Center on Privacy and Technology explained

Center on Privacy and Technology
Formation:2014
Type:Policy think tank
Parent Organization:Georgetown University Law Center
Founder:Alvaro Bedoya
Leader Name:Emily Tucker
Leader Title:Director
Location:Washington, D.C.

The Georgetown Center on Privacy and Technology is a think tank at Georgetown University in Washington, DC dedicated to the study of privacy and technology. Established in 2014, it is housed within the Georgetown University Law Center.[1] The goal of the Center is to conduct research and empower legal and legislative advocacy around issues of privacy and surveillance, with a focus on how such issues affect groups of different social class and race.[2] In May 2022, the Center's founding director Alvaro Bedoya was confirmed as a commissioner of the United States Federal Trade Commission.[3]

Activities

Surveillance

From 2016 to 2019, the Center hosted an annual conference titled "The Color of Surveillance" which explored how government and technological surveillance affected different marginalized populations, including Black Americans, immigrants to the United States, religious minorities, and poor and working people.[4]

Facial recognition

The Center has collaborated with many advocacy organizations, including the ACLU, the Algorithmic Justice League, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, as part of campaigns raising awareness about the use of facial recognition by the government. In 2016, the Center published a report called The Perpetual Line-Up: Unregulated Police Face Recognition in America which documents the widespread unregulated use of facial recognition by law enforcement across the United States.[5] [6] In 2018, a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by the Center against the New York Police Department revealed that facial recognition scans were being run on mugshots of every arrestee.[7] A subsequent report in 2019, "Garbage In, Garbage Out: Face Recognition on Flawed Data" documented multiple cases of police departments attempting to identify suspects using hand-drawn sketches, highly edited photos, and photos of celebrity lookalikes.[8] [9]

External links

Notes and References

  1. News: Ho . Catherine . Georgetown Law, MIT team up to tackle topic of privacy in the age of big data . 12 September 2021 . Washington Post . 11 January 2015.
  2. Web site: Center on Privacy and Technology . www.law.georgetown.edu . 12 March 2021.
  3. Web site: U.S. Senate: U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 117th Congress - 2nd Session . www.senate.gov . 29 November 2022 . 11 May 2022.
  4. Web site: The Color of Surveillance: Government Monitoring of the African American Community . www.law.georgetown.edu . 26 March 2021.
  5. Web site: The Perpetual Line-Up. live. 2021-09-18. Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law. en. https://web.archive.org/web/20161018214913/https://www.perpetuallineup.org/ . 2016-10-18 .
  6. News: Williams . Patricia J. . Americans Are Finding New Ways to Join the Surveillance State . 13 March 2021 . The Nation . 7 November 2016.
  7. News: Brown . Stephen Rex . NYPD ripped for abusing facial-recognition tool . 12 September 2021 . NY Daily News . 1 March 2018.
  8. Web site: Garbage In. Garbage Out. Face Recognition on Flawed Data. live. 2021-09-18. Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law. en. https://web.archive.org/web/20190516143756/https://www.flawedfacedata.com/ . 2019-05-16 .
  9. News: Ng . Alfred . Police are using flawed data in facial recognition searches, study finds . 13 March 2021 . CNET . en.