Carl von Rokitansky explained

Baron Carl von Rokitansky
Birth Date:19 February 1804
Birth Place:Hradec Králové (Königgrätz), Bohemia, Habsburg monarchy
Death Place:Vienna, Austria-Hungary
Field:Physician
pathologist
Alma Mater:University of Vienna

Baron Carl von Rokitansky (German: Carl Freiherr von Rokitansky, Czech: Karel Rokytanský; 19 February 1804 – 23 July 1878) was an Austrian physician, pathologist, humanist philosopher and liberal politician, founder of the Viennese School of Medicine of the 19th century.[1] He was the founder of science-based diagnostics.[2] [3]

Early life

Carl Joseph Wenzel Prokop Rokitansky, usually known as Carl Rokitansky, was born in Hradec Králové (German: Königgrätz), in the Kingdom of Bohemia, then part of the Habsburg monarchy and an imperial state of the Holy Roman Empire. His father Prokop Rokitansky (1771–1813) was a civil servant in Leitmeritz. His mother Theresia (1772–1827) was the daughter of Václav Lodgman Ritter von Auen, the first regional commissioner of Hradec Králové. Carl was the eldest of four children (Prokop, Marie, Theresie).Due to the early death of his father († 1812), Carl and his siblings grew up in straitened circumstances. Despite this, his mother made sure that he attended grammar school in Hradec Králové and made it possible for him to study at the Charles University in Prague. Rokitansky described his upbringing as very liberal.[4] Rokitansky remembered his father, as having been very widely read and erudite.[5] For this reason, Rokitansky originally intended to study classical philology at the University of Prague.

University studies

Rokitansky began university in 1818 with the obligatory philosophical propaedeutics. Some of his classes were taught by the philosopher Bernardo Bolzano (1771–1848), who was to have a lasting influence on his political and social ideas.[6] However, in 1821 he decided to study medicine in Prague. In 1824 he moved to Vienna to live with his uncle Lodgman von Auen and to continue his medical studies at the University of Vienna. In 1827 he began his research at the Pathological-Anatomical Prosecture at the Vienna General Hospital. His first complete autopsy report is dated 23 October 1827.[7] He obtained his doctorate in medicine from the University of Vienna on 6 March 1828. His doctoral thesis was entitled "De Varioloide Vaccinica",[8] and was a study of the smallpox vaccination, as he had very early on developed an interest in serology.

Medical career

From 3 January 1827 onwards Rokitansky began working at the Pathological-Anatomical Prosecture as an unpaid assistant, as can be seen from some of his early autopsy protocols.[9] 1832 he was appointed interim director of the Pathological-Anatomical Prosecture and in 1834 became Extraordinary Professor for Pathological Anatomy at the University of Vienna and Curator of the Pathological-Anatomical Museum.

First chair for pathological anatomy in the German-speaking world:

In 1844 he was appointed to the first chair for pathological anatomy in the German-speaking world and in the years 1849/50, 1856/57, 1859/60, and 1862/63 served as Dean of the Medical Faculty. In 1852/53 academic year he was the first freely-elected rector of the University of Vienna.[10]

Pathologist

New Viennese School:

The 1830s saw the emergence of the New Viennese School that was based on the new scientific methods established by Carl Rokitansky. In the 20th century, this became known as the Second Viennese School of Medicine. Other well-known proponents besides Rokitansky were the clinician Josef Škoda and the dermatologist Ferdinand Ritter von Hebra. However, contemporary students such as Sigmund Freud described themselves until well into the 20th century as students of the New Viennese School and regarded Rokitansky as a father figure,[11] calling him "Vater Roki". The New Viennese School sought to introduce a new system of science-based medicine. Until then, pathology had been a purely descriptive science and while contemporary pathologists such as Gabriel Andral and Jean Frédéric Lobstein compiled autopsy reports containing descriptions of illnesses they did not make any diagnoses. They believed that the origins of an illness were to be found in the "dynamic moment", an imbalance of the four humours as postulated by Hippocrates.

