Carrier aircraft used during World War II explained

Over 700 different aircraft models were used during World War II.[1] At least 135 of these models were developed for naval use,[2] including about 50 fighters[3] and 38 bombers.[4]

Only about 25 carrier-launched aircraft models were used extensively for combat operations. Of these, nine were introduced during the war years after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor brought United States into the war, four by the United States Navy (USN) and three by the Royal Navy (RN) and two by the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN).

Principal carrier aircraft used

The table below lists the principal carrier-launched fighters and bombers used during World War II. They are listed within each aircraft type in chronological order of their introduction to service. Allied reporting names such as "Val" and "Kate" are included for IJN aircraft. Neither Germany nor Italy put carriers or carrier-launched aircraft into service. Some Axis fighters are included in the table below for comparison with the Allied fighters that met them in combat.

Table of carrier aircraft 1935-1945
+ (performance figures refer to a representative version)
OriginArmed service useAircraft name & variantType Year introduced Number produced Loaded weight (lb) Engine power (hp) Max (mph) Range (miles)Service ceiling (ft) Rate of climb (ft/min) Wing loading (lb/ft2) Max ordnance (lb) Machine guns Cannon(20mm)Rockets
Carrier fighters/fighter-bombers
JapanIJN Nakajima A4N1Biplane 1936 221 3,880 730 219 526 25,390 2,812 15.7 265 2 -- --
JapanIJN Mitsubishi A5M-4 "Claude"Monoplane 1937 1,094 3,684 710 270 746 32,000 2,749 19.2 132 2 -- --
UKRN Gloster Sea Gladiator Mk IBiplane 1937 98 4,594 830 253 400 32,800 2,300 14.2 -- 4 -- --
USAUSN Brewster F2A-3 BuffaloMonoplane 1939 509 4,732 1,200 321 965 33,200 2,440 34 200 4× 0.5in -- --
UKRN Blackburn RocMonoplane 1939 136 7950 890 223 810 18,000 1500 25.6 240
(8x 30-lb)
4 -- --
JapanIJN Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero "Zeke"Monoplane 1940 10,939 5,313 940 331 1,162 32,810 3,090 25.5 264 2 2 --
UKRN Fairey FulmarMonoplane 1940 600 9,672 1,300 272 780 27,200 1,200 28.3 250 8x 0.303 or 4 x 0.5
USAUSN RN Grumman F4F-3 WildcatMonoplane 1940 7,885 7,423 1,200 331 845 39,500 2,303 28.6 200 4-6 -- --
UKRN Hawker Sea Hurricane Mk IICMonoplane 1941 438 7,670 1,460 342 600 36,000 2,780 29.8 4x 20mm --
UKRN Supermarine Seafire F Mk IIIMonoplane 1942 2,6467,232 1,585 359 465 36,000 3,250 29.9 500 4 x 0.303 2x 20mm --
USAUSNRN Vought F4U CorsairMonoplane 194212,571 14,533 2,380 446 1,005 41,500 4,360 46.3 4,000 -- 4 8
