymans' plan" was proposed (named after Paul Hymans). The plan consisted of 15 points, among them were:[41]

The talks came to a halt when Poland demanded that a delegation from Central Lithuania (boycotted by Lithuania) be invited to Brussels.[41] Hymans' proposal left Vilnius in Polish hands, which was unacceptable to Lithuania.[41]

A new plan was presented to the governments of Lithuania and Poland in September 1921. It was basically a modification of "Hymans' plan", with the difference that the Klaipėda Region (the area in East Prussia north of the Neman River) was to be incorporated into Lithuania. However, both Poland and Lithuania openly criticized this revised plan and finally this turn of talks came to a halt as well.[43]

Resolution

After the talks in Brussels failed, the tensions in the area grew. The most important issue was the huge army Central Lithuania fielded (27,000).[44] General Lucjan Żeligowski decided to pass the power to the civil authorities and confirmed the date of the elections (8 January 1922).[45] There was a significant electioneering propaganda campaign as Poles tried to win the support of other ethnic groups present in the area. The Polish government was also accused of various strong-arm policies (like the closing of Lithuanian newspapers[2] or election violations like not asking for a valid document from a voter).[46] The elections were boycotted by Lithuanians, most of the Jews and some Belarusians. Poles were the only major ethnic group out of which the majority of people voted.[40]

The elections were not recognized by Lithuania. Polish factions, which gained control over the parliament (Sejm) of the Republic (the Sejm of Central Lithuania), on February 20 passed the request of incorporation into Poland.[47] The request was accepted by the Polish Sejm on 22 March 1922.

All of the Republic's territory was eventually incorporated into the newly formed Wilno Voivodeship. Lithuania declined to accept the Polish authority over the area. Instead, it continued to treat the so-called Vilnius Region as part of its own territory and the city itself as its constitutional capital, with Kaunas being only a temporary seat of government. The dispute over the Vilnius region resulted in much tensions in the Polish–Lithuanian relations in the interwar period.

Aftermath

Alfred Erich Senn noted that if Poland had not prevailed in the Polish–Soviet War, Lithuania would have been invaded by the Soviets, and would never have experienced two decades of independence. Despite the Soviet–Lithuanian Peace Treaty of 1920, Lithuania was very close to being invaded by the Soviets in summer 1920 and being forcibly incorporated into that state, and only the Polish victory derailed this plan.[48] [49] [50] [51]

After the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact and the Soviet invasion of Poland in 1939, Vilnius and its surroundings of up to 30 kilometres were given to Lithuania in accordance with the Soviet–Lithuanian Mutual Assistance Treaty of 10 October 1939, and Vilnius again became the capital of Lithuania. However, in 1940, Lithuania was annexed by the Soviet Union, forcing the country to become the Lithuanian SSR. Since the restoration of Lithuanian independence in 1991, the city's status as Lithuania's capital has been internationally recognized.