For Rokitansky, however, such an approach no longer sufficed; he wanted to find explanations, to reach science-based diagnoses. One of his first autopsies that he performed as a young man together with his superior Johann Wagner (1799–1832) was that of Ludwig van Beethoven. In this autopsy the question of the composer's deafness was of particular interest and the pathologists did far more than produce the customary description as they sought to find an explanation for Beethoven's deafness in anatomical changes. This was to have a lasting impression on Rokitansky's approach to research, which was driven by a desire to explain the origins of illness with the help of anatomy,[12] an intellectual approach that had first been initiated by the Italian pathologist Giovanni Battista Morgagni in the 18th century. Rokitansky's approach differed from that of his contemporaries as he no longer looked for the "dynamic moment", but for the "anatomical seat" of the illness.[13] The inscription on the Pathological-Anatomical Institute subsequently erected in Spitalgasse in the ninth district of Vienna therefore reads: "Indagandis sedibus et causis morborum" (Der Erforschung des Sitzes und der Ursachen der Erkrankungen).[14]

Diagnostics:

Rokitansky developed pathology from a descriptive discipline into an explanatory science. Over the course of his life he performed almost 60,000 autopsies in which he compared the patients' medical history and clinical symptoms with their autopsy protocols. He recognised that physicians named illnesses after the most conspicuous external symptom without considering the underlying internal disease of the organs (e.g. diagnosing jaundice in patients who presented with yellowish skin with no thought given to the underlying liver disease). It became clear to him that these symptomata, (which in Greek means coincidences) are not coincidences but in fact external indications of a pathological change to an internal organ.In close collaboration with the internist Joseph Škoda he made clear the relationships between clinical symptoms that can be seen, felt or heard and pathological changes to organs, i.e. clinico-pathological correlation. Thus it was now possible for the first time to make scientifically sound diagnoses. Rokitansky thus initiated a paradigm shift from speculative, natural-philosophical medicine to systematic, science-based medicine. By classifying illnesses according to their stage of progression, it became possible to diagnose how far a pathological condition had advanced and to deliver a prognosis. From the 1830s onwards medical students and physicians from all over the world came to Vienna to learn about Rokitansky's diagnostic methods and nosology, which soon became known internationally as the Young or New Viennese School.[15] [16] The systematic investigation of each individual organ led to the development in Vienna of new clinical disciplines. Rokitansky also supported this development in his role as a medical advisor to the Minister of the Interior as well as the establishment of the world's first clinic for otology. As a pathologist and philosopher, Rokitansky thought about patients holistically and was vehement in his demands that patients with psychological disorders, back then called "lunatics" also had the right to a diagnosis, treatment and healing. He therefore demanded the establishment of the first University Clinic of Psychiatry in Austria. In his application, he wrote that the clinic should be headed by Theodor Meynert. The importance subsequently given to the psyche paved the way not only for Sigmund Freud, psychology and psychoanalysis, according to Eric Kandel it also influenced modernist art which turned its gaze below the surface appearance of things and placed the depiction of its models' emotions in the foreground.[17]

Manual of Pathological Anatomy:

Rokitansky documented the results of his research in his three-volume Handbuch der pathologischen Anatomie published in 1842–46 by Braumüller & Seidel. He systematically described pathological changes to each and every organ and explained how to arrive at a diagnosis on the basis of the respective symptoms. The third edition (1855–1861) contains woodcut prints of his hand-drawn sketches of his histopathological specimens at 550-times magnification.[18] An order of the Emperor in 1846 made it compulsory for all medical students in the Habsburg Monarchy to study Rokitansky's manual. In response to the stream of physicians and students from abroad who came to Austria to study Rokitansky's methods, the manual was translated into a number of languages to worldwide acclaim. It was published in countries including

Rokitansky's Doctrine of Crases and Dyscrases as the Groundwork for Modern Humoral Pathology:

Ancient humoral pathology based on the theory of the four humours espoused by Hippocrates was concerned with the balance of the four bodily fluids, blood, yellow bile, black bile and phlegm and considered that illness was the result of an imbalance of these fluids. Nowadays, humoral pathology is an integral aspect of the humoral immune response,i.e. antibody-mediated immunity. Humoral factors in the blood stream participate in the body's immunological response to ward off infection. Rokitansky's doctrine of crases and dyscrases laid the groundwork for modern humoral pathology.[26] As mentioned above, Rokitansky developed an interest in serology even as a student. In his subsequent pathological investigations, he analysed blood, blood plasma, blood serum, secretion, excretions, lymphs and exsudates. In his doctrine of crases and dyscrases he described illnesses of the protein, nowadays also known as paraproteinemia, amyloid and immune deficiencies, as well as illnesses of the fibrin, i.e. coagulopathies. He also analysed the influence of proteins on inflammation and the effect of diseased blood components (dyscrases) on human tissue.[27] In this regard, his ideas were far ahead of those of his contemporaries, which resulted in fierce academic debates. The physician Gustav Zimmermann (1817–1866) concurred with Rokitansky and wrote in his text book that Rokitansky's studies on blood "were like an electric shock for all those who were driven by a zeal to uncover the secrets of the pathological processes themselves".[28] However, the physiologist and chemist Carl Gotthelf Lehmann (1812–1863) described the doctrine of crases and dyscrases as a "monstrosity" of pathological anatomy.[29] The 25-year-old physician Rudolf Virchow (1821– 1902), who later became a renowned cellular phathologist, accused Rokitansky of having fallen back into an outdated doctrine of humoral pathology,[30] calling the illnesses of proteins and fibrin "grave ontological errors"[31] and Rokitansky's Manual a danger to medicine.[32] In response to the controversy, Rokitansky withdrew those aspects of his visionary humoral pathological views which could not yet be scientifically proven. However, this did not mean that he disavowed his theory and thus he petitioned for the establishment of two new faculties in Vienna, the Institute of Medical Chemistry and the Department for General and Experimental Pathology, to press ahead with research in these fields.[33] Virchow's criticism was not just scientifically motivated: At the time, Virchow was a young protegé of the influential privy councillor Joseph Hermann Schmidt (1804–1852) at the Ministry of Culture in Berlin. He had sent Virchow to Vienna to develop strategies to ensure the success of the Berlin Medical School on the Austrian model.[34] Schmidt was discontented with the situation in Prussia, complaining that "it is unbearable that we are outstripped by the Viennese.".[35] In December 1846, after staying just 10 days in Vienna, Virchow presented the Minister of Education Friedrich Eichhorn (1779–1856) with a programme on pathological anatomy. In his report Virchow criticised several respected Austrian scientists, but focused chiefly on Rokitansky as the founder of the New Viennese School.[36] He hoped that this would lead to his rapid advancement to a position of associate professor – a hope that was not disappointed. As early as February 1847, Virchow's application for early habilitation was approved by the Prussian Minister of Education. This was highly unusual, as physicians were ordinarily required to demonstrate three years of medical practice before they could submit this application. The Prussian government, however, credited Virchow with having shaken one of the "pillars" of the Viennese School. Virchow had thus served both the interests of the Prussian educational bureaucracy and his own career.[37]

Political career

The old prosecture also played an important role in the March Revolution of 1848. What became known as the "Doctors' Revolution" was prepared by 40 physicians in Rokitansky's pathology department, as this was not under police surveillance even during the Metternich era.[38] Due to Rokitansky's liberal attitudes, the construction of a new building was repeatedly delayed by the government. Thus he spent 35 years working in the old building which he described as being in such a state that it would "cause lasting harm to even the most robust health". In his legendary address "Freedom for Natural Science!" delivered at the inauguration of the new Pathological Anatomical Institute in 1862, Rokitansky demanded that science should be free from political interference.

By virtue of the key positions he held in various academic and political bodies, Rokitansky also had a significant influence on Liberalism in Austria. In 1863, Rokitansky was appointed by Anton von Schmerling as medical adviser to the Ministry of the Interior. In this capacity, he had great influence on university organisation, the content of medical teaching and appointments. In his pamphlet "Zeitfragen betreffend die Universität …" (1863) he addressed among other things, freedom of teaching and learning and demanded modern, interdisciplinary teaching. In "Die Conformität der Universitäten ..." (1863) he called for equality of opportunity for all students in the Habsburg Monarchy. He demanded that all universities should teach all disciplines and that examinations should be standardised. In response to his urging, the school for barber-surgeons in Graz and Innsbruck became medical faculties in 1863 and 1869, thus becoming fully-fledged universities. Moreover, he advocated opening the University of Vienna to students from the crownlands in the east and did his best to counter the emerging strains of nationalism.

On 25 November 1867, Rokitansky was "unexpectedly and unpreparedly" appointed for life to the upper chamber of the Reichsrat by Emperor Franz Joseph I. As the main speaker for the Liberal Party in the chamber, Rokitansky demanded in 1868 that each confession with the resources to do so should have the right to open schools for its children.

In his endeavours to advance "freedom and progress", he contributed significantly to university reform and to improving the healthcare system.

Under his presidency (1850–1878) the College of Physicians in Vienna campaigned for the construction of the pipelines that would bring fresh water from the mountains to Vienna. On 17 July 1848, Rokitansky became a Full Member of the Imperial Academy of Sciences, where on 26 June 1851 he gave his lecture Ueber einige der wichtigsten Krankheiten der Arterien, one of the first occasions on which arteriosclerosis was discussed in public.[32] In 1866 he became vice-president, and from 1869 to 1878 served as President of the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Vienna, which he described as the "greatest honour that I enjoy". From 1870 Rokitansky served as first President of the Supreme Sanitary Council and as president of the newly founded Anthropological Society in Vienna.