USAUSN Grumman Hellcat F6F-5Monoplane 1943 12,275 12,598 2,200 391 945 37,300 3,000 37.7 4,000 4-6 2 6
UKRN Fairey Firefly Mk.1Monoplane 1943 1,702 13,479 1,730 316 665 28,000 1,700 42.0 2,000 -- 4 16
JapanIJN Kawanishi N1K1-J "George"Monoplane 1944 1,532 8,598 1,975 355 505 39,400 3,880 34.0 1,100 -- 4 --
Notable land based fighters, for comparison
USAUSAAF Boeing P-26 Model 281Monoplane 1933151 3,360 600 234 360 27,400 719 -- 200 2 -- --
USSRPolikarpov I-16 Type 24Monoplane 1935 6,848 4,279 1,100 326 430 31,800 2,890 27.4 1,100 2 2 6
GermanyLuft. Messerschmitt Bf 109C-1Monoplane 1937 33,984 5,062 700 292 405 27,600 -- 30 -- -- 4 --
UKRAF Hawker Hurricane Mk IMonoplane 1937 14,000 6,670 1,030 316 525 36,000 2,640 29.8 -- 8x 0.303 -- --
ItalyRA Macchi C.200Monoplane 1939 1,152 4,850 870 313 350 29,200 3,010 26.8 330 2 -- --
GermanyLuft. Focke-Wulf Fw 190 A-8Monoplane 1941>20,000 9,738 1,677 405 620 33,960 3,000 49.4 1,100 2 4--
ItalyRA Reggiane Re.2001Monoplane 1941 237 7,231 1,159 337 680 36,000 2,600 32.9 -- 2 -- --
ItalyRA Macchi C.202 FolgoreMonoplane 1941 1,150 6,460 1,159 370 765 37,700 3,560 35.7 350 4 -- --
USAUSAF RAF North American P-51A/Mustang IIMonoplane 1942 15,000 9,200 1,490 440 1,650 41,900 3,200 39 1,000 4x 0.5in -- 6
Torpedo bombers
UKRN Fairey SwordfishBiplane 1936 2,391 7,580 690 143 522 16,500 1,220 12.5 1,670 2 -- 8
USAUSN Douglas TBD DevastatorMonoplane 1937 130 9,862 900 206 435 20,800 720 22.0 1,935 2 -- --
JapanIJN Nakajima B5N2 "Kate"Monoplane 1937 1,149 8,378 1,000 235 608 27,100 1,280 20.6 1,760 3 -- --
UKRN Fairey AlbacoreBiplane 1940 800 10,460 1,130 161 710 18,800 750 16.8 2,000 1-2 -- --
USAUSNRN Grumman TBF Avenger TBF-1Monoplane 1942 9,839 15,536 1,700 278 1,215 22,402 2,060 31.7 2,000 4 -- 8
UKRN Fairey Barracuda Mk IIMonoplane 1943 2,602 13,200 1,640 240 687 16,000 833 32.6 1,800 2 x 0.303
JapanIJN Nakajima B6N2 "Jill"Monoplane 1943 1,268 11,464 1,850 300 1,085 29,660 1,577 28.7 1,760 2 -- --
Dive bombers
USAUSN Curtiss SBC-4 HelldiverBiplane 1938 257 7,080 850 234 405 24,000 1,630 22.3 1,000 2 -- --
UKRN Blackburn Skua Mk. IIMonoplane 1938 192 8,228 890 225 760 20,200 1,580 25.8 500
(+ 160 lb)
5 -- --
USAUSN Douglas SBD-5 DauntlessMonoplane 1940 5,936 9,359 1,200 255 1,115 25,530 1,700 28.8 2,250 4 x 0.303
JapanIJN Aichi D3A2 "Val"Monoplane 1940 1,495 8,378 1,300 240 840 34,400 1,690 22.3 810 3 -- --
JapanIJN Yokosuka D4Y2 "Judy"Monoplane 1942 2,038 9,370 1,400 343 910 35,100 2,800 36.9 1,100 2 -- --
USAUSN Curtiss SB2C-4 HelldiverMonoplane 1942 7,140 16,616 1,900 295 1,165 29,100 1,800 39.4 2,500 2 2 8
Sources:

