Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation explained

Litigants:Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation
Decidedate:April 21
Decideyear:2022
Usvol:596
Uspage:___
Docket:20-1566
Holding:In a suit raising non-federal claims against a foreign state or instrumentality under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, a court should determine the substantive law by using the same choice-of-law rule applicable in a similar suit against a private party.
Majority:Kagan
Joinmajority:unanimous
Lawsapplied:Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, in a suit raising non-federal claims against a foreign state or instrumentality under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, a court should determine the substantive law by using the same choice-of-law rule applicable in a similar suit against a private party.[1] [2]

Notes and References

  1. .
  2. Web site: 2022-04-21 . Family seeking to recover Nazi-stolen art notches small victory — but still might not get the painting back . 2024-10-31 . SCOTUSblog . en-US.