Boilover Explained

A boilover (or boil-over) is an extremely hazardous phenomenon in which a layer of water under a pool fire (e.g., an open-top tank fire) starts boiling, which results in a significant increase in fire intensity accompanied by violent expulsion of burning fluid to the surrounding areas.[1] Boilover can only occur if the liquid fluid is a mixture of different chemical species with sufficiently diverse boiling points, although a so-called thin-layer boilover – a far less hazardous phenomenon – can arise from any water-immiscible liquid fuel. Crude oil, kerosene and some diesel oils are examples of fuels giving rise to boilover.

Boilovers at industrial scale are rare but can lead to serious plant damage. Given the sudden and not easily predictable onset of the phenomenon, fatalities can occur, especially among firefighters and bystanders that have not been made to leave the area.

Slopover and frothover are phenomena similar to boilover but distinct from it. A slopover occurs when pouring water over a liquid pool fire, which may result in sudden expulsion of blazing fluid as well as considerable flame growth if the fire is small, as is the case when dousing water over a chip pan fire. A frothover is a situation occurring when there is a layer of water under a layer of a viscous fuel that, although not on fire, is at higher temperature than the boiling point of water.

Features

The extreme violence of boilovers is due to the expansion of water from liquid to steam, which is by a factor of 1500 or more.[2] In practical storage scenarios, the presence of water under the burning fluid is sometimes due to spurious accumulation during plant operation (e.g., rainwater entering a seam in the tank roof, off-specification products from the source, residual water from an oil reservoir, or humidity condensation) or as a consequence of attempts to extinguish the fire with water. A typical scenario for a tank fire that may eventually result in boilover is an initial confined explosion blowing off the tank roof.

Pure chemical species are not liable to boilover. In order for one to occur, the material must be a mixture of species with sufficiently diverse boiling points. Crude oil and some commercial hydrocarbon mixtures, such as kerosene and some diesel oils, are examples of such materials. The fact that these are stored in large atmospheric tanks in refineries, tank farms, power stations, etc. makes boilover a hazard of interest in terms of process safety.[3] [4] During a pool fire, a distillation process takes place in the fuel. Separation of light components from heavier ones occurs thanks to convective fluid motion. An intermediate fuel layer, called the hot zone or heat wave, is formed, which becomes progressively richer in higher-boiling-point species. Its temperature, as well as thickness, progressively increase. Its lower boundary moves downwards towards the fuel–water interface at a speed higher than the overall level of fuel decreases due to the fire burning it. As a result, when the hot zone reaches the water layer, a considerable amount of unburnt fuel may still be present above the water. Upon the water contacting the hot zone, some steam forms. The resulting turbulence promotes mixing of the water into the hot fuel. This can result in rapid water vaporization. The violent expansion of the steam bubbles will push out a significant part of the fuel above it, causing a violent overflow of flaming liquid. In these conditions water may be superheated, in which case part of it goes through a explosive boiling with homogeneous nucleation of steam. When this happens, the abruptness of the expansion further enhances the expulsion of blazing fuel.[5] [6] Typical hot-zone speeds are 0.3–0.5 meters per hour (1.0–1.7 ft/h), although speeds of up to 1.2 meters per hour (4.0 ft/h) have been recorded.

Apart from the presence of a water layer under the fuel, other conditions must be met for a hot-zone boilover to occur:

The hazards posed by a hot-zone boilover are significant for several reasons. At industrial scale, hydrocarbon tanks can contain up to hundreds of thousands of barrels of fluid. If a boilover occurs, the amount of blazing liquid erupting from the tank can therefore be huge. Ejected blazing fluids can travel at speeds up to 32km/h and attain distances well in excess of the limits of secondary containment bunding, often hundreds of meters or in the order of ten tank diameters downwind. Bunding, however, remains an important measure to reduce fire spread. Moreover, since boilover inception is sometimes unpredictable —either in terms of time to onset or whether it will occur at all (because the presence of water in the tank bottom may not be a known factor)— the impact on the firefighters that have intervened to control the fire can be deadly. In some cases, simple bystanders were caught in the blaze and perished.