Philosophical career

Although Rokitansky defended the "materialistic method" in scientific research, he rejected materialism as a philosophical world view. In his commemorative speech on the occasion of the opening of the Institute of Pathological Anatomy at the General Hospital of Vienna, he warned against the abuse of "natural science liberties". Scientists should first regard humans as "conscious and free-willing subjects" and only then follow their urge toward knowledge. The feeling of humanity would be lost if physicians regarded human beings purely as research objects. Thus Rokitansky brought up for the first time the question of ethics in medicine. In another speech about the "solidarity of all animal life", delivered at the Imperial Academy of Sciences, Rokitansky showed his proximity to Arthur Schopenhauer's writings on compassion: "if we [... ] preserve and practice compassion", he explained "we are able to alleviate part of the load of suffering" of patients. Human generosity will be shown by our capability to accept the greatest sufferings by voluntarily renouncing aggression. Those who succeed in this should be our greatest ethical role models."

He was elected as a member of the American Philosophical Society in 1862.[39]

In 1845, he was elected a foreign member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. On 17 July 1848 Rokitansky was elected as an effective member of the Imperial Academy of Sciences. In 1866, he became its vice-president and from 1869 until his death in Vienna, Austria-Hungary, on 23 July 1878, its president. Rokitansky felt that this "was the largest honour which I could enjoy".

Family

In 1834 Rokitansky married the internationally recognized concert singer Marie Weis (1806–1888). She was a student of Antonio Salieri (1770–1825), who gave her free singing lessons because of her special talent.[40] She sang with Franz Schubert and Franz Liszt,[41] She taught her two eldest sons,

The two younger sons studied medicine.

Memberships of international learned societies and honors

Rokitansky became Member of:[45]

Corresponding Member of:

Honorary member of:[48]

Honours:[49]

Honorary Diplomas of the:

Contributions

Rokitansky's name is associated with the following diseases/morphologic features of disease:

he first described about endometriosis in 1860

Rokitansky also developed a method of autopsy which consisted mainly of in situ dissection. Rokitansky is said "to have supervised 70,000 autopsies, and personally performed over 30,000, averaging two a day, seven days a week, for 45 years".[50]

Published works

His published works include:

In popular culture

The main character in the film series Mad Max, Max Rockatansky, is named after Carl von Rokitansky. The reason for this bizarre connection is the fact that the director of this film series, George Miller, studied medicine and also made a living as doctor at the time when he was raising funds for his first movie - Mad Max.[51]

