paqb
The theorem was proved by using the representation theory of finite groups. Several special cases of the theorem had previously been proved by Burnside in 1897, Jordan in 1898, and Frobenius in 1902. John G. Thompson pointed out that a proof avoiding the use of representation theory could be extracted from his work in the 1960s and 1970s on the N-group theorem, and this was done explicitly by for groups of odd order, and by for groups of even order. simplified the proofs.
The following proof — using more background than Burnside's — is by contradiction. Let paqb be the smallest product of two prime powers, such that there is a non-solvable group G whose order is equal to this number.
If G had a nontrivial proper normal subgroup H, then (because of the minimality of G), H and G/H would be solvable, so G as well, which would contradict our assumption. So G is simple.
If a were zero, G would be a finite q-group, hence nilpotent, and therefore solvable.
Similarly, G cannot be abelian, otherwise it would be solvable. As G is simple, its center must therefore be trivial.
By the first statement of Sylow's theorem, G has a subgroup S of order pa. Because S is a nontrivial p-group, its center Z(S) is nontrivial. Fix a nontrivial element
g\inZ(S)
Let (χi)1 ≤ i ≤ h be the family of irreducible characters of G over
C
h | |
0=\sum | |
i=1 |
\chii(1)\chii(g)=1+
h | |
\sum | |
i=2 |
\chii(1)\chii(g).
Now the χi(g) are algebraic integers, because they are sums of roots of unity. If all the nontrivial irreducible characters which don't vanish at g take a value divisible by q at 1, we deduce that
- | 1q=\sum | |||
|
\chii(1) | |
q\chi |
i(g)
is an algebraic integer (since it is a sum of integer multiples of algebraic integers), which is absurd. This proves the statement.
The set of integer-valued class functions on G, Z(
\Z
\Z
\Z
The mapping
A\colonZ(\Z[G]) → \operatorname{End}(\Complexn)
\sums\inf(s)\rho(s)
is a ring homomorphism. Because
\rho(s)-1A(u)\rho(s)=A(u)
A(u)
λIn
\sums\inf(s)\chi(s)=qd\chi(g).
Because the homothety λIn is the homomorphic image of an integral element, this proves that the complex number λ = qdχ(g)/n is an algebraic integer.
Since q is relatively prime to n, by Bézout's identity there are two integers x and y such that:
xqd+yn=1 therefore
\chi(g) | =x | |
n |
qd\chi(g) | |
n |
+y\chi(g).
Because a linear combination with integer coefficients of algebraic integers is again an algebraic integer, this proves the statement.
Let ζ be the complex number χ(g)/n. It is an algebraic integer, so its norm N(ζ) (i.e. the product of its conjugates, that is the roots of its minimal polynomial over
\Q
Let N be the kernel of ρ. The homothety ρ(g) is central in Im(ρ) (which is canonically isomorphic to G/N), whereas g is not central in G. Consequently, the normal subgroup N of the simple group G is nontrivial, hence it is equal to G, which contradicts the fact that ρ is a nontrivial representation.
This contradiction proves the theorem.