Categoriae decem explained

The Latin: Categoriae decem (Latin for "The Ten Categories"), also known as the Latin: Paraphrasis Themistiana ("Themistian Paraphrase"), is a Latin summary of Aristotle's Categories thought to date to the 4th century AD. Traditionally credited to St Augustine, it is now variously attributed to Themistius or Pseudo-Augustinus.^{[1] [2]}

From the eighth century onwards, this text became one of the major sources of logical teaching in medieval Europe,^{[3] [4]} where it was taken at times as a full translation of Aristotle's work, rather than a compression. Its importance rests in the revival of the study of logic it stimulated in the early medieval West, beginning, it would seem, at the court of Charlemagne. Those influenced included Alcuin,^[5] particularly in his De Dialectica,^[6] Fridugisus^[7] and Johannes Scotus Eriugena.^{[8] [9]}

From around the 10th century, the Categoriae decem was increasingly replaced by Boethius's translations and commentaries on Aristotle's logic before being replaced by new translations from Arabic and Greek copies of the work during the 12th-century renaissance.

See also

• Commentaries on Aristotle

References

Bibliography

• Aristoteles Latinus, editor Lorenzo Minio-Paluello: Categoriae vel Praedicamenta. Translatio Boethii, Editio Composite, Translatio Guillelmi de Moerbeka, Lemmata e Simplicii commentario decerpta, Pseudo-Augustini Paraphrasis Themistiana - Desclée De Brouwer (Bruges-Paris 1961).
• .

Notes and References

1. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-commentators/: 'An anonymous paraphrase of the Categories falsely attributed to Augustine and traditionally known as Categoriae Decem has survived only because it was widely read and used in the early Middle Ages.'
2. See, for example, this PDF, p.34.
3. A.Arlig's unpublished Ohio PhD thesis, 'A study in early medieval Mereology', note p.34, describes its popularity in the ninth and tenth centuries. It was glossed by Heiric, this PDF, note p.30.
4. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophyhttp://www.seop.leeds.ac.uk/archives/sum2006/entries/medieval-categories/ describes the work as ‘neoplatonic’; it also states 'In the early Middle Ages, Neoplatonic works such as the Categoriae decem were very important'http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/medieval-categories/.
5. 'It seems to have been Alcuin who introduced both Boethius' discussions of logic and the Categoriae Decem into general circulation in the Frankish kingdom, or at least, it is in his writings that the earliest extant evidence of these works being read is to be seen'. Rosamond McKitterick, The Frankish Kingdoms under the Carolingians (1983), p.287. On p.286 she includes Ratramnus of Corbie with those knowing Aristotle through the work.
6. Edited in J-P. Migne, Patrologia Latina
7. S.Haverkamp, 'Making something of Nothing: the Content and Context of Fredegisus of Tours' 'De substantia nihili et tenebrarum', unpublished thesis, Utrecht 2006,
8. Eriugena's synthesis began with Dionysius' two branches of theology: apophatic and cataphatic. Apophasis was then considered from the perspective of the ten categories of Aristotle, interpreted through Augustine and the ps.-Augustinian Categoriae decem. (http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/complit/transverse1.pdf p.23)
9. https://www.ucc.ie/celt/eriugenabibl.html