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Senn . Alfred Erich . Alfred E. Senn . On the State of Central Lithuania . Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas . 1964 . 12 . 3 . . 366–374 . 41042359 . 21 July 2021.
  2. Book: Čepėnas, Pranas . Pranas Čepėnas . Naujųjų laikų Lietuvos istorija, vol. II . 1986 . Dr. Griniaus fondas . Chicago . 5-89957-012-1. lt.
  3. Book: Rauch, Georg von . Georg von Rauch . Gerald Onn . The Baltic States: Years of Independence – Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, 1917–40 . 1974 . 100–102 . The Early Stages of Independence . https://books.google.com/books?id=emBIdi4LPz8C&pg=PA101 . C. Hurst & Co. 0-903983-00-1 .
  4. Nanevič . Beata . Imitavusi valstybę: "Vidurio Lietuvos" (1920-1922) vidaus politika . Darbai ir dienos . 2004 . 12 February 2023 . lt.
  5. Book: Phipps, Eric . Eric Phipps . Romano Avezzana . Raymond Poincaré . Raymond Poincaré . Maurycy Zamoyski . Maurycy Zamoyski . M. Matsuda . Decision taken by the conference of ambassadors regarding the eastern frontiers of Poland . 1923. . 11 March 2008.
  6. Book: League of Nations, Treaty Series . 1923 . 261–265 . League of Nations . 15 .
  7. Miniotaitė . Gražina . The Security Policy of Lithuania and the 'Integration Dilemma' . NATO Academic Forum. 1999 . 21. 14 March 2008.
  8. Book: The Vilna problem . Lithuanian Information Bureau. London . 1922. 24–25.
  9. Claudio Madonia, Fra l'orso russo e l'aquila prussiana, Clueb Edizioni, 2013, 978-88-49-13800-9, p.82.
  10. Book: Roshwald, Aviel . Ethnic Nationalism and the Fall of Empires: Central Europe, Russia and the Middle East, 1914–1923 . Routledge . 2001. 0-415-17893-2 . 24 .
  11. Book: Geifman, Anna . Russia Under the Last Tsar: Opposition and Subversion, 1894–1917 . Blackwell Publishing . 1999 . 1-55786-995-2 . 116 .
  12. Tomas Venclova . Tomas . Venclova . Four Centuries of Enlightenment. A Historic View of the University of Vilnius, 1579–1979 . Lituanus . 1 . 27 . Summer 1981.
  13. Stasys . Yla . The Clash of Nationalities at the University of Vilnius . Lituanus . 1 . 27 . Summer 1981.
  14. The Lithuanian Language and Nation Through the Ages: Outline of a History of Lithuanian in its Social Context . William R. . Schmalstieg . Lituanus . Winter 1989. 4 . 34.
  15. Book: Ajnenkiel, Andrzej . Od rządów ludowych do przewrotu majowego: zarys dziejów politycznych Polski 1918-1926 . From peoples assembly to May coup: overview of political history of Poland 1918-1926 . 1986 . Wiedza Powszechna . According to falsified data of the Russian census of 1897, the Poles constituted 886,000 of the region's inhabitants, but the numbers have to be at least doubled..
  16. Book: Łossowski, Piotr . Piotr Łossowski . Konflikt polsko-litewski 1918–1920 . Warsaw . 83-05-12769-9 . 11 . pl . Książka i Wiedza . 1995.
  17. The first census of the Russian Empire in 1897 . https://web.archive.org/web/20080517235216/http://demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/rus_lan_97.php?reg=32 . dead . 17 May 2008 . Демоскоп Weekly . Первая всеобщая перепись населения Российской Империи 1897 г. Распределение населения по родному языку и регионам . ru . Институт демографии Высшей школы экономики . 331-332, 28 апреля - 18 мая 2008 . 2008.
  18. Book: Brensztejn, Michał Eustachy . 1919 . Spisy ludności m. Wilna za okupacji niemieckiej od. 1 listopada 1915 r. . Biblioteka Delegacji Rad Polskich Litwy i Białej Rusi . Warsaw . pl.
  19. Book: Łossowski, Piotr . Piotr Łossowski . Konflikt polsko-litewski 1918–1920 . Warsaw . Książka i Wiedza . 1995 . 83-05-12769-9 . 11, 104 . pl . Spis z grudnia 1919 r. jest bardzo dokładny; operuje danymi z poszczególnych gmin, wykazując ogólną liczbę mieszkańców, a następnie w rozbiciu na poszczególne narodowości — w liczbach bezwzględnych i w ujęciu procentowym. Z wielkiej ilości danych przytoczyć możemy tylko najważniejsze, najbardziej charakterystyczne liczby. W samym więc mieście Wilnie na 129 tysięcy mieszkańców spis wykazuje 72 tysiące Polaków, czyli 56,2% ogółu ludności (Żydów — 47 tysięcy, to znaczy 36,1%, Litwinów — 3 tysiące, to jest 2,3%). Jeszcze wyższy odsetek Polaków stwierdzono w powiecie wileńskim. Na 184 tysiące mieszkańców zapisano tam 161 tysięcy Polaków..
  20. Book: Brensztejn, Michał (1874-1938) . Spisy ludności miasta Wilna za okupacji niemieckiej od d. 1 listopada 1915 r. . 1919 . Warszawska Drukarnia Wydawnicza.
  21. Book: Januszewska-Jurkiewicz, Joanna . Stosunki narodowościowe na Wileńszczyźnie w latach 1920—1939 . Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego . 2010 . 978-83-226-1817-2 . Katowice . pl . National relations in the Vilnius region in the years 1920-1939.
  22. Book: Davies, Norman . God's Playground . 1982 . 69 . Columbia University Press . 978-0-231-05353-2.