Tank fires that appear to be relatively stable may burst into massive boilovers several hours after the fire starts, as it occurred in the Tacoa disaster.[9] Failure to appreciate the hazards posed by a water layer underneath the fuel has been a significant contributing cause to the aftermath of boilover accidents, in terms of human and material losses. Uncertainty surrounding the time to boilover onset adds unpredictability that further complicates the efforts of the firefighting services.[10] Mathematical models for boilover have been developed that predict the time necessary for boilover to initiate, among other things.[11]

Notable accidents

The following are some notable accidents in which a standard, or hot-zone, boilover occurred:

Related phenomena

Thin-layer boilover

A thin-layer boilover occurs in one of two situations:

In a thin-layer boilover, the size of the flames increases upon boilover onset, and a characteristic crackling sound is produced. However, due to the little amount of fuel left, this phenomenon is far less hazardous than a standard boilover. The study of thin-layer boilover is of interest in the context of in-situ burning of oil spills over water.

Slopover

A slopover is a phenomenon similar to boilover, although distinct from it. It occurs when water is poured onto the fuel while a pool fire is occurring. If the fire is small enough, the water that instantly boils in contact with the fire or with the lower layers of blazing liquid (which are themselves not on fire but may be hotter than the water boiling point) can extend the flames, especially in the upwards direction.

In industrial-scale tank fires, there is no noticeable effect when water is doused on the fire, although water sinking to the bottom of the tank may contribute to a later boilover.[14] However, at smaller scale, slopovers pose significant hazards. Trying to extinguish a chip pan or cooking oil fire with water, for example, causes slopover, which can harm people and spread the fire in the kitchen.[15] Serious burn incidents have also occurred during Mid-autumn Festival celebrations, where boiling candlewax and pouring water on it for entertainment has become a habit.[16]

Frothover

A frothover occurs when a water layer is present under a layer of a viscous oil that is not on fire and whose temperature is higher than the water boiling point. An example is hot asphalt loaded into a tank car containing some water. Although nothing may happen at first, water may eventually superheat and later start to boil violently, resulting in overflow.

Fire protection

Water is generally unsuitable for extinguishing liquid fires. In the context of boilovers and slopovers, the fuel is generally lighter than water. At industrial scale, this means that water applied to an open-top tank fire will sink to the bottom of the tank, which can cause boilover at a later stage. At small/domestic scale, assuming the water can find its way down through the fuel, use of water may cause the content of the vessel to spill over and spread the fire. If water does not sink efficiently to the bottom, then a violent slopover may occur. This makes water both inefficient as an extinguishing agent and potentially very hazardous.

Industrial-scale storage sites

Hot-zone boilovers of large tanks are relatively rare events. However, they can be extremely disruptive. Therefore, prevention and control are very important.

Boilover can be prevented by regularly checking for and draining water in the tank bottoms.

In terms of plant layout, intertank distances would have to exceed five tank diameters in order to prevent escalation to adjacent tanks. In most cases, it is not feasible to design for such an arrangement.

Open-top crude oil tank fires can be tackled using firefighting foam at rates of 10–12 L/(min × m2). However, it is not clear if these rates are adequate to minimize the potential for a boilover event, especially in cases where foam attack is initiated long after the inception of the tank fire. It has been suggested that foam firefighting should be started within 2–4 hours from ignition.

Thermal radiation during a boilover is considerably higher than during the pool fire that precedes it. Although the event is short-lived, emergency response activities, for which tenable levels of thermal radiations are typically 6.3 kW/m2, cannot be safely accomplished, so operations should take place from a safe distance.

Some approaches are available to assess the probability of and the proximity to boilover in tank fires. An estimation can be made a priori from the distillation curve and the properties of the fuel, with the aid of mathematical formulas, including the ones given above. However, this approach requires knowledge of the depth of the water layer at the bottom of the tank. Further, it does not consider the potential for a layer of water–fuel emulsion being present above the water. Progression of the hot zone can be monitored by using vertical strips of intumescent paint applied to the tank walls, or applying a water jet to the walls to assess at what height it starts boiling. Use of thermographic cameras or pyrometers has also been proposed. However, uncertainty regarding the presence and depth of a water or a water–fuel emulsion layer remains, and unpredictability about boilover onset cannot be completely dispelled. Draining the product from the tank may reduce accidental consequences, because less fluid would be subject to boilover. However, pumping out product may also reduce the time to boilover onset.

