A bubble column reactor is a chemical reactor that belongs to the general class of multiphase reactors, which consists of three main categories: trickle bed reactor (fixed or packed bed), fluidized bed reactor, and bubble column reactor.[1] A bubble column reactor is a very simple device consisting of a vertical vessel filled with water with a gas distributor at the inlet. Due to the ease of design and operation, which does not involve moving parts, they are widely used in the chemical, biochemical, petrochemical, and pharmaceutical industries to generate and control gas-liquid chemical reactions.
Despite the simple column arrangement, the hydrodynamics of bubble columns is very complex due to the interactions between liquid and gas phases. In recent years, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has become a very popular tool to design and optimize bubble column reactors.
In its simplest configuration, a bubble column consists of a vertically-arranged cylindrical column filled with liquid. The gas flow rate is introduced at the bottom of the column through a gas distributor. The gas is supplied in the form of bubbles to either a liquid phase or a liquid-solid suspension. In this case, the solid particle size (typically a catalyst) ranges from 5 to 100 μm. These three-phase reactors are referred to us as slurry bubble columns.[2]
The liquid flow rate may be fed co-currently or counter-currently to the rising bubbles, or it may be zero. In the latter case, the column operates in batch condition.
Bubble columns offer a significant number of advantages: excellent heat and mass transfer between the phases, low operating and maintenance costs due to the absence of moving parts, solids can be handled without any erosion or plugging problems, slow reactions can be carried out due to the high liquid residence time (this is the case for gas-liquid reactions with a Hatta number Ha <0.3), reasonable control of temperature when strongly exothermic reactions take place.[3] [4] However, the back-mixing of the liquid phase (the result of buoyancy-driven recirculation) is a limitation for bubble columns: excessive back-mixing can limit the conversion efficiency. The reactor may be equipped with internals, baffles, or sieve plates, to overcome the back-mixing problem with an inevitable modification in the fluid dynamics.[5]
Bubble columns are extensively used in many industrial applications. They are of considerable interest in chemical processes involving reactions like oxidation, chlorination, alkylation, polymerization, and hydrogenation, as well as in the production of synthetic fuels via a gas conversion process (Fischer-Tropsch process) in biochemical processes such as fermentation and biological wastewater treatment.
| Oxidation | Ethylenen-paraffins, cyclohexane | Acetaldehyde, secondary alcohols, adipic acid | |
| Chlorination | Aliphatic hydrocarbons,aromatic hydrocarbons | Chlorinated compounds | |
| Alkylation | Methanol | Acetic acid | |
| Hydroformylation | Olefins | Aldehydes, alcohols | |
| Carbonylations | Methanol, ethanol | Acetic acid, acetic anhydride,propionic acid | |
| Hydrogenation | Unsaturated fatty acids, glucose, nitroaromatics | Saturated fatty acids, sorbitol, ammines | |
| Gas to liquid fuels (Fischer-Tropsch) | Syngas | Liquid fuels | |
| Coal liquification | Coal | Liquid fuels | |
| Desulferization | Petroleum fractions | Desulferize fractions | |
| Aerobic bio-chemical processes | Molasses | Ethanol |
Due to the increasing importance of bubble column reactors in most industrial sectors, the study of their hydrodynamics acquired significant relevance in recent years. The design of bubble columns depends on the quantification of three main phenomena: (1) mixing characteristics, (2) heat and mass transfer properties, (3) chemical kinetics in case of reactants systems.[6]
As a consequence, the correct design and operation relies on the precise knowledge of the fluid dynamics phenomena on different scales: (1) molecular scale, (2) bubble scale, (3) reactor scale, and (4) industrial scale. The fluid dynamics properties in bubble columns depend on the interaction between the gas and liquid phases, which are related to the prevailing flow regime.[7]
The description of the hydrodynamics of bubble columns required the definition of some parameters. The superficial gas and liquid velocities are defined as the ratio between the volumetric flow rate of the gas and liquid, respectively, divided by the column cross-sectional area. [8] Although the superficial velocity concept is based on a simple one-dimensional flow assumption, it can be used to characterize and determine the hydrodynamics in bubble columns since an increase in its value can determine a flow regime transition. [9]
Concerning global flow properties, a fundamental aspect which is helpful in describing the bubble column design process is the global gas holdup. It is defined as the ratio of the volume occupied by the gas phase and the sum of the volume occupied by the gas and liquid phases:
| \varepsilon | ||||
|
Where:
VG
VL
The gas holdup provides information about the mean residence time of bubbles inside the column. Combined with bubble dimensions (a fundamental local flow property), it determines the interfacial area for the heat and mass transfer rate between the phases.
In multiphase reactors, the flow regime gives information about the behaviour of the gas phase and its interaction with the continuous liquid phase. The flow regime can vary significantly depending on several factors, including gas and liquid flow rates, geometric aspects of the column (column diameter, column height, sparger type, sparger holes diameter, and eventually, the size of the solid particles) and physical properties of the phases.[10]
In the most general case, four flow regimes can be encountered in bubble column reactors: (1) homogeneous or bubbly flow regime, (2) slug flow regime, (3) churn or heterogeneous flow regime, and (4) annular flow regime.[11]
The homogeneous flow regime takes place at very low superficial gas velocity and can be divided into mono-dispersed and poly-dispersed homogeneous flow regimes. The former is characterized by a mono-dispersed bubble size distribution, the latter by a poly-dispersed one, according to the change in sign of the lift force. Small bubbles with a positive lift coefficient move towards the column wall, and large bubbles with a negative lift coefficient move towards the column center. [12] The heterogeneous flow regime occurs at very high gas velocity and represents a chaotic and unsteady flow pattern, with high liquid recirculation and vigorous mixing. A wide range of bubble sizes is experienced, and the average bubble size is governed by coalescence and breakup phenomena, which determine the flow properties, no longer influenced by the primary bubbles generated at the sparger.
