Starlicide Explained

Starlicide or gull toxicant is a chemical avicide that is highly toxic to European starlings (thus the name) and gulls, but less toxic to other birds or to mammals such as humans and pets.

Synonyms

The name starlicide originated as a registered trademark of the animal feed manufacturer Ralston-Purina in St. Louis, Missouri.[1] Starlicide is a small molecule in which a central benzene ring is modified by amine, chloro and methyl substituents in a specific pattern. Because special names exist for benzene rings modified with one or two of these functional groups, several synonymous chemical names may be encountered: 3-chloro-4-methylaniline or 3-chloro-4-methylbenzenamine, 2-chloro-4-aminotoluene, or 3-chloro-p-toluidine.[2] Numbered groups (2-chloro, 4-amino) also may be named out of order; the numbers of such groups equal the number of carbon atoms in the benzene ring separating them from the group implied in the special name.

Preparations of this chemical may be named as a hydrochloride (e.g. "3-chloro-p-toluidine hydrochloride", CPTH), indicating that hydrochloric acid has been used to neutralize the molecule to a salt in which the amine group is protonated and a chloride counterion is present; otherwise the free base is indicated. The chemical salt is also known as DRC-1339.

Use

Starlicide is lethal to starlings with an acute oral of 3.8 milligrams per kilogram body weight, but it is less toxic to most other birds. Grain-eating game birds such as bobwhite quail,[3] pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) and rooks (Corvus frugilegus)[4] are also vulnerable. Hawks and mammals (only exception are cats) are resistant to the poison. Starlings are killed in a slow death by uremic poisoning and congestion of major organs.[5] The effect is described as "a grayish white, frost-like material of uric acid overlaying the serosal surfaces of the various organs, accompanied by sterile inflammation and necrosis in the affected and adjacent tissues" akin to avian visceral gout.[4] The site of action is believed to be in the kidney.[6]

Uses for CPTH include killing blackbirds on sprouting rice[7] and on corn and soybean fields.[8] For these and other uses the poison is often given with brown rice. Research continues to improve the effectiveness of delivery on brown rice by causing the poison to be retained on the bait longer and resist degradation by sunlight.[9] [10] The effect of the poison is believed to be cumulative: for example, the LC50 for starlings was 4.7 ppm over 30 days, but only 1.0 ppm when fed for 90 days.[3]

In New Zealand, starlicide is used for rook control.[11]

In 2009, a culling with starlicide received national attention after USDA employees dispensed the poison in Griggstown, New Jersey, to kill an estimated 5,000 starlings that plagued feed lots and dairies on local farms. When "it began raining birds", community members became alarmed, unsure whether a toxin or disease was at work. Two property owners in the area reported collecting more than 150 birds each from their land.[12] [13]

In January 2011, there was another incident in Yankton, South Dakota, causing public alarm. The USDA had poisoned the birds in Nebraska to protect farmers' feeds. African countries use it to control house crows.[14] [15] 3-chloro-4-methylaniline is also used as intermediate for production of organic pigments, drugs and herbicide chlortoluron.[16]

Ecological impacts

Starlicide can and does kill nontarget species of birds that eat at feedlots and other places it is used. However, this rarely occurs because of the places that Starlicide is used.

The Rusty blackbirds (Euphagus carolinus), a once abundant species that is declining precipitously, has been theorized to be declining as a result of the use of Starlicide. This issue has been analyzed and found to be insignificant.[17] Rusty blackbirds primarily feed on invertebrates in wet woodlands and near streams throughout the year. Even though they roost with other blackbirds, rusty blackbirds will not usually feed with them. Rusty blackbirds are a species not likely to be taken protecting crops because they mostly feed in wet woodland bottoms on acorns, pine seeds, fruits, and animal matter during winter, but sometimes will be found in feedlots (Avery 2013). Even at the highest potential nontarget take with starlicide, few, if any, would be taken: not sufficient to cause a decline in their population. Habitat issues, possibly on their Canadian breeding habitat and on wintering grounds in the southeastern United States (for example, the decline of wetlands), is likely to be the primary reason for their decline. But, as poisoned birds may fly long distances before they die, it is difficult to find carcasses and results of studies may underestimate mortality. (This had been shown in studying effectiveness of poison to control ravens).

