Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank explained

Litigants:Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank
Arguedate:1 April
Argueyear:2015
Decidedate:4 May
Decideyear:2015
Fullname:Bullard v. Hyde Park Savings Bank
Docket:14-116
Usvol:575
Uspage:496
Parallelcitations:135 S. Ct. 1686; 191 L. Ed. 2d 621
Prior:In re Bullard, 475 B.R. 304 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2012); affirmed, 494 B.R. 92 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2013); appeal dismissed, 752 F.3d 483 (1st Cir. 2014); cert. granted, 135 S. Ct. 781 (2014).
Majority:Roberts
Joinmajority:unanimous

Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank, 575 U.S. 496 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that an order from a bankruptcy court denying a debtor's confirmation of a proposed repayment cannot be immediately appealed, as it is not a final order.[1] The decision, in favor of Blue Hills Bank, was unanimous.[2]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Bullard v. Hyde Park Savings Bank. SCOTUSblog. 27 July 2017.
  2. Web site: Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank, fka Hyde Park Savings. Oyez. 27 July 2017.