The slug and the annular flow regimes are usually observed in small-diameter bubble columns with an inner diameter of less than 0.15 m. [13] The former is characterized by giant bubbles, named Taylor bubbles, that occupy the entire cross-sectional area of the column. The latter is characterized by a central core of gas surrounded by a thin liquid film. The annular flow regime exists only at very high gas velocity.
When dealing with industrial applications, larger-diameter bubble columns are typically employed so that the slug flow regime is not usually observed due to the so-called Rayleight-Taylor instabilities.[14] [15] The quantification of these instabilities at the reactor-scale is obtained by comparing the dimensionless bubble diameter,
| * | |
| D | |
| H |
| * | |
| D | |
| H,cr |
| * | |
| D | |
| H= |
{DH\over\sqrt{\sigma/g(\rhoL-\rhoG)}}>
| * | |
| D | |
| H,cr |
=52
Where
DH
\sigma
g
\rhoL
\rhoG
For example, at ambient temperature and pressure and considering air and water as working fluids, a bubble column is classified as a large-diameter if it has a hydraulic diameter greater than 0.15 m.
Due to the very high gas velocity, the annular flow regime is not usually observed in industrial bubble columns. Consequently, in a large-scale bubble column, we may have only the bubbly (or homogeneous) and the churn (or heterogenous) flow regimes. Between these flow regimes, a transition region is usually observed, in which the flow field is not as distinct and well defined as in the bubbly-homogeneous and churn-heterogeneous flow regimes.
The boundaries between the flow regimes can be graphically observed in the flow regimes map.
Numerical modelling of bubble column reactors is a way of predicting the multiphase flow to improve the reactor design and understand the reactor fluid dynamics. The recent increase in interest in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) spurred substantial research efforts in determining numerical models that can obtain reasonably accurate predictions with limited computational time, thus overcoming the limitations of traditional empirical methods.
When a dispersed flow is considered, two main models have been developed to predict the complex fluid dynamics phenomena: the Eulerian-Lagrangian and the Eulerian-Eulerian Multi-Fluid models.[16] The Eulerian-Lagrangian model couples the Eulerian description of the continuous phase with a Lagrangian scheme for tracking the individual particulates. The dynamic of the surrounding fluid (continuous phase) is solved through the governing equations, while the particulates (dispersed phase) are tracked independently through the surrounding fluid by computing their trajectory.[17] The interactions between the phases and their impact on both the continuous and the discrete phases can be considered, but it requires a greater computational effort. Consequently, it can not be used to simulate bubble columns at the industrial scale.
The Eulerian-Eulerian model considers each phase as interpenetrating continua. All the phases share a single pressure field, whereas continuity and momentum equations are solved for each phase. The coupling between the phases is achieved considering interfacial source terms.
Considering an isothermal flow without mass transfer, the Unsteady Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes equations (URANS) are:
| \partial | |
| \partialt |
(\alphak\rhok)+\nabla ⋅ (\alphak\rhok\vec{uk})=0
| \partial | |
| \partialt |
(\alphak\rhok\vec{uk})+\nabla ⋅ (\alphak\rhok\vec{uk}\vec{uk})= -\alphak\nablaP+\nabla ⋅ (\alphak\bar{\tauk})+\alphak\rhok\vec{g}+\vec{M}I,k
Where:
\alphak
\rhok
k
\vec{u}k
k
\bar{\tau}k
k
g
\vec{M}I,k
To correctly solve the
k
The non drag forces are the lift, turbulent dispersion, wall lubrication and virtual mass forces:[19]
All the interfacial forces can be added to the numerical model using suitable correlations derived from experimental studies.
Depending on the regime under investigation, different approaches can be used to model the dispersed gas phase. The simplest is to use a fixed bubble size distribution. This approximation is suitable to simulate the homogeneous flow regime, where the interactions between the bubbles are negligible. In addition, this approach calls for the knowledge of the bubbles diameter since it is an input parameter for the simulations.
However, in industrial practice, large-scale bubble columns are typically employed, equipped with gas distributors characterized by large openings, so a heterogeneous flow regime is commonly observed.[21] Bubble coalescence and breakup phenomena are relevant and can not be neglected. In this case, the CFD model can be coupled with a Population Balance Model (PBM) to account for the changes in bubbles size.
A Population Balance Model consists of a transport equation derived from the Boltzmann statistical transport equation, and it describes the particles entering or leaving a control volume via several mechanisms. The bubble number density transport equation is also known as Population Balance Equation (PBE):[22]
| \partial | |
| \partialt |
| n(\vec{x},V | ||||
|
[n(\vec{x},Vb,t)u
|
| [n(\vec{x},V | ||||
|
Vb(\vec{x},Vb)]=S(\vec{x},Vb,t)
Where
n(\vec{x},Vb,t)
(t)
\vec{x}
Vb
Vb+d(Vb)
ub