Notes:

Relative aircraft capabilities were not the only factors that contributed to success or failure for carrier aircraft in combat. Attack coordination and tactics, along with pilot skill, determination, and willingness to self-sacrifice were at least as important and perhaps more so. For example, both the new, high-performing Grumman TBF Avenger and the obsolete Douglas TBD Devastator were slaughtered as they tried to deliver their torpedoes at Midway without fighter protection. But their pilots' dogged pressing of their attacks in the face of almost hopeless odds created opportunities for the dive bomber pilots that, by luck as well as by determination, arrived in a timely manner to sink four IJN carriers. The effectiveness of the special attacks ("kamikaze") late in the war using mostly outdated aircraft can also be attributed to pilot determination and self-sacrifice. Nonetheless, other things being equal, faster, more maneuverable aircraft with longer ranges and better armament contributed to successful combat outcomes.

Carrier aircraft types, functions, and features

Carrier aircraft types.

The types of aircraft usually launched from aircraft carriers were fighters, torpedo bombers, and dive-bombers. Floatplanes were also launched from some carriers but were typically catapulted from cruisers and battleships. Land-based aircraft types were frequently launched from carriers when delivering them to forward bases, such as when Curtiss P-40 Warhawk fighters flew from carriers to newly captured land-bases during the Allied invasion of North Africa. Sometimes land-based aircraft were launched from carriers for special operations, such as the USN Doolittle Raid, when B-25s were launched for a raid on Tokyo. Some carrier aircraft served in dual roles, such as fighter-bomber and bomber-reconnaissance aircraft.

Carrier aircraft functions.

Carrier aircraft features.

Pre- and early-war aircraft (1936-1941)

Chinese land-based aircraft vs. Japanese carrier aircraft

During the short “Shanghai Incident” in 1932, Japanese carrier-launched fighters and bombers and water-launched floatplanes attacked areas in and around the city. In one engagement, a group of three Mitsubishi B1M torpedo bombers and three Nakajima A1N fighters were attacked by a lone Boeing 218 fighter flown by Robert McCawley Short, an American pilot training Chinese flyers. He was shot down and the following month, Japanese fighters were unsuccessfully opposed by Chinese Curtiss Hawk fighters, some of which were also shot down.[7]

Over the next five years, IJN introduced improved fighters including the Nakajima A2N in 1932, the first purely Japanese-designed fighter. In 1936, the Nakajima A4N entered service. The year after that, the Mitsubishi A5M "Claude" became the world's first low-wing, carrier-launched monoplane. It was highly maneuverable and the direct predecessor of the famed Mitsubishi A6M Zero introduced three years later.

At the time the Second Sino-Japanese War began in July 1937, IJN had about 200 fighters and bombers and 62 floatplanes available to attack. The Imperial Japanese Army (IJA0 had force concentrations in China's north and agreed that IJN would be responsible for aerial operations over central China. Three aircraft carriers with a total of 136 up-to-date fighters and bombers were sent to the coast off Shanghai.[8] The Republic of China Air Force (ROCAF) was just emerging from a loose confederation of aircraft and airmen controlled by individual Chinese warlords. It was a hodgepodge of about 300 land-based fighters, mostly supplied by the US, UK, and Italy, with which to intercept Japanese fighters and bombers. The USSR also began supplying China aircraft after the Sino-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact was agreed in August.

The Curtiss Model 68 Hawk III biplane, built both in the US and China, was used by the ROCAF as a bomber as well as the primary fighter during the early part of the war. It took the brunt of the Japanese attack during the defense of Shanghai and battle of Nanking, helping to make flying aces of several Chinese pilots. Shortly after the conflict began, Gao Zhihang intercepted a land-based Japanese bomber group from Taiwan and shot down a Mitsubishi G3M medium bomber. This was the first aerial combat victory for the Chinese.[9] In addition to Curtiss Hawk IIIs, the ROCAF opposed Japanese attacks with some older Curtis Hawk II, Boeing P-26 Peashooter, Gloster Gladiator, and Fiat CR.32 fighters. After attrition had taken its toll of these aircraft, they were replaced by Soviet Polikarpov I-15 biplane fighters and later by Polikarpov I-16 aircraft, the world's first low-wing monoplane fighter with retractable landing gear used in combat. The latter also had 20mm cannons, making it one of the most heavily armed fighters for the period.

For the next three years, IJN and ROCAF pilots fought above Beijing, Shanghai, Nanjing, Wuhan and elsewhere as Japan sought unsuccessfully to subdue China. Sometimes IJN carrier air groups were sent temporarily to land bases. Both air forces suffered defeats and enjoyed victories. Losing ground, the Chinese shifted their capital westward and inland until establishing it at Chongqing in central China. By 1941, Japan held large portions of northern and coastal China but had been weakened by the battles for inland central China. In mid-September 1941, as the IJN began to focus on the possibility of a wider war in the Pacific, it turned over responsibility for the air war over China to the Imperial Japanese Army.[10] Continued resistance by China's National Revolutionary Army led to a war of attrition that tied down large numbers of Japanese troops until the end of World War II in 1945.[11]

