Bishop Auckland Hospital Explained

Bishop Auckland Hospital
Org/Group:County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
Location:Cockton Hill Road,
Bishop Auckland,
County Durham
Country:England
Healthcare:NHS
Type:District general
Beds:145
Founded:2002
Map Type:County Durham
Coordinates:54.6557°N -1.6784°W

Bishop Auckland Hospital is a small NHS district general hospital serving the western part of County Durham, with a primarily rural catchment area centred on the Wear Valley. The hospital is managed by the County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust.

History

The original hospital in the town, known as the Bishop Auckland Infirmary, was built in around 1910.[1] It joined the National Health Service as the Bishop Auckland General Hospital in 1948.[1]

The new hospital was procured under a Private Finance Initiative contract to replace the old Bishop Auckland General Hospital. It was built by Shepherd Building Group at a cost of £66 million and opened in June 2002.[2] Facilities management services are provided by ISS.[2]

The hospital had around 286 beds when it opened, but the number has since been cut substantially. The loss of the special care baby unit (SCBU) in October 2007 created much controversy.[3] There was also controversy over the 'decline of services' generally at the hospital at that time.[4] [5] [6]

In June 2009, it was announced that the hospital's children's ward would close from 1 July 2009, with all services transferred to Darlington and Durham, a decision that was attacked by campaigners against the hospital's downgrading, but defended by NHS management on the basis of paediatric specialists being "spread too thin".[7]

The hospital lost its acute services in October 2009. The reasons given for this by the trust were that services were being spread too thinly and there were insufficient doctors, money and resources to run three A&E departments within the trust efficiently.[8] However opponents to this view argued that the downgrading of emergency services meant that people in the Wear Valley area would have to travel significantly further to access A&E services and that this could mean the difference between life and death. The local council spent much money on protesting against the closure of services at the hospital.[9]

Facilities

From October 2009 the hospital has a treatment centre for planned operations, a centre of excellence for hip and knee replacement.[10]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Auckland. Workhouses. 8 April 2018.
  2. Web site: Bishop Auckland Hospital, UK. HICL. 8 April 2018.
  3. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article434863.ece Hospital admits stillbirth mistakes
  4. News: New hospital ward closure decision 'defies all logic' . . 2007-01-09 . 2007-10-18.
  5. News: Question mark hangs over the future of hospital ward . . 2005-07-27 . 2007-10-18 .
  6. http://www.healthdemocracy.org.uk/healthdemocracy.org.uk/TheNHS/NHSPerformance/WithdrawalOfLocalFacilities/sources.htm Withdrawal of Local Facilities/Sources
  7. Web site: Anger at closure of Bishop Auckland Hospital children's ward. Northern Echo . 2 June 2009. 7 April 2018.
  8. Web site: Have YOUR say.... https://web.archive.org/web/20090103031215/http://www.seizingthefuture.org.uk/ . dead . 3 January 2009 . 7 April 2018.
  9. Web site: Vote to spend cash on hospital closure protest. The Northern Echo. 17 October 2008. 8 April 2018.
  10. Web site: Bishop Auckland General Hospital. https://web.archive.org/web/20081204101717/http://www.cddft.nhs.uk/Contact%2BUs/Hospital%2BSites/BishopAucklandGeneralHospital.htm. dead. 4 December 2008. 8 April 2018.