Starlicide is used in invasive[18] and overabundant native[19] bird control programsand proponents suggest, that reduction of such birds might benefit rare natives. However, harm-benefit ratio of these actions is controversial due to possible non-target by-kill and unpredictable effects of population reduction.[20] Even if reduction is needed, non-lethal and physical lethal methods can also be effective,[21] except for house crow control,[22] so in many cases poison is currently being replaced with alternative methods. For example, effective reduction of gull population and related problems can be achieved by hazing, egg destruction and selective shooting of problem birds. Despite the fact that starlicide is used for mynas control programs, they can sometimes be successfully controlled or eradicated using trapping and shooting alone (a notable example being their eradication from Denis island).[23] There is an opinion that reduction of starlings benefits those native birds which nest in cavities, and, also, that reduction can cause an increase of insect pests and reduce food for raptors. (These two claims are not mutually exclusive). However, there is not enough verified data to support either claim, because studies of starlicide use were focused on direct mortality and did not include indirect effects. In Samoa, the use of starlicide for myna control causes native bird mortality and increases the chlorine in water and, though mynas pose some threat for native birds, risk-benefit ratio for this ecosystem is uncertain.[24] [25] Despite the poison being considered harmless for raptors in both primary and secondary poisoning issues, it can affect them indirectly. The use of starlicide (known locally as F-1) in Hungary to control rook population seems to have caused decline of red-footed falcon, which relies upon rooks for nesting and so pesticide was banned.[26] [27] 3-chloro-p-toluidine also can be released into environment in wastewater from factories which use it as intermediate[28] or by biodegradation of chlortoluron.[29] Non-avian toxicology of compound is poorly studied, yet high toxicity for freshwater invertebrates and fish has been noticed.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Knittle, C.E.; Guarino, J.L.; Nelson, P.C.; Dehaven, R.W.; Twedt, D.J.: Baiting Blackbird and Starling Congregating Areas in Kentucky and Tennessee, Proc. of the 9th Vertebrate Pest Conference (1980), Lincoln, NE; p. 31, footnote http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=vpc9
  2. Web site: starlicide – Compound Summary (CID: 7255). NCBI.
  3. Schafer Jr . EW . Bruton . RB . Cunningham . DJ . Lockyer . NF . The chronic toxicity of 3-chloro-4-methyl benzamine HCl to birds . Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology . 6 . 2–3 . 241–8 . 1977 . 901004 . 10.1007/BF02097765. 1977ArECT...6..241S . 5869549 .
  4. Nikodémusz . E . Imre . R . Pathological features of 3-chloro-4-methyl benzamine HCl toxicity in rooks (Corvus frugilegus L.) and pheasants (Phasianus colchicus L.) . Gegenbaurs Morphologisches Jahrbuch . 128 . 5 . 753–61 . 1982 . 7152225.
  5. Toxicity of DRC-1339 to starlings. Journal of Wildlife Management. 30. 2. April 1966. 249–253. 10.2307/3797809. 3797809 . Decino . Thomas J. . Cunningham . Donald J. . Schafer . Edward W. .
  6. Goldade . DA . Tessari . JD . Johnston . JJ . Absorption, distribution, and excretion of 14C-3-chloro-4-methylaniline hydrochloride in two species of birds following a single oral dose . Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 52 . 26 . 8074–80 . 2004 . 15612798 . 10.1021/jf0493977. 42646 .
  7. Johnston . JJ . Holmes . MJ . Hart . A . Kohler . DJ . Stahl . RS . Probabilistic model for estimating field mortality of target and non-target bird populations when simultaneously exposed to avicide bait . Pest Management Science . 61 . 7 . 649–59 . 2005 . 15747324 . 10.1002/ps.1040. 19452898 .
  8. Linz . GM . Knutsen . GA . Homan . HJ . Bleier . WJ . Attractiveness of brown rice baits to non-target birds in harvested corn and soybean fields . Pest Management Science . 60 . 11 . 1143–8 . 2004 . 15532691 . 10.1002/ps.913. 19094168 .