United States vs. Japanese carrier aircraft

The design of Japanese carrier aircraft was consistent with their overall strategy of emphasizing the offense in order to win a short war before America's overwhelmingly superior production capacity could be brought to bear. Expecting to face a numerically superior fleet, Japan's strategy envisioned using aircraft to help neutralize this advantage by gradual attrition as the enemy USN fleet approached Japan. This required aircraft with extended ranges and striking power, which in turn meant having them be lighter and faster but with less protection.[12] Accordingly, Japan's Mitsubishi A6M Zero fighter, Nakajima B5N "Kate" torpedo bomber, and Aichi D3A "Val" dive bomber were all lightly-built with weight minimized by not providing cockpit armor to protect pilots or self-sealing fuel tanks to enable them to continue fighting after taking some hits. As a result of having greater range for its aircraft, the IJN would, during 1942, attack from 250 to 300 miles away compared to the USN that would only do so from 200 miles away.[13]

Fighters

At the time of the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, Japan had both the world's best fighter and best torpedo bomber. In addition, their aircraft were flown by the world's most extensively trained and experienced airmen,[14] in part due to their engagement since 1937 in the war in China. The A6M Zero was fast, highly maneuverable, and could out-turn and out-climb the USN Grumman F4F Wildcat. Also, when enemy planes were approaching for an attack, it was important for fighters to get off their decks and reach an advantageous altitude quickly. The Zero could climb at 3,000 ft/minute and the Wildcat only 2,300 ft/minute. Experienced Zero pilots were initially very successful against the lower performing Allied aircraft. Over the course of 1942, however, pilots in Wildcats developed aerial combat tactics such as the high-side pass and the Thach Weave. Exploiting these tactics coupled with greater aircraft survivability due to armor and self-sealing tanks, American pilots neutralized the Zero's advantages. Although better USN fighters were introduced later, the Wildcat served throughout the war. Over the course of 1942, Japan's substantial losses of her experienced pilots contributed to the American's gaining an upper hand in fighter combat.[15]

Torpedo bombers

The Nakajima B5N "Kate" torpedo bomber was superior to the obsolete USN Douglas TBD Devastator in speed, rate of climb, and range. Kate torpedoes contributed to sinking USN fleet carriers Lexington (battle of the Coral Sea), Yorktown (Midway), and Hornet (Santa Cruz Islands), all during 1942. Devastator torpedoes contributed to sinking the IJN carrier Shōhō at the Coral Sea, but Zero fighters slaughtered the Devastators at Midway where they attacked without fighter protection. Only six of the 41 Devastators launched returned to their carriers.[16] Though some closed to targets and launched torpedoes (the Mark 13 torpedo), the torpedoes ran deep or failed to explode

Dive bombers

The US had a superior dive bomber in the Douglas SBD-5 Dauntless compared to Japan's Aichi D3A2 "Val".[17] Benefitting from fortunate timing, bombs from the Dauntless sank all four of the Japanese carriers lost at Midway. Nonetheless, the "Vals" served throughout the war and sank more Allied warships than any other Axis aircraft. This included sinking HMS Hermes, the first carrier to be sunk by carrier aircraft.[18]