Notes

Footnotes

Citations

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Helmut Rumpler, Helmut Denk (Hrsg.), Christine Ottner (Redaktion): Carl Freiherr von Rokitansky 1804–1878. Pathologe, Politiker, Philosoph, Gründer der Wiener Medizinischen Schule des 19. Jahrhunderts. Wien, Böhlau 2005, ISBN 3-205-77205-9.
  2. Österreichisches Biographisches Lexikon und biographische Dokumentation: Rokitansky, Carl Frh. von. 2003, accessed 3 April 2021.
  3. Web site: Rokitansky, Carl FRH. Von . 2003 .
  4. Carl Rokitansky: Carl von Rokitansky. Selbstbiographie und Antrittsrede-. Erna Lesky, 1960, p 47.
  5. Carl Rokitansky: Carl von Rokitansky. Selbstbiographie und Antrittsrede-. Erna Lesky, 1960, p 47.
  6. Felicitas Seebacher: "Freiheit der Naturforschung!" Carl Freiherr von Rokitansky und die Wiener medizinische Schule. Wissenschaft und Politik im Konflikt. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften [ÖAW], Wien 2006, p 47.
  7. Helmut Rumpler, Helmut Denk, Christine Ottner: Carl Freiherr von Rokitansky 1804–1878. Pathologe, Politiker, Philosoph, Gründer der Wiener Medizinischen Schule des 19. Jahrhunderts. Wien, Böhlau 2005, p 9. ISBN 3-205-77205-9.
  8. Carl Rokitansky: Dissertation; De Varioloide Vaccinica. Wien 1828.
  9. Kletter G. Hic locus est ubi mors gaudet succurrere vitae, Die Geschichte der Entwicklung der pathologischen Anatomie im 19. Jahrhundert. p 21. unpublished manuscript Narrenturm, Naturhistorisches Museum Wien.
  10. Österreichisches Biographisches Lexikon und biographische Dokumentation: Rokitansky, Carl Frh. von. 2003, retrieved 3 April 2021.
  11. Werner Hanak-Lettner: Die Universität. Eine Kampfzone. Hrsg.: Werner Hanak-Lettner im Auftrag des Jüdischesn Museums Wien. Picus, Wien 2015, ISBN 978-3-7117-2031-3, S. 54.
  12. Ursula Rokitansky-Tilscher: Beethoven's influence on Rokitansky's methodology. Retrieved 3 April 2021.
  13. Carl von Rokitansky: Handbuch der pathologischen Anatomie. Band 1. Braumüller & Seidel, Wien 1846, S. 1–2 (google.at [accsessed 3 April 2021]).
  14. Strukturen und Netzwerke. 3 December 2018, doi:10.14220/9783737009164 (vr-elibrary.de [retrieved 3 April 2021]).
  15. Österreichisches Biographisches Lexikon und biographische Dokumentation: Rokitansky, Carl Frh. von. 2003, accessed 3 April 2021.
  16. Web site: Rokitansky, Carl FRH. Von . 2003 .
  17. Eric Kandel: The age of insight. Random House. New York 2013, p 27.
  18. Pathologisch-anatomische Sammlung im Narrenturm, MN 11.931, Naturhistorisches Museum Wien. Eigenhändige anatomische Zeichnungen von Carl Rokitansky.
  19. Book: Руководство к патологической анатомии - Рокитанский Карл . 1844 . ru.
  20. Web site: A treatise on pathological anatomy. Part I, The abnormal conditions of the organs of respiration - Digital Collections - National Library of Medicine . 2023-11-30 . collections.nlm.nih.gov.
  21. Web site: A treatise on pathological anatomy. Part I, The abnormal conditions of the organs of respiration - Digital Collections - National Library of Medicine . 2023-11-30 . collections.nlm.nih.gov.
  22. Book: Rokitansky, C. . Handboek der bijzondere ziektekundige ontleedkunde . Moleschott . J. . 1846–1849 . Erven F. Bohn . Dutch.
  23. Carl Rokitansky, translated by William Edward Swaine, Edward H Sieveking, Charles Hewitt Moore, George Edward Day: A manual of pathological anatomy. Printed for the Sydenham Society, London 1849 https://www.worldcat.org/title/manual-of-pathological-anatomy/oclc/659502669
  24. Book: Rokitansky, Carl Freiherr von . Trattato completo di anatomia patologica ; Prima traduzione italiana per cura di Ricchetti e Fano con annotazioni ed aggiunte . 1852 . Tipi del Giornale "Lombardo- Veneto" . it.
  25. A Manual of Pathological Anatomy. Philadelphia: Blanchard & Lea 1855 https://www.worldcat.org/title/manual-of-pathological-anatomy/oclc/5582622 accessed 4 April 2021
  26. Das Handbuch der pathologischen Anatomie und seine Auswirkung auf Carl Freiherr von Rokitanskys internationale Verbindungen. In: Angetter et al. (Hrsg.): Strukturen und Netzwerke, Medizin und Wissenschaft in Wien 1848–1955. 650 Jahre Universität Wien – Aufbruch ins neue Jahrhundert. Band 5. V&R unipress, Wien 2018, S. 805–812.
  27. Carl Rokitansky: Handbuch der Pathologischen Anatomie. 1. Auflage. Band 1. Braumüller, Wien 1946, S. 134, 139, 145,148, 195, 497, 500, 530.
  28. Gustav Zimmermann: Ueber die Analyse des Blutes und die pathologischen Krasenlehren, nebst Beiträgen zur Physiologie der dyskrasischen Processe. G. Reimer, G. Reimer 1847, S. 170–171.