  23. Book: Liulevicius, Vejas Gabrielas . War Land on the Eastern Front . 34 . Cambridge University Press . 978-0-521-66157-7 . 2000.
  24. Michael . MacQueen . The Context of Mass Destruction: Agents and Prerequisites of the Holocaust in Lithuania . Holocaust and Genocide Studies . 12 . 1 . 27–48 . 1998 . 10.1093/hgs/12.1.27.
  25. Book: Łossowski, Piotr. Piotr Łossowski . Konflikt polsko-litewski 1918–1920. Warsaw . Książka i Wiedza . 1995 . 83-05-12769-9 . 13–16 . pl.
  26. Book: Merkys, Vytautas. Tautiniai santykiai Vilniaus vyskupijoje . Vilnius aureus . Versus . 2006. 9955-699-42-6. 1–480. lt.
  27. Book: Snyder, Timothy . Timothy Snyder . The Reconstruction of Nations: Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, 1569–1999. Yale University Press . 2003 . 0-300-10586-X . 65 .
  28. Tomas Balkelis, Violeta Davoliūtė, Population Displacement in Lithuania in the Twentieth Century, BRILL, 2016; pp. 70-71.
  29. Book: Zinkevičius, Zigmas . Zigmas Zinkevičius . Rytų Lietuva praeityje ir dabar . . Vilnius . 1993 . 158 . 5-420-01085-2.
  30. Book: Alfred Erich Senn . Leiden: E.J. Brill Archive . 1966 . The Great Powers Lithuania and the Vilna Question, 1920-1928 . 49–57 .
  31. Book: Venclova, Tomas . Tomas Venclova . Czesław Miłosz . Czesław Miłosz . Winter Dialogue . 1999 . 146 . Northwestern University Press . 0-8101-1726-6 .
  32. Book: Lerski, Jerzy J. . Jerzy J. Lerski . Piotr Wróbel . Richard J. Kozicki . Historical Dictionary of Poland 966–1945 . 1996 . Greenwood Press . 0-313-26007-9 . 309.
  33. Royal Institute of International Affairs, Vol. 36, No. 3 (1960), pg. 354.
  34. Book: Łossowski, Piotr. Piotr Łossowski . Konflikt polsko-litewski 1918–1920. Warsaw . Książka i Wiedza . 1995 . 83-05-12769-9 . 216–218 . pl.
  35. [Aviel Roshwald]
  36. Richard K Debo, Survival and Consolidation: The Foreign Policy of Soviet Russia, 1918-192, McGill-Queen's Press, 1992;, pg. 59
  37. James H. Billington, Fire in the Minds of Men, Transaction Publishers;, pg. 432
  38. [Andrzej Paczkowski]
  39. David Parker, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, W. W. Norton & Company, 2001;, pg. 194
  40. Saulius A. Suziedelis, Historical Dictionary of Lithuania, Scarecrow Press, 2011;, pg. 78: “The elections of the Central Lithuania (...) were boycotted by much of the non-Polish population”.
  41. Book: Moroz, Małgorzata . Krynica. Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmu . 2001 . Białoruski ruch chrześcijańsko—demokratyczny w okresie pierwszej wojny światowej . http://kamunikat.fontel.net/www/knizki/historia/moroz/krynica/krynica_02.htm . Białoruskie Towarzystwo Historyczne . Białystok . 83-915029-0-2 . pl . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20110716070731/http://kamunikat.fontel.net/www/knizki/historia/moroz/krynica/krynica_spis.htm . 16 July 2011.
  42. Book: Lapradelle, Albert Geouffre de . Albert Geouffre de Lapradelle . André Nicolayévitch Mandelstam . Louis Le Fur . The Vilna Question . 1929. 15–18 . Hazell, Watson & Viney, ld. . London .
  43. John Besemeres, A Difficult Neighbourhood: Essays on Russia and East-Central Europe since WW II, ANU Press, 2016,, Acknowledgements.
  44. Fulvio Fusco, L’ammaliatrice di Kaunas, Youcanprint, 2014;, pg. 30.
  45. Charles W. Ingrao, Franz A. J. Szabo, The Germans and the East, Purdue University Press, 2008;, pg. 262
  46. Book: Documents diplomatiques. Conflit Polono-Lituanien. Questions de Vilna 1918–1924 . 1924.
  47. Vilkelis, Gintautas (2006). Lietuvos ir Lenkijos santykiai Tautų Sąjungoje (in Lithuanian). Versus aureus. pp. 81–83. .
  48. Book: Senn . Alfred Erich . Slavic Review . September 1962 . Cambridge University Press . 500–507 . 21 . The Formation of the Lithuanian Foreign Office, 1918–1921 . A Bolshevik victory over the Poles would have certainly meant a move by the Lithuanian communists, backed by the Red Army, to overthrow the Lithuanian nationalist government... Kaunas, in effect, paid for its independence with the loss of Vilna..
  49. Book: Erich . Senn Alfred . Lietuvos valstybės atkūrimas 1918-1920 . 163 . 1992 . lt-LT . If the Poles didn't stop the Soviet attack, Lithuania would fell to the Soviets... Polish victory costs the Lithuanians the city of Wilno, but saved Lithuania itself..
  50. Book: Rukša . Antanas . Kovos dėl Lietuvos nepriklausomybės . 1982 . Lietuvių Karių veteranų sąjunga "Ramovė" . 417 . 3 . lt-LT . In summer 1920 Russia was working on a communist revolution in Lithuania... From this disaster Lithuania was saved by the miracle at Vistula..
  51. Web site: Rudokas . Jonas . Józef Piłsudski - wróg niepodległości Litwy czy jej wybawca? . pogon.lt . Veidas . 11 January 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20180814001959/http://www.pogon.lt/_NCZ_ARCHYVAS/519/na_lamach.html . 14 August 2018 . pl-PL . 25 August 2005.