United Kingdom vs. German and Italian land-based aircraft

Fighters

When war broke out in 1939 in the Atlantic Theater, the RN had only recently reacquired responsibility for their carrier-launched aircraft. For the previous two decades, the Royal Air Force (RAF) had responsibility for all air operations, and development of improved carrier-launched aircraft had been neglected in favor of land-based fighters for the defence of UK and bombers for the offensive. As a result, the RN entered the war with mostly relatively slow, limited range biplane fighters and bombers that were that were inferior to USN and IJN carrier aircraft of the same age.[19] At the time of Britain's evacuation from Norway, her Gloster Sea Gladiator fighters, Fairey Swordfish torpedo bombers, and Blackburn Skua fighter-bombers were also inferior compared to the land-based German aircraft.[20] Nonetheless, the Sea Gladiators did succeed in shooting down a couple of Messerschmitt Bf 110 fighters during the Norwegian campaign in early 1940. Gladiators and Sea Gladiators did take part in the Battle of Britain that autumn, but it was the numerous land-based Supermarine Spitfires and Hawker Hurricanes and their pilots that provided the principal aerial defense for the UK. Sea Gladiators also assisted during the defense of Malta, where the few in operation shot down Italian aircraft. Gladiators were removed from front-line service around Britain by 1941. The more modern, monoplane Blackburn Roc was able to shoot down a Junkers Ju 88 fighter-bomber attacking a convoy in 1940. However, the Roc was no match for German Messerschmitt Bf 109 or Focke-Wulf Fw 190 fighters and could not even perform as well as Britain's own Blackburn Skua. Considered one of the worst fighters of the war, the Roc was, by late 1940, taken out of front line service and consigned to training, target towing, and rescue duties.[21] A more modern monoplane fighter, the Fairey Fulmar, was introduced in 1940 to replace the obsolete Sea Gladiator. It was a two-seat design and was large and less nimble than the Axis fighters it opposed. Nonetheless, while protecting convoys to Malta, Fulmars shot down ten Italian bombers and six Axis fighters. During the war, they provided air cover for the raids on Taranto and Petsamo, protected convoys to Russia, and supported invasions of French North Africa and Italy. Fulmars shadowed the German battleship Bismarck enabling Fairey Swordfish torpedo bombers to catch up with her.[22] The UK upgraded their naval fighter squadrons in 1941 by adapting the highly successful, land-based Hawker Hurricane to carrier use. The Hawker Sea Hurricane performed well while protecting the Malta convoys and, operating from escort carriers, many Atlantic convoys.

Dive bombers

The monoplane Blackburn Skua two-man fighter-dive bomber was introduced in late 1938. It sank the German cruiser Königsberg during the German invasion of Norway; the first major warship sunk by a dive bomber in combat. Skuas provided air cover during the Dunkirk evacuation and served in the Mediterranean. Like the Roc, however, they fared poorly against the higher performance land-based Messerschmitt Bf 109, and were withdrawn from front line service during 1941.

Torpedo bombers

The biplane Fairey Swordfish torpedo bomber, affectionately referred to as "Stringbag" by her aircrews, was introduced in 1936. It was an archaic-looking biplane with cloth-covered wings, open cockpit and fixed landing gear. It had been designed as a torpedo-spotter-reconnaissance aircraft and emerged as the standard naval attack aircraft serving as both a dive-bomber and torpedo bomber.[23] In the first airborne torpedo attack of the war, Swordfish damaged a German destroyer at Trondheim. Later, Swordfish crippled the French battleship Dunkerque during the Attack on Mers-el-Kébir, disabled three Italian battleships during the Battle of Taranto and attacked the German battleship Bismarck through gale-force storms in the Atlantic, ultimately landing the torpedo that doomed her. Swordfish dropped depth charges and laid mines as well as well. The Fairey Albacore was introduced in 1940 to replace the Swordfish. Both were replaced in the front line by the Barracuda, but the Swordfish was retained to serve in anti-submarine and bombardment spotting assignments throughout the war. In the final accounting, the Swordfish destroyed more tonnage of Axis shipping than any other Allied aircraft.[24]

Later introductions (1942-1943)

Over the course of the war, new aircraft introductions tended to be heavier with more powerful engines.[25] They had greater speed, a faster rate of climb, and greater range than their predecessors. In 1944, the IJN would initiate an attack from 350 to 400 miles, 100 miles further away than in 1942. The RN would send out its Swordfish from 250 to about 300 and the USN from 250 miles out.[26] However, aircraft "wing loading", the mass of the aircraft divided by the surface area of its wing, also tended to increase, suggesting poorer maneuverability for these larger planes.

