Queen Anne Revival architecture in the United Kingdom explained

British Queen Anne Revival architecture, also known as Domestic Revival, is a style of building using red brick, white woodwork, and an eclectic mixture of decorative features, that became popular in the 1870s, both for houses and for larger buildings such as offices, hotels, and town halls. It was popularised by Norman Shaw (1831–1912) and George Devey (1820–1886).

Beginnings

The Queen Anne Revival was to a large extent anticipated by George Frederick Bodley, George Gilbert Scott, Norman Shaw, W. Eden Nesfield, J. J. Stevenson, and Philip Webb in the 1860s; they had used and mixed together brick pediments and pilasters, fan-lights, ribbed chimneys, Flemish or plain gables, hipped roofs, wrought-iron railings, sash windows, outside shutters, asymmetry and even sunflower decorations.[1]

Features

The Queen Anne Revival style has, as the architectural historian Mark Girouard writes,

All of these features can be seen in houses, large or small, of the later part of the Victorian era.[2] [3]

Architects

Norman Shaw

Characteristic features of Shaw's houses, well seen in the Bedford Park garden suburb in west London alongside the work of other contemporary architects interpreting the Queen Anne Revival style, are red brick, walls hung with tiles, gables of varying shapes, balconies, bay windows, terracotta and rubbed brick decorations, pediments, elaborate chimneys, and balustrades painted white.[4] [5]

Shaw's eclectic designs freely combined Arts & Crafts, Georgian, medieval, Tudor, and Wren styles.[6]

J. J. Stevenson

In 1871–3, the Scottish architect J. J. Stevenson built his widely-imitated Red House on Bayswater Hill; its name may have been a response to William Morris's Red House, Bexleyheath. Both inside and out it was an eclectic mix of styles, with furnishings from different continents and centuries. Outside it was brown brick with red brick dressings; dormer windows with Flemish gables in a flat facade over a cornice; bay windows, and sashes with louvred shutters.

W. E. Nesfield

W. E. Nesfield worked in partnership with Shaw from 1866 to 1869, helping to develop the Queen Anne Revival style. Together they examined the architecture of the English countryside, sketching Kent and Sussex's half-timbered farmhouses and tile-hung cottages, and then the structure and ornamentation of houses in country towns, with their red brick, sash windows, plasterwork, pargetting, joinery and rubbed or shaped brick. From this and a measure of George Edmund Street's Gothic Revival, they made their "Old English" style. Gradually adding in their exploration of 17th and 18th century classic architecture, they developed their Queen Anne Revival style.

Other architects

Developments

New World Queen Anne Revival architecture and its derivative the Shingle style are related to the British Queen Anne style but with time became increasingly different from it, and in Girouard's view are "both more adventurous and more exciting."

Reception

Professional

Professional criticism of the style began quickly, with comments such as that in the Building News of 31 May 1872, likely by the church architect J. P. Seddon, that it was "mediaeval, but freely treated, with a good deal of impure classical details, introduced after the fashion of the Queen Anne period, now so much and so foolishly imitated". Other Gothic Revival architects followed suit, though the younger ones were more accepting; E. W. Godwin remarked on the "excellence both of the materials and workmanship" of J. J. Stevenson's Red House. When in 1873 the Royal Academy showed off the designs for George Frederick Bodley's School Board Offices, Edward Robert Robson & Stevenson's Board Schools, and Shaw's New Zealand Chambers, they were found in Girouard's words "clever, no doubt, but also startling and even shocking".

Amateur

The lay press was more relaxed about the new style; The Globe of 13 January 1874 called it a natural response to the more assertive Gothic Revival, while The Saturday Review of 31 July 1875 described its own response as "perfect good humour and equal scepticism", considering the style to be artificially based on an eclectic mix and not at all serious.

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Domestic Architecture 1700 to 1960: 7 Late Victorian and Edwardian Architecture - Change . University of the West of England . 8 August 2021.
  2. Web site: Banerjee . Jacqueline . Some Features of the Queen Anne/Domestic Revival Family Home . Victorian Web . 14 August 2021 . 26 May 2017.
  3. Book: Domestic 3: Suburban and Country Houses Listing Selection Guide . Queen Anne and the Domestic Revival . . 14 August 2021 . 15-17 . December 2017 . 2011.
  4. Web site: Anon . Grant . Sandra . Architecture and architects . The Bedford Park Society . 3 August 2021.
  5. Book: Cherry . Bridget . Bridget Cherry . Pevsner . Nikolaus . Nikolaus Pevsner . The Buildings of England. London 3: North West . Penguin Books . London . 1991 . 1951 . 978-0-14-071048-9 . 24722942 . 406–410.
  6. Book: Inwood, Stephen . Historic London: An Explorer's Companion . 2012 . Pan Macmillan . 978-0-230-75252-8 . 155–157.