  29. Carl Gotthelf Lehmann: Lehrbuch der physiologischen Chemie. Engelmann, Berlin 1853, S. 175.
  30. Rudolf Virchow: Rokitansky. Handbuch der allgemeinen pathologischen Anatomie. In: Medizinische Zeitung Berlin. Band 15, Nr. 49, 50. Berlin 1846, p 237–238, 238; 243–244.
  31. L. J. Rather: A Commentary on the Medical Writings of Rudolf Virchow: Based on Schwalbe's Virchow-Bibliographie, 1843-1901. Norman Publishing, 1990, ISBN 978-0-930405-19-9, S. 7 (google.at [retrieved 18 April 2021]).
  32. Rudolf Virchow: Rokitansky. Handbuch der allgemeinen pathologischen Anatomie. In: Medizinische Zeitung Berlin. Band 15, Nr. 49, 50. Berlin 1846, p 244.
  33. Meinrad Peterlik, "Indagandis sedibus et causis morborum" – die Entwicklung der Pathophysiologie als Desiderat Rokitanskys, in: Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 154 (2004) 19/20, 467–471.
  34. Constantin Goschler: Rudolf Virchow: Mediziner – Anthropologe – Politiker. Böhlau, Köln–Wien 2009, S. 56.
  35. Rudolf Virchow: Brief an seinen Vater, Charité, 25. Mai 1846. In: Marie Rabl (Hrsg.): Rudolf Virchow, Briefe an seine Eltern 1839 bis 1864. Engelmann, Leipzig 1907, p 109–113, 110.
  36. Felicitas Seebacher: "Freiheit der Naturforschung!" Carl Freiherr von Rokitansky und die Wiener medizinische Schule. Wissenschaft und Politik im Konflikt. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften [ÖAW], Wien 2006, p 47.
  37. Constantin Goschler: Rudolf Virchow: Mediziner – Anthropologe – Politiker. Böhlau, Köln–Wien 2009, S. 56.
  38. Isidor Fischer: Wiens Mediziner und die Freiheitsbewegung des Jahres 1848. Ars Medici, Wien 1935, p 8.
  39. Web site: APS Member History. 2021-04-20. search.amphilsoc.org.
  40. Christian Fastl, Monika Kornberger. Institut für kunst-und musikhistorische Forschungen: Weis (ab 1872 Weis-Ostborn, eig. Weis Ritter von Ostborn), Familie Maria. 2002, accessed 3 April 2021.
  41. Rokitansky-Tilscher . Ursula . November 2021 . Beethoven's death as the starting point for Rokitansky's family ties to the art world "We were there when they buried him and when he died we wept." . Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift . 171 . 15–16 . 363–372 . 10.1007/s10354-021-00842-w . 1563-258X . 33929632. 233451443 .
  42. Clemens Höslinger, Österreichisches Biographisches Lexikon und biographische Dokumentation: Rokitansky, Hans Frh. von. 2003, accessed 3 April 2021.
  43. Ursula Rokitansky-Tilscher, Österreichisches Biographisches Lexikon und biographische Dokumentation: Rokitansky, Karl (Carl) Frh. von. 2003, Accessed. 3 April 2021.
  44. Ursula Rokitansky-Tilscher, Österreichisches Biographisches Lexikon und biographische Dokumentation: Rokitansky, Prokop Lothar (Prokopp) Frh. von. 2003, Accessed: 3 April 2021.
  45. Almanach der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. In: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften (Hrsg.): Almanach der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Band 7. Braumüller, Wien 1857, S. 95.
  46. Mitglieder seit 1652: Carl Frhr. von Rokitansky. Leopoldina, accessed 22 February 2020.
  47. Web site: Les membres du passé dont le nom commence par R | Liste des membres depuis la création de l'Académie des sciences | Membres | Nous connaître.
  48. Rokitansky-Tilscher . Ursula . 2020-01-29 . The influence of neighbouring countries and sciences and the international spread of Viennese medicine: Carl Freiherr von Rokitansky's international relations . Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift . 170 . 11–12 . 274–283 . 10.1007/s10354-019-00725-1. 31997034 . 210948695 .
  49. Almanach der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Volume 7. Wien: Braumüller, 1857; p 95., see also: Erna Lesky: Carl von Rokitansky Selbstbiographie und Antrittsrede. Eingeleitet, Hrsg.: Veröff. d. Kommission f. Geschichte d. Erziehung u. d. Unterrichtes, H. 4 = Sitzungsberichte d. Österr. Akad. d. Wiss., Phil.-hist. Klasse,. Band 234, Nr. 3. Böhlau, Wien 1960, S. 65–66.
  50. Stöppler, MD, Melissa Conrad (2015-06-01). "Medically Reviewed by [Jay W. Marks, MD]." MedicineNet, 1 June 2015. Autopsy (Post Mortem Examination, Necropsy). Retrieved from http://www.medicinenet.com/autopsy/page4.htm.
  51. Web site: 2016-05-21. 11 Fascinating Facts About Mad Max. 2020-07-12. www.mentalfloss.com. en.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Carl von Rokitansky".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.