See also

References

Sources

Notes and References

  1. Book: API . Fighting Fires in and Around Flammable and Combustible Liquid Atmospheric Storage Tanks . . 1991 . 3rd . API Publication 2021 . Washington, D.C. . 29 . American Petroleum Institute.
  2. LASTFIRE Boilover Research: Position Paper and Practical Lessons Learned . December 2016 . LASTFIRE . 3 . 26 February 2024 . https://web.archive.org/web/20211019160906/https://www.lastfire.org.uk/uploads/LASTFIRE%20BOILOVER%20LESSONS%20Issue%203%20December%202016.pdf . 19 October 2021 . live.
  3. Book: Biswas . Samarendra Kumar . Fundamentals of Process Safety Engineering . Mathur . Umesh . Hazra . Swapan Kumar . . 2021 . 9780367620769 . Boca Raton, Fla., etc. . 10.1201/9781003107873.
  4. Book: Kletz, Trevor . Dispelling Chemical Engineering Myths . . 1-56032-438-4 . 3rd . Washington, D.C., etc. . 96–97 . Trevor Kletz.
  5. Garrison . William W. . 1984 . C.A. La Electricidad de Caracas, December 19, 1982, Fire (Near) Caracas, Venezuela . https://web.archive.org/web/20230722153934/https://www.icheme.org/media/5781/lpb_issue057p026.pdf . 22 July 2023 . 22 July 2023 . . . 26–30 . 57 . 0260-9576.
  6. Broeckmann . Bernd . Schecker . Hans-Georg . 1995 . Heat Transfer Mechanisms and Boilover in Burning Oil–Water Systems . . 8 . 3 . 137–147 . 10.1016/0950-4230(95)00016-T . 0950-4230 . 1873-3352.
  7. Book: Slye, Jr., Orville M. . Fire Protection Handbook . . 2008 . 978-0-87765-758-3 . Cote . Arthur E. . 20th . FPH2008 . I . Quincy, Mass. . 6-206 . Flammable and Combustible Liquids.
  8. Book: API . Interim Study: Prevention and Suppression of Fires in Large Aboveground Atmospheric Storage Tanks . July 1998 . . API Publication 2021A . Washington, D.C. . 33 . American Petroleum Institute.
  9. Stewart . Ewan . 2023 . Case Study: Revisiting the Tacoa Power Plant Boilover 40 Years On . . . 290 . 2–6 . 0260-9576 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230722153314/https://www.icheme.org/media/20093/lpb290online_tacoa.pdf . 2023-07-22.
  10. Book: API . Management of Atmospheric Storage Tank Fires . September 2015 . . 4th . API Recommended Practice 2021 . Washington, D.C. . 56 . American Petroleum Institute.
  11. Hristov . Jordan . 2006 . An Inverse Stefan Problem Relevant to Boilover: Heat Balance Integral Solutions and Analysis . . 11 . 2 . 141–160 . 1012.2534 . 10.2298/TSCI0702141H . free.
  12. Web site: Boilover of a Crude Oil Tank – 30 August 1983 – Milford Haven [Wales] – United Kingdom ]. live . https://web.archive.org/web/20211006031226/https://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/wp-content/files_mf/FD_6077_MilfordHaven_1983_ang.pdf . 6 October 2021 . 24 February 2024 . Analyse, Recherche et Information sur les Accidents (ARIA) . ARIA no. 6077.
  13. Garo . Jean-Pierre . Koseki . Hiroshi . Vantelon . Jean-Pierre . Fernandez-Pello . Carlos . Carlos Fernández-Pello . 2007 . Combustion of Liquid Fuels Floating on Water . . 11 . 2 . 119–140 . 10.2298/TSCI0702119G . free.
  14. Book: Frank, John A. . Fire Protection Handbook . . 2008 . 978-0-87765-758-3 . Cote . Arthur E. . 20th . FPH2008 . II . Quincy, Mass. . 17-37–17-38 . Characteristics and Hazards of Water and Water Additives for Fire Suppression.
  15. Web site: 27 September 2022 . What to Do in the Event of a Chip Pan Fire . 27 February 2024 . Northantsfire.
  16. Chan . Eric S.Y. . Chan . Edmund C.K. . Ho . W.S. . King . Walter W.K. . November–December 1997 . Boiling Wax Burn in Mid-autumn Festival in Hong Kong . . 23 . 7–8 . 629–630 . 10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00074-0 . 0305-4179 . 1879-1409 . 9568338.