  9. Hurley . JC . Volz . SA . Johnston . JJ . Stabilization of the avicide 3-chloro-p-toluidine as the beta-cyclodextrin adduct . Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 47 . 7 . 2904–7 . 1999 . 10552584 . 10.1021/jf981127z.
  10. Stahl . RS . Furcolow . C . Hurley . JC . Johnston . JJ . Characterizing 3-chloro-p-toluidine hydrochloride on rough-hulled rice and ethyl-cellulose-coated rice baits using high-performance liquid chromatography . Journal of Chromatographic Science . 43 . 7 . 367–71 . 2005 . 16176650. 10.1093/chromsci/43.7.367 . free .
  11. Cowan, Phil; Booth, Lynn; Duckworth, Janine and Glen, Al (September 2010) Future options for the management of rooks (Corvus frugilegus). Landcare Research, Massey University, New Zealand
  12. Web site: Bird culling fallout alarms New Jersey community. Epstein, Victor. . 2009-01-27. Associated Press.
  13. Web site: Dead birds horrify and anger Franklin residents. 2009-01-26.
  14. Archer, Al. (July 2001) Control of the Indian House Crow Corvus splendens in eastern Africa. 10th Pan-African Ornithological Congress
  15. 10.1079/cabicompendium.15463 . Corvus splendens (House crow) . 2022 . Ryall . Colin . Cabi Compendium . 253618459 . free .
  16. Web site: 3-Chloro-4-methylaniline . Chembk.com . 2022-12-15 . 2023-06-30. chembk.
  17. Avery, Michael L. (2013). "Rusty Blackbird (Euphagus carolinus)". The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
  18. Feare, Chris (January 2010) The use of StarlicideH in preliminary trials to control invasive common myna Acridotheres tristis populations on St Helena and Ascension islands
  19. Conservation of Great Bustard (Otis tarda) population of the Mosoni-Plain – A success story. Faragó, Sándor. Spakovszky, Péter . Raab, Rainer . Ornis Hungarica. 22. 2. 2014. 14–31. 10.2478/orhu-2014-0015 . 59358572 . free.
  20. Parkes, John (June 2006) Protection of Tanga'eo, the endemic Mangaia kingfisher (Todiramphus rufficollaris) from common myna (Acridotheres tristis). Taporoporo’anga Ipukarea Society, Cook Islands
  21. Martinkovic, Martin D. . "Report to the Casco Bay Estuary Partnership for habitat restoration co" by Martin D. Martinkovic and National Audubon Society Seabird Restoration Program . Publications . Digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu . 2019-07-01 . 2023-06-30.
  22. Puttoo, M and Archer, T. (January 2004) CONTROL AND / OR ERADICATION OF INDIAN CROWS (Corvus splendens) IN MAURITIUS. Food and Agricultural Research Council, Réduit, Mauritius
  23. 10.1002/ps.4263. Eradication of common mynas Acridotheres tristisfrom Denis Island, Seychelles . 2017 . Feare . Chris J. . Van Der Woude . Jildou . Greenwell . Phill . Edwards . Hannah A. . Taylor . Jenni A. . Larose . Christine S. . Ahlen . Per-Arne . West . Jack . Chadwick . Will . Pandey . Smita . Raines . Katherine . Garcia . Fernando . Komdeur . Jan . De Groene . Arjan . Pest Management Science . 73 . 2 . 295–304 . 26936226 .
  24. Nagle, William G. (August, 2015) Managing myna birds (Acridotheres fuscus and A. tristis) in the Independent State of Samoa. Division of Environment and Conservation, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, New Zealand
  25. 10.3390/molecules25214871 . free . MH-ICP-MS Analysis of the Freshwater and Saltwater Environmental Resources of Upolu Island, Samoa . 2020 . Rabieh . Sasan . Bayaraa . Odmaa . Romeo . Emarosa . Amosa . Patila . Calnek . Khemet . Idaghdour . Youssef . Ochsenkühn . Michael A. . Amin . Shady A. . Goldstein . Gary . Bromage . Timothy G. . Molecules . 25 . 21 . 4871 . 33105583 . 7659969 .
  26. Web site: DELMAGYAR – Varjak vendégségben . 12 January 2011 . delmagyar.hu.
  27. Web site: Úgy kezdődött, hogy a vetési varjú visszaütött . Winkler, Robert . 29 November 2018 . index.hu.
  28. 10.1002/ep.670190114 . Development of an extractive membrane bioreactor for degradation of 3 chloro-4-methylaniline: From lab bench to pilot scale . 2000 . Splendiani . Antonietta . Moreira De Sa . Joaquim A.G.C. . Jorge . Ruben . Nicolella . Cristiano . Livingston . Andrew G. . Hughes . Kevin . Cook . Stuart . Environmental Progress . 19 . 18–27 . free .
  29. 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1978.tb01568.x . The fate of the herbicide chlortoluron and its possible degradation products in soils . 1978 . Smith . A. E. . Briggs . G. G. . Weed Research . 18 . 1 . 1–7 . 1978WeedR..18....1S .