United States aircraft

Fighters

The Vought F4U Corsair fighter-bomber introduced in 1942 had almost twice the horsepower of the Wildcat, was faster, had greater range, faster rate of climb, and was capable of carrying a 4,000 lb total load of bombs and High Velocity Aircraft Rockets. It was judged to be relatively difficult to land on a carrier, however, and was initially released by the USN only for use by land-based Marine units. The Grumman F6F Hellcat fighter-bomber introduced in 1943 was also faster than the Wildcat, had greater range, a rate of climb comparable to the IJN Zero, and was capable of carrying a 4,000 lb total load of bombs, torpedoes, and rockets. Both the Corsair and the Hellcat aircraft were faster than the Zero and, having armor protection and self-sealing fuel tanks, could take much more punishment. With the Corsair initially relegated to land-based use, the Hellcat became the mainstay of the USN Fast Carrier Task Groups of 1944–45.[27] She was the most successful fighter of the war, with her pilots shooting down over 5,000 enemy aircraft at a 19:1 ratio of victories to losses.[28] The Corsair was deployed for USN carrier squadrons after the British refined the aircraft and landing procedures for it.

Torpedo bombers.

After their devastating torpedo bomber losses at Midway, the USN quickly replaced the Devastator with the faster Grumman TBF Avenger. It also had twice the range of the Devastator, in part because the Avenger's torpedo was carried inside the plane, reducing drag.[29] Like the Devastator, it had attacked the Japanese fleet at Midway without fighter protection, and only one of the six attacking planes returned to its base at Naval Air Station on Midway. The Avenger ultimately became the most effective and widely used torpedo bomber of the war and functioned even more often as a level bomber than as a torpedo bomber. Avengers operated from both fleet carriers and escort carriers and were highly effective submarine killers in both the Atlantic and Pacific theaters. They shared credit for sinking the Japanese super-battleships IJN Yamato and Musashi.

Dive bombers

The Curtiss SB2C Helldiver dive bomber introduced in 1942 was faster than the Dauntless but regarded as difficult to handle. Making necessary improvements delayed its first use in combat until late 1943. By this time, the Allies were moving away from an aircraft type dedicated to dive bombing. Air-to-ground rockets had been introduced that offered accuracy that formerly had been the primary advantage of the dive bomber over level bombers. Such rockets could be fired from the other types of carrier aircraft and were ultimately carried by Hellcat fighters, Corsair fighter-bombers, and Avenger and Swordfish torpedo bombers as well as Helldiver dive bombers. Nonetheless, the Helldiver became widely used and participated in battles over the Marianas, Philippines, Formosa, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa and sank more tonnage of Japanese shipping than any other aircraft during the war.[30] It shared credit with Avengers for sinking IJN Yamato and Musashi.

United Kingdom aircraft

Fighters

In 1942, the British introduced another naval fighter by adapting a highly successful land-based aircraft, the Spitfire, to carrier use. The Supermarine Seafire was faster than its predecessors and began replacing Hawker Sea Hurricanes for front-line service. In light wind, however, it was subject to crash landings. Also having its engine-cooling air inlets on the underside of the fuselage made ditching more dangerous for the pilot, as was also the case with the Hurricane.[31] The Seafire's range was limited, but could be extended using drop tanks. Seafires supported the Allied invasions of North Africa, Sicily, mainland Italy, and southern France. Temporarily assigned to land bases, they also supported the invasion of Normandy. In the Pacific as part of the British Pacific Fleet, Seafires were used for CAP. Overall, the adaptations of land aircraft had inferior performance to purpose-built carrier aircraft. Introduced late in the war, the Fairey Firefly was superior in performance and firepower to its predecessor, the Fairey Fulmer. It was conceived as early as 1938, but prolonged development delayed its combat use until mid-1944, by which time its performance had been eclipsed by both Axis and Allied fighters. The Firely was used for ground attack, reconnaissance and anti-submarine as well as a fighter aircraft. The Firefly participated in operations against the German battleship Tirpitz in Norway in July 1944. During operations against the Japanese oil refineries at Sumatra in early 1945, a Firefly shot down a Nakajima Ki-43 (“Oscar”) fighter. Fireflies also supported carrier-based actions against Japanese shipping and against positions in the Caroline and Japanese home islands. Less than 800 were produced during the war years.

Bombers

The Fairey Barracuda torpedo bomber/dive bomber was introduced in early 1943 and was the only RN aircraft designed to withstand the stresses of dive bombing since the retirement of the Skua.

As the war progressed, the RN increasingly used US-made, purpose-built Hellcats, Corsairs, and Avengers for carrier operations in both the Atlantic and Pacific theaters.[32]

Japanese aircraft

Fighters

The Zero was among the world's best fighters at the time of the raid on Pearl Harbor. It was little improved over the war, while the Allies introduced more powerful planes with better protection.[33] Over time, the Zero lost its competitive advantage due to development by the Allies of more capable aircraft as well as improved tactics. The IJN introduced a land-based fighter, the Kawanishi N1K1-J, in 1944 that had the power, maneuverability, and ruggedness to compete with the late-war Allied fighters.An improved version of the carrier-launched Zero, the Mitsubishi A6M6, included self-sealing fuel tanks, armor plate protection for the pilot, and a more powerful engine, but the additions made it heavier and less nimble. Only one prototype was built before the war ended. With its diminished value as a competitive fighter, the Zero became the first aircraft to be used as a kamikaze special attack plane[34] and was used more than any other aircraft for this purpose.[35] [36]

Torpedo bombers

The Nakajima B6N "Jill" torpedo bomber incorporated considerable improvements over the Nakajima B5N "Kate" in speed and range but its introduction was delayed by development and production problems. By the time the Jill was introduced, the Allied thrust up the Solomon Islands caused IJN leadership, in late 1943, to transfer many carrier aircraft from their first line carriers to land-based service out of Rabaul.[37] With the Allies having firmly established air superiority in the area, only a fraction of these planes made it back to their carriers two weeks later. In the following year, carrier-based Jills suffered huge losses at the Battle of the Philippine Sea in mid-1944. With so few IJN carriers remaining afloat after the Battle of Leyte Gulf, the Jills became mostly land-based and by early 1945 were in use as kamikazes.

Dive bombers

IJN plans to upgrade carrier bombers were also frustrated by development and production delays. The Yokosuka D4Y3 "Judy" dive bomber was introduced in mid-1942 and intended to replace the slower "Val" by the end of that year, but the Val was kept in service until 1944.[38] The Judy could outrun the USN Wildcat but, by the time the Judy came into wide use, the even faster USN Hellcat had been introduced. Many Judys were among the several hundred IJN planes lost during the Battle of the Philippine Sea. Nonetheless, it was bombs from a Judy, then operating from a land-base in the Philippines, that sank the light carrier USN Princeton during the Battle of Leyte Gulf in October 1944.[39] A bomb from another Judy almost sank USN Franklin in March 1945.[40]

Kamikaze special attack aircraft

Japanese use of "kamikaze" suicide aircraft began at the Leyte Gulf battle, and the D4Y3 "Judy" served in that role, damaging several Allied fleet and escort carriers. As the Allies approached Japan in early 1945, the IJN introduced the Yokosuka D4Y4, specifically for use as a kamikaze. Operating from land-bases, this version caused damage to several Allied carriers. By the end of the war, all six of the monoplane IJN carrier aircraft models used extensively during the war had also been engaged as kamikazes. Non-kamikaze aircraft models continued in use, often providing escort protection for kamikazes en route to enemy fleets.

Notes and References

  1. Web site: World War 2 Aircraft (1939-1945) . . Military Factory . 2020. 15 Nov 2020.
  2. Web site: WW2 Navy Aircraft (1939-1945) . . 2020 . Military Factory . 15 Nov 2020.
  3. Web site: WW2 Navy Fighter Aircraft (1939-1945). . 2020 . Military Factory . 15 Nov 2020.
  4. Web site: WW2 Navy Bomber Aircraft (1939-1945) . . 2020. Military Factory . 15 Nov 2020.
  5. Web site: Cannon or Machine Gun?- The Second World War Aircraft Gun Controversy . Williams . Anthony G . 16 Apr 2010 . The Spitfire Site . Martin Waligorski . 3 Dec 2020 . 12 January 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170112173743/http://spitfiresite.com/2010/04/cannon-or-machine-gun-the-second-world-war-aircraft-gun-controversy.html . dead .
  6. Web site: Fighter Armour . Gustin . Emmanuel . 1999 . The WWII Fighter Gun Debate . 2 Dec 2020 .
  7. Book: Hata . Ikuhiko . Izawa . Yashuho . Shores . Christopher . 2011 . Japanese Naval Air Force Fighter Units And Their Aces 1932-1945 . London, England . Grub Street. 2–3 . 9781906502843 .
  8. Hata, p. 5
  9. Web site: Gao Zhihang . Chen . C. Peter . 2015 . World War II Database . Peter Chen . 11 December 2020.
  10. Hata, p. 6-13
  11. Pike, p. 80-88
  12. Book: Bresnahan, Jim . 2011 . Refighting the Pacific War- An Alternative History of World War II . Annapolis, MD . Naval Institute Press . 4–11 . 978-1-59114-079-5 .
  13. Book: Celander, Lars . 2018 . How Carriers Fought- Carrier Operations in World War II. USA . Casemate Publishers . 71 . 978-1-61200-621-5.
  14. Book: Parshall . Jonathan . Tully . Anthony . 2005 . Shattered Sword . USA . Potomac Books. 419.
  15. Book: Celander, Lars . 2018 . How Carriers Fought . USA & Great Britain . Casemate Publishers . 47–48 . 978-1-61200-621-5 .
  16. Book: Wouk, Herman . 1978 . War and Remembrance . U.S.A. . Pocket Books, Simon & Schuster . 409–12 . 0-671-81638-1 .
  17. Book: Pike, Francis. 2019. Hirohito's War- The Pacific War 1941-1945. London. Bloomsbury Academic. 393–95. 978-1-4725-9671-0.
  18. Web site: Aichi D3A Val . . Virtual Aircraft Museum . 21 Nov 2020.
  19. Book: Mawdsley, Evan . 2019 . The War For The Seas- A Maritime History of World War II . London . Yale University Press . 477 . 978-0-300-19019-9 .
  20. Book: Symonds, Craig L. . 2018 . World War II At Sea- A global History. New York, NY . Oxford University Press . 54 . 9780190243678.
  21. Web site: The Blackburn Roc; A Terrible Fighter but a Good Idea? . Nash . Ed . 22 Jan 2020 . Military Matters . 21 Nov 2020.
  22. Web site: Fairey Fulmar (N1854) . . Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm Museum . 5 Dec 2020.
  23. Symonds, WWII At Sea, p.84
  24. Book: Stott, Ian G . The Fairey Swordfish Mks. I-IV . Aircraft in Profile No. 212 . Windsor . Profile Publications . 1971 . 21.
  25. Web site: The Aircraft Engines of World War II . Culy . Doug. 28 September 2016 . Defense Media Network . Faircount Media Group. . 3 Dec 2020.
  26. Celander, p. 71
  27. Celander, p. 45
  28. Web site: Grumman F6F Hellcat . . 29 May 2019 . Military Factory . 14 December 2020.
  29. Celander, p. 44
  30. Web site: Curtiss SB2C Helldiver . . 5 Apr 2019 . Military Factory . 11 Dec 2019.
  31. Celander, p. 49
  32. Web site: Naval Aviation Development in World War II–U.S. Navy Versus Royal Navy Experience . Lockhart. Lt. Col. Stuart R. . 31 July 2018 . The Sextant . History and Heritage Command . 22 Nov 2020.
  33. Web site: Most Famous Japanese Plane of WWII – 15 Facts About the Mitsubishi Zero . Knighton. Andrew. 7 September 2008 . War History Online . 23 November 2020.
  34. Knighton
  35. Web site: A6M Zero. Chen. Peter . 2010 . World War II Database . Peter Chen . 5 Nov 2020.
  36. Web site: MITSUBISHI A6M2 ZERO . . 4 Feb 2011. Museum of the USAF . https://web.archive.org/web/20120113033903/http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=471 . 14 Nov 2020. 2012-01-13 .
  37. Web site: Operation Ro . Chant. Christopher . Codenames- Operations of World War 2 . 22 Nov 2020.
  38. Celander, p. 47
  39. Web site: USS Princeton (CVL-23) . . National Museum of the U.S. Navy . Naval History and Heritage Command . 22 November 2020.
  40. Web site: USS Franklin: Struck by a Japanese Dive Bomber During World War II . Lippman. David H. Historynet. 1995